Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not
Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10 Sayfa Aralığı: 26 - 45 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not
Öz: Joseph Schumpeter, Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1912) kitabının yedinci bölümüne, kitabın ikinci ve daha sonraki baskılarında yer vermemiştir. Schumpeter bu ilk baskıyı, tüm toplumsal gerçekliğin anlaşılması doğrultusunda, dinamik iktisadî yaklaşımı kurgulayabilmek amacıyla gözden geçirmiştir. Bu olgunun en belirgin yanı Schumpeter’in yenilikçi girişimciye yönelik tavrındaki farklılıktır. Nitekim Schumpeter 1930’lardan itibaren girişimci teorisini genişletmiş ve kısmen de olsa değiştirmiştir. Burada vurgulanan daha ziyade girişimci tipin işlevleridir. Dolayısıyla bu yazı, Schumpeter’in değişiminin esas nedeninin, onun düşüncesindeki epistemolojik ikilemden kaynaklandığını ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
A Note the Joseph A. Schumpeter's Idea of teh Entrepreneurship
Öz: Joseph Schumpeter omitted the seventh chapter of his book Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1912) from the second and subsequent editions. Schumpeter revised this first edition, in order to provide the contours of a general theory of dynamic economics, encompassing the entire social realm. The most significant part of this feature is the changing attitude of Schumpeter, towards theorising the innovative entrepreneur. Thus, from 1930’s onwards, Schumpeter extended and slightly changed his theory of the entrepreneur. From now on, it’s the function of this unique type that has been emphasized. In this context, this paper points out that the main cause of this proclivity is the epistemological dilemma of Schumpeter’s thought.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- BACKHAUS, U. (2002) The Economy as a Whole: Seventh Chapter of The Theory of Economic Development, Industry and Innovation, 9, (1/2), 93-145.
- BAGCHI, A. K. (1989) Schumpeter: The Inconsistencies of a Prescient Ideologue, K. Bharadwaj ve S. Kaviraj (der.), Perspectives on Capitalism: Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter and Weber içinde, New Delhi, Sage Publications,118-131.
- BECKER, M. C.; EßLINGER, H. U.; HEDTKE, U.; KNUDSEN, T. (2002) Schumpeter’s Unknown Article Development: A Missing Link Between Schumpeter’s Theories of Economic Development, Business Cycles and Democracy,The Link Program Working Papers, (02-19), Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
- BECKER, M. C.; KNUDSEN, T. (2002a) Schumpeter 1911: Farsighted Visions on Economic Development, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, (2), 387-403.
- BECKER, M. C.; KNUDSEN, T. (2002b) New Translations from Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung by Dr. Joseph Schumpeter, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, (2), 405-437.
- BLAUG, M. (1986) Economic History and the History of Economics, New York, New York University Press.
- BLAUG, M. (1997) Not Only an Economist: Recent Essays, Cheltenham,Edward Elgar.
- BRONFENBRENNER, M. (1986) Schumpeter and Keynes as ‘Rich Man’s Karl Marxes’, H. J. Wagener ve J. W. Drukker (der.), The Economic Law of Motion of Modern Society: A Marx-Keynes-Schumpeter Centennial içinde, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 22-30.
- BROUWER, M. T. (2002) Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, (1), 83-105.
- CLEMENCE, R.; DOODY, F. S. (1950) The Schumpeterian System, Cambridge, Addison-Wesley Press.
- CRAMER, D. L.; LEATHERS, C. G. (1981) Schumpeter’s Corporatist Views: Links among his Social Theory, Quadragesimo Anno, and Moral Reform, History of Political Economy, 13, (4), 745-771.
- CSONTOS, L. (1987) Wieser’s Influence on Schumpeter, (appendix to Langlois, 2002: Schumpeter and the Obsolescence of the Entrepreneur), paper presented at the History of Economics Society Annual Meeting, Boston.
- EBNER, A. (2000) Schumpeter and the ‘Schmollerprogramm’: Integrating Theory and History in the Analysis of Economic Development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, (3), 355-372.
- FOSTER, J. (2000) Competitive Selection, Self-Organisation and Joseph A.Schumpeter, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, (3), 311-328.
- GOODWIN, R. M. (1990) Walras and Schumpeter: The Vision Reaffirmed, A. Heertje ve M. Perlman (der.) Evolving Technology and Market Structure: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics içinde, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 39-49.
