Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma

DÖNMEZ POLAT, Dilek; ALTUNDAŞ, Gültekin

Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma

Gültekin ALTUNDAŞ, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Yüksek Okulu, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Dilek DÖNMEZ POLAT (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Turizm İşletmeciliği Bölümü, Gökçeada Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksek Okulu, Çanakkale, Türkiye)

İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi

3 0

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 50 - 74 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma

Öz:

Bu çalışmada, “işletme içerisinde yeni ürün, süreç, pazar, teknoloji, strateji ve yönetim tekniği geliştirmeye yönelik tüm faaliyetler” olarak tanımlanabilecek kurumsal girişimcilik olgusunun öncülü biçiminde görülebilecek olan girişimcilik yönelimi ile örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, yazın taraması eşliğinde, “rekabet koşullarını kendi lehine değiştirmek ve stratejik amaçları gerçekleştirmek ile ilgili yönetsel yetenekleri yansıtan” girişimcilik yönelimi ile örgütsel performans ilişkisi Çanakkale Bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmeleri üzerinde görgül olarak incelenmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen Pearson, Spearman Korelâsyon ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizleri doğrultusunda, girişimcilik yöneliminin boyutları olarak yenilikçiliğin, finansal açıdan çeşitli büyüme ve kârlılık; proaktifliğin, büyüme, kârlılık ve büyüklük / likidite ve saldırgan rekabetçiliğin büyüme, kârlılık ve likidite ile ilgili yazına uygun biçimde pozitif bir ilişki içerisinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında, ayrıca, yenilikçilik ile çalışan performansı; proaktiflik ile çalışan ve müşteri performansları arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance: Evidence from the hotel industry in Çanakkale region

Öz:

It is aimed in this study to present the relationship between the entrepreneurial orientation (i.e. managerial methods, practices and decision-making styles in a business to make competitive conditions in its favor and to meet the strategic objectives), an antecedent of the corporate entrepreneurship (i.e. “all formal and informal activities to develop new products, services, technologies, strategies and administrative techniques) and financial / nonfinancial success in scope of organizational performance. With a literature review, an empirical study has been conducted on hotels businesses in Çanakkale Region in Turkey with Pearson and Spearman Correlations as well as multiple linear regression analysis. The study reveals that there is a positive relationship between innovatiness and change in sales, net profit margin, and net profit level as well as between proactivity and change in sales, net profit margin, gross profit margin, net profit from operations and ability to fund growth. In addition, the competitive aggressiveness is in a similar relationship with change in sales, net profit margin, gross profit margin, and net profit level. Furthermore, the findings suggest that innovatiness and employee performance is positively related to each other as do proactivity, employee and customer performances in terms of nonfinancial performance.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

