Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature

Umur BUCAK, (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, Türkiye)
İbrahim Müjdat BAŞARAN, (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Türkiye)
Soner ESMER (İskenderun Teknik Üniversitesi, Barbaros Hayrettin Gemi İnşaatı ve Denizcilik Fakülte, Türkiye)
Journal of Eta Maritime Science
9 2
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 214 - 240 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2020.76598 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2021

Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature

Öz:
The port performance has frequently been studied in the academic literature, and thefirst studies on the subject are focused on financial or operational dimensions. However,today, port performance has become multi-dimensional due to the changing roles of theports to its stakeholders, and the fact that local competition has been replaced by globalcompetition through continuously developing routes, etc. Within this study, it is aimed todetermine each dimension of the port performance concept which had been handled as amulti-dimensional process in recent years in literature. For this purpose, port performanceliterature is reviewed and frequency analysis of the related studies was made. As a resultof the analysis, dimensional perspective was brought to the port performance conceptand the indicators of each dimension used in empirical studies were gathered together.So, the concept of port performance had been divided into four basic dimensions whichare operational, financial, sustainable, and logistics. Finally, dimensional gaps in portperformance literature were revealed and some suggestions were given for further studies
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Dutra, A., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., Fillol, A. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 243-269.
  • [2] Wiegmans, B., & Dekker, S. (2016). Benchmarking deep-sea port performance in the Hamburg-Le Havre range. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(1), 96-112.
  • [3] Caldeirinha, V.R.,&Felício, J.A.(2014). The relationship between ‘positionport’, ‘hard-port’ and ‘soft-port’ characteristics and port performance: conceptual models. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(6), 528-559.
  • [4] Ha, M. H., & Yang, Z. (2017). Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 264-278.
  • [5] Esmer, S. (2008). Performance measurements of container terminal operations. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 238-255.
  • [6] Hossain, N. U. I., Nur, F., Jaradat, R., Hosseini, S., Marufuzzaman, M., Puryear, S. M., & Buchanan, R. K. (2019). Metrics for assessing overall performance of inland waterway ports: A bayesian network based approach. Complexity, 1-17.
  • [7] Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., Ji, P., & Wang, T. F. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of network Economics, 3(2), 184-206.
  • [8] Chudasama,K.M.(2009).Performance appraisal of Indian major ports using port ranking model. IUP Journal of Infrastructure, 7(1), 7-21.
  • [9] Schellinck, T., & Brooks, M. R. (2014). Improving port effectiveness through determinance/performance gap analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(4), 328-345.
  • [10] Bichou,K.,&Gray,R.(2004).Alogistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(1), 47-67.
  • [11] Aqmarina, A., & Achjar, N. (2018). Determinants of port performancecase study of 4 main ports in Indonesia (2005-2015). Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 63(2), 176- 185.
  • [12] Ateş, A., & Esmer, S. (2014). Farklı yöntemler ile türk konteyner limanlarının verimliliği. Verimlilik Dergisi, (1), 61-76.
  • [13] Langenus,M.,&Dooms,M.(2015).Port industry performance management: A meso-level gap in literature and practice?. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3), 251-275.
  • [14] Onwuegbuchunam, D. E. (2018). Assessing port governance, devolution and terminal performance in Nigeria. Logistics, 2(1), 1-16.
  • [15] Lin, L. C., & Tseng, C. C. (2007). Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the AsiaPacific region. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(6), 535-551.
  • [16] UNCTAD (2016). Port Management Series: Volume 4 Port Performance. UNCTAD Publishing: Geneva.
  • [17] Tongzon, J. L. (1995). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(3), 245-252.
  • [18] Martinez-Budria, E., Diaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibanez, M., & Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999). A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia deitrasporti, 237-253.
  • [19] Bichou, K. (2006). Review of port performance approaches and a supply chain framework to port performancebenchmarking.Researchin Transportation Economics, 17, 567-598.
  • [20] Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., & Ji, P. (2006). The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(4), 354-374.