- HIRSCHMAN, A. O. (1982) Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble?, Journal of Economic Literature, 20, (4), 1463-1484.
- KELM, M. (1997) Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Evolution: A Darwinian Interpretation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7, (2), 97-130.
- KIZILKAYA, E. (2003) Bir Büyük İktisatçının Metafizik Değer Yargılarına Bakışı: Joseph A. Schumpeter’in Vizyon Kavramı, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, (1), 1-26.
- KIZILKAYA, E. (2004a) Friedrich Nietzsche’nin Joseph A. Schumpeter’in İktisat Düşüncesi Üzerindeki Etkisine Dair Bir Not, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5, (2), 197-212.
- KIZILKAYA, E. (2004b) Joseph A. Schumpeter’in Korporatist Görüşleri Bağlamında Girişimci, Sivil Toplum ve Kapitalizm, Sivil Toplum, 2, (6- 7), 145-155.
- KUZNETS, S. (1940) Schumpeter’s Business Cycles, American Economic Review, 30, (2), 257-271.
- LANGLOIS, R. N. (2002) Schumpeter and the Obsolescence of the Entrepreneur, Working Paper, (2002-19), Department of Economics Working Paper Series, University of Connecticut, Connecticut.
- PEUKERT, H. (2002) Schumpeter’s “Lost” Seventh Chapter: A Critical Overview, Industry and Innovation, 9, (1/2), 79-89.
- RAINES, J. P.; JUNG, C. R. (1992) Schumpeter and Knight on Economic and Political Rationality: A Comparative Restatement, Journal of Socio-economics, 21, (2), 109-125.
- REINERT, E. S. (2002) Schumpeter in the Context of Two Canons of Economic Thought, Industry and Innovation, 9, (1/2), 23-39.
- SAYAR, A. G. (1998) Bir İktisatçının Entellektüel Portresi: Sabri F. Ülgener, İstanbul, Eren Yayınları.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1926) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjukturzyklus, 2. ed., München-Leipzig, Duncker und Humblot.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1951a) The Creative Response in Economic History, R. V. Clemence (der.), Essays on Entrepreurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism içinde, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, 216-226.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1951b) Preface to the Japanese Edition of “Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung” , R. V. Clemence (der.), Essays on Entrepreurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism içinde, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, 158-163.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1951c) Imperialism and Social Classes, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis, London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1961) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, New York, Oxford University Press.
- SHIONOYA, Y. (1990) The Origin of the Schumpeterian Research Program: A Chapter Omitted from Schumpeter’s ‘Theory of Economic Development’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146, (2), 314-327.
- SWEDBERG, R. (1989) Joseph A. Schumpeter and the Tradition of Economic Sociology, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, (3), 508-524.
- WITT, U. (2002) How Evolutionary is Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development, Industry and Innovation, 9, (1/2), 7-22.
- ZASSENHAUS, H. K. (1981) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy: the ‘Vision’ and the ‘Theories’, A. Heertje (der.), Schumpeter’s Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy after 40 years içinde, New York, Praeger Publishers, 170-202.
| APA | KIZILKAYA E (2005). Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. , 26 - 45. |
| Chicago | KIZILKAYA Ertuğrul İbrahim Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. (2005): 26 - 45. |
| MLA | KIZILKAYA Ertuğrul İbrahim Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. , 2005, ss.26 - 45. |
| AMA | KIZILKAYA E Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. . 2005; 26 - 45. |
| Vancouver | KIZILKAYA E Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. . 2005; 26 - 45. |
| IEEE | KIZILKAYA E "Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not." , ss.26 - 45, 2005. |
| ISNAD | KIZILKAYA, Ertuğrul İbrahim. "Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not". (2005), 26-45. |
| APA | KIZILKAYA E (2005). Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 5(10), 26 - 45. |
| Chicago | KIZILKAYA Ertuğrul İbrahim Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 5, no.10 (2005): 26 - 45. |
| MLA | KIZILKAYA Ertuğrul İbrahim Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol.5, no.10, 2005, ss.26 - 45. |
| AMA | KIZILKAYA E Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2005; 5(10): 26 - 45. |
| Vancouver | KIZILKAYA E Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2005; 5(10): 26 - 45. |
| IEEE | KIZILKAYA E "Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not." Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 5, ss.26 - 45, 2005. |
| ISNAD | KIZILKAYA, Ertuğrul İbrahim. "Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Girişimcilik Fikrine Dair Bir Not". Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 5/10 (2005), 26-45. |
