Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 691 - 706 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.36681/tused.2021.98 İndeks Tarihi: 09-06-2022

What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?

Öz:
This study aims to determine pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of blackbody radiation. Designed as a qualitative study, it employed a case study design, which is one of the descriptive research methods. The study group consists of 18 pre-service physics teachers enrolled as seniors. An opinion form and a concept map were used as data collection tools. In other words, results were intended to be comparatively examined by using two different qualitative data collection methods. Pre-service teachers’ answers were analysed with the help of answer sculptures. At the end of the study, it was determined that while pre-service teachers generally have the correct conceptual structure, they still have some specific gaps in knowledge. It was seen that pre-service teachers have problems with understanding, especially the Wien law and electromagnetic radiation taking place in black-body radiation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ayene, M., Kriek, J., & Damtie, B. (2011). Wave-particle duality and uncertainty principle: phenomenographic categories of description of tertiary physics students’ depictions. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1–13. 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113
  • Balta, N. (2018). High school teachers’ understanding of blackbody radiation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 23-43. 10.1007/s10763-016-9769-z
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Observation. In Research Methods in Education, 396-412. 10.4324/9780203029053
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  • DeVore, S., & Singh, C. (2015). Development of an interactive tutorial on quantum key distribution. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 59–62.10.1119/perc.2014. pr.011
  • Didiş, N. (2012). Investigation of undergraduate students’ mental models about the quantization of physical observables [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Ejigu, M. A. (2014). Conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics: an investigation into physics students’ depictions of the basic concepts of quantum mechanics [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
  • Emigh, P. J., Passante, G., & Shaffer, P. S. (2013). Student understanding of blackbody radiation and its application to everyday objects. 2013 Physics Education Research Conference, Portland.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Galvez, E. J. (2008). Photon quantum mechanical labs. The annual meeting of American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), Edmonton.
  • Gearhart., C. (2009). Black-body radiation, In Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K., & Weinert, F. (Eds.), Compendium of quantum physics: concepts, experiments, history and philosophy (pp. 39–42). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Görecek Baybars, M., & Küçüközer, H. (2014). The pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of quantum physics. MSKU Journal of Education, 1(1). 10.21666/mskuefd.36735
  • Henriksen, E. K., Bungum, B., Angell, C., Tellefsen, C. W., Fraget, T., & Vetleseter Boe, M. (2014). Relativity, quantum physics and philosophy in the upper secondary curriculum: challenges, opportunities and proposed approaches. Physics Education, 49(6), 678–684. 10.1088/0031- 9120/49/6/678
  • Hinojosa, C. M. (2008). Learning the uncertainty principle: A study of its difficulties. The annual meeting of American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), Edmonton.
  • Johansson, K. E., & Milstead, D. (2008). Uncertainty in the classroom-teaching quantum physics. Physics Education, 43(2), 173–179. 10.1088/0031-9120/43/2/006
  • Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446. 10.1080/0950069980200404
  • Kara, F., & Kefeli, N. (2018). The effect of using concept maps on student’s success, logical thinking and attitudes towards science. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 594-619. 10.17522/balikesirnef.506475
  • Ke, J., Monk, M., & Duschl, R. (2005). Learning Introductory Quantum Physics: Sensori‐motor experiences and mental models. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1571–1594. 10.1080/09500690500186485
  • Kınık Topalsan, A., & Bayram, H. (2019). Identifying prospective primary school teachers’ ontologically categorized misconceptions on the topic of “force and motion”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 85-109. 10.12973/tused.10268a
  • Kohnle, A., Bozhinova, I., Browne, D., Everitt, M., Fomins, A., Kok, P., Kulaitis, G., Prokopas, M., Raine, D., & Swinbank, E. (2014). A new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum. European Journal of Physics, 35(1), 015001. 10.1088/0143-0807/35/1/015001
  • Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1). 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109
  • Kural, M. (2015). Teaching for hot conceptual change: an example of grade 11 modern physics [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Balikesir University Institute of Science, Balikesir.
  • Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365- 375. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
  • Ladj, R., Oldache, M., Khiari, C. E., & Belarbi, T. (2010). On students’ misunderstanding of the basic concepts of quantum mechanics: the case of Algerian Universities. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 4(2), 286-293.
  • Lancor, R., & Lancor, B. (2018). Solar cookers in the physics classroom. The Physics Teacher, 56(9), 607– 610. 10.1119/1.5080574
  • Lautesse, P., Vila Valls, A., Ferlin, F., Héraud, J. L., & Chabot, H. (2015). Teaching Quantum Physics in Upper Secondary School in France: ‘Quanton’ Versus ‘Wave–Particle’ Duality, Two Approaches of the Problem of Reference. Science and Education, 24(7–8), 937–955. 10.1007/s11191-015-9755-9
  • Macleod, K. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of teaching STSE-Based high school physics: Implications for post-secondary studies. European Journal of Physics Education, 5(1), 1-15. 10.20308/ejpe.v5i1.59
  • Mashhadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students’ understanding of quantum physics: Visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20(6), 511–516. 10.1088/0143- 0807/20/6/317
  • Marshman, E., & Singh, C. (2016). Interactive tutorial to improve student understanding of single photon experiments involving a Mach–Zehnder interferometer. European Journal of Physics, 37(2), 024001. 10.1088/0143-0807/37/2/024001
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
  • McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Design and validation of the quantum mechanics conceptual survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1– 17. 10.1103 /PhysRevSTPER.6.020121
  • Melo, L., Cañada-Cañada, F., González-Gómez, D., & Jeong, J. S. (2020). Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of Physics Teachers in a Colombian Secondary School. Education Sciences, 10(12), 362. 10.3390/educsci10120362
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdale, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Josey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52. 10.1007/BF00377984
  • Novak, J. D., Bob Gowin, D., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625–645. 10.1002/sce.3730670511
  • Ogborn, J., & Taylor., E. F. (2004). Quantum physics explains Newton’s laws of motion. Physics Education, 40(1), 26–34. 10.1088/0031-9120/40/1/001
  • Ohle, A., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Investigating the impact of teachers’ physics CK on students’ outcomes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1211–1233. 10.1007 /s10763-014-9547-8
  • Olsen, R. V. (2002). Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565–574. 10.1080/09500690110073982
  • Özdemir, E. (2017). Comics in modern physics: Learning blackbody radiation through quasi-history of physics. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 1(1), 41-59.
  • Park, E. J. (2006). Student perception and conceptual development as represented by student mental models of atomic structure [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. The Ohio State University, Ohio.
  • Passante, G., Emigh. P. J., & Shaffer, P. S. (2015). Examining student ideas about energy measurements on quantum states across undergraduate and graduate levels. Physical Review Special TopicsPhysics Education Research, 11(2), 1–10. 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020111
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & Evaluation methods. Sage.
  • Persson, J. R. (2018). Evolution of quasi-history of the Planck blackbody radiation equation in a physics textbook. American Journal of Physics, 86(12), 887–892. 10.1119/1.5054005
  • Pinochet, J. (2019). Five misconceptions about black holes. Physics Education, 54(5), 055003. 10.1088/1361-6552/ab26c3
  • Ranganath, G. S. (2008). Black-body radiation. Resonance, 13(2), 115–133. 10.1007/s12045-008-0028-7
  • Ribeiro, C. I. (2014). Blackbody Radiation from an Incandescent Lamp. The Physics Teacher, 52(6), 371– 372. 10.1119/1.4893096
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600. 10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(199608)33:6<569::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Sadaghiani, H. R. (2005). Conceptual and mathematical barriers to students learning quantum mechanics [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Ohio State University, Ohio.
  • Sadoğlu, G. P., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2015). Turkish student’s perception about the black body radiation, photoelectric effect and Compton scattering phenomena. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(3), 309-326. 10.5296/jse.v5i3.8109
  • Saljö, R. (1994). Minding action: Conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices. Nordisk Pedagogik, 14(2), 71-80.
  • Serway, R. A. (1996). Physics for scientists and engineers, with modern physics (4th ed.). Saunders College.
  • Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 69(8), 885– 895. 10.1119/1.1365404
  • Singh, C. (2006). Student difficulties with quantum mechanics formalism. Physics Education Research Conference, New York, 26-27 July, pp. 883.
  • Shi., W. Z. (2013). The effect of peer interactions on quantum physics: A study from China. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(2), 152–158.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage.
  • Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682. 10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0
  • Ünlü Yavaş, P., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2018). Investigating the causes of students’ having difficulties in the introductory quantum physics topics. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(1), 25-73.
  • Vadnere, R., & Joshi, P. (2009). On analysis of the perceptions of standard 12 students regarding a physics concept using techniques of quantum mechanics. Physics Education, 26, 279-290.
  • Ventura, R. D., Carvalho, S. P., & Dias, A. M. (2017). Standing waves in an elastic spring: A systematic study by video analysis. The Physics Teacher, 55, 232-234. 10.1119/1.4978723
  • Vokos, S., Shaffer, P. S., Ambrose, B. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2000). Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: diffraction and interference of particles. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S42–S51. 10.1119/1.19519
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Yalçın, O., & Emrahoğlu, N. (2017). Examining the high school students’ transfer levels of modern physics topics to daily life. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 7(1), 115-158. 10.14527/pegegog.2017.005
  • Yener, D., Köklü, N., Yamaç, R. Z., & Yalçın, S. (2020). Analysis of the studies done on laboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 162-179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods, applied social research methods. Sage.
APA Bezen S, Aykutlu I, bayrak c (2021). What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. , 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
Chicago Bezen Sevim,Aykutlu Işıl,bayrak celal What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. (2021): 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
MLA Bezen Sevim,Aykutlu Işıl,bayrak celal What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. , 2021, ss.691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
AMA Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. . 2021; 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
Vancouver Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. . 2021; 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
IEEE Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c "What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?." , ss.691 - 706, 2021. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
ISNAD Bezen, Sevim vd. "What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?". (2021), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.98
APA Bezen S, Aykutlu I, bayrak c (2021). What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
Chicago Bezen Sevim,Aykutlu Işıl,bayrak celal What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. Journal of Turkish Science Education 18, no.4 (2021): 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
MLA Bezen Sevim,Aykutlu Işıl,bayrak celal What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol.18, no.4, 2021, ss.691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
AMA Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2021; 18(4): 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
Vancouver Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2021; 18(4): 691 - 706. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
IEEE Bezen S,Aykutlu I,bayrak c "What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?." Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18, ss.691 - 706, 2021. 10.36681/tused.2021.98
ISNAD Bezen, Sevim vd. "What Does Black-body Radiation Mean for Pre-Service Physics Teachers?". Journal of Turkish Science Education 18/4 (2021), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.98