The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gulsemin Bostanoglu, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ebelik Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Meltem BAL (Marmara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ebelik Bölümü, Türkiye)
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
1 1
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 251 - 257 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497 İndeks Tarihi: 13-01-2022

The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Öz:
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of continuous labor support by midwife. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled experimental design. Seventy primipara women were randomized into two groups, the continuous labor support by midwife group (n=35) and control group (n=35). In the experiment group was given the continuous midwife support and in the control group were undergone to routine hospital care in the clinic. Visual Analog Scale was used to assess women’s anxiety level and coping with labor pain. All interventions and childbirth time were recorded by the researcher. Results: Anxiety level decreased and the level of coping with labor pain increased in the experimental group (p<0.05). The total childbirth time in the intervention group was shorter by 2 hours and 21 minutes. Labor induction, episiotomy, amniotomy and perineal trauma were higher in the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Continuous labor support should be provided at each childbirth to enhance childbirth outcomes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Beech BA, Phipps B. Normal birth: women's stories. Downe S, editor. Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p.67-79.
  • [2] TDHS “Turkey Demographic and Health Survey". Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.C. Ministry of Development and TUBITAK. Ankara. Apple Technical Printing; 2018. p.5-8.
  • [3] NICE. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Clinical Guideline. 2017. (serial online) 3 December 2014 Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.
  • [4] Hodnett E, Lowe NK, Hannah ME, Willan AR. Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288(11):1373-1381.
  • [5] Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7(7):CD003766.
  • [6] Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6(7):CD003766.
  • [7] Zemla AJ, Sauer KN, Jarmoszewich K., Wera K, Batkiewitz S, Pietrzykowska M. Measures of preoperative anxiety. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2017; 51(1):64-69.
  • [8] Tumbilin A, Simkin P. Pregnat women's perceptions of their nurse's role during labor and delivery. Birth 2001;28(1):52-6.
  • [9] Dickinson JE, Paech MJ, McDonald SJ, Evans SF. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and intrapartum analgesia in nulliparous labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43(6):463- 10.
  • [10] Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 17(10):CD003766.
  • [11] Sangestani G, Khatiban M, Pourolajal J, Oshvandi K. Influence of doula on the primiparous parturients' anxiety in the delivery ward. J Hayat 2014; 19(4):48-60.
  • [12] Sehhatie F, Najjarzadeh M, Zamanzadeh V, Seyyedrasooli A. The effect of midwifery continuing care on childbirth outcomes. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014; 19(3):233-7.
  • [13] Sydsjö G, Blomberg M, Palmquist S, Angerbjörn L, Bladh M, Josefsson A. Effects of continuous midwifery labour support for women with severe fear of childbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 2-5.
  • [14] Fernández-Campos FJ, Escrivá D, Palanca JM, Ridocci F, Barrios C, Gallego J. Women’s acute anxiety variations before and after epidural anesthesia for childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 38 (2):152-158.
  • [15] Scott KD, Berkowitz G, Klaus M. Comparison of intermittent and continuous support during labor: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180(5):1054-9.
  • [16] Buckley SJ. Physiologic onset of labor and scheduled birth. Buckley SJ, editors. Hormonal physiology of childbearing: Evidence and implications for women, babies, and maternity care. Washington: Connecticut Avenue; 2015. p.14-26.
  • [17] Safarzadeh A, Beigi M, Salehian T, Khojasteh F, Burayri TT. Effect of doula support on labour pain and outcomes in primiparous women in Zahedan, Southeastern Iran: A randomized controlled trial. J Pain Relief 2012; 1:111-112.
  • [18] Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD004667.
  • [19] Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, Hu Z, Gong Y, Arier C. Lee, Qi Chen. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a CrossSectional study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18(1):480.
  • [20] Demirel G, Celik DB. Intervention to natural birth: Use of synthetic oxytocin. Sted 2013; 22(4): 157-164.
  • [21] Kenny TH, Nicodemo JM, Fenton BW, von Gruenigen, VE. Does quality “bundling” improve obstetrical outcomes? A comparative study of elective inductions. J Reprod Med 2013; 58(9-10):402-410.
  • [22] Hersh AR, Skeith AE, Sargent JA, Caughey AB. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10.
  • [23] Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20(65):1-584.
  • [24] Acharya T, Devkota R, Bhattarai B, Acharya, R. Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour. SAGE Open Medicine 2017;5: 1-7.
  • [25] Ergin A. Coping With Labor Pain. Bal MD, Yilmaz SD editors. Comprehensive birth for midwives. Ankara: Akademisyen Bookstore; 2017. p. 73-75.
  • [26] Beji NK. Labor. Beji NK editor. Women's health and diseases. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstores; 2015. p. 88-95.
  • [27] Sinclair AJ, Ramsay IN. The psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. The Obst and Gyna 2011; 13(3):143- 148.
  • [28] Sundquist JC. Long-term outcome after obstetric injury: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(6):715-718.
  • [29] Fitzpatrick M, O'Herlihy C. Short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury and their management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 17(6):605-610.
  • [30] Weledji EP, Elong A, Verla V. Secondary repair of severe chronic fourth-degree perineal tear due to obstetric trauma. J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5:1-3.
  • [31] Mota RL. Female urinary incontinence and sexuality. Int Braz J Urol 2017; 43(1):20-28.
  • [32] WHO. Evidence and recommendations. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. p.18- 35.
  • [33] Aguiar M, Farley A, Hope L, Amin A, Shah P, Manaseki-Holland S. Birt-related perineal trauma in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J 2019; 23(8):1048-1070.
  • [34] Orlovic M, Carter AW, Marti J, Mossialos E. Estimating the incidence and the economic burden of third and fourth-degree obstetric tears in the English NHS: an observational study using propensity score matching. BMJ Open 2017; 12:7(6):1-9.
  • [35] Bernitz S, Oian P, Rolland R, Sandvik L, Blix E. Oxytocin and dystocia as risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: A cohort of low-risk nulliparous women. Midwifery 2014; 30(3):364-370.
  • [36] Bugg GJ, Stanley E, Baker PN, Taggart MJ, Johnston TA. Outcomes of labors augmented with oxytocin. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124(1):37–41.
APA BOSTANOĞLU G, Demirgöz Bal M (2021). The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
Chicago BOSTANOĞLU GÜLSEMİN,Demirgöz Bal Meltem The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2021): 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
MLA BOSTANOĞLU GÜLSEMİN,Demirgöz Bal Meltem The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2021, ss.251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
AMA BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. . 2021; 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
Vancouver BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. . 2021; 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
IEEE BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M "The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial." , ss.251 - 257, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
ISNAD BOSTANOĞLU, GÜLSEMİN - Demirgöz Bal, Meltem. "The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial". (2021), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
APA BOSTANOĞLU G, Demirgöz Bal M (2021). The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11(2), 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
Chicago BOSTANOĞLU GÜLSEMİN,Demirgöz Bal Meltem The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11, no.2 (2021): 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
MLA BOSTANOĞLU GÜLSEMİN,Demirgöz Bal Meltem The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol.11, no.2, 2021, ss.251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
AMA BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(2): 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
Vancouver BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(2): 251 - 257. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
IEEE BOSTANOĞLU G,Demirgöz Bal M "The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11, ss.251 - 257, 2021. 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
ISNAD BOSTANOĞLU, GÜLSEMİN - Demirgöz Bal, Meltem. "The Effects of Continuous Labor Support by Midwife: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11/2 (2021), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.736497
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 14:32

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları