Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 43 - 55 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15671/hjbc.722876 İndeks Tarihi: 12-10-2021

Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University

Öz:
Beytepe Campus (Hacettepe University) is one of the few isolated areas with large scale for wildlife within Ankara metropolis (Turkey). However, there is no checklist regarding to the terrestrial vertebrate (amphibian, reptile, avian and mammalian) fauna of this campus has ever been published so far. Therefore, field studies and literature surveys were conducted towards Beytepe Campus from 2005 to 2019. According to the results, a total of 3 amphibians, 11 reptilians, 93 avian and 14 mammalian species were identified in the study area. Due to increasing urbanization trends in this metropolitan city, this study will provide us a useful guide for further surveys and conservation activities in similar areas.
Anahtar Kelime:

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Beytepe Yerleşkesinin Karasal Omurgalı Faunası

Öz:
Beytepe Yerleşkesi (Hacettepe Üniversitesi), Ankara’daki (Türkiye) kentsel yaşamda yaban hayatı için birkaç büyük izolealandan birisidir. Bununla birlikte, şimdiye kadar bu yerleşkenin karasal omurgalı (amfibi, sürüngen, kuş ve memeli)faunasına ilişkin genel bir tür listesi bulunmamaktadır. Bu amaçla 2005 – 2019 yılları arasında Beytepe Yerleşkesi’ndeyapılan çalışmalar sonucunda toplam 3 amfibi, 11 sürüngen, 93 kuş ve 14 memeli türü tespit edilmiştir. Kentselleşmeninbüyükşehirlerde giderek artan trendi nedeniyle, bu çalışma bize benzer alanlarda yapılacak araştırmalar ve korumafaaliyetleri için faydalı bir rehber olacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, C.H. Nilon, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R. Costanza, Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32 (2001) 127–157.
  • 2. S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms, Landscape and Urban Planning. 69 (2004) 369–384.
  • 3. J. Niemelä, Ecology and urban planning, Biodiversity & Conservation. 8 (1999) 119–131.
  • 4. D.C. Dearborn, S. Kark, Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity, Conservation Biology. 24 (2010) 432–440.
  • 5. M.A. Goddard, A.J. Dougill, T.G. Benton, Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments, Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (2010) 90–98.
  • 6. B. Güneralp, K.C. Seto, Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation, Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2013) 014025.
  • 7. M.F. Aronson, C.A. Lepczyk, K.L. Evans, M.A. Goddard, S.B. Lerman, J.S. MacIvor, C.H. Nilon, T. Vargo, Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 15 (2017) 189– 196.
  • 8. X. Zhang, M.A. Friedl, C.B. Schaaf, A.H. Strahler, A. Schneider, The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology, Geophysical Research Letters. 31 (2004).
  • 9. H. Sevgili, A. Karataş, O. Candan, Biodiversity in Urban environments of Ordu City and Nearby Areas: Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry. 44 (2016) 47–63.
  • 10. P. Faramarzi, Determination of Chemical Composition in Pm2. 5 Samples Collected in Urban and Semi-Urban Two Stations in Ankara, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, 2018.
  • 11. Climate:Ankara, Ankara_Climate. (n.d.). https://tr.climate- data.org/asya/tuerkiye/ankara/ankara-172/ (accessed April 10, 2020).
  • 12. R. Heyer, M.A. Donnelly, M. Foster, R. Mcdiarmid, Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians, Smithsonian Institution, 2014.
  • 13. N.J. Scott, M.L. Crump, B.L. Zimmerman, R.G. Jaeger, R.F. Inger, P.S. Corn, B.D. Woodward, C.K. Dodd, D.E. Scott, H.B. Shaffer, Standard techniques for inventory and monitoring, Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Amphibians/Heyer, W. Ronald. (1994).
  • 14. İ. Baran, Ç. Ilgaz, A. Avcı, Y. Kumlutaş, K. Olgun, Türkiye Amfibi ve Sürüngenleri [The Amphibians and Reptiles of Turkey]; Ankara Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları no: 207, Semih Publishing House.(in Turkish), 2013.
  • 15. AmphibiaWeb, (n.d.). https://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed February 10, 2020).
  • 16. The Reptile Database, (n.d.). http://www.reptile-database. org/ (accessed June 10, 2019).
  • 17. C.J.O. Harrison, field guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of European birds, Collins, 1975.
  • 18. H. Heinzel, R. Fitter, J. Parslow, A. Boyla, Türkiye’nin ve Avrupa’nın kuşları: Kuzey Afrika ve Ortadoğu dahil, Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği, 2002 (in Turkish).
