Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties

LEVENDOĞLU, Taner; KARSLI, M. Akif; Akdeniz, Hakkı; TERZİOĞLU, Ömer

Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties

M. Akif KARSLI, (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Hakkı AKDENİZ, (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastanesi, Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Taner LEVENDOĞLU, (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastanesi, Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Ömer TERZİOĞLU (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Van, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

2 0

Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 1291 - 1297 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties

Öz:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, dört farklı adi fiğ varyetesinin besin madde kompozisyonu, sindirilebilirliği, in situ N kinetiği ve by-pass protein içeriğini belirlemektir. Farklı özelliklerde dört farklı adi fiğ varyetesi (Emir 20/1, Nilüfer 17/1, 28/1 ve Uludağ 31/4) seçilmiştir. Fiğ parselleri 15 Haziran 2002'de, her varyete tesadüfi olarak seçilmiş üç tekerrür şeklinde ekilmiştir. Fiğler 11 Eylül'de çim makası kullanılarak elle hasat edilmiştir. Tüm örnekler kuru madde (KM), ham kül (HK), ham protein (HP), nötral deterjan fiber (NDF), asit deterjan fiber (ADF) ve asit deterjan solüsyonunda çözünmeyen azot (ADIN) içeriklerini belirlemek için analiz edilmiştir. Örneklerin in vitro KM sindirimi ve belli saatlerde in situ yıkılımları da belirlenmiştir. Örneklerin KM ve ADİN içerikleri benzer, organik madde, HP, NDF ve ADF içerikleri fiğ varyeteleri arasında anlamlı derecede farklı bulunmuştur (P < 0,05). Nilüfer 17/1 varyetesinin suda çözünen KM içeriği 28/1 varyetesine oranla anlamlı derecede yüksek (P < 0,05), ancak 48 saat inkubasyon sonrası in situ KM yıkılımları, in vitro KM sindirim, metabolik enerji ve net enerji laktasyon değerleri istatistiksel olarak varyeteler arasında benzer bulunmuştur (P > 0,05). 28/1 varyetesinin suda çözünen protein içeriği düşük, potansiyel olarak yıkımlanabilir protein, total sindirilebilir HP ve KM içerisindeki by-pass protein oranlan Nilüfer 17/1 ve Uludağ 31/4'e oranla daha yüksek bulunmuştur (P < 0,05). Ancak, yıkımlanmayan protein oranı, 48 saat inkubasyon sonrası HP yıkılımları fiğ varyeteleri arasında değişmemiştir (P > 0,05). Eğer yüksek by-pass protein içeriği arzulanıyorsa, 28/1 ve Emir 20/1 varyeteleri diğer varyetelere tercih edilebilir, aksi takdirde, enerji içerikleri ve sindirilmeyen HP içerikleri varyeteler arasında değişmediği için, KM sindirimi ve HP içerikleri baz alınarak Nilüfer 17/1 ve Uludağ 31/4 varyetelerinin ilk tercih olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime: adi fiğ fiğ sindirilebilirlik kimyasal bileşim besin değeri protein protein değeri

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Dört farklı adi fiğ varyetesinin besin madde içeriği ve protein fraksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesi

Öz:

The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition, digestibility, in situ N kinetics, and by-pass protein contents of 4 different common vetch varieties grown under irrigation. Four different common vetch varieties (Emir 20/1, Nilüfer 17/1, 28/1, and Uludağ 31/4) with different characteristics were selected. The vetch plots were planted on June 15 2002 and each variety was randomly assigned to 3 replications. The vetches were harvested by hand using a clipper on September 11. All samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN) concentrations. In vitro dry matter digestibility, and in situ degradabiiity of samples at given times were also determined. While the concentrations of DM and AD1N-N did not differ, concentrations of organic matter (OM), CP, NDF, and ADF varied significantly among different vetch varieties (P < 0.05). The water soluble DM content of Nilüfer 17/1 was significantly greater then that of 28/1 (P < 0.05), but in situ DM degradabilities after 48-h incubation, in vitro dry matter digestibilities, and metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy for lactation (NEL) values were statistically similar among the vetch varieties (P > 0.05). While the water soluble protein (WSP) concentration was lower, concentrations of potentially degradable protein (PDP), and by-pass CP as a percentage of total digestible CP or DM were significantly greater in 28/1 than in Nilüfer 17/1 and Uludağ 31/4 (P < 0.05). However, concentrations of non-degradable protein (NDP) and in situ CP degradabilities after 48-h incubation did not differ among the vetch varieties (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that if high by-pass protein content is desired, 28/1 and Emir 20/1 should be preferred over the other varieties. Otherwise, Nilüfer 17/1 and Uludağ 31/4 should be first choice, based on DM digestibility and CP contents, because the energy contents and percentage of non-digestible CP did not differ among the vetches.

Anahtar Kelime: protein value common vetch vetch digestibility chemical composition nutritive value protein

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Ergün, A., Tuncer, Ş.D.: Hayvan besleme ve beslenme hastalıkları, Medipress, Ankara. 2001.
2. Minson, D.J., Wison, J.R.: Prediction of intake as element of forage quality. In: Fahey, G.C., Jr., (Ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization, pp. 533-563. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI. 1994.
3. Weiden W.F., Hodgson, H.J., Jacobson, N.L.: Utilizing plant and animal resources in producing human food. J. Anim. Sci., 1975; 41:667-681.
4. Griffith, W.K.: Forages in the United States, perspective. J. Anim. Sci., 1978:47:708-715.
5. Broderick, G.A.: Desirable characteristics of forage legumes for improving protein utilization in ruminants. J. Ani«n. Sci., 1995; 73: 2760-2773.
6. Brown, W.F., Pittman W.D.: Concentration and degradation of nitrogen and fiber fractions in selected tropical grasses and legumes. Trop. Grass!., 1991; 25: 305-312.
7. NRC: Nutrient requirements of beef cattle (7th Ed.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 1996.
8. Buxton, D.R., Fales, S.L.: Quantifying forage protein quality. In: Fahey, G.C., Jr., (Ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization, pp. 200-229, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wl. 1994.
9. A.O.A.C: Official methods of analysis (13th-Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC. 1980.
10. Van Soet, P.J., Robertson J.B.: Systems of analyses for evaluation of fibrous feed. In: WJ. Pigden, C.C. Balch, M. Graham (Eds.) Proc. Int. Workshop on standardization of analytical methodology for feeds, pp. 49-60. Int. Dev. Res. Center, Ottawa, Canada.
11. Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J.: Forage fiber analyses. Apparatus, reagent, procedures and applications. USDA Agric. Handbook No. 379, 1970.
12. Tilley, J. M. A., Terry, R. A.: A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc, 1963; 18: 104-111.
13. Marten, G.C., Barnes, R.F.: Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems. In: WJ. Pigden, C.C. Balch, M.Graham, (Eds.) Proc. Int. Workshop on standardization of analytical methodology for feed. Int. Dev. Res. Center, Ottawa, Canada. 1980.
14. Türkmen, İ.İ.: Ruminant yem değerlendirme sistemleri ve karma yem maddeleri. İn: H.M. Yavuz, (Ed.) Çiftlik hayvanlarının beslenmesinde temel prensipler ve karma yem üretiminde bazı bilimsel yaklaşımlar. Farmavet, İstanbul, 2001.
15. Farquhar, A.S.: Kinetics of alfalfa nitrogen and cell wall disappearance from ruminally-incubated dacron bags. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, 1985.
16. Muhalley, J.J., Waller, S.S., Moore, K.J., Moser, L.E., Klopfenstein, T. J.: İn situ ruminal degradation of switchgras and smooth-bromegrass. Agron. J., 1992; 84: 183-188.
17. SAS User's Guide.: Statistics, Version 5 ed. SAS inst, Inc., Cary, NC. 1985.
18. Caballero, R., Alzueta, C, Ortiz, L.T., Rodriguez, M. L, Barro, C, Rebole, A.: Carbohydrate and protein fractions of fresh and dried common vetch at three maturity stages. Agron. J., 2001; 93: 1006-1013.
19. Smith, B.W.: Feed industry red book. Communications Marketing, Inc., MN. 1990.
20. Deniz, S., Nursoy, N., Yılmaz, İ., Karslı, M.A.: Vejetasyonun farklı devrelerinde hasat edilmenin bazı mısır varyetelerinde besin madde içeriği ve silaj kalitesi ile sindirilebilir kuru madde miktarına etkisi. S. Ü. Vet Bil. Derg., 2001; 17: 43-49.
21. Nelson, C.J., Moser, L.E.: Factors affecting forage quality. In: Fahey, G.C., Jr., (Ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization, pp. 115-154. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wl. 1994.
22. Karslı, M.A., Russell, J.R.: Prediction of the voluntary intake and digestibility of forage-based diets from chemical composition and ruminal degradation characteristics. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. ScL, 2002; 26:249-255.
23. Çelik, S.: Van ekolojik koşullarında yetiştirilen mısır ve macar fiği yem bitkilerinden yapılan karma silajların kaliteleri ve rumende ham besin madde yıkılmalarının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, 2000.

APA	KARSLI M, Akdeniz H, LEVENDOĞLU T, TERZİOĞLU Ö (2005). Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. , 1291 - 1297.
Chicago	KARSLI M. Akif,Akdeniz Hakkı,LEVENDOĞLU Taner,TERZİOĞLU Ömer Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. (2005): 1291 - 1297.
MLA	KARSLI M. Akif,Akdeniz Hakkı,LEVENDOĞLU Taner,TERZİOĞLU Ömer Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. , 2005, ss.1291 - 1297.
AMA	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. . 2005; 1291 - 1297.
Vancouver	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. . 2005; 1291 - 1297.
IEEE	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö "Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties." , ss.1291 - 1297, 2005.
ISNAD	KARSLI, M. Akif vd. "Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties". (2005), 1291-1297.

APA	KARSLI M, Akdeniz H, LEVENDOĞLU T, TERZİOĞLU Ö (2005). Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29(6), 1291 - 1297.
Chicago	KARSLI M. Akif,Akdeniz Hakkı,LEVENDOĞLU Taner,TERZİOĞLU Ömer Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29, no.6 (2005): 1291 - 1297.
MLA	KARSLI M. Akif,Akdeniz Hakkı,LEVENDOĞLU Taner,TERZİOĞLU Ömer Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.29, no.6, 2005, ss.1291 - 1297.
AMA	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2005; 29(6): 1291 - 1297.
Vancouver	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2005; 29(6): 1291 - 1297.
IEEE	KARSLI M,Akdeniz H,LEVENDOĞLU T,TERZİOĞLU Ö "Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29, ss.1291 - 1297, 2005.
ISNAD	KARSLI, M. Akif vd. "Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29/6 (2005), 1291-1297.