Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 101 - 110 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717 İndeks Tarihi: 15-06-2022

Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Öz:
Objective: This study aimed to observe the preventive effect of prophylactic treatment on joint health in people with hemophilia (PwH) and to investigate the importance of integration of ultrasonographic examination into clinical and radiological evaluation of the joints. Materials and Methods: This national, multicenter, prospective, observational study included male patients aged ≥6 years with the diagnosis of moderate or severe hemophilia A or B from 8 centers across Turkey between January 2017 and March 2019. Patients were followed for 1 year with 5 visits (baseline and 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month visits). The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was used for physical examination of joints, the Pettersson scoring system was used for radiological assessment, point-of-care (POC) ultrasonography was used for bilateral examinations of joints, and the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score was used for evaluation of ultrasonography results. Results: Seventy-three PwH, of whom 62 had hemophilia A and 11 had hemophilia B, were included and 24.7% had target joints at baseline. The HJHS and HEAD-US scores were significantly increased at the 12th month in all patients. These scores were also higher in the hemophilia A subgroup than the hemophilia B subgroup. However, in the childhood group, the increment of scores was not significant. The HEAD-US total score was significantly correlated with both the HJHS total score and Pettersson total score at baseline and at the 12th month. Conclusion: The HEAD-US and HJHS scoring systems are valuable tools during follow-up examinations of PwH and they complement each other. We suggest that POC ultrasonographic evaluation and the HEAD-US scoring system may be integrated into differential diagnosis of bleeding and long-term monitoring for joint health as a routine procedure.
Anahtar Kelime:

Hemofili Hastalarında Profilaksinin Koruyucu Etkisinin Gözlenmesinde HEAD-US SkorlamaSisteminin Önemi: Prospektif, Çok Merkezli ve Gözlemsel Bir Çalışma

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada hemofili hastalarında profilaksinin eklem sağlığı üzerindeki koruyucu etkisini gözlemlemek ve eklemlerin klinik ve ultrasonografik olarak değerlendirilmesinin öneminin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ulusal, çok merkezli, prospektif ve gözlemsel olan araştırma Ocak 2017 - Mart 2019 arasında 8 ayrı merkezde takip edilen erkek ve 6 yaşından büyük orta seviyede veya ağır hemofili-A ve hemofili-B hastalarını kapsıyordu. Hastalar 1 yıllık takip sırasında toplam 5 ayrı vizitte (başlangıç, 3. ay, 6. ay, 9. ay ve 12. ay) değerlendirildi. Hemofili Eklem Sağlığı Skoru (HJHS) eklemlerin fiziksel bakısında kullanılırken Petterson skorlama sistemi radyolojik bakı sırasında değerlendirildi. Ayrıca, hasta başı ultrasonografisiyle bilateral eklem incelemeleri yapılarak HEAD-US skorlama yöntemiyle eklem skorları belirlendi.Bulgular: Çalışmada 62’si hemofili A ve 11’I hemofili B olan 73 hastanın %24,7’sinde hedef eklem varlığı mevcuttu. HJHS ve HEAD-US skorlarının tüm hastalarda takibin 12. ayında anlamlı olarak arttığı gözlendi. Hemofili A hastalarında daha yüksek skorlar saptandı. Skor artımı alt gruplarda değerlendirildiğinde çocukluk yaş grubunda artışın anlamlı olmadığı gözlendi. Başlangıçta ve 12. ayda yapılan üçlü bakıda HJHS, HEAD-US ve Petterson skorlarının anlamlı olarak korele olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: HJHS eklem skoru ile HEAD-US radyolojik skorlamasının hemofili hastalarının eklem sağlığının takibinde çok değerli olup birbirlerini destekledikleri yakından gözlendi. Hasta başı US skorlama sistemlerinin günümüzde hemofilide eklem sağlığının rutin takip ve izlemi sürecinde hem kanama ayırıcı tanısı hem de uzun dönemli takip açısından oldukça değerli bir yeri olacağını düşünüyoruz.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Colvin BT, Astermark J, Fischer K, Gringeri A, Lassila R, Schramm W, Thomas A, Ingerslev J; Inter Disciplinary Working Group. European principles of haemophilia care. Haemophilia 2008;14:361-374.
  • 2. Fischer K, Ljung R. Primary prophylaxis in haemophilia care: Guideline update 2016. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2017;67:81-85.
  • 3. Weyand AC, Pipe SW. New therapies for hemophilia. Blood 2019;133:389- 398.
