Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 49 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.29399/npa.23674 İndeks Tarihi: 11-10-2020
Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4
Öz: Introduction: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 2–4 year olds (SDQ 2–4) is one of the best of these scales developed to screen children in early childhood for psychosocial problems. The aim of this study is toinvestigate the psychometric properties of SDQ 2–4 in Turkish for the age group of 2–4 years.Methods: The study was conducted with 159 participants. SDQ 2–4 Parent and BITSEA scales were applied to parents. Patients whose scores were detected to be at risk were referred to the hospital and a clinical interview was performed.Results: Chronbach alpha value for total difficulties scale was 0.80. Total difficulties score of the SDQ was positively correlated with the BITSEA/P score, and negatively correlated with the BITSEA/C score. ProsocialBehaviors score of SDQ was positively correlated with BITSEA/C while it was negatively correlated with BITSEA/P. In all scales of SDQ that identified the problem, the scores of the participants with clinical diagnosis were significantly higher than the scores of the participantsnot diagnosed. The cut-off value for total difficulties scale was calculated as 10 with 80% sensitivity and 88% specificity.Conclusion: The SDQ 2–4 scale is valid and reliable in the Turkish language
Anahtar Kelime: Güçler ve Güçlükler Anketinin 2-4 Yaş için Türkçe Versiyonunun Psikometrik Özellikleri
Öz: Amaç: Güçler ve Güçlükler Anketi 2–4 yaş arası çocuklar için (SDQ 2–4), erken çocukluk dönemindeki psikososyal problemleri taramak için geliştirilen en iyi ölçeklerden birisidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2–4 yaş grubunda Türkçe SDQ 2–4’ün psikometrik özelliklerini araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Çalışma 159 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirildi. SDQ 2–4 Ebeveyn anketi ve BITSEA ölçekleri ebeveynlere uygulandı. Skorları riskli bulunan hastalar hastaneye sevk edildi ve klinik görüşme yapıldı. Bulgular: Toplam güçlükler alt ölçeği için Chronbach alfa değeri 0,80’di. SDQ’nun toplam güçlükler skoru BITSEA/P skoru ile pozitif, BITSEA/C skoru ile negatif korelasyon gösterdi. SDQ Prososyal Davranışlar skoru BITSEA/C ile pozitif korelasyon gösterirken, BITSEA/P ile negatif korelasyon gösteriyordu. Sorun tanımlayan tüm SDQ alt ölçeklerinde, klinik tanılı katılımcıların puanları, tanı konmamış katılımcıların puanlarından anlamlı derecede yüksekti. Toplam güçlükler alt ölçeği için kesme değeri %80 duyarlılık ve %88 özgüllük ile 10 olarak hesaplandı. Sonuç: SDQ 2–4 ölçeği Türkçe dilinde geçerli ve güvenilirdir
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS, Irwin JR, Wachtel K, Cicchetti DV. The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment: screening for social-emotional problems and delays in competence. J Pediatr Psychol 2004;29:143–155. [CrossRef]
- 2. Richman N, Stevenson J, Graham P. Prevalence of Behaviour Problems In
- 3-Year-Old Children: An Epidemiological Study in A London Borough. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1975;16:277–287. [CrossRef]
- 3. Egger HL, Angold A. Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: presentation, nosology, and epidemiology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006;47:313–337. [CrossRef]
- 4. Lavigne JV, Gibbons RD, Christoffel KK, Arend R, Rosenbaum D, Binns H,Dawson N, Sobel H, Isaacs C. Prevalence rates and correlates of psychiatric disorders among preschool children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996;35:204–214. [CrossRef]
- 5. Angold A, Messer SC, Stangl D, Farmer E, Costello EJ, Burns BJ. Perceived parental burden and service use for child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Am J Public Health 1998;88:75–80. [CrossRef]
- 6. Essex MJ, Kraemer HC, Slattery MJ, Burk LR, Boyce WT, Woodward HR, Kupfer DJ. Screening for Childhood Mental Health Problems: Outcomes and Early Identification. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:562–570. [CrossRef]
- 7. Sen B, Wilkinson G, Mari JJ. Psychiatric Morbidity in Primary Health Care a Two-stage Screening Procedure in Developing Countries: Choice of Instruments and Cost-effectiveness. Br J Psychiatry 1987;151:33–38.[CrossRef]
- 8. Croft S, Stride C, Maughan B, Rowe R. Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Preschool-Aged Children. Pediatrics 2015;135:e1210– e1219. [CrossRef]
- 9. Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997;38:581–586. [CrossRef]
- 10. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:1337–1345. [CrossRef]
- 11. Goodman R, Scott S. Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 1999;27:17–24. [CrossRef]
- 12. Theunissen MH, Vogels AG, de Wolff MS, Crone MR, Reijneveld SA. Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial problems among 3 to 4-year olds. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:84. [CrossRef]
- 13. Güvenir T, Özbek A, Baykara B, Arkar H, Şentürk B, İncekaş S. Psychometric Properties of The Turkish Version of The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Turk J Child Adolesc Mental Health 2008;15:65–74.
- 14. Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sébille V, Hardouin J-B. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:176.[CrossRef]
- 15. Karabekiroglu K, Rodopman-Arman A, Ay P, Ozkesen M, Akbas S, Tasdemir GN, Boke O, Peksen Y. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the brief infant-toddler social emotional assessment (BITSEA). Infant Behav Dev 2009;32:291–297. [CrossRef]
- 16. Smedje H, Broman JE, Hetta J, von Knorring A-L. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire”. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;8:63–70. [CrossRef]
- 17. Klasen H, Woerner W, Wolke D, Meyer R, Overmeyer S, Kaschnitz W, Rothenberger A, Goodman R. Comparing the German Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;9:271–276. [CrossRef]
- 18. He JP, Burstein M, Schmitz A, Merikangas KR. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in U. S. adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2013;41:583–595. [CrossRef]
- 19. De Giacomo A, Lamanna AL, Craig F, Santoro N, Goffredo S, Cecinati V. The SDQ in Italian clinical practice: evaluation between three outpatient groups compared. Riv Psichiatr 2012;47:400–406. [CrossRef]
- 20. Lai KY, Leung PW, Luk ES, Wong AS. Use of the extended Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to predict psychiatric caseness in Hong Kong. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2014;45:703–711. [CrossRef]
- 21. Kremer P, de Silva A, Cleary J, Santoro G, Weston K, Steele E, Nolan T, Waters E. Normative data for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for young children in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:970–975. [CrossRef]
- 22. Borg AM, Kaukonen P, Joukamaa M, Tamminen T. Finnish norms for young children on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Nord J Psychiatry 2014;68:433–442. [CrossRef]
- 23. Shahrivar Z, Tehrani-Doost M, Pakbaz B, Rezaie A, Ahmadi F. Normative data and psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in an Iranian community sample. J Res Med Sci 2009;14:69–77. [CrossRef]
- 24. Malmberg M, Rydell A-m, Smedje H. Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry 2003;57:357–363. [CrossRef]
- 25. Ezpeleta L, Granero R, de la Osa N, Penelo E, Domènech JM. Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 3–4 in 3-year-old preschoolers. Compr Psychiatry 2013;54:282–291. [CrossRef] https://doi. org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.009
- 26. Egger HL, Erkanli A, Keeler G, Potts E, Walter BK, Angold A. Test-retest reliability of the preschool age psychiatric assessment (PAPA). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:538–549. [CrossRef]
- 27. Ezpeleta L, de la Osa N, Doménech JM. Prevalence of DSM-IV disorders, comorbidity and impairment in 3-year-old Spanish preschoolers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014;49:145–155. [CrossRef]
| APA | Dursun O, ÖĞÜTLÜ H, ESİN İ (2020). Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. , 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| Chicago | Dursun Onur Burak,ÖĞÜTLÜ Hakan,ESİN İbrahim Selçuk Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. (2020): 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| MLA | Dursun Onur Burak,ÖĞÜTLÜ Hakan,ESİN İbrahim Selçuk Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. , 2020, ss.44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| AMA | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. . 2020; 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| Vancouver | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. . 2020; 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| IEEE | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ "Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4." , ss.44 - 49, 2020. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| ISNAD | Dursun, Onur Burak vd. "Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4". (2020), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.23674 |
| APA | Dursun O, ÖĞÜTLÜ H, ESİN İ (2020). Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 57(1), 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| Chicago | Dursun Onur Burak,ÖĞÜTLÜ Hakan,ESİN İbrahim Selçuk Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 57, no.1 (2020): 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| MLA | Dursun Onur Burak,ÖĞÜTLÜ Hakan,ESİN İbrahim Selçuk Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, vol.57, no.1, 2020, ss.44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| AMA | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2020; 57(1): 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| Vancouver | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2020; 57(1): 44 - 49. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| IEEE | Dursun O,ÖĞÜTLÜ H,ESİN İ "Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4." Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 57, ss.44 - 49, 2020. 10.29399/npa.23674 |
| ISNAD | Dursun, Onur Burak vd. "Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Age 2-4". Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 57/1 (2020), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.23674 |
