Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey

Ahmet Serhat ULUDAĞ, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Lojistik, Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)
Evrim ERDOĞAN YAZAR (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)
Ege Akademik Bakış
0 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 245 - 264 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21121/eab.454115 İndeks Tarihi: 26-12-2020

Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey

Öz:
The population is decreasing in the regions whereagricultural lands are prevalent, agricultural areasare not used effectively and efficiently, and boththe afore-said regions and the people livingthere show a recession with each passing day interms of economic, social and cultural aspects.This study examines from a different perspectivethe agritourism, which can be considered asan alternative option for rural development.Accordingly, the main objective of the study is todetermine and weight the evaluation criteria foragritourism. Decision-making techniques such asDelphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process methods havebeen used for this purpose. 52 evaluation criteriahave been determined by common consent througha Delphi study consisting of three rounds. TheAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has beenused for the calculation of specified criteria weights.In this way, it has been aimed to contribute to thestudies that will be carried out in order to determinethe existence of agritourism potentials in any region.
Anahtar Kelime:

Tarım Turizmi Değerlendirme Kriterlerinin DELPHI ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Yöntemleriyle Belirlenmesi: Türkiye’de Bir Vaka Çalışması

Öz:
Her heçen gün tarım arazilerinin olduğu bölgelerde nüfus azalmakta, tarımsal araziler etkin ve verimli kullanılamamakta; söz konusu bölgeler ve bu bölgelerde yaşayanlar ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel açılardan biraz daha fazla geriye gitmektedirler. Bu çalışma, kırsal kalkınma için alternatif opsiyonlardan biri olan tarım turizminini farklı bir açıdan incelemektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın temel amacı, tarım turizmi değerlendirme kriterlerini belirlemek ve ağırlıklandırmaktır. Bu amaçla Delphi ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci yöntemleri gibi karar verme teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Üç turdan oluşan bir Delphi çalışmasıyla üzerinde uzlaşmaya varılan 52 adet tarım turizmi değerlendirme kriteri belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen kriterlerin öneciliklerinin tespiti ve ağırlıklarının hesaplanması için Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yolla, herhangi bir bölgenin tarım turizmi potansiyelinin var olup olmadığının tespit edilmesine yönelik yapılacak çalışmalara katkı sağlanması amaçlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Olgu Sunumu Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahipaşaoğlu , S. & Çeltek, E. (2006). Sürdürülebilir Kırsal Turizm. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara
  • Aikaterini, G., Ioannis, S., & Thanasis, K. (2001). Is agrotourism ‘agro’or ‘tourism’? Evidence from agrotourist holdings in Lesvos, Greece. Anatolia, 12 (1), 6-22.
  • Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2005). İstatistiktiksel Analiz Teknikleri “SPSS”te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları”. Emek Ofset, Ankara.
  • Akins, R. B., Tolson, H., & Cole, B. R. (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC medical research methodology, 5 (1), 1-12.
  • Aktaş, R., Doğanay, M.M., Gökmen, Y., Gazibey, Y., & Türen, U. (2015). Sayısal Karar Verme Yöntemleri. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Blancas, F. J., Lozano-Oyola, M., González, M., Guerrero, F. M., & Caballero, R. (2011). How to use sustainability indicators for tourism planning: The case of rural tourism in Andalusia (Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 412, 28-45.
  • Briedenhann, J., & Butts, S. (2006). Application of the Delphi technique to rural tourism project evaluation. Current Issues in Tourism, 9 (2), 171-190.
  • Busby, G. & Rendle, S. (2000). The Transition From Tourism on Farms to Farm Tourism,.Tourism Management, 21 (6),635-642.
  • Çelikbilek, Y. (2018). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri Açıklamalı ve Karşılaştırmalı Sağlık Bilimleri Uygulamaları İle (Editör: D.Muhlis Özdemir). Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Choi, H. C., & Sirakaya, E. (2006). Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tourism management, 27 (6), 1274-1289.
  • Dağdeviren, M.; Yavuz, S. ve Kılınç, N. (2009). Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8143-8151.
  • Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9 (3), 458-467.
  • Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 156- 167.
  • Dymond, S. J. (1997). Indicators of sustainable tourism in New Zealand: A local government perspective. Journal of sustainable tourism, 5 (4), 279-293.
  • Fischer, R. G. (1978). The Delphi method: a description, review and criticism. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 4(2), 64-70.
  • Fusfeld, A. R., & Foster, R. N. (1971). The Delphi technique: Survey and comment: Essentials for corporate use. Business Horizons, 14 (3), 63-74.
  • Gordean, R. S., Buzilă, N., & Dragotă, G. (2009). Agrotourism-a viable alternative of county development. Agricultural Management/Lucrari Stiintifice Seria I, Management Agricol, 11 (4).
  • Green, B., Jones, M., Hughes, D., & Williams, A. (1999). Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health & social care in the community, 7 (3), 198-205.
  • Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing, 32 (4), 1008-1015.
  • Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 12 (10), 1-8.
  • Hung, H. L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y. F. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31 (2), 191-198.
  • Hunter, C., & Shaw, J. (2007). The ecological footprint as a key indicator of sustainable tourism. Tourism management, 28 (1), 46-57.
  • Iakovıdou, O., Emmanouılıdou, M., Stavrakas, T., Sımeonıdou, P., & Chrısostomıdıs, C. D. (2001). Trends of tourism market for agro-tourism. Anatolia, 12 (2), 165-179.
  • Jolson, M. A., & Rossow, G. L. (1971). The Delphi process in marketing decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 443-448.
  • Keeney, S., McKenna, H., & Hasson, F. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kılıç, B., & Kurnaz, A. (2010). Alternative Tourism and Ecological Farms on Creating Diversification of Tourism Product: Example of Pastoral Valley. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 2 (4), 39-56.
  • Kızılaslan, N., & Ünal, T. (2013). Determination of Rural Tourism Potential of Manisa Spil Mountain National Park, Gaziosmanpasa Journal of Scientific Research, (7), 10-29.