  • 4. Soliman M, Daruge P, Dertkigil SSJ, De Avila Fernandes E, Negrao JR, de Aguiar Vilela Mitraud S, Sakuma ETI, Fernandes ARC, Zhang N, Huo A, Li YJ, Zhou F, Rodrigues BM, Mohanta A, Blanchette VS, Doria AS. Imaging of haemophilic arthropathy in growing joints: pitfalls in ultrasound and MRI. Haemophilia 2017;23:660-672.
  • 5. Foppen W, van der Schaaf IC, Beek FJA, Mali WPTM, Fischer K. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for evaluation of early blood-induced joint changes: Comparison with MRI. Haemophilia 2018;24:971-979.
  • 6. Feldman BM, Funk SM, Bergstrom BM, Zourikian N, Hilliard P, van der Net J, Engelbert R, Petrini P, van den Berg HM, Manco-Johnson MJ, Rivard GE, Abad A, Blanchette VS. Validation of a new pediatric joint scoring system from the International Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study Group: validity of the hemophilia joint health score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:223- 230.
  • 7. Pettersson H, Nilsson IM, Hedner U, Noréhn K, Ahlberg A. Radiologic evaluation of prophylaxis in severe haemophilia. Acta Paediatr Scand 1981;70:565-570.
  • 8. Foppen W, van der Schaaf IC, Fischer K. Value of routine ultrasound in detecting early joint changes in children with haemophilia using the ‘Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound’ protocol. Haemophilia 2016;22:121-125.
  • 9. Martinoli C, Della Casa Alberighi O, Di Minno G, Graziano E, Molinari AC, Pasta G, Russo G, Santagostino E, Tagliaferri A, Tagliafico A, Morfini M. Development and definition of a simplified scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost 2013;109:1170-1179.
  • 10. Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T. Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:1628-1634.
  • 11. Selivanova A, Buskens E, Krabbe PFM. Head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D3L and EQ-5D-5L health values. Pharmacoeconomics 2018;36:715-725.
  • 12. Warren BB, Thornhill D, Stein J, Fadell M, Ingram JD, Funk S, Norton KL, Lane HD, Bennett CM, Dunn A, Recht M, Shapiro A, Manco-Johnson MJ. Young adult outcomes of childhood prophylaxis for severe hemophilia A: results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study. Blood Adv 2020;4:2451-2459.
  • 13. Geraghty S, Dunkley T, Harrington C, Lindvall K, Maahs J, Sek J. Practice patterns in haemophilia A therapy - global progress towards optimal care. Haemophilia 2006;12:75-81.
  • 14. Blanchette VS. Prophylaxis in the haemophilia population. Haemophilia 2010;16(Suppl 5):181-188.
  • 15. Manco-Johnson MJ, Lundin B, Funk S, Peterfy C, Raunig D, Werk M, Kempton CL, Reding MT, Goranov S, Gercheva L, Rusen L, Uscatescu V, Pierdominici M, Engelen S, Pocoski J, Walker D, Hong W. Effect of late prophylaxis in hemophilia on joint status: a randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 2017;15:2115-2124.
  • 16. Carroll L, Benson G, Lambert J, Benmedjahed K, Zak M, Lee XY. Real-world utilities and health-related quality-of-life data in hemophilia patients in France and the United Kingdom. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:941- 957.
  • 17. St-Louis J, Urajnik DJ, Ménard F, Cloutier S, Klaassen RJ, Ritchie B, Rivard GE, Warner M, Blanchette V, Young NL. Generic and disease-specific quality of life among youth and young men with Hemophilia in Canada. BMC Hematol 2016;16:13.
  • 18. Soucie JM, Grosse SD, Siddiqi AE, Byams V, Thierry J, Zack MM, Shapiro A, Duncan N; Hemophilia Treatment Centers Network. The effects of joint disease, inhibitors and other complications on health-related quality of life among males with severe haemophilia A in the United States. Haemophilia 2017;23:287-293.
  • 19. Aledort L, Bullinger M, von Mackensen S, Wasserman J, Young NL, Globe D; Health Related Quality of Life Expert Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Why should we care about quality of life in persons with haemophilia? Haemophilia 2012;18:154-157.
  • 20. van den Berg HM, Feldman BM, Fischer K, Blanchette V, Poonnoose P, Srivastava A. Assessments of outcome in haemophilia - what is the added value of QoL tools? Haemophilia 2015;21:430-435.
  • 21. García-Dasí M, Aznar JA, Jiménez-Yuste V, Altisent C, Bonanad S, Mingot E, Lucía F, Giménez F, López MF, Marco P, Pérez R, Fernández MÁ, Paloma MJ, Galmes B, Herrero S, García-Talavera JA. Adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life in children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2015;21:458-464.
  • 22. Khawaji M, Astermark J, Berntorp E. Lifelong prophylaxis in a large cohort of adult patients with severe haemophilia: a beneficial effect on orthopaedic outcome and quality of life. Eur J Haematol 2012;88:329-335.