  • [21] Wanke, P. F. (2013). Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage networkDEAapproach.TransportPolicy,29,145- 153.
  • [22] Talley, W. K. (2006). Port performance: an economics perspective. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 499-516.
  • [23] Ha, M. H., Yang, Z., Notteboom, T., Ng, A. K., & Heo, M. W. (2017). Revisiting port performance measurement: A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators.TransportationResearch Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 103, 1-16.
  • [24] Suárez-Alemán, A., Sarriera, J. M., Serebrisky, T.,&Trujillo, L.(2016). When it comes to container port efficiency, are all developing regions equal?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 56-77.
  • [25] Estrada, M. A. R., Jenatabadi, H. S., & Chin, A. T. (2017). Measuring ports efficiency under the application of PEP-model. Procedia Computer Science, 104, 205-212.
  • [26] Somensi, K., Ensslin, S., Dutra, A., Ensslin,L.,Ripoll-Feliu,V.M.,&Dezem, V. (2017). Knowledge construction about port performance evaluation: An international literature analysis. Intangible Capital, 13(4), 720-744.
  • [27] Rezaei, J., van Wulfften Palthe, L., Tavasszy, L., Wiegmans, B., & van der Laan, F. (2019). Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an MCDA approach. Management Decision, 57(2), 396- 417.
  • [28] Sentia, P. D., Ramadani, R., & Zuhri, S. (2018). Logistic performance determination on the arrival of ship container. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 20(1), 59-64.
  • [29] Chen, Y., Yang, D., Lian, P., Wan, Z., & Yang, Y. (2020). Will structureenvironment-fit result in better port performance?—An empirical test on the validity of Matching Framework Theory. Transport Policy, 86, 23-33.
  • [30] Feng, M., Mangan, J., & Lalwani, C. (2012).Comparingportperformance: Western European versus Eastern Asian ports. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42 (5), 490-512.
  • [31] Kang, D. J., & Woo, S. H. (2017). Liner shipping networks, port characteristics and the impact on port performance. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(2), 274- 295.
  • [32] Wu, J., Yan, H., & Liu, J.(2009). Groups in DEA based cross-evaluation: An application to Asian container ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(6), 545-558.
  • [33] Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(2), 107-122.
  • [34] Al‐Eraqi, A. S., Mustafa, A., & Khader, A. T. (2010). An extended DEA windows analysis: Middle East and East African seaports. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(2), 208-218.
  • [35] Ferrari, C., Puliafito, P. P., & Tei, A. (2013). Performance and quality indexes in the evaluation of the terminal activity: A dynamic approach.Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 77-86.
  • [36] Nguyen, H. O., Nghiem, H. S., & Chang, Y. T. (2018). A regional perspective of port performance using metafrontier analysis:the case study of Vietnamese ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(1), 112-130.
  • [37] Lu, C. S., Shang, K. C., & Lin, C. C. (2016). Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(8), 909- 927.
  • [38] Mickiene, R., & Valioniene, E. (2017). Evaluation of the interaction between the state seaport governance model and port performance indicators. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5 (3), 27-43.
  • [39] Shetty, D. K., & Dwarakish, G. S. (2020). Measuring port performance and productivity. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 26(2), 221- 227.
  • [40] Mlimbila, J., & Mbamba, U. O. (2018). The role of information systems usage in enhancing port logistics performance: evidence from the Dar Es Salaam port, Tanzania. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(10), 1-20.
  • [41] Park, R. K., & De, P. (2015). An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. In Port Management (pp. 273-292). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • [42] Itoh, H. (2002). Efficiency changes at major container ports in Japan: a window application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Review of urban & regional development studies, 14(2), 133-152.
  • [43] Al-Eraqi, A. S., Mustafa, A., Khader, A. T., & Barros, C. P. (2008). Efficiency of Middle Eastern and East African seaports: application of DEA using window analysis. European journal of scientific research, 23(4), 597- 612.
  • [44] Sirajuddin, Zagloel, T. Y., & Sunaryo. (2019). Effect of strategic alliance based on port characteristic and integrated global supply chain for enhancing industrial port performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1567893), 1-14.
  • [45] Pak, J. Y., Thai, V. V., & Yeo, G. T. (2015). Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating intangible resources affecting port service quality. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(4), 459-468.
  • [46] Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR spectrum, 32(3), 717-738.
  • [47] Cheon, S., Maltz, A., & Dooley, K. (2017). The link between economic and environmental performance of the top 10 US ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(2), 227-247.
  • [48] Jeevan, J., Chen, S. L., & Cahoon, S. (2019). The impact of dry port operations on container seaports competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(1), 4-23.
  • [49] Han, C. H. (2018). Assessing the impacts of port supply chain integration on port performance. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 129-135.
  • [50] Wang, Z., Yao, D. Q., Yue, X., & Liu, J. J. (2018). Impact of IT capability on the performance of port operation. Production and Operations Management, 27(11), 1996-2009.
  • [51] Hervás-Peralta, M., Poveda-Reyes, S., Molero, G. D., Santarremigia, F. E., & Pastor-Ferrando, J. P. (2019). Improving the performance of dry and maritime ports by increasing knowledge about the most relevant functionalities of the Terminal Operating System (TOS). Sustainability, 11(6), 1648.
  • [52] Teng, J. Y., Huang, W. C., & Huang, M. J. (2004). Multicriteria evaluation for port competitiveness of eight East Asian container ports. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 12(4), 256-264.
  • [53] Darbra, R. M., Ronza, A., Casal, J., Stojanovic, T. A., & Wooldridge, C. (2004). The Self Diagnosis Method: A new methodology to assess environmental management in sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48(5-6), 420-428.
  • [54] Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405-424.
  • [55] Cullinane, K. P., & Wang, T. F. (2006). The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 19-31.
  • [56] Chou, C. C. (2007). A fuzzy MCDM method for solving marine transshipment container port selection problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186(1), 435-444.
  • [57] Brooks, M. R. (2007). Issues in measuring port devolution program performance: a managerial perspective. Research in transportation Economics, 17, 599- 629.
  • [58] Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: processandperformancecomponents. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(4), 411-432.
  • [59] Lam, J. S. L., & Yap, W. Y. (2008). Competition for transhipment containers by major ports in Southeast Asia: slot capacity analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(1), 89-101.
  • [60] Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 910-921.
  • [61] Saengsupavanich, C., Coowanitwong, N.,Gallardo,W.G.,&Lertsuchatavanich, C.(2009).Environmentalperformance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state controlderived indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 154-161.
  • [62] Wu, J., Yan, H., & Liu, J. (2010). DEA models for identifying sensitive performance measures in container port evaluation. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 12(3), 215-236.
  • [63] Wu, J., Liang, L., & Song, M. (2010). Performance based clustering for benchmarking of container ports: an application of DEA and cluster analysis technique. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(6), 709-722.
  • [64] Simões, P., & Marques, R. C. (2010). Seaport performance analysis using robust non-parametric efficiency estimators. Transportation Planning and Technology, 33(5), 435-451.
  • [65] Dragovic, B., & Zrnic, N. D. (2011). A queuing model study of port performance evolution. Analele Universitatii" Eftimie Murgu" Resita Fascicola de Inginerie, 2(18), 65-76.
  • [66] Ding, J. F., & Chou, C. C. (2011). A fuzzy MCDM model of service performance for container ports. Scientific research and Essays, 6(3), 559-566.
  • [67] Venus Lun, Y. H. (2011). Green management practices and firm performance:Acaseofcontainer terminal operations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 559-566.
  • [68] Woo, S. H., Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. K. (2011). Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 13(3), 250-277.
  • [69] Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Torun, E. (2011). Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: A case study in the Marmara Region, Turkey. Transport Policy, 18(1), 182-193.
