Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 22 Sayfa Aralığı: 771 - 784 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02 İndeks Tarihi: 20-06-2022

Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?

Öz:
It is known that digits have a positive effect on the performance of short term memory (STM) span and it is called the digit superiority effect. This study aims to examine the effect of familiar stimuli (digits, colors, digit names, color names, and words) on STM span. In order to measure STM capacity, a memory span task was used including the digit, word, and color span lists. 91 participants (44 female, 47 male) aged between 18-27 (M = 21,43, SD = 1.50) participated in the study that consisted of three different experiments. Results of Experiment 1 revealed that there was a significant difference between the digit name and word with regard to span size and total span. In Experiment 2 and 3, the main effect of familiar stimulus type on total span and span size was significant, and also the difference between all types of stimuli was significant (Experiment II, digit name>word=color name; Experiment III, digit>digit name>color name>color). The common result obtained from all experiments is that digits are superior with regard to STM span than other familiar stimuli types such as words, color names, colors. This study confirmed that digit superiority effect is indispensable on verbal and visual STM span
Anahtar Kelime:

Kısa Süreli Bellek Uzamı Açısından Sayı Üstünlüğü Vazgeçilmez Mi?

Öz:
Sayıların kısa süreli bellek (KSB) uzamı performansı üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğu bilinmekte ve bu durum sayı üstünlüğü etkisi olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, aşina uyarıcı türlerinin (sayı, renk, sayı ismi, renk ismi ve kelime) KSB uzamı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. KSB kapasitesini ölçmek için sayı, kelime ve renk uzam listelerinden oluşan bellek uzamı görevi kullanılmıştır. Üç deneyden oluşan araştırmaya yaşları 18-27 arasında (Ort = 21.43, SS = 1.50) toplam 91 katılımcı (44 kadın, 47 erkek) katılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, Deney 1’de sayı ismi ile kelime arasında uzam genişliği ve toplam uzam açısından anlamlı fark bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Deney 2 ve 3’te aşina uyarıcı türünün toplam uzam ve uzam genişliği üzerindeki temel etkisi ve tüm uyarıcı türleri arasındaki fark anlamlıdır (Deney 2, sayı ismi>kelime=renk ismi; Deney 3, sayı>sayı ismi>renk ismi>renk). Üç deneyden ulaşılan ortak sonuç, KSB uzamı açısından sayıların kelimeler, renk isimleri ve renkler gibi aşina uyarıcı türlerinden daha üstün olduğudur. Bu çalışma, sözel ve görsel KSB uzamı üzerinde sayı üstünlüğü etkisinin vazgeçilmez olduğunu doğrulamıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akdoğan, G., & Aydın, Ö. (1995). Color naming and the problem of language-real. Journal of Language, 28, 49-66.
  • Allen, C. K. (1983). Short-term memory for colors and color names. Psychological Reports, 53 (2), 579-582. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.579
  • Allen, C. K. (1984) Short-term memory for colors and color names in the absence of vocalization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 263-266. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.59.1.263
  • Allen, C. K. (1995). Short-term memory for color names using Stroop material. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(3), 1355-1362. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.3c.1355
  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
  • Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
  • Bachelder, B. L., & Denny, M. R. (1977). A theory of intelligence: I. Span and the complexity of stimulus control. Intelligence, 1(2), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(77)90001-0
  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561-571.
  • Brener, R. (1940). An experimental investigation of memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(5), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061096
  • Crannell, C. W., & Parrish, J. M. (1957). A comparison of immediate memory span for digits, letters, and words. The Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1957.9713089
  • Cohen, R. M., Weingartner, H., Smallberg, S. A., Pickar, D., & Murphy, D. L. (1982). Effort and cognition in depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39(5), 593-597. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290050061012
  • Colby, C. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Memory deficits in depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12(6), 611-627.
  • Davidoff, J., Davies, I., & Roberson, D. (1999). Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398(6724), 203-204.
  • Deich, R.F. (1972). Color recognition and word frequency. American Journal of Psychology 85(3), 393-396.
  • Dempster, F. N. (1981). Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 63-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.63
  • Ekinci, A., & Cangöz, B. (2018). Adaptation and norm determination study of the Boston naming test for healthy Turkish elderly. Archieves of Neuropsychiatry, 55(4), 341-348. DOI: 10.5152/npa.2017.19331
  • Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(5), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9
  • Göz, I. (2003). Yazılı Türkçenin kelime sıklığı sözlüğü [The word frequency dictionary: In Turkish]. Ankara, Turkey: Türk Dil Kurumu.
  • Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 603-609.
  • Hisli, N. (1988). A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 6(22), 118-122.
  • Hulme, C., Maughan, S., & Brown, G. D. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90032-F
  • Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1217-1232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1217
  • Jefferies, E., Frankish, C., & Noble, K. (2009). Lexical coherence in short-term memory: Strategic reconstruction or “semantic glue”? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1967- 1982. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802697672
  • Jones, G., & Macken, B. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009
  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
  • Kool, W., Conway, A. R., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2014). Sequential dynamics in visual short-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(7), 1885-1901. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014- 0755-7
  • Macken, B., Taylor, J., & Jones, D. (2015). Limitless capacity: A dynamic object-oriented approach to shortterm memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 293-307. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00293
  • Miotto, E. C., Sato, J., Lucia, M., Camargo, C. H., & Scaff, M. (2010). Development of an adapted version of the Boston Naming Test for Portuguese speakers. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 32(3), 279- 282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462010005000006
  • Norris, D., & Kalm, K. (2021). Chunking and data compression in verbal short-term memory. Cognition, 208, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104534
  • Özgen, E. (2004). Language, learning, and color perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00282.x
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Pavio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255-287.
  • Peteranderl, S., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli. Memory & cognition, 46(1), 1-16. doi:10.3758/s13421-017- 0741-0
  • Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001
  • Schweickert, R., & Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(3), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.419
  • Souza, A. S., & Skóra, Z. (2017). The interplay of language and visual perception in working memory. Cognition, 166, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.038
  • Tekcan, A. İ., Göz, İ., Yalçın, S., Akırmak, Ü., Serbest, S., Fırat, C., & Rodoplu, S. (2002). A study on the construct validity of the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 17(49), 27-45.
  • Terry, W. S. (2013). Learning and memory: Basic principles, processes, and procedures (4th edition). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4567-4570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811155106
  • Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Interactions between language and mental representations. Language Learning, 66(3), 554-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12188
APA Erdoğan Ş, DOGAN D, CANGOZ TAVAT B (2021). Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. , 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
Chicago Erdoğan Şengül,DOGAN DILARA,CANGOZ TAVAT BANU Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. (2021): 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
MLA Erdoğan Şengül,DOGAN DILARA,CANGOZ TAVAT BANU Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. , 2021, ss.771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
AMA Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. . 2021; 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
Vancouver Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. . 2021; 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
IEEE Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B "Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?." , ss.771 - 784, 2021. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
ISNAD Erdoğan, Şengül vd. "Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?". (2021), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
APA Erdoğan Ş, DOGAN D, CANGOZ TAVAT B (2021). Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. Nesne Dergisi, 9(22), 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
Chicago Erdoğan Şengül,DOGAN DILARA,CANGOZ TAVAT BANU Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. Nesne Dergisi 9, no.22 (2021): 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
MLA Erdoğan Şengül,DOGAN DILARA,CANGOZ TAVAT BANU Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. Nesne Dergisi, vol.9, no.22, 2021, ss.771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
AMA Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. Nesne Dergisi. 2021; 9(22): 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
Vancouver Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?. Nesne Dergisi. 2021; 9(22): 771 - 784. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
IEEE Erdoğan Ş,DOGAN D,CANGOZ TAVAT B "Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?." Nesne Dergisi, 9, ss.771 - 784, 2021. 10.7816/nesne-09-22-02
ISNAD Erdoğan, Şengül vd. "Is Digit Superiority Indispensable with regard to Short Term Memory Span?". Nesne Dergisi 9/22 (2021), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-09-22-02