  • Ko, J. T. (2001). Assessing progress of tourism sustainability. Annals of Tourism Research, 28 (3), 817-820.
  • Kozak Akoğlan, M. & Bahçe, A. S. (2009). Özel İlgi Turizmi, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological forecasting and social change, 73 (5), 467-482.
  • Linstone, H. & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Retrieved March.
  • López, E. P., & García, F. J. C. (2006). Agrotourism, sustainable tourism and ultraperipheral areas: the case of Canary Islands. PASOS. Revista de Turismoy Patrimonio Cultural, 4 (1), 85-97.
  • Loughlin, K. G., & Moore, L. F. (1979). Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. Academic Medicine, 54 (2), 101-106.
  • McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing?. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(6), 1221-1225.
  • Mearns, K. (2012). Lessons from the application of sustainability indicators to community-based ecotourism ventures in Southern Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (26), 7851-7860.
  • Miller, G. (2001). The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers. Tourism management, 22 (4), 351-362.
  • Möller, P., M. Thulemark, Engström C. (2014). Rural tourism an international perspective (Edithor: Katherine Dashper). Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UNITED KINGDOM: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Newbold, P. (1995). İşletme ve İktisat için İstatistik (Çeviren: Ümit Şenesen), Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Özbek, A. (2017). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve Excel İle Problem Çözümü Kavram-Teori-Uygulama, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara
  • Park, D. B., & Yoon, Y. S. (2011). Developing sustainable rural tourism evaluation indicators. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13 (5), 401-415.
  • Phillip, S., Hunter, C., & Blackstock, K. (2010). A typology for defining agritourism. Tourism Management, 31 (6), 754-758.
  • Procter, S., & Hunt, M. (1994). Using the Delphi survey technique to develop a professional definition of nursing for analysing nursing workload. Journal of advanced nursing, 19 (5), 1003-1014.
  • Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological economics, 59 (4), 406-418.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1986). Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science. 32 (7), 841-855.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1987). The Anaytic Hierarchy Process – What It Is and How It Is Used, Mathl.Modelling, 9, 3-5, 161-176.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1 (1), 83-98.
  • Sarıkamış, M. ve Bahar, O. (2013). Turizm, Yoksulluk ve Bölgesel Gelişmişlik Farklılıkları, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: the case of Cyprus. Tourism management, 23 (3), 233-244.
  • Siow, M. L., Abidin, Z.Z., Nair, V., Ramachandran, S.& Shuid, A. (2011). Developing criteria and indicators for responsible rural tourism in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia, The Malaysian Forester, 74 (2):143-156.
  • Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of information technology education, 6, 1.
  • Thangaratinam, S., & Redman, C. W. (2005). The delphi technique. The obstetrician & gynaecologist, 7 (2), 120-125.
  • Tsaur, S. H., & Wang, C. H. (2007). The evaluation of sustainable tourism development by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory: An empirical study on the Green Island in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 12 (2), 127-145.
  • Twining-Ward, L., & Butler, R. (2002). Implementing STD on a small island: Development and use of sustainable tourism development indicators in Samoa. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10 (5), 363-387.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of management Journal, 17 (4), 605-621.
  • Williams, P. L., & Webb, C. (1994). The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of advanced nursing, 19 (1), 180-186.
  • Woudenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological forecasting and social change, 40 (2), 131-150.
  • Yavuzaslanoğlu, E., & Yavuz, M. (2012). Agritourism Potantial of Karaman. Journal of Social and Economic Research, 2012 (1), 31-33.
  • Yıldırım, B.F., & Önder, E. (2014). İşletmeciler, Mühendisler ve Yöneticiler için Operasyonel, Yönetsel ve Stratejik Problemlerin Çözümünde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa.
  • Zeliff, N., & Heldenbrand, S. (1993). What’s being done in the international business curriculum. Business Education Forum, 48 (1), 23-25.
APA Uludag A, Erdogan Yazar E (2019). Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. , 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
Chicago Uludag Ahmet Serhat,Erdogan Yazar Evrim Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. (2019): 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
MLA Uludag Ahmet Serhat,Erdogan Yazar Evrim Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. , 2019, ss.245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
AMA Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. . 2019; 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
Vancouver Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. . 2019; 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
IEEE Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E "Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey." , ss.245 - 264, 2019. 10.21121/eab.454115
ISNAD Uludag, Ahmet Serhat - Erdogan Yazar, Evrim. "Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey". (2019), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.454115
APA Uludag A, Erdogan Yazar E (2019). Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış, 19(2), 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
Chicago Uludag Ahmet Serhat,Erdogan Yazar Evrim Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış 19, no.2 (2019): 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
MLA Uludag Ahmet Serhat,Erdogan Yazar Evrim Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış, vol.19, no.2, 2019, ss.245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
AMA Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış. 2019; 19(2): 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
Vancouver Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış. 2019; 19(2): 245 - 264. 10.21121/eab.454115
IEEE Uludag A,Erdogan Yazar E "Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey." Ege Akademik Bakış, 19, ss.245 - 264, 2019. 10.21121/eab.454115
ISNAD Uludag, Ahmet Serhat - Erdogan Yazar, Evrim. "Determination of the evaluation criteria for agritourism via delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods: a case study in Turkey". Ege Akademik Bakış 19/2 (2019), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.454115
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 16:16

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları