AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Metin KOCATÜRK, (İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Tuğba TÜRK KURTÇA (Trakya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık, Edirne, Türkiye)
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik)
19 12
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 79 Sayfa Aralığı: 1123 - 1136 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17755/esosder.834590 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz:
Kişiler arası ilişkilerde öne çıkan konulardan biri de saldırganlık içeren tutum ve davranışlardır. Bu tutum vedavranışlar belirli kavramsal yapılar içinde değerlendirilmektedir. Saldırganlığın görünümlerinden biri de akranzorbalığıdır. Zorbalık günümüzde sosyal ortamlardan sanal ortama taşınmıştır. Sanal ortamda beliren ve akranzorbalığının siber dünyadaki dönüşümü olan siber zorbalık arasındaki ahlaki yargılama ve duygusal faktörlerbakımından ilişkiler önemli ölçüde dikkatleri çekmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı akran zorbalığı vemağduriyeti, siber zorbalık, ahlaki uzaklaşma ve empatik ilgi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir. Bu amaçlaİstanbul’da çeşitli üniversitelere devam eden 18-25 yaş aralığındaki genç yetişkinlerden uygun örneklemeyöntemiyle 210 kadın 60 erkek olmak üzere toplam 270 katılımcıya ulaşılmıştır. Katılımcılara Zorbalığı veMağduriyeti Belirleme Ölçeği, Ahlaki Uzaklaşma Ölçeği, Kişilerarası Tepkisellik Ölçeği ve Siber ZorbalıkÖlçeği uygulanmıştır. Bağımsız ve bağımlı değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler Pearson Momentler ÇarpımıKorelasyonu, Basit Doğrusal ve Çoklu Regresyon Analizi ile test edilmiştir. Akran zorbalığı, akran zorbalığınamaruz kalma ve ahlaki uzaklaşmanın basit regresyon analizi sonucunda siber zorbalığı anlamlı düzeydeyordadığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca ahlaki uzaklaşmanın ve empatik ilginin akran zorbalığını ve mağduriyetiniyordadığı görülmüştür. Akran zorbalığı ve siber zorbalık arasında birbirinin devamı niteliğindeki ilişkiler gözönünde bulundurularak ahlaki uzaklaşma eğilimi, ahlaki biliş ve empatik ilgi bağlamında araştırma konusutartışılmıştır. Hem akran zorbalığını hem de siber zorbalığı önleyici çalışmalarda ve müdahale programlarındaempati ve ahlaki bilişle ilgili unsurlara yer verilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelime: ahlaki uzaklaşma akran zorbalığı

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PEER BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION, CYBERBULLYING, MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND EMPATHIC CONCERN

Öz:
One of the prominent issues in interpersonal relationships is aggressive attitudes. Those are evaluated within certain conceptual structures. Peer bullying could be considered as reflection of aggression. Bullying has moved from social environments to virtual environments today. In terms of moral judgement and emotional factors, relationships between cyberbullying, which appear in the virtual environment and are the transformation of peer bullying in the cyber world, attract significant attention. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between peer bullying and victimization, cyber bullying, moral disengagement and empathic concern. For this purpose, data were collected from 270 participants, 210 female and 60 male young adults. Participants determined through convenience sampling were students at different universities in İstanbul. Peer Bullying Scale, Moral Disengagement Scale, Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Cyberbullying Scale were applied to the participants. Relationships between independent and dependent variables were tested with Pearson Product Moment Correlation, Simple Linear and Multiple Regression Analysis. It was found that peer bullying, victimization of peer bullying and moral disengagement significantly predicted cyberbullying as a result of simple regression analysis. In addition, it was seen that moral disengagement and empathic concern predicted peer bullying and victimization. Considering the relationships between peer bullying and cyberbullying, which are the continuation of each other, the main purpose of the study was discussed in the context of moral disengagement tendency, moral cognition and empathic concern. Elements of empathy and moral cognition should be included in both peer bullying and cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Antoniadou, N., Kokkinos, C. M., & Markos, A. (2016). Possible common correlates between bullying and cyber-bullying among adolescents. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.003
  • Aricak, O. T., Kinay, H., & Tanrikulu, T. (2012). Siber zorbalık ölçeğinin ilk psikometrik bulguları. Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education/Hasan Ali Yücel Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi (HAYEF), 9(1), 101-114.
  • Ayas, T., & Pişkin, M. (2007). Akran zorbalığı belirleme ölçeği ergen formunun geliştirilmesi. IX. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 17-19 Ekim.
  • Bamford, A. (2004). Cyberbullying. AHISA Pastoral Care National Conference. Melbourne, Australia.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
  • Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., Ourda, D., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2016). Tackling psychosocial risk factors for adolescent cyberbullying: Evidence from a school‐based intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21625
  • Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2008). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.21913/jsw.v1i2.172
  • Bjärehed, M., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2020). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their associations with indirect bullying, direct bullying, and proaggressive bystander behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(1), 28-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618824745
  • Bussey, K., Quinn, C., & Dobson, J. (2015). The moderating role of empathic concern and perspective taking on the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(1), 10-29. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.1.0010
  • Callaghan, M., Kelly, C., & Molcho, M. (2015). Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0638-7
  • Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513491212
  • Carter, M. (2017). The role of attachment in the relationship between perceived parenting dimensions and bullying among preadolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology Faculty of Humanities University of the Free State, Bloemfontein. Retrieved from http://scholar.ufs.ac.za:8080/xmlui/handle/11660/7640.
  • Doane, A. N., Kelley, M. L., Chiang, E. S., & Padilla, M. A. (2013). Development of the cyberbullying experiences survey. Emerging Adulthood, 1(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813479584
  • Engeler, A., & Yargıç, L. İ. (2007). Kişilerarası tepkisellik indeksi: Empatinin çok boyutlu ölçümü. In New Symposium Journal, 45(3), 119-127.
  • Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341260
  • Gez c -Yalçın, M., enyurt, A. Y., Gültepe, B., & Coşkun, H. (2016). Ahlaki uzaklaşma ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Kalem International Journal of Education and Human Sciences, 6(1), 309-332. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2017.63
  • Gini, G., & Espelage, D. L. (2014). Peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide risk in children and adolescents. JAMA, 312(5), 545-546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3212
  • Harris, S., & Petrie, G. F. (2003). Bullying: The bullies, the victims, the bystanders. Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(6), 540-550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20154
  • Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D. J., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21833
  • Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 15(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9168-9
  • Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: Bullying in digital age. Blackwell Publishing.
  • König, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge?. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(02), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210
  • Landstedt, E., & Persson, S. (2014). Bullying, cyberbullying, and mental health in young people. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(4), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814525004
  • Lazuras, L., Pyżalski, J., Barkoukis, V., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2012). Empathy and moral disengagement in adolescent cyberbullying: Implications for educational intervention and pedagogical practice. Studia Edukacyjne, 23, 57-69.
  • Marciano, L., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A. L. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in youth: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 25(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz031
  • Marín-López, I., Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Hunter, S. C., & Llorent, V. J. (2020a). Relations among online emotional content use, social and emotional competencies and cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, Article 104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104647
  • Marín-López, I., Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Monks, C. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2020b). Empathy online and moral disengagement through technology as longitudinal predictors of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, Article 105144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105144
  • Meter, D. J., & Bauman, S. (2018). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring: Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616670752
  • Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
  • Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer‐victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098- 2337(2000)26:2<169::aid-ab3>3.0.co;2-a
  • Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 129- 142. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.129
  • Nusantara, B. A., Sugiharto, D. Y. P., & Mulawarman, M. (2020). The effects of empathy on cyberbullying mediated by moral disengagement. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9(2), 116-122.
  • Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at School. In L.R. Huesmann (Ed.) Aggressive Behavior: The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5
  • Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Nocentini, A., Fida, R., & Menesini, E. (2020). The role of traditional and online moral disengagement on cyberbullying: Do externalising problems make any difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.024
  • Paez, G. R. (2019). Assessing predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: The influence of individual factors, attachments, and prior victimization. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019- 00025-7
  • Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643168
  • Pişkin, M. (2002). Okul zorbalığı: Tanımı, türleri, ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2(2), 531-562.
  • Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies.Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
  • Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders' behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011
  • Renati, R., Berrone, C., & Zanetti, M. A. (2012). Morally disengaged and unempathic: Do cyberbullies fit these definitions? An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(8), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0046
  • Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2012.762921
  • Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Lalande, K., & Colman, I. (2020). Cyberbullying victimisation and internalising and externalising problems among adolescents: The moderating role of parent–child relationship and child's sex. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, E8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796018000653
  • Schneider, S. K., O'donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2011.300308
  • Skilbred-Fjeld, S., Reme, S. E., & Mossige, S. (2020). Cyberbullying involvement and mental health problems among late adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-1-5
  • Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
  • van Geel, M., & Vedder, P. (2020). Does cyberbullying predict internalizing problems and conduct problems when controlled for traditional bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12601
  • Vieno, A., Gini, G., Lenzi, M., Pozzoli, T., Canale, N., & Santinello, M. (2014). Cybervictimization and somatic and psychological symptoms among Italian middle school students. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(3), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12601
  • Wachs, S. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 347-360.
  • Wang, X., Lei, L., Yang, J., Gao, L., & Zhao, F. (2017). Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0643-6
  • Washington, E. T. (2014). An overview of cyberbullying in higher education. Adult Learning, 26(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159514558412
  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characterictics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x
  • Zelidman, A. (2014). Empathy as a moderator of adolescent bullying behavior and moral disengagement after controlling for social desirability. Doctoral Dissertations, Wayne State University.
  • Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.004
  • Zych, I., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Affective empathy and moral disengagement related to late adolescent bullying perpetration. Ethics & Behavior, 29(7), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1521282
APA KOCATÜRK M, TÜRK-KURTÇA T (2021). AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. , 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
Chicago KOCATÜRK METİN,TÜRK-KURTÇA TUGBA AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. (2021): 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
MLA KOCATÜRK METİN,TÜRK-KURTÇA TUGBA AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. , 2021, ss.1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
AMA KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. . 2021; 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
Vancouver KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. . 2021; 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
IEEE KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T "AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ." , ss.1123 - 1136, 2021. 10.17755/esosder.834590
ISNAD KOCATÜRK, METİN - TÜRK-KURTÇA, TUGBA. "AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ". (2021), 1123-1136. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.834590
APA KOCATÜRK M, TÜRK-KURTÇA T (2021). AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20(79), 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
Chicago KOCATÜRK METİN,TÜRK-KURTÇA TUGBA AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20, no.79 (2021): 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
MLA KOCATÜRK METİN,TÜRK-KURTÇA TUGBA AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), vol.20, no.79, 2021, ss.1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
AMA KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(79): 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
Vancouver KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(79): 1123 - 1136. 10.17755/esosder.834590
IEEE KOCATÜRK M,TÜRK-KURTÇA T "AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ." Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20, ss.1123 - 1136, 2021. 10.17755/esosder.834590
ISNAD KOCATÜRK, METİN - TÜRK-KURTÇA, TUGBA. "AKRAN ZORBALIĞI VE MAĞDURİYETİ, SİBER ZORBALIK, AHLAKİ UZAKLAŞMA VE EMPATİK İLGİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20/79 (2021), 1123-1136. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.834590
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
26-04-2024 1:43

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları