TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 651 - 671 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2022
TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ
Öz: Bu çalışmada, temel benlik değerlendirmesinin güç izlenim algısı üzerindeki etkisinde duygu
düzenlemenin aracı rolünün ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bireylerin temel benlik
değerlendirmesi algıları, sosyal bilişsel kuram çerçevesinde, duygu düzenlemeyi sağlamada öncülük
eden kaynaklar arasında görülmektedir. Bireylerin temel benlik değerlendirmesi sayesinde
kendilerine yönelik değerlendirmeleri arttıkça ne yapıp ne yapamayacakları konusunda fikir sahibi
olacakları yani öz yeterlilik inançlarının gelişeceği ve bu sayede duygularını olumlu veya olumsuz
yönde düzenleyebilecekleri düşünülmektedir. Bununla birlikte bireylerin güç izlenimlerini nasıl
algıladıkları kendilerini nasıl tanımladıklarına bağlı olarak değişebilmektedir. Bireylerde anlam
oluşturabilen güç izleniminin fiziksel kaynaklara dayalı bir güç izlenim algısına nazaran daha etkili
olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Buradan hareketle, öz yeterlilik, özgüven ve özsaygı inançlarının
katalizör etkisiyle, çalışanların temel benlik değerlendirme algıları arttıkça, duygu düzenleme
yeteneklerinin de artacağı bunun sonucunda güç izlenim algılarının içsel kaynaklara dayanacağı
düşünülmektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemi Sinop ilindeki 261 çalışandan oluşmaktadır. Tanımlayıcı
nicel araştırma yöntemi çerçevesinde 5’li Likert tipi ölçekler kullanılmıştır. Kesitsel tarama
çerçevesinde yüz yüze anket yöntemi ile toplanan verilerin analizleri için istatistik paket programları
kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre temel benlik değerlendirmesinin güç izlenim algısı üzerinde
duygu düzenleme gizli değişken olduğu durumda etkisi %57 iken (β= 0,573, p<0,01), duygu
düzenlemenin ilişkiden çekildiği durumda bu etki %29’a düşmekte fakat ilişki
anlamsızlaşmamaktadır (β= 0,296, p<0,01).
Anahtar Kelime: The Mediation Effect of Emotion Regulation on the Relationship Between Core-Self Evaluation and Personal Sense of PowerIn this study, it is aimed to reveal the mediation role of emotion regulation on the relationship between core-self-evaluation an
Öz: In this study, it is aimed to reveal the mediation role of emotion regulation on the relationship
between core-self-evaluation and personal sense of power. Core-self-evaluation perceptions of
employees are seen among the sources leading to emotion regulation within the framework of social cognitive theory. It is thought that employees will have an idea about what they can and
cannot do as their assessments towards themselves increase by means of core-self-assessment, in
short their self-efficacy beliefs will develop and thus, they can organize their feelings in a positive or
negative way. Besides their thoughts of personal sense of power depends on how they define
themselves. Making sense on members of organization is seen as more powerful than a power
depends on physical resources. From this point of view, with the catalytic effect of self-efficacy,
self-esteem and confidence beliefs, it is thought that as the core-self-evaluation perceptions of the
employees increase, the emotion regulation will increase. Through this personal sense of power is
thought depends on internal resources than physical resources. In this context, firstly, the
conceptual framework for the concepts of core-self-evaluation, emotion regulation and personal
sense of power is given, and then findings and results are presented for the survey application in
the research section. The sample of the study consists of 261 employees in Sinop province. A 5-
point Likert-type scale was used within frames of descriptive quantitative research method.
Package programs were used to analyze of the data collected by the face-to-face survey method in
cross sectional method. According to the results of analyses; the total effect on the personal sense
of power is observed as % 57 (β= 0,573, p<0,01) and the direct effect decreased to % 29 with
keeping its significance when emotion regulation is in mediation role (β= 0,296, p<0,01).
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Alessandri, G., Perinelli, E., De Longis, E., Schaufeli, W. B., Theodorou, A., Borgogni, L., Caprara, G. V. and Cingue, L. (2018). Job burnout: The contribution of emotional stability and emotional self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 823-851.
- Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M. and Caprara, G. V. (2014). Assessment of regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs: A review of the status of the art and some suggestions to move the field forward. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(1), 24-32. doi: 10.1177/07344282914550382
- Anderson, C., John, O. P. and Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313-344.
- Arseven, A. (2016). Öz yeterlilik: Bir kavram analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(19), 63-80.
- Arslan, A. ve Yener, S. (2015). Temel benlik değerlendirmeleri-girişimci kişilik ilişkisinde ençoklamacı karar verme yaklaşımının aracı değişken rolü: Konya örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 283-310.
- Astin, J. (1997). Stress reduction through mindfulness meditation. Psychotherapy Psychosomatic, 66, 97-106. doi: 10.1159/000289116
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1989a). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.
- Bandura, A. (1989b). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self- efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729-735.
- Bandura, A. and Wood, R. E. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805-814. doi: 10.1.1.111.1192
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of personality, 2, 154-196.
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
- Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
- Best, R. G. (2003). Are self-evaluations at the core of job burnout? Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kansas State University.
- Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality Eur. J. Pers., 17, 5-18.
- Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 353-363.
- Buchanan, D. and Huczynski, A. (2004). Organizational Behaviour (4th edition). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
- Bugental, D. B. and Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51-64. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00104
- Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A. and Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3, 48-67. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48
- Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C. and Tramontano, C. (2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. American Psychological Association, 20(3), 227–237. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227
- Consiglio, C., Borgogni, L., Alessandri, G. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Does self-efficacy matter for burnout and sickness absenteeism? The mediating role of demands and resources at the individual and team levels. Work & Stress, 27(1), 22–42. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2013.769325
- Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
- Demirtaş, A. S. (2018). Duygu düzenleme stratejileri ve benlik saygısının mutluluğu yordayıcılığı. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(11), 487-503. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.13465
- Dou, K., Wang, Y. J., Bin, J. L. and Liu, Y. Z. (2016). Core self-evaluation, regulatory emotional self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms: Testing two mediation models. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(3), 391-399. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.3.391.
- Eisenberg, A. P. (2000). The search for integrity: A leadership impact study. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Depaul University.
- Erez, A. and Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270-1279. doi: 10.1037//0021- 9010.86.6.1270
- Fast, N. J. and Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological science, 20(11), 1406-1413.
- Field A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London: Sage.
- French, J. and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (259-269). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
- Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H. and Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
- Goodall, K., Trejnowska, A. and Darling, S. (2012). The relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attachment security and emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 622-626. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.008
- Goodstadt, B. and Hjelle, L. (1973). Power to the powerless: Locus of control and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 190-196. doi: 10.1037/h0034784.
- Grant, A. M. and Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I Won't Let You Down ... or Will I? Core-selfevaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 108-121. doi: 10.1037/a0017974.
- Greenberg, L. S. (2010). Emotion-focused therapy: An overview. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(33), 1-12.
- Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent and response focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237.
- Gross, J. J. and John, P. O. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Pscyhology, 85(2), 348-362. doi: 10.1.1.688.115
- Gross, J. J. and Levenson, R. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970-986.
- Gürbüz, S., Erkuş, A. ve Sığrı, Ü. (2010). İş tatmini ve iş performansının bir öncülü: Temel benlik değerlendirmesi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 69-76.
- Hartman, T. (2010). Mindfulness and well-being: testing for mediation and predictiveness. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Illinois, USA, Eastern Illinois University.
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
- John, O. P. and Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1333.
- Jones, A. M. and York, S. L. (2016). The fragile balance of power and leadership. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 9(2), 1-14.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A. and Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 257-268. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.257
- Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. and Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331.
- Judge, T. A. and Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
- Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. and Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17- 34.
- Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A. and Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151- 188.
- Kalokerinos, E. K., Greenaway, K. H. and Denson, T. F. (2014). Reappraisal but not suppression downregulates the experience of positive and negative emotion. Emotion, 271-275. doi: 10.1037/emo0000025
- Kittinger, J. D., Walker, A. G., Cope, J. G. and Wuensch, K. L. (2009). The relationship between core self-evaluations and affective commitment. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, 68-92. doi: 10.1.1.566.4122
- Koole, S. L. (2010). The psychology of emotion regulation: an integrative review. (In J. D. Houwerand ve D. Hermans (Eds), Cognition and emotion: Reviews of current research and theories (128-167). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
- Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K. and Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
- Lefcourt, H. M. (1966). Internal-external control of reinforcement. Psychological Bulletin, 65(4), 206-220.
- Nezlek, J. and Kuppens, P. (2008). Regulating positive and negative emotions in daily life. Journal of Personality, 76, 561-580. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00496.x.
- Macklam, G. L. (2010). Practitioner’s guide to emotion regulation in school-aged children. New York, NY: Springer Science.
- Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Holt.
- McRae, K., Misra, S., Prasad, A. K., Periera, S. C. and Gross, J. J. (2009). Bottom-up and topdown emotion generation: Implications for emotion regulation. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(3), 253-262. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq103
- Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
- Pajares, F. and Miller, D. M. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
- Pajares. F. and Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353-360.
- Randhawa, S. B., Beamer, E. J. and Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 41-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.41
- Raven, B. H. and Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Conflict and power. In P. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict (69-109). New York: Academic Press.
- Park, J. K. and Roedder, J. D. (2014). I think I can, I think I can: Brand use, self-efficacy, and performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 233-247. doi: 10.1509/jmr.11.0532
- Parrott, W. G. (1993). Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. In D. M. Wegner, & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (278-308). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- Schunk, H. D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207- 231.
- Seligman, M. E., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F. and Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future of driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119-141.
- Shiota, M. N. and Kalat, J. W. (2012). Emotion (2. Baskı). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
- Shoutham-Gerow, M. A. (2014). Çocuklarda ve ergenlerde duygusal düzenleme. Uygulayıcının rehberi (Şahin M. Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
- Süral, Ö. P. ve Tozkoparan, G. (2013). Tükenmişlik, örgütsel adalet algıları ve öz benlik değerlendirmeleri ilişkisi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 50(583), 65-79.
- Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, S. (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Pres US.
- Tannenbaum, A. S. (1962). Control in Organizations: Individual Adjustment and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(2), 236-257.
- Teper, R., Segal, Z. V. and Inzlicht, M. (2013). Inside the mindful mind: How mindfulness enhances emotion regulation through improvements in executive control. Association for Psychological Science, 22(6), 449-454.
- Teti, M. D. and Gelfand, M. D. (1991). Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: The mediational role of maternal self-efficacy. Child Development, 62, 918- 929.
- Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2/3), 25-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1540- 5834.1994.tb01276.x.
- Thibaut, J. W. and Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
- Totan, T. (2015). Duygu düzenlenme anketi Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3, 153-161.
- Yalçınkaya-Alkar, Ö. (2017). Is self esteem mediating the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depression? Current Psychology, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12144- 017- 9755-9.
APA | korkmaz f, yener S (2019). TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. , 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
Chicago | korkmaz fatma,yener Serdar TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. (2019): 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
MLA | korkmaz fatma,yener Serdar TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. , 2019, ss.651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
AMA | korkmaz f,yener S TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. . 2019; 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
Vancouver | korkmaz f,yener S TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. . 2019; 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
IEEE | korkmaz f,yener S "TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ." , ss.651 - 671, 2019. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
ISNAD | korkmaz, fatma - yener, Serdar. "TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ". (2019), 651-671. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
APA | korkmaz f, yener S (2019). TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
Chicago | korkmaz fatma,yener Serdar TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12, no.2 (2019): 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
MLA | korkmaz fatma,yener Serdar TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.12, no.2, 2019, ss.651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
AMA | korkmaz f,yener S TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019; 12(2): 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
Vancouver | korkmaz f,yener S TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019; 12(2): 651 - 671. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
IEEE | korkmaz f,yener S "TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ." Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, ss.651 - 671, 2019. 10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |
ISNAD | korkmaz, fatma - yener, Serdar. "TEMEL BENLİK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ İLE GÜÇ İZLENİM ALGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE DUYGU DÜZENLEMENİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ". Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12/2 (2019), 651-671. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.627272 |