Ismail Konevî who is one of the 18th century Ottoman scholarsis a person who has proved his identity as a mufasseer (the interpreter of the Quran) with the postscript that he has written in the tafsir of Baydâwî, and his identity as a theologian with the treatises that he has written in the field of kalam. One of his works in the aforementioned field is the treatise named “Teklîf-i mâ lâ yutâk”. In this treatise, which has different copies in various libraries, the author first dealt with the topic through the triple classification, and then went deeply into the issue by means of Ash'ari and Maturidi sources. Konevi, divided the actions which were brought forward, but weren’t possible to carry out, into three parts; the first action was impossible in terms of the reason and the laws of nature, the secondaction was possible in terms of the reason,but wasimpossible in terms of the natural laws, and the last actionwas possible in both ways, but the carrying out the action was contrary to the divine knowledge. The scholarfocused his attention more on whether the last part could be included in the first part. He, opposed some Ash'ari people who considered that the carrying out of the actions in the third section was impossible in essence with the thought that it was contrary to the knowledge of Allah, therefore, included these actions in the first part, and in this respect he used a language that supported the Maturidi approach.