The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 183 - 189 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 İndeks Tarihi: 11-11-2021
The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation
Öz: Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate phantom limb pain (PLP), PL sensation (PLS), and residual limb pain (RLP)after lower-extremity amputation and their effect on patients’ effective prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in prostheticusers.Methods: Fifty-seven patients with lower-extremity amputation who used prosthesis for at least 3 months were included inour study. PLP, PLS, and RLP were evaluated through the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ). Prosthetic use, locomotorskills, body image, and quality of life were measured by administering Houghton scale, locomotor capabilities index (LCI),amputee body image scale (ABIS), and short-form health survey (SF-36), respectively.Results: On the PEQ, 43.9% of the patients reported PLP, while 63.2% reported PLS, and 40.4% reported RLP. Correlationanalyses revealed that as the frequency and duration of PLP increased, the patients’ basic and advanced locomotor skills andquality of life decreased. When the intensity of PLP and the degree of distress caused by it increased, the patients’ quality oflife decreased, and when the frequency of PLS increased, the patients’ emotional state worsened. When the intensity of PLSand the degree of bother caused by it increased, the patients’ body image, emotional state, and social status worsened. Therewas no correlation between the rate, frequency, severity, or duration of RLP and scores on Houghton scale, LCI, ABIS, or SF-36.Conclusion: The presence of PLP and PLS decreases the use of prostheses and impairs body image and quality of life in prostheticusers.
Anahtar Kelime: Alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan hastalarda postamputasyon ağrısı ve fantom duyusunun protez kullanımı, vücut imajı ve yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız protez kullanan, alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan hastalarda fantom ağrısı (PLP), fantom hissi (PLS) ve güdük ağrısı (RLP)’nın değerlendirilmesi; bu ağrıların protez kullanımı, lokomotor beceriler ve vücut imajı ile ilişkisinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza ampute polikliniğimize başvuran alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan, en az 3 aydır ampute alt ekstremite için protez kullanan 57 hasta dahil edildi. Fantom ağrısı, fantom hissi ve güdük ağrısı Protez Değerlendirme Anketi (PEQ) ile ölçüldü. Protez kullanımı Houghton Skalası ile, lokomotor becerileri Lokomotor Kapasite İndeksi (LCI) ile, vücut imajı Ampute Vücut İmaj Skalası (ABIS) ile, yaşam kalitesi Kısa Form Sağlık Anketi (SF-36) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: PEQ’ya göre hastaların %43.9’unda fantom ağrısı, %63.2’sinde fantom hissi ve %40.4’ünde güdük ağrısı tespit edilmiştir. Korelasyon analizleri fantom ağrısı sıklığı ve süresi arttıkça hastaların temel ve ileri lokomotor becerileri ile yaşam kalitesinin düştüğünü ortaya koymuştur. Fantom ağrısı’ nın yoğunluğu ve neden olduğu stres derecesi arttığında, hastaların yaşam kalitesinin düştüğü; fantom hissi sıklığı arttığında, hastaların emosyonel durumunun kötüleştiği tespit edilmiştir. Fantom hissi’ nin yoğunluğu ve rahatsızlık derecesi arttığında, hastaların vücut imajı, emosyonel durumu ve sosyal durumu kötüleşmiştir. Güdük ağrısının oranı, sıklığı, şiddeti veya süresi ile Houghton ölçeği, LCI, ABIS veya SF-36 skorları arasında korelasyon bulunmamıştır. Sonuç: Fantom ağrısı ve fantom hissi, protez kullanım sıklığını azaltmasının yanı sıra ampute hastaların vücut imajını ve yaşam kalitesini de olumsuz etkiler.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Raja SN, Benzon HT. Phantom pain. In: Benzon HT, Raja SN, Molloy RE, Liu SS, Fishman SM. Essentials of Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005. p. 394-8. [CrossRef ]
- 2. Lovergreen W, Murphy DP, Smith WK, Stevens P, Webster J. Lower limb amputation and gait. In: Cifu DX, editor. Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadephia, PA: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1073-94.
- 3. Morgan SJ, Friedly JL, Amtmann D, Salem R, Hafner BJ. Cross-sectional assessment of factors related to pain ıntensity and pain ınterference in lower limb prosthesis users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98(1):105–13. [CrossRef ]
- 4. Uustal H, Meier RH. Pain issues and treatment of the person with an amputation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014;25(1):45–52. [CrossRef ]
- 5. Srivastava D. Chronic post-amputation pain: Peri-operative management review. Br J Pain 2017;11(4):192–202. [CrossRef]
- 6. Prosthetic Research Study. Guide for the Use of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Seattle, WA: Prosthetics Research Study; 1998.
- 7. Prosthetic Research Study. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Seattle, WA: Prosthetics Research Study; 1998.
- 8. Safer VB, Yavuzer G, Demir SO, Yanikoglu I, Guneri FD. The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: Reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27(6):1677–80. [CrossRef ]
- 9. Devlin M, Pauley T, Head K, Garfinkel S. Houghton scale of prosthetic use in people with lowerextremity amputations: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(8):1339–44. [CrossRef ]
- 10. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Ferriero G, Muñoz S, Orlandini D, Amoresano A. Rasch analysis of the locomotor capabilities ındex-5 in people with lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31(4):394–404. [CrossRef ]
- 11. Wen PS, Randolph MG, Elbaum L, De la Rosa, M. Gender differences in psychosocial and physical outcomes in Haitian amputees. Am J Occup Ther 2018;72(3):1–8. [CrossRef ]
- 12. Safaz I, Göktepe AS, Yılmaz B, Taşkaynatan MA, Yazıcıoğlu K. Reliability of locomotor capabilities ındex, Houghton scale in young people with lower limb amputatıon. J PMR Sci 2009;12:15–18.
- 13. Breakey JW. Body ımage: The lower-limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9:58–66. [CrossRef ]
- 14. Bumin G, Bayramlar K, Yakut Y, Sener GY. Cross cultural adaptation and reliability of the Turkish version of amputee body ımage scale (ABIS). J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2009;22(1):11–6. [CrossRef ]
- 15. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130–9. [CrossRef ]
- 16. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: A study of a patients with romatoid disorder. J Drug Ther 1999;12:102–6.
- 17. Devan H, Hendrick P, Hale L, Carman A, Dillon MP, Ribeiro DC. Exploring factors ınfluencing low back pain in people with nondysvascular lower limb amputation: A national survey. PM R 2017;9(10):949–59. [CrossRef ]
- 18. Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, Kim J, Hafner BJ. Health-related profiles of people with lower limb loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(8):1474–83. [CrossRef ]
- 19. Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(14–15):831–6. [CrossRef ]
- 20. Geertzen JH, Bosmans JC, van der Schans CP, Dijkstra PU. Claimed walking distance of lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(3):101–4. [CrossRef ]
- 21. Brunelli S, Morone G, Iosa M, Ciotti C, De Giorgi R, Foti C, et al. Efficacy of progressive muscle relaxation, mental imagery, and phantom exercise training on phantom limb: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(2):181–7. [CrossRef ]
- 22. Dietrich C, Nehrdich S, Seifert S, Blume KR, Miltner WH, Hofmann GO, et al. Leg prosthesis with somatosensory feedback reduces phantom limb pain and ıncreases functionality. Front Neurol 2018;9:270. [CrossRef ]
- 23. Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower-and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45(7):961– 72. [CrossRef ]
- 24. Holzer LA, Sevelda F, Fraberger G, Bluder O, Kickinger W, Holzer G. Body image and self-esteem in lower-limb amputees. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92943. [CrossRef ]
- 25. Pucher I, Kickinger W, Frischenschlager O. Coping with amputation and phantom limb pain. J Psychosom Res 1999;46(4):379–83. [CrossRef ]
- 26. Davidson JH, Khor KE, Jones LE. A cross-sectional study of post-amputation pain in upper and lower limb amputees, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32(22):1855–62. [CrossRef ]
- 27. Christensen J, Ipsen T, Doherty P, Langberg H. Physical and social factors determining quality of life for veterans with lower-limb amputation(s): A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38(24):2345–53. [CrossRef ]
| APA | AYDIN T, Şen E, kesiktas n, Bugdayci D, öneş k, guven kaya s, KARACAN I (2021). The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. , 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| Chicago | AYDIN Tuğba,Şen Ekin İlke,kesiktas nur,Bugdayci Derya,öneş kadriye,guven kaya sumeyye,KARACAN ILHAN The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. (2021): 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| MLA | AYDIN Tuğba,Şen Ekin İlke,kesiktas nur,Bugdayci Derya,öneş kadriye,guven kaya sumeyye,KARACAN ILHAN The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. , 2021, ss.183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| AMA | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. . 2021; 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| Vancouver | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. . 2021; 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| IEEE | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I "The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation." , ss.183 - 189, 2021. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| ISNAD | AYDIN, Tuğba vd. "The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation". (2021), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| APA | AYDIN T, Şen E, kesiktas n, Bugdayci D, öneş k, guven kaya s, KARACAN I (2021). The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. Ağrı, 33(3), 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| Chicago | AYDIN Tuğba,Şen Ekin İlke,kesiktas nur,Bugdayci Derya,öneş kadriye,guven kaya sumeyye,KARACAN ILHAN The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. Ağrı 33, no.3 (2021): 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| MLA | AYDIN Tuğba,Şen Ekin İlke,kesiktas nur,Bugdayci Derya,öneş kadriye,guven kaya sumeyye,KARACAN ILHAN The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. Ağrı, vol.33, no.3, 2021, ss.183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| AMA | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. Ağrı. 2021; 33(3): 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| Vancouver | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation. Ağrı. 2021; 33(3): 183 - 189. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| IEEE | AYDIN T,Şen E,kesiktas n,Bugdayci D,öneş k,guven kaya s,KARACAN I "The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation." Ağrı, 33, ss.183 - 189, 2021. 10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
| ISNAD | AYDIN, Tuğba vd. "The effect of post-amputation pain and phantom sensations on prosthesis use, body image, and quality of life in patients with lower-extremity amputation". Ağrı 33/3 (2021), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2020.83798 |