  • [70] Arlı, E. (2012). Konumlandırma stratejilerinin işletme performansı ile ilişkisi: Liman işletmeciliğinde bir uygulama. Journal of Management & Economics, 19(2), 99-121.
  • [71] Madeira, A. G. J., Cardoso, M. M. J., Belderrain, M. C. N., Correia, A. R., & Schwanz, S. H. (2012). Multicriteria and multivariate analysis for port performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 450-456.
  • [72] Almaz, O. A., & Altıok, T. (2012). Simulation modeling of the vessel traffic in Delaware River: Impact of deepening on port performance. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 22, 146-165.
  • [73] Park, J. Y., & Yeo, G. T. (2012). An evaluation of greenness of major Korean ports: A fuzzy set approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(1), 67-82.
  • [74] Dias,J.C.Q.,Azevedo,S.G.,Ferreira,J.M.,& Palma, S. F.(2012). Seaport performance comparison using data envelopment analysis: the case of Iberian container terminals. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 13(3-4), 426-449.
  • [75] Gong, S. X., Cullinane, K., & Firth, M. (2012). The impact of airport and seaport privatization on efficiency and performance: A review of the international evidence and implications for developing countries. Transport Policy, 24, 37-47.
  • [76] Lirn, T. C., Wu, Y. C. J., & Chen, Y. J. (2013). Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia. International JournalofPhysicalDistribution&Logistics Management, 43 (5/6), 427-451.
  • [77] Yang, Y. C., & Chang, W. M. (2013). Impacts of electric rubber-tired gantries on green port performance. Research in TransportationBusiness&Management, 8, 67-76.
  • [78] De Langen, P. W., & Sharypova, K. (2013). Intermodal connectivity as a port performance indicator. Research in TransportationBusiness&Management, 8, 97-102.
  • [79] Brooks, M. R., & Schellinck, T. (2013). Measuring port effectiveness in user service delivery: What really determines users' evaluations of port service delivery? Research in Transportation Business& Management, 8, 87-96.
  • [80] Bergantino, A. S., Musso, E., & Porcelli, F. (2013). Port management performance and contextual variables: Which relationship? Methodological and empirical issues. Research in TransportationBusiness&Management, 8, 39-49.
  • [81] Öztürk, E., Mesci, M., & Kılınç, İ. (2013). Yenilik faaliyetlerinin işletme performansına etkisi: yat limanları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 8 (2), 97-118.
  • [82] Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. (2013). An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a structural equation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18 (3), 235- 252.
  • [83] Chang, Y. T. (2013). Environmental efficiencyofports:adataenvelopment analysis approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(5), 467-478.
  • [84] Lam, J. S. L., & Song, D. W. (2013). Seaport network performance measurement in the context of global freight supply chains. Polish Maritime Research, 20(Special Issue), 47-54.
  • [85] Schøyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2013). The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: A comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(2), 197-221.
  • [86] Vieira, G. B. B., Kliemann Neto, F. J., & Amaral, F. G. (2014). Governance, governance models and port performance: A systematic review. Transport Reviews, 34(5), 645-662.
  • [87] Güner, S., Coşkun, E., & Taşkın, K. (2014). Liman özelleştirmelerinin operasyonel etkinlik üzerindeki etkisi: Türk limanları üzerinde dönemsel bir çalışma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme FakültesiDergisi, 43(2), 218-236.
  • [88] Talley, W. K., Ng, M., & Marsillac, E. (2014). Port service chains and port performance evaluation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 69, 236-247.
  • [89] Ursavaş,E.(2014).Adecision support system for quayside operations in a container terminal. Decision Support Systems, 59, 312-324.
  • [90] Rios, A. M. C., & de Sousa Ramos, F. (2014). Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 423-431.
  • [91] Li, J., & Jiang, B. (2014). Cooperation performance evaluation between seaport and dry port; case of Qingdao port and Xi'an port. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 1, 99-109.
  • [92] Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., & Darbra, R. M.(2014).Identificationandselection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 81(1), 124-130.
  • [93] Shaheen, A., & El-All, H. M. A. (2014). The competitive advantage of seaports and applied to the east port said-port said. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (11), 111-120.
  • [94] Kavakeb, S., Nguyen, T. T., McGinley, K., Yang, Z., Jenkinson, I., & Murray, R. (2015). Green vehicle technology to enhance the performance of a European port: a simulation model with a cost-benefit approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 60, 169- 188.
  • [95] Wiegmans, B., Witte, P. A., & Spit, T. J. M. (2015). Inland port performance: a statistical analysis of Dutch inland ports. Current Practices in Transport: Appraisal Methods, Policies and Models, 8, 145-154.
  • [96] Güner, S. (2015). Liman etkinliği ölçümünde iki aşamalı bir model önerisi ve türk limanları üzerinde bir uygulama. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2), 99-106.
  • [97] Oliveira,G.F.D.,&Cariou,P.(2015).The impact of competition on container port (in) efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 124-133.
  • [98] Ergin, A., Eker, İ., & Alkan, G. (2015). Selection of container port using ELECTRE technique. International Journal of Operations and Logistics Management, 4(4), 268-275.
  • [99] Chen, L., Zhang, D., Ma, X., Wang, L., Li, S., Wu, Z., & Pan, G. (2016). Container port performance measurement and comparisonleveragingshipGPStracesand maritimeopendata.IEEETransactionson IntelligentTransportationSystems,17(5), 1227-1242.
  • [100] Antão, P., Calderón, M., Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C., & Darbra, R. M. (2016). Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas. Safety Science, 85, 266-275.
  • [101] Seo, Y. J., Dinwoodie, J., & Roe, M. (2016). The influence of supply chain collaboration on collaborative advantage and port performance in maritime logistics. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 562-582.
  • [102] Chen, Z., & Pak, M. (2017). A Delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in China. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(5), 537-550.
  • [103] Ha, M. H., Yang, Z., & Heo, M. W. (2017). A new hybrid decision making framework for prioritising port performance improvement strategies. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(3), 105-116.
  • [104] Daldır, I. & Tosun, Ö. (2017). Comparison of the port authority's efficiency in Turkey. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics, 4 (2), 152-158.
  • [105]Cheon, S., Song, D. W., & Park, S.(2018). Does more competition result in better port performance? Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(3), 433-455.
  • [106]Sridi, I., Bouguerra, H., & Benammou, S.(2017). Performance of the Tunisian port system. LOGISTIQUA, 88-93.
  • [107]Burhani,J.T., Zukhruf, F.,&Frazila,R.B. (2017). Port performance evaluation tool based on microsimulation model. MATEC Web of Conferences, 101, 1-5.
  • [108]Acer, A., & Yangınlar, G. (2017). The determination of Turkish container ports performance with TOPSIS multiple criteria decision making method. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(2), 67-75.
  • [109]Bolevics, V. (2017). The Impact of Governance on the Effıciency of the Baltic States’ Major Ports. Journal of Business Management, 14, 7-26.
  • [110]Roos, E. C., & Neto, F. J. K. (2017). Tools for evaluating environmental performance at Brazilian public ports: Analysis and proposal. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 115(1-2), 211-216.
  • [111]Ridwan, A., & Noche, B. (2018). Model of the port performance metrics in ports by integration six sigma and system dynamics. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35 (1), 82-108.
  • [112]Sağlam, B. B., Açık, A., & Ertürk, E. (2018). Evaluation of investment impact on port efficiency: Berthing time difference as a performance indicator. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 6(1), 37-46.
  • [113]Manikandan,M.,&Chidambaranathan, S. (2018). A conceptual hybrid model to improve the performance of port supply chain using importance performance analysis, quality function deployment and interpretive structural modeling. IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 15(2), 7-20.
  • [114]Rocha, C. H., Silva, G. L., & de Abreu, L. M. (2018). Analysis of the evolution of Brazilian Ports’ environmental performances. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 18(2), 103-109.
  • [115]Aloini, D., Benevento, E., Stefanini, A. & Zerbino, P. (2020). Process fragmentation and port performance: merging SNA and text mining. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 1-14.
  • [116]Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., & Beresford, A. (2019). Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 47- 64.
  • [117]Paing, W. P., & Prabnasak, J. (2019). Determinants of Port Performance– Case Study of Five Major Container Ports in Myanmar. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 639(1), 1-8.
  • [118]Florin, N., Cotorcea, A., Filip, A., Bucur, M., & Buciu, A. (2019). Performance measurement of the port logistics system. Scientific Bulletin" Mircea cel Batran" Naval Academy, 22(1), 1-11.
  • [119]Hui, F. K. P., Aye, L., & Duffield, C. F. (2019). Engaging employees with good sustainability: key performance indicators for dry ports. Sustainability, 11(10), 1-11.
  • [120]Muangpan, T., & Suthiwartnarueput, K. (2019). Key performance indicators of sustainable port: Case study of the eastern economic corridor in Thailand. Cogent Business & Management, 6, 1-18.
  • [121]Musso, E., & Sciomachen, A. (2020). Impact of megaships on the performance of port container terminals. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22, 432-445.
  • [122]Ha, M. H., Yang, Z., & Lam, J. S. L. (2019). Port performance in container transport logistics: A multistakeholder perspective. Transport Policy, 73, 25-40.
  • [123]Korucuk, S., & Memiş, S. (2019). Yeşil liman uygulamaları performans kriterlerinin DEMATEL yöntemi ile önceliklendirilmesi: İstanbul örneği. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(16), 134-148.
  • [124]Aguiar-Diaz, I., Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V., & Trujillo, L. (2019). Ownership structure and financial performance of Spanish port service companies. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1-25.
  • [125]Görçün, Ö. F. (2019). An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Terminal Selection Problems in the Logistics Management Perspectives of Marine Container Ports: A Case Study for Turkey’s Container Ports and Terminals. Journal of Yaşar University, 14, 33-47.
  • [126]Notteboom, T., Ducruet, C., & De Langen, P. (2016). Ports in proximity: Competition and coordination among adjacent seaports. London: Routledge.
  • [127]Darbra, R. M., & Casal, J. (2004). Historical analysis of accidents in seaports. Safety Science, 42(2), 85-98.
  • [128]Yip, T. L. (2008). Port traffic risks–A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 921-931.
  • [129]Mollaoğlu, M., Bucak, U., & Demirel, H. (2019). A quantitative analysis of the factors that may cause occupational accidents at ports. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 7(4), 294-303.
  • [130]Bichou, K. (2013). Port operations, planning and logistics. New York: Informa Law from Rutledge
APA Bucak U, Başaran İ, Esmer S (2020). Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. , 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
Chicago Bucak Umur,Başaran İbrahim Müjdat,Esmer Soner Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. (2020): 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
MLA Bucak Umur,Başaran İbrahim Müjdat,Esmer Soner Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. , 2020, ss.214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
AMA Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. . 2020; 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
Vancouver Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. . 2020; 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
IEEE Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S "Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature." , ss.214 - 240, 2020. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
ISNAD Bucak, Umur vd. "Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature". (2020), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2020.76598
APA Bucak U, Başaran İ, Esmer S (2020). Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 8(4), 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
Chicago Bucak Umur,Başaran İbrahim Müjdat,Esmer Soner Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 8, no.4 (2020): 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
MLA Bucak Umur,Başaran İbrahim Müjdat,Esmer Soner Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.8, no.4, 2020, ss.214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
AMA Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2020; 8(4): 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
Vancouver Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2020; 8(4): 214 - 240. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
IEEE Bucak U,Başaran İ,Esmer S "Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 8, ss.214 - 240, 2020. 10.5505/jems.2020.76598
ISNAD Bucak, Umur vd. "Dimensions of the Port Performance: A Review of Literature". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 8/4 (2020), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2020.76598
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 18:32

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları