Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 162 - 179 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.36681/tused.2020.19 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2021
Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey
Öz: The aim of this study is to determine the trend of studies in the laboratory and put the current situation in Turkey. For this purpose, document analysis technique, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data group of the research consists of thesis studies on laboratories in our country between 1999-2017. Theses in the fields of science, physics, chemistry, and biology have been determined and themes and sub-themes have been created through the keywords of these theses. Then, frequency tables were created according to the themes and sub-themes created. According to the findings obtained, it was seen that the traditional laboratory approach and inquiry-based laboratory approaches are compared in the studies. It was determined that the studies were done on physics subjects and it was determinedthatcomplementarymeasurementandevaluationstudiesperformedforperformance evaluation were used in very fewnumbers. In addition, it was concluded that the keywords did not give enough information about the studies. In this context, it can be suggested to examine the effectiveness of these approaches according to each other and experiment types by examining theapproaches in which students can be more active in laboratories.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Airasian, P. W. (2001). Assessment in the classroom a concise approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Akben, N. & Köseoğlu, F. (2010). Laboratory activity sample based on inquiry on the subject of elementary education fifth grade density. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences,5(3), 1281-1289.
- Alkan, F. & Koçak, C. (2015). Chemistry laboratory applications supported with simulations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (176), 970-976.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.566
- Antonio, V. V. (2018). Science laboratory interest and preferences of teacher education studies: Implications to science teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisiplinary Research, 6(3), 57-67.
- Aydın, M. (2010). The compare effect of using prediction-observe-explain method on students’ achievement in science and technology of remediation of misconceptions. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Zonguldak Kara Elmas University.
- Aydoğdu, B. & Ergin, Ö. (2010, November 11-13). Effects of different experimental techniques used in science and technologylesson on students' learning approaches.[Conference presentation]. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya.
- Aydoğdu, C. (2018). Historical development of laboratory in the elementary school science program in Turkey. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Iowa: ISRES Publishing.
- Baysal, Y. E., Mutlu, F. & Kış, A. (2019). The effect of laboratory applications based on modern approaches on the attitudes of the students in turkey in laboratory courses: a meta-analysis study. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(3), 802-817.https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-531395
- Bekiroğlu, F. O. (2004). How successful? classical and alternative measurement-evaluation methods and applications in physics.Ankara: Nobel Publications.
- Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B, Lundberg, B. & Tibell, L. (2003) Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment, International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
- Brownell, H. & Wade, F. B. (1925). The teaching of science and the science teacher. New York: Century Company.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2011). Scientific research methods (8thed.), Ankara: Pegem Academy.https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
- Cerit Berber, N. (2013). The relationship of the physics laboratory based on deductive approach with the critical thinking tendencies of prospective teachers. Journal of National Education, (197), 228-243.
- Ceylan, E. & Saygıner, Ş. (2017, October 27-28). An alternative to traditional laboratory practices in science and mathematics education: PhET simulations.[Conference presentation]. International Educational Technologies Symposium. Sivas.
- Chang, C. & Mao, S. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan Science Students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction, The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597617
- Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002). Science education in the middle and secondary schools(5th edn.) Upper Saddle River.NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
- Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research pattern. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches(2nded.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
- Çelik, H., Katrancı, M. & Çakır, E. (2017). The effect of the open-ended enquirer-inquiry laboratory approach to creative thinking skill in science teaching. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, (2), 1-10.
- Çelik, H. (2018). Science teaching with laboratory approaches. In O. Karamustafaoğlu, Ö. Tezel, & U. Sarı (Eds.), Activity supported science teaching with current approaches and methods(1sted., pp.239-283). Ankara: PegemA Academy.
- Çepni, S & Ayvacı, H. (2010). Laboratory supported science and technology teaching. In S. Çepni (Ed). Science and technology teaching from theory to practice(pp. 177-237). Ankara: PegemA Academy.https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053186496.08
- Çepni, S. (2007). Introduction to research and project studies, (3rded.). Trabzon: Celepler.
- Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D. & Turgut, F. (1997). Physics teaching. Ankara: CoHE/World Bank National Education Development Project Pre-Service Teacher Education.
- Demirci, N. (2001). The effects of a web-based physics software program on students’ achievement and misconceptions in force and motion concepts. [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Florida Institute of Technology.
- Demirci, N. & Çınkı, A. (2009). The effect of using V-Diagrams on the success of primary school 6th grade students in science experiments. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 28, 23-36.
- Demirezen, S. (2010). Effect of 7e model on electric circuits on students' success, development of scientific process skills, conceptual achievements, and permanence levels.[Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Gazi University.
- Deveci, İ. (2018). Middle school science laboratory academic risk-taking scale: validity and reliability study. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 1861-1876.
- Dindar, H. & Yaman, S. (2003). The status of instructional technology in the primary schools and classroom teachers’ level of using these technologies. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 13(13), 167-176.
- Doğru, M., Gençosman, T., Ataalkın, A. N., & Şeker, F. (2012). Analysis of the postgraduate and doctoral theses conducted on sciences education Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1), 49-64.
- Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles.Journal of Chemical Education,76(4), 543-547
- Duru, M.K., Demir, S., Önen, F. & Benzer, E. (2011). THE effects of inquiry-based laboratory applications to preservice science teachers’ laboratory environment perceptions, attitudes and scientific process skills. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences,(33), 25-44.
- Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-32.
- Gürel, C., & Hesapçıoğlu, M. (2002). THE evaluation of curriculum laboratory schools from the viewpoint of physics education. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 15, 137-150.
- Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: thirty years of experience with development, implementation and research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264.https://doi.org/10.1039/b4rp90027h
- Huyugüzel Çavaş, P. (2004). Processing of the electrical unit directing our life in primary science course according to the learning cycle. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Ege University.
- Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2019). Analyzing the Relationships between Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 299-313.
- Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research (4thed.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
- Kanlı, U. & Yağbasan, R. (2008). The efficacy of the 7E learning cycle model based on laboratory approach on development of students science process skills. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 28(1), 91-125.
- Karamustafaoğlu, O. & Yaman, S. (2006). Special teaching methods in science education I-II. Ankara: Anı.
- Karslı, F. & Ayas, A. (2013). Is it possible to eliminate alternative conceptions and to ımprove scientific process skills with different conceptual change methods? ‘an example of electrochemical cells’. Journal of Computer and Educational Research, 1(1), 1-26.
- Karslı Baydere, F. & Şahin Çakır, Ç. (2019). The effect of laboratory practices based on scientific process skills on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy in scientific process skills. Online ScienceEducation Journal, 4(2), 117-130.
- Kiras, B. (2019). Subject Orientation and Methodological Analysis of Science Education Thesis Theme in Turkey.[Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.
- Koç Şenol, A. (2012). Robotic Supported Science and Technology Laboratory Applications: Robolab. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Erciyes University.
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: an overview.Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Kurt, S. & Birinci Konur, K. (2017). Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Impressions towards Chemistry Experiments Based on Constructivist Laboratory Approach. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(3), 145-161.https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.296545
- Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Millar R., Tiberghien, A. & Maréchal J. F. (2002). Varieties of Labwork: A Way of Profiling Labwork Tasks. In. Psillos, D., Niedderer H. (Eds.). Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory. Science & Technology Education Library,Dordrecht: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48196-0_3
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2004). Primary school science and technology lesson (6th, 7th, and 8th grades) curriculum. Ankara.
- Morgil, İ., Güngör Seyhan, H. & Seçken, N. (2009). Investigating the effects of project-oriented chemistry experiments on some affective and cognitive field components. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 89-107.
- National Education Association. (1894). Report of the Committee of Ten secondary school studies. New York, American Book Company.
- Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908-937.https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20169
- Özmen, H. (2004). Learning theories and technology supported constructivist learning in science education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 100-111.
- Özmen, H. & Yiğit, N. (2005). Laboratory use in science education. Ankara: Anı.
- Pugh, C. (1991). The globalisation of finance capital and the changing relationships between property and finance –1. Journal of Property Finance, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/09588689110033027
- Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for masses: The origins of the “scientific method” in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45(2), 341-376.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5959.2005.tb00039.x
- Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. & Stevens, R. (2012). Effect of cooperative problem-based lab instruction metacognition and problem-solving skills. Journal of Chemical Education,(89), 700-706.https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1011844
- Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L. & Schweingruber, H. A. (2006).America’s lab report: Investigation in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Sun, K., Lin, Y. & Yu, C. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computer & Education, (50), 1411-1422.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.003
- Şahin Pekmez, E., Aktamış, H. & Can, B. (2010). The effectiveness of science laboratory course regarding the scientific process skills and scientific creativity of prospective teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(1), 93-112.
- Şenkal, O & Dinçer, S. (2016). The trend of the work done in the field of physics education in Turkey. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 25(2), 57-70.
- Şimşekli, Y. (2018). Investigation of the experiment design skills of biology and science teachers and preservice teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 199-207.https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3564
- Tiftikçi, H. İ., Yüksel, İ., Koç, A. & Çıbık A. S. (2017). The effect of laboratory applications based on prediction observation explanation method to eliminate the misconceptions about electrical current and on success. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 18(Special ed.), 19-29.
- Turgut, M. F. (1994). Measurement and evaluation methods in education.Ankara: Yargıcı.
- Uluçınar, Ş., Doğan, A. & Kaya, O. N. (2008). Views of elementary teachers on science teaching and laboratory. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(2), 485-494.
- Ulukök, Ş., Çelik, H. & Sarı, U. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction of simple circuits on experimental process skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(1), 77-101.
- Whewell, W. (1858). The history of inductive sciences, from earliest to the present time(3rd). New York: Appleton.
- Whitman, F. P. (1898). The beginnings of laboratory teaching in America. Science, New Series 8(190), 201-206.
- Yener, D. (2010). Determining the effectiveness of the rearranged experiment papers for performance evaluation in physic laboratories. [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Selçuk University.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (10thed.). Ankara: Seçkin.
- Yıldırım, N. (2016). Opinions of pre-service classroom teachers towards laboratory using in science instruction and their preferences towards laboratory approaches. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(3), 208-222.https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1304
- Yıldız Feyizoğlu, E. & Tatar, N. (2012). An analysis of the activities in elementary science and technology textbooks according to science process skills and structural characteristics. Education & Science, 37(164), 108-125.
- Yüksel, İ. & Ateş, S. (2019). Developing scientific reasoning skills test. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 8(3), 635-650.
| APA | Yener D, KOKLU N, YAMAÇ R, YALÇIN S (2020). Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. , 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| Chicago | Yener Dündar,KOKLU NIGMET,YAMAÇ Ramazan Ziya,YALÇIN Seher Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. (2020): 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| MLA | Yener Dündar,KOKLU NIGMET,YAMAÇ Ramazan Ziya,YALÇIN Seher Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. , 2020, ss.162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| AMA | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. . 2020; 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| Vancouver | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. . 2020; 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| IEEE | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S "Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey." , ss.162 - 179, 2020. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| ISNAD | Yener, Dündar vd. "Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey". (2020), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| APA | Yener D, KOKLU N, YAMAÇ R, YALÇIN S (2020). Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| Chicago | Yener Dündar,KOKLU NIGMET,YAMAÇ Ramazan Ziya,YALÇIN Seher Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education 17, no.2 (2020): 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| MLA | Yener Dündar,KOKLU NIGMET,YAMAÇ Ramazan Ziya,YALÇIN Seher Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol.17, no.2, 2020, ss.162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| AMA | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2020; 17(2): 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| Vancouver | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2020; 17(2): 162 - 179. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| IEEE | Yener D,KOKLU N,YAMAÇ R,YALÇIN S "Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey." Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17, ss.162 - 179, 2020. 10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
| ISNAD | Yener, Dündar vd. "Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey". Journal of Turkish Science Education 17/2 (2020), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.19 |