  • 19. P. Bang, P. Dahlstrøm, G. Vevers, Collins guide to animal tracks and signs: The tracks and signs of British and European mammals and birds, Collins, 1974.
  • 20. Ankara İli Tüm Yüzölçüm Alanı için Karasal ve İç su Ekosistemleri Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Envanteri ve İzleme Projesi Sonuç Raporu, Tarim Ve Orman Bakanlığı, 2014 (in Turkish).
  • 21. B. Akman, M. Çakmak, M.Z. Yildiz, On the Herpetofauna of the Central Anatolian Province of Kırıkkale (Turkey), Acta Biologica Turcica. 33 (2020) 70–79.
  • 22. Ç.H. Şekercioğlu, S. Anderson, E. Akçay, R. Bilgin, Ö.E. Can, G. Semiz, Ç. Tavşanoğlu, M.B. Yokeş, A. Soyumert, K. Ipekdal, Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis, Biological Conservation. 144 (2011) 2752–2769.
  • 23. G. Kirwan, B. Demirci, H. Welch, K. Boyla, M. Özen, P. Castell, T. Marlow, The birds of Turkey, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010.
  • 24. A. Karataş, A. Budak, The mammals (Mammalia) of Yamanlar Mountain (İzmir and Manisa provinces) and their ectoparasites, Acta Biologica Turcica. 32 (2019) 53–60.
  • 25. J. Beninde, M. Veith, A. Hochkirch, Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra- urban biodiversity variation, Ecology Letters. 18 (2015) 581–592.
  • 26. M.L. McKinney, Urbanization, Biodiversity, and ConservationThe impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems, Bioscience. 52 (2002) 883– 890.
  • 27. A.J. Hamer, M.J. McDonnell, The response of herpetofauna to urbanization: inferring patterns of persistence from wildlife databases, Austral Ecology. 35 (2010) 568–580.
  • 28. K. Szlavecz, P. Warren, S. Pickett, Biodiversity on the urban landscape, in: Human Population, Springer, 2011: pp. 75– 101.
  • 29. D.S. Favre, International trade in endangered species: a guide to CITES [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species], Brill, 1989.
  • 30. P. Genovesi, C. Shine, European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention), Council of Europe, 2004.
  • 31. S. IUCN, IUCN red list of threatened species, Version. 2017 (2017) 3.
APA SAHIN M, Akbaba B, Bulut Ş, Ayaş Z (2021). Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. , 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
Chicago SAHIN Mehmet Kursat,Akbaba Burak,Bulut Şafak,Ayaş Zafer Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. (2021): 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
MLA SAHIN Mehmet Kursat,Akbaba Burak,Bulut Şafak,Ayaş Zafer Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. , 2021, ss.43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
AMA SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. . 2021; 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
Vancouver SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. . 2021; 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
IEEE SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z "Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University." , ss.43 - 55, 2021. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
ISNAD SAHIN, Mehmet Kursat vd. "Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University". (2021), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.722876
APA SAHIN M, Akbaba B, Bulut Ş, Ayaş Z (2021). Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 49(1), 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
Chicago SAHIN Mehmet Kursat,Akbaba Burak,Bulut Şafak,Ayaş Zafer Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 49, no.1 (2021): 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
MLA SAHIN Mehmet Kursat,Akbaba Burak,Bulut Şafak,Ayaş Zafer Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, vol.49, no.1, 2021, ss.43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
AMA SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry. 2021; 49(1): 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
Vancouver SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry. 2021; 49(1): 43 - 55. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
IEEE SAHIN M,Akbaba B,Bulut Ş,Ayaş Z "Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University." Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 49, ss.43 - 55, 2021. 10.15671/hjbc.722876
ISNAD SAHIN, Mehmet Kursat vd. "Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University". Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 49/1 (2021), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.722876