THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 740 - 764 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 30-06-2022

THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS

Öz:
The aim of this study; The aim of this study is to determine the effect of applying the cooperative learning method together with structured materials in coding workshops on the basic skill levels of preschool students and to evaluate them together with the opinions of teachers and parents. A quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest control group was used in the research conducted in accordance with the mixed research design. The study group of the research consists of 35 students, 15 girls and 20 boys, studying in two branches in a kindergarten located in Sivas city center in the first semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. Cooperative learning method was used in one of the branches in the study and the existing learning method was applied in the other. "Basic Skills Scale for Preschool Students" was used to obtain quantitative data. In the analysis of data; descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Tukey, dependent groups t test and content analysis were used. In the quantitative findings of the research; It was determined that there was no significant difference between the pretest scores of the research groups from the scale, and that there was a significant difference between the pretest-posttest scores of the experimental group in favor of the posttest. It was observed that there was no significant difference between the pretest-posttest scores of the control group and the posttest scores of the research groups. In the qualitative findings of the research; It has been determined that the application has a positive effect on different development areas of the students, the use of structured materials contributes to learning and its use in different acquisitions is supported.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akpınar, Y., & Altun, A. (2014). The need for programming education in information society schools. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 1-4.
  • Aktamış, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Determining the relationship between scientific process skills and scientific creativity. H. U. Journal of Education, 33, 11-23.
  • Alabay, E., & Özdoğan, İ. M. (2018). Research on the effects of inquiry-based science activities to science process skills of preschool children practicing the outdoor activities. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(3), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.312655
  • Arslan, A. (2017). The effect of cooperative teaching method on academic achievement, learning motivation, attitude and permanent in Turkish teaching program [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Atatürk University.
  • Aydoğdu, B., & Karakuş, F. (2017). Basic process skills scale of towards pre-school students: a scale development study. Journal Of Theoretical Educational Science, 10(1), 49-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.10767
  • Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. (2012). A general overview of mixed method researches. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(42), 1-21.
  • Bayrakçeken, S., Doymuş, K., & Doğan, A. (2013). Cooperative learning model and its application. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science or science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_1
  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada. 1-25.
  • Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A. and Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-ımplications for policy and practice. Joint Research Centre (Seville site). https://doi.org/10.2791/792158
  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search for understanding the case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific research methods. (17. Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Büyüktaşkapu, S. (2010). A science teaching program proposal based on constructivist science education to develop 6 year-old children’s scientific processing skills [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Selçuk University.
  • Büyüktaşkapu, S., Çeliköz, N., & Akman, B. (2012). the effects of constructivist science teaching program on scientific processing skills of 6 year-old children. Education and Science, 37(165).
  • Cahya, P. D., & Sholihah, L. (2017). The comparative study of using number head together (NHT) and cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) toward students’ reading ability. Premise Journal, (6)2, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.1014
  • Çalık, E. Ö. & Altay, I. F. (2021). Analysis of English lesson broadcasts durıng emergency remote teaching from pedagogical, instructional and techniıcal aspects. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science (IJETS),1(2), 71–87.
  • Casey, P. J. (1997). Computer programming. Journal of Computers in the Schools, 13(1-2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v13n01_05
  • Celep, A., & Bacanak, A. (2013). Perceptions of teachers who are attending on their master’s degree regarding the science process skills and their attainment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(1), 56-78.
  • Ceylan, V. K., & Gündoğdu, K. (2018). A phenomonological study: What’s happening in coding education? Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.340103
  • Chabalengula, V., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers, understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.832a
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In designing and conducting mixed methods research (2. Edition, pp. 53-106). Oaks CA: Sage.
  • Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D., & Turgut, M.F.(1996). Physics teaching. Ankara: National Education Development Project Pre-Service Teacher Education Trial Edition.
  • Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Framework for key stages 1 to 4. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationalcurriculum-in-englandframework-for-key-stages-1-to-4.
  • Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2004). The effect of cooperative learning method on academic achievement and attitude in science lesson. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 1(2), 103-115.
  • Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2014). Should your 8-year-old learn coding? Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 60- 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670774
  • Ergin, Ö., Şahin-Pekmez, E., & Öngel-Erdal, S. (2005). Science teaching from theory to practice through experimentation. İzmir: Dinazor Bookstore.
  • Erlidawati. E., & Syarfuni. S. (2018). The effect of cooperative ıntegrated reading and composition on reading comprehension of IAIN lhokseumawe, Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 153–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.153
  • Ersoy, H., Madran, R.,, & Gülbahar, Y. (2011). A model proposed for teaching programming languages: Robotic programming. Academic Informatics’11 - XIII. Academic Informatics Conference Proceedings (pp. 731-736). Malatya: Inönü Üniversitesy.
  • Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
  • Germann, P. J., & Aram R. J. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7) 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(199609)33:7<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Germann, J. P., Aram, R. J., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh grade students to the science process skills of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<79::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Göksoy, S., & Yılmaz, İ. (2018). THE opinions of information relations teacher and their students with regard to lessons of robots and decoding. Duzce University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(1), 178-196.
  • Gülbahar, Y., Kalelioğlu, F., & Karataş, E. (2017). Computer Science. Ankara: Ministry of Education.
  • Hallumoğlu, K. Ö. (2019). The effect of montessori materials supported individual and cooperative math activities on early mathematical reasoning skills [Unpublished master's thesis]. Kırklareli University.
  • Hayatina, M., & Fajrina, S. A. (2018). Cooperative integrated reading composition to improve pupils’ reading comprehension achievement and motivation. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 8(2), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol8.no2.4.2018
  • Jenkins, T. (2002, August). On the difficulty of learning to program. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, 4, 53-58.
  • Juliana, M., & Surya, E. (2017). An analysis of Jigsaw cooperative effectiveness to ımprove the self-confidence and learning result of vocational high school students. International
  • Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 3(2), 3519-3526. httpsa://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-8-25
  • Kafai, Y. B., Burke, Q., & Resnick, M. (2014). Connected code: Why children need to learn programming. Mit Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/connected-code.
  • Kalelioglu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583- 596.
  • Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS and AMOS applications, scientific research methods and publication ethics. (2. Edition). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Kasalak, İ. (2017). Effects of robotic coding activities on the effectiveness of secondary school students 'self-efficacy and student experience about activities [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversity.
  • Kazeni, M. M. M. (2005). Development and validation of a test integrated science process skills for the further education and training learners [Unpublished Master Thesis]. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Koca, M., & Türkoğlu, İ. (2019). The effect of the application of station technique in teaching the 6th grade science lesson cell topic on the academic achievement of students, permanence and attitudes. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538653
  • Marlowe, A. B., & Page, L. M. (1998) Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. California: Corwin Press.
  • McCormick, R., & Paechter, C. (1999) Learning and knowledge. The Open University: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, MyEducationLab Series. Pearson. ED573319.
  • Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational technology, 31(5), 45-53.
  • Merton, R. K., & Storer, N. W. (1979). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. İnteractions, 15(2), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/1340961.1340974
  • Myers, B. E., Washburn S. G., & Dyer J. E. (2004). Assessing agriculture teachers’ capacity for teaching science integrated process skills. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 54(1), 74-85.
  • Odacı, M. M., & Uzun, E., (2017). Information technology teachers' opinions about preschool coding education and tools that can be used: A case study. 1. International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, Inönü University (ICITS), 715- 722.
  • Özmen, H. (2004). Learning theories and technology supported constructivist learning in science teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 100- 111.
  • Öztürk, E., & Tanrıverdi, T. (2019). The Role of Cooperative Learning Method in Vocabulary Development. Journalof SocialSciencesand Education, 2(1), 93-120.
  • Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research matters - to the science teacher. National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. M. Bütün and S. B. Demir (Trans.). (1. Edition). Ankara: PegemA.
  • Rambuda, A. M., & Fraser, W. J. (2004). Perceptions of teachers of the application of science process skills in the teaching of geography in secondary schools in the free state province. South African Journal of Education, 24(1), 10 – 17.
  • Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
  • Sarıkoz, A., & Alpan, G. B. (2019). Information technologies and software courses through the perspectives of students and teachers. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(4), 1595- 1607. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3159
  • Seğmen, E. (2017). Determination of cognitive factors affecting programming learning performance [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Okan Üniversity.
  • Serim, E. Ü. (2019). Investigation of computational thinking skills and selfefficacy perceptions of coding with coding education designed by gamification method [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Balıkesir Üniversity.
  • Shim, J., Kwon, D., & Lee, W. (2017). The effects of a robot game environment on computer programming education for elementary school students. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Education, 60 (2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2622227
  • Slavin, R. E. (1999). Students teams-achievement divisions. S. Sharan (Ed.). In handbook of cooperative learning methods (2. Edition, pp. 3-19). London: Praeger.
  • Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. Ways of knowing science series. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027.
  • Staver, J. R. (1998). Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (5), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<501::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Tercan, M. A. (2019). The effect of the station technique in the acquisition of high – level cognitive skills in mathematics [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversity.
  • Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. (2011). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(2012), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
  • Tzuo, P. W. (2007). The tension between teacher control and children’s freedom in a childcentered classroom: Resolving the practical dilemma through a closer look at the related theories. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 33–39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0166-7
  • Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (2002). Dilemmas of science. New York: Routledge Falmer. Wachenchauzer, R. (2004). Work in progress promoting critical thinking while learning programming language concepts and paradigms. 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Savannah, GA.
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (5. Edition). Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Zamin, N., Rahim, H., Savita, K., Bhattacharyya, E., Zaffar, M., & Jamil, S. (2018). Learning block programming using scratch among school children in Malaysia and Australia: An exploratory study. 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS.2018.8510586
APA ARSLAN A, Kayahan Yüksel D (2022). THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. , 740 - 764.
Chicago ARSLAN AYSEL,Kayahan Yüksel Didem THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. (2022): 740 - 764.
MLA ARSLAN AYSEL,Kayahan Yüksel Didem THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. , 2022, ss.740 - 764.
AMA ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. . 2022; 740 - 764.
Vancouver ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. . 2022; 740 - 764.
IEEE ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D "THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS." , ss.740 - 764, 2022.
ISNAD ARSLAN, AYSEL - Kayahan Yüksel, Didem. "THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS". (2022), 740-764.
APA ARSLAN A, Kayahan Yüksel D (2022). THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. IOJET, 9(2), 740 - 764.
Chicago ARSLAN AYSEL,Kayahan Yüksel Didem THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. IOJET 9, no.2 (2022): 740 - 764.
MLA ARSLAN AYSEL,Kayahan Yüksel Didem THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. IOJET, vol.9, no.2, 2022, ss.740 - 764.
AMA ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. IOJET. 2022; 9(2): 740 - 764.
Vancouver ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS. IOJET. 2022; 9(2): 740 - 764.
IEEE ARSLAN A,Kayahan Yüksel D "THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS." IOJET, 9, ss.740 - 764, 2022.
ISNAD ARSLAN, AYSEL - Kayahan Yüksel, Didem. "THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURED MATERIAL SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE CODING WORKSHOPS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION ON STUDENTS' BASIC SKILLS". IOJET 9/2 (2022), 740-764.