  • 23. Krishnan S, Vietri J, Furlan R, Duncan N. Adherence to prophylaxis is associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe haemophilia: results of a patient survey. Haemophilia 2015;21:64-70.
  • 24. Fischer K, Poonnoose P, Dunn AL, Babyn P, Manco-Johnson MJ, David JA, van der Net J, Feldman B, Berger K, Carcao M, de Kleijn P, Silva M, Hilliard P, Doria A, Srivastava A, Blanchette V; Participants of the International Symposium on Outcome Measures in Hemophilic Arthropathy. Choosing outcome assessment tools in haemophilia care and research: a multidisciplinary perspective. Haemophilia 2017;23:11-24.
  • 25. Melchiorre D, Linari S, Innocenti M, Biscoglio I, Toigo M, Cerinic MM, Morfini M. Ultrasound detects joint damage and bleeding in haemophilic arthropathy: a proposal of a score. Haemophilia 2011;17:112-117.
  • 26. Muça-Perja M, Riva S, Grochowska B, Mangiafico L, Mago D, Gringeri A. Ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2012;18:364- 368.
  • 27. Ligocki CC, Abadeh A, Wang KC, Adams-Webber T, Blanchette VS, Doria AS. A systematic review of ultrasound imaging as a tool for evaluating haemophilic arthropathy in children and adults. Haemophilia 2017;23:598- 612.
  • 28. Di Minno MND, Pasta G, Airaldi S, Zaottini F, Storino A, Cimino E, Martinoli C. Ultrasound for early detection of joint disease in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. J Clin Med 2017;6:77.
  • 29. De la Corte-Rodriguez H, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Jimenez-Yuste V. Pointof-care ultrasonography in orthopedic management of hemophilia: multiple uses of an effective tool. HSS J 2018;14:307-313.
  • 30. Di Minno A, Spadarella G, Nardone A, Mormile M, Ventre I, Morfini M, Di Minno G. Attempting to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence in haemophilia: The rationale for repeated ultrasound visualisations of the patient’s joint status. Blood Rev 2019;33:106-116.
  • 31. Acharya SS, Rule B, McMillan O, Humphries TJ. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in hemophilia A: a commentary on current status and its potential role for improving prophylaxis management in severe hemophilia A. Ther Adv Hematol 2017;8:153-156.
  • 32. Altisent C, Martorell M, Crespo A, Casas L, Torrents C, Parra R. Early prophylaxis in children with severe haemophilia A: clinical and ultrasound imaging outcomes. Haemophilia 2016;22:218-224.
  • 33. Jiménez-Yuste V, Álvarez-Román MT, Martín-Salces M, De la CorteRodríguez H, Altisent C, Parra R, Núñez R, Pérez R, García-Candel F, Bonanad S, Querol F, Alonso N, Fernández-Mosteirín N, López-Ansoar E, García-Frade LJ, Bermejo N, Pérez-González N, Gutiérrez-Pimentel MJ, Martinoli C, Fernández-Arias I, Kim HK. Joint status in Spanish haemophilia B patients assessed using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score. Haemophilia 2019;25:144-153.
  • 34. Li J, Liu W, Guo XJ, Ding XL, Lyu BM, Xiao J, Sun QL, Li DS, Zhang WF, Zhong JC, Li CP, Yang RC. HEAD-US-C quantitative ultrasound assessment scale in evaluation of joint damage in patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A received on-demand versus prophylaxis replacement therapy]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2018;39:817-821.
  • 35. Banchev A, Stoyanova D, Konstantinov D, Ignatova I, Peteva E, Kaleva V, Kostova S, Petkova N, Dineva A, Pavlova A. Beyond the bleeding rates- HEAD-US joint assessment in patients treated by late prophylaxis. Haemophilia 2019;25:294-297.
  • 36. Plut D, Kotnik BF, Zupan IP, Kljucevsek D, Vidmar G, Snoj Z, Martinoli C, Salapura V. Diagnostic accuracy of haemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US): a comparative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Radiol Oncol 2019;53:178-186.
  • 37. Volland LM, Zhou JY, Barnes RFW, Kruse-Jarres R, Steiner B, Quon DV, Bailey C, Hughes TH, Moore RE, Chang EY, von Drygalski A. Development and reliability of the joint tissue activity and damage examination for quantitation of structural abnormalities by musculoskeletal ultrasound in hemophilic joints. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:1569-1581.
APA Kavakli K, ÖZBEK S, Antmen B, Sahin F, Aytac S, Kupesiz O, Zulfikar B, Sonmez M, ÇALISKAN Ü, BALKAN C, Akbas T, Arpaci T, tamsel i, SEBER T, OGUZ B, Cevikol C, BULAKCI M, KOŞUCU P, AYDOĞDU D, ŞAŞMAZ h, Tüysüz G, Koc B, Tokgöz H, Demirci Z, Ozkan B (2021). Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. , 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
Chicago Kavakli Kaan,ÖZBEK Süha Süreyya,Antmen Bulent,Sahin Fahri,Aytac Selin,Kupesiz Osman Alphan,Zulfikar Bulent,Sonmez Mehmet,ÇALISKAN ÜMRAN,BALKAN CAN,Akbas Tugana,Arpaci Taner,tamsel ipek,SEBER TURGUT,OGUZ BERNA,Cevikol Can,BULAKCI MESUT,KOŞUCU Polat,AYDOĞDU Demet,ŞAŞMAZ hatice,Tüysüz Gülen,Koc Basak,Tokgöz Hüseyin,Demirci Zühal,Ozkan Burcu Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. (2021): 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
MLA Kavakli Kaan,ÖZBEK Süha Süreyya,Antmen Bulent,Sahin Fahri,Aytac Selin,Kupesiz Osman Alphan,Zulfikar Bulent,Sonmez Mehmet,ÇALISKAN ÜMRAN,BALKAN CAN,Akbas Tugana,Arpaci Taner,tamsel ipek,SEBER TURGUT,OGUZ BERNA,Cevikol Can,BULAKCI MESUT,KOŞUCU Polat,AYDOĞDU Demet,ŞAŞMAZ hatice,Tüysüz Gülen,Koc Basak,Tokgöz Hüseyin,Demirci Zühal,Ozkan Burcu Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. , 2021, ss.101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
AMA Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. . 2021; 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
Vancouver Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. . 2021; 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
IEEE Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B "Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study." , ss.101 - 110, 2021. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
ISNAD Kavakli, Kaan vd. "Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study". (2021), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
APA Kavakli K, ÖZBEK S, Antmen B, Sahin F, Aytac S, Kupesiz O, Zulfikar B, Sonmez M, ÇALISKAN Ü, BALKAN C, Akbas T, Arpaci T, tamsel i, SEBER T, OGUZ B, Cevikol C, BULAKCI M, KOŞUCU P, AYDOĞDU D, ŞAŞMAZ h, Tüysüz G, Koc B, Tokgöz H, Demirci Z, Ozkan B (2021). Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology, 38(2), 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
Chicago Kavakli Kaan,ÖZBEK Süha Süreyya,Antmen Bulent,Sahin Fahri,Aytac Selin,Kupesiz Osman Alphan,Zulfikar Bulent,Sonmez Mehmet,ÇALISKAN ÜMRAN,BALKAN CAN,Akbas Tugana,Arpaci Taner,tamsel ipek,SEBER TURGUT,OGUZ BERNA,Cevikol Can,BULAKCI MESUT,KOŞUCU Polat,AYDOĞDU Demet,ŞAŞMAZ hatice,Tüysüz Gülen,Koc Basak,Tokgöz Hüseyin,Demirci Zühal,Ozkan Burcu Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology 38, no.2 (2021): 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
MLA Kavakli Kaan,ÖZBEK Süha Süreyya,Antmen Bulent,Sahin Fahri,Aytac Selin,Kupesiz Osman Alphan,Zulfikar Bulent,Sonmez Mehmet,ÇALISKAN ÜMRAN,BALKAN CAN,Akbas Tugana,Arpaci Taner,tamsel ipek,SEBER TURGUT,OGUZ BERNA,Cevikol Can,BULAKCI MESUT,KOŞUCU Polat,AYDOĞDU Demet,ŞAŞMAZ hatice,Tüysüz Gülen,Koc Basak,Tokgöz Hüseyin,Demirci Zühal,Ozkan Burcu Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology, vol.38, no.2, 2021, ss.101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
AMA Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology. 2021; 38(2): 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
Vancouver Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology. 2021; 38(2): 101 - 110. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
IEEE Kavakli K,ÖZBEK S,Antmen B,Sahin F,Aytac S,Kupesiz O,Zulfikar B,Sonmez M,ÇALISKAN Ü,BALKAN C,Akbas T,Arpaci T,tamsel i,SEBER T,OGUZ B,Cevikol C,BULAKCI M,KOŞUCU P,AYDOĞDU D,ŞAŞMAZ h,Tüysüz G,Koc B,Tokgöz H,Demirci Z,Ozkan B "Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study." Turkish Journal of Hematology, 38, ss.101 - 110, 2021. 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717
ISNAD Kavakli, Kaan vd. "Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study". Turkish Journal of Hematology 38/2 (2021), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2021.2020.0717