This study aims to reveal the perceptions and experiences of forensic interviewers on taking statements of crime victims in Forensic İnterview Rooms (AGO), which were introduced on April 3, 2017, in 30 courthouses in Turkey. The qualitative research method was used to determine the perceptions and experiences of forensic interviewers about statement taking processes. The research carried out in February 2018 in Eskişehir Courthouse with 12 forensic interviewers between the ages of 26-46. In-depth interviews were made with a semistructured interview form created by 7 social workers, 3 pedagogues and 2 psychologists. The phenomenological analysis method was used to evaluate the data. The research result was that the risk of trauma in crime victims whose statements were taken in AGOs instead of hearing rooms was decreased as they didn't have to see the defendants and were not directly exposed to the questions of judges/prosecutors. However, lack of cooperation and coordination between interviewers, differences in the common language and understanding, lack of education of judges/prosecutors, who were the determinants, on the vulnerable group, the power to decide whether the victim's statement should be taken in AGOs belonging solely to judges/prosecutors, technical difficulties and long waiting hours are among the problems faced in AGO practices. It is foreseen that providing forensic interviewers with necessary conditions to prepare for their interviews and to apply intervention methods during the interview, granting more right to speak, power and responsibility to the forensic interviewer during the interview and when determining the victim's vulnerability, removing technical difficulties and improving physical conditions will increase the functionality of the practice.