Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 51 - 66 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service

Öz:
İletişim ve iş tatmini, işletme araştırmasında popüler konulardan birisi olmuştur. Çalışanlara yönelik olarak yapılan iletişim faaliyetleri bir gereklilik olarak değerlendirilmekte ve kuruluşun yaptığı bu faaliyetler ileride kazanç sağlayacak bir yatırım olarak görülmektedir. Literatürde çalışanlarla olumlu iletişimin çalışanların performansını ve iş memnuniyetlerini artırdıklarına dair bazı bulgular vardır. İş tatmini de sırasıyla verimliliği artırmakta ve kuruluşun başarısına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Türkiye’de çalışanlarla iletişimin kamu ve özel kesimlerde farklılık gösterdiği göz önünde tutulmalıdır. Kamu kuruluşlarının dahili iletişim faaliyetleri bir hayli zayıfken özel kuruluşların çalışanlarıyla iletişime daha fazla önem verdikleri görülebilir. Bunun başlıca nedeni Türk kamu kuruluşlarının bürokratik yapısıdır. Büyük ölçüde kullanılan işletme iletişimi memnuniyeti anketi olan İletişim Memnuniyeti Anketi, Türkiye’de posta hizmetinde kullanılmamıştır. 520 postacının katıldığı bu alan araştırması, Türkiye’deki örgütsel iletişim, iş memnuniyeti ve iş performansıyla algılanan memnuniyet arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemiştir. Bu makale posta hizmetinde İletişim Memnuniyeti Anketi’nin faktör analizini ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırmamız üst yönetimin çalışanlara yönelik olarak etkin iletişim yöntemlerini kullanmadıklarını ve çalışanların da yapılan bu iletişim faaliyetlerinden memnun olmadıklarını ortaya çıkarmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: posta hizmetleri örgütsel yönetim iş tatmini örgütsel iletişim anket iletişim doyumu ölçeği işgören tatmini Türkiye ptt çalışanları

Konular: İletişim

PTT'deki iletişim memnuniyetinin analitik bir çalışması

Öz:
Communication and job satisfaction have been one of the popular topics in business research. Communication activities directed at employees are currently considered as necessary, which are also seen as an investment that will eventually yield its return. In literature there are some evidences that favourable employees communication have effects on the increase of job satisfaction and employee performance. The appearing job satisfaction, in return, creates an increase in productivity, which contributes to the success of the organization, too. It should be considered that employee communication differs among public institutions and private organization in Turkey. It can be seen that public institutions are rather weak in their internal communication activities whereas private organizations give more importance to communicate with employees. The reason is mainly the fact that in the bureaucratic structure of Turkish public institutions. The most widely used business communication satisfaction questionnaire, the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) has not been used in the postal service in Turkey. This field study of 520 postman investigated the relationship amongst perceived satisfaction with organizational communication, job satisfaction and, job performance in Turkey. This article presents a factor analytic study of CSQ in a postal service. Our research has revealed that top management does not use effective communication methods towards employees, likewise the employees are not satisfied with those communication activities
Anahtar Kelime: communication satisfaction scale employee satisfaction Turkey ptt workers postal services organizational management job satisfaction organizational communication questionnaire

Konular: İletişim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anderson C & Martin M M (1995) Why employees speak to coworkers and bosses: Motives, gender, and organizational satisfaction, Journal of Business Communication, 32(3), 249-266.
  • Argenti P A (1998) Strategic Employee Communications, Human Resource Management, 37(3-4), 199-206.
  • Barrett D J (2002) Change Communication: Using Strategic Employee Communication to Communications: An International Journal, 7(4), 219-231.
  • Bartoo H & Sias P M (2004) When Enough is too Much: Communication Apprehension and Employee Information Experiences, Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 15-26.
  • Buckley F, Monks K & Sinnott A (1998) Communication Enhancement: A Process Dividend for the Organization and the HRM Department, Human Resource Management, 37(3/4), 221-234.
  • Byrne Z S & Lemay E (2006) Different Media for Organizational Communication: Perceptions of Quality and Satisfaction, Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2), 149-173.
  • Chen N (2008) Internal/Employee Communication and Organizational Effectiveness: A Study of Chinese Corporations in Transition, Journal of Contemporary China, 17(54), 167- 189.
  • Clampitt P G & Downs C W (1993) Employee Perceptions Of The Relationship Between Communication and Productivity: A Field Study, Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 5-28.
  • Croft S (2003) Managing Corporate Reputation: The New Currency, Thorogood, London.
  • Cutlip S M, Center A H &Broom G M (1985) Effective Public Relations, 6th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Daft R L & Weick K E (1984) Towards A Model Of Organizations As Interpretive Systems, The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
  • Difonzo N & Bordia P (1998) A Tale Of Two Corporations: Managing Uncertainty During Organizational Change, Human Resource Management, 37(3/4), 295-303.
  • Dolphin R R (2005) Internal Communications: Today’s Strategic Imperative, Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(3), 171-190.
  • Downs C W, & Hazen M D (1977) A Factor Analytic Study of Communication Satisfaction, Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 63- 73.
  • Farmer B A, Slater J W &Wright K S (1998) The Role Of Communication in Achieving Shared Vision Under New Organizational Leadership, Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(4), 219-235.
  • Goldhaber G M, Porter D T, Yates M P & Lesniak R (1978) “Organizational Communication: 1978”, Human Communication Research, 5(1), 76-96.
  • Gray J & Laidlaw H (2002) Part-time Employment and Communication Satisfaction in an Australian Retail Organization, Employee Relations, 24(1-2), 211-228.
  • Gray J & Laidlaw H (2004) Improving The Measurement Of Communication Satisfaction, Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 425-448.
  • Grunig L A, Grunig J & Dozier D M (2002) Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey.
  • Hackman J R, Oldham G R (1975) Development Of The Job Diagnostic Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
  • Hargie O, Tourish D & Wilson N (2002) Communication Audits and the Effects of Increased Information: A Follow-up Study, Journal of Business Communication, 39(4), 414-436.
  • Holtzhausen D (2002) The Effects of a Divisionalised and Decentralised Organizational Structure on a Formal Internal Communication Function in a South African Organization, Journal of Communication Management, 6(4), 323-339.
  • Holtzhausen D (2002a) The Effects of Workplace Democracy on Employee Communication Behavior: Implications for Competitive Advantage, Competitiveness Review, 12(2), 30-48.
  • Hunt O, Tourish D & Hargie O D W (2000) The communication experiences of education managers: Identifying strengths, weaknesses and critical incidents, The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(3), 120-129.
  • Jo S & Shim S W (2005) Paradigm shift of employee communication: The effect of management communication on trusting relationships, Public Relations Review 31(2), 277-280.
  • Johlke M C & Duhan D F (2000) Supervisor Communication Practices And Service Employee Job Outcomes, Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 154-165.
  • Johnson J D, Donohue W A, Atkin C K & Johnson S (1994) Differences between Formal and Informal Communication Channels, Journal of Business Communication, 31(2), 111-122.
  • Kalla H K (2005) Integrated Internal Communications: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, Corporate Communications. An International Journal, 10(4), 302-314.
  • Kitchen P J & Daly F (2002) Internal Communication during Change Management, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(1), 46-53.
  • Mount D J & Back K-J (1999) A Factor- Analytic Study of Communication Satisfaction in the Lodging Industry, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 23(4), 401-418.
  • Nicoll D C (1993) Corporate Value Statements and Employee Communications, Management Decision, 31(8), 34-40.
  • Pettit J D, Goris J R & Vaught B C (1997) An Examination of Organizational Communication as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 81-98.
  • Pincus J D (1986) Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance, Human Communication Research, 12(3), 395-419.
  • Proctor T & Doukakis I (2003) Change Management: The Role of Internal Communication and Employee Development, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8(4), 268-277.
  • Putti J M, Aryee S & Phua J (1990) Communication Relationship Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, Group & Organization Studies, 15(1), 44-52.
  • Rubin A M (1993) The effects of locus of control on communication motives, anxiety, and satisfaction, Communication Quarterly, 41, 162-171.
  • Rudnick M (1996) Employee Communications: How Technology Impacts on Practice, Managing Service Quality, 6(2), 45-48.
  • Seitel F P (1992) The Practice of Public Relations, 5th Edition, Macmillan ,New York.
  • Serini S A, Toth E, Wright D K & Emig A G (1997) Watch for Falling Glass… Women, Men, and Job Satisfaction in Public Relations: A Preliminary Analysis, Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(2), 99-118.
  • Silverthone C P (2005) Organizational Psychology in Cross-Cultural Perspective, University Press, New York.
  • Smidts A, Pruyn A T H & VanRiel C B M (2001) The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification, Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051- 1062.
  • Sparks B (1994) Communicative Aspects of the Service Encounter, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 17(2), 39-50.
  • Spitzer R & Swidler M (2003) Using a Marketing Approach to Improve Internal Communications, Employment Relations Today, 30(1), 69-82.
  • Therkelsen D J & Fiebich C L (2003) The Supervisor: The Linchpin of Employee Relations, Journal of Communication Management, 8(2), 120-129.
  • Tompkins P K & Wanca-Thibault M (2001) Organizational Communication: Prelude and Prospects, In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putman (Eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods, (pp. xvii-3), Sage Publications, Inc., London.
  • Tourish D (1997) Transforming Internal Corporate Communications: The Power of Symbolic Gestures and Barriers to Change, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2(3), 109-116.
  • Young M & Post J E (1993) Managing to Communicate, Communicating to Manage: How Leading Companies Communicate with Employees, Organizational Dynamics, 22(1), 31-43.
  • Zwijze-Koning K & Jong M (2007) Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a Communication Audit Tool, Management Communication Quarterly, 20(3), 261-282.
APA OKAY A, Okay A (2009). An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. , 51 - 66.
Chicago OKAY Aydemir,Okay Ayla An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. (2009): 51 - 66.
MLA OKAY Aydemir,Okay Ayla An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. , 2009, ss.51 - 66.
AMA OKAY A,Okay A An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. . 2009; 51 - 66.
Vancouver OKAY A,Okay A An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. . 2009; 51 - 66.
IEEE OKAY A,Okay A "An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service." , ss.51 - 66, 2009.
ISNAD OKAY, Aydemir - Okay, Ayla. "An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service". (2009), 51-66.
APA OKAY A, Okay A (2009). An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. Selçuk İletişim, 6(1), 51 - 66.
Chicago OKAY Aydemir,Okay Ayla An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. Selçuk İletişim 6, no.1 (2009): 51 - 66.
MLA OKAY Aydemir,Okay Ayla An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. Selçuk İletişim, vol.6, no.1, 2009, ss.51 - 66.
AMA OKAY A,Okay A An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. Selçuk İletişim. 2009; 6(1): 51 - 66.
Vancouver OKAY A,Okay A An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service. Selçuk İletişim. 2009; 6(1): 51 - 66.
IEEE OKAY A,Okay A "An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service." Selçuk İletişim, 6, ss.51 - 66, 2009.
ISNAD OKAY, Aydemir - Okay, Ayla. "An analytic study of communication satisfaction in the Turkish postal service". Selçuk İletişim 6/1 (2009), 51-66.