TRDizin Dışındaki Atıf Sayıları

OpenCitations: 0

OpenAlex: 0

Crossref: 0

[1] B. Dreyer, K. Gronhaug, Uncertainty, flexibility and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research. 57, 5, 484–494 (2004).
[2] E.M. Olson, S.F. Slater, The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance. Business Horizons. 45, 3, 11–16 (2002).
[3] J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 16, 1, 7–24 (1991).
[4] M. Porter, Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press, 1980.
[5] D. Miller, The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science. 29, 7, 770–791 (1983).
[6] V. Sathe, Fostering entrepreneurship in a large diversified firm. Organizational Dynamics. 18, 1, 20–32 (1989).
[7] T. Kelley, J. Littman, The Ten Faces Of Innovation: IDEO's Strategies For Defeating The Devil's Advocate And Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization, Currency, USA: Trade Cloth, 2005.
[8] P. Drucker, The discipline of the innovator. Harvard Business Review. 63, 3, 67–72 (1985).
[9] J.A. Schumpeter, On the concept of social value. Quarterly Journal of Sociology. 23, 2, 213–232 (1909).
[10] J.A. Schumpeter, The Theory Of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, And The Business Cycle, (Çev. Redvers Opie), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
[11] T.J. Hostager, et al., Seeing environmental opportunities: Effects of intrapreneurial ability, efficacy, motivation and desirability. Journal of Organisational Change Management. 11, 1, 11- 25 (1998).
[12] A.M. Fiş, D. Çetindamar, Kurumsal girişimcilik ve performans ilişkisi, 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. 320–325, 2009.
[13] J.C. Hayton, D.J. Kelley, A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management. 45, 3, 407–427 (2006).
[14] G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 5, 429–451 (2001).
[15] K. Chittipeddi, T.A. Wallet, Entrepreneurship and competitive strategy for the 1990's. Journal of Small Business Management. 29, 1, 94–98 (1991).
[16] D.F. Jennings, R.J. Lumpkin, Functioning modeling corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical integrative analysis. Journal of Management. 15, 3, 485–502 (1989).
[17] S.A. Zahra, Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of
[18] V. Gautam, V. Verma, Corporate entrepreneurship: Changing perspectives. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 6, 2, 233–247 (1997). Business Venturing. 6, 4, 259–285 (1997).
[19] R. Van Wyk, M. Adonisi, The role of entrepreneurial characteristics in predicting job satisfaction. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
[20] V. Ağca, M. Kurt, İç girişimcilik ve temel belirleyicileri: Kavramsal bir çerçeve. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 29, (Temmuz-Aralık), 83–112 (2007). . 11, 4, 391–407 (2008).
[21] L. Alpkan, vd., Şirket girişimciliğinin şirket performansına etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 6, 2, 175–189 (2005).
[22] A. Danışman, E. Erkocaoğlan, Kurumsal girişimcilik ve firma performansı: İMKB'de işlem gören firmalar üzerine bir araştırma. İktisat İşletme ve Finans. 22, 11, 82–101 (2007).
[23] Ç. Bulut, vd., Kurumsal girişimcilik: Kavramsal yapı üzerine bir tartışma. Journal of Yasar University. 3, 10, 1–26 (2007).
[24] G. Pinchot, Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper and Row, 1985.
[25] D.F. Kuratko, R.V. Montagno, J.S. Hornsby, Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 4,
[26] H. Schollhammer, Internal corporate entrepreneurship, İçinde, C. Kent, D. Sexton ve K. Vesper (Editörler), Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Clipp, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1982. 49–58 (1990).
[27] W. Guth, A. Ginsberg, Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 4, 297–308 (1990).
[28] R.J. Ellis, N.T. Taylor, Specifying entrepreneurship (N.C. Churchill, et al., Eds.), Frontiers Of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 1987.
[29] I.C. MacMillan, Z. Block, P.N.S. Narasimha, Corporate venturing: Alternatives, obstacles encountered, and experience effects. Journal of Business Venturing. 1, 2, 177–192 (1986).
[30] J.S. Hornsby, D.F. Kuratko, S.A. Zahra, Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing. 17, 3, 253–273 (2002).
[31] P.N. Khandwalla, The Design Of Organizations. New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.
[32] D. Miller, P. Friesen, Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal.
[33] J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environment. Strategic Management Journal. 10, 1, 75–87 (1989). 221–235 (1983).
[34] G.R. Merz, B.J. Parker, M.J. Kallis, Resource-related dependencies: Marketing strategies of technological-based firms. European Journal of Marketing. 23, 4, 44–65 (1990).
[35] G. Knight, Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing. 12, 3, 213–225 (1987).
[36] S.A. Zahra, D.F. Jennings, D.F. Kuratko, The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 24, 2, 45–64 (1999).
[37] A.M. Fiş, D. Çetindamar, Girişimcilik oryantasyonu, kurum içi girişimcilik ve bağlı ölçeklerin Türkçe’de geçerlemesi, 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. 124–132 (2007).
[38] M.H. Morris, D.F. Kuratko, Corporate Entrepreneurship. Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishers, 2002.
[39] B. Antoncic ve R.D. Hisrich, Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 10, 1, 7–24 (2003).
[40] G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construction and linking it to performance. Academy of
[41] O. Richard, et al., Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal. 47, 2, 255–266 (2004). Management Review. 21, 1, 135–173 (1996).
[42] S. Lee, S. Peterson, Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business. 35, 4, 401–416 (2000).
[43] J. Wiklund, D. Shepherd, Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal. 24, 13, 1307–1314 (2003).
[44] J. Wiklund, D. Shepherd, Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing. 20, 1, 71–91 (2005).
[45] A.M. Fiş, S.A. Wasti, Örgüt kültürü ve girişimcilik yönelimi ilişkisi. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. 35, Özel Sayı, 127-164 (2009).
[46] D.F. Kuratko, et al., A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 29, 6, 699–716 (2005).
[47] S.A. Zahra, Governance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technology opportunities. Academy of
[48] T.E. Brown, P.Davidsson, J. Wiklund, An operationalization of Stevenson's conceptualisation of Entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Joumal. 22, 953–968 (2001). Management Journal. 39, 6, 1713–1735 (1996).
[49] H.H. Stevenson, J.C. Jarillo, A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 17–27 (1990).
[50] B. Antoncic, R.D. Hisrich, Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing. 16, 5, 495–527 (2001).
[51] J.M.L. Poon, R.A. Ainuddin, S.A. Junit, Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal. 24, 1, 61–82 (2006).
[52] W. Aloulou, A. Fayolle, A conceptual approach of entrepreneurial orientation within small business context. Journal of Enterprising Culture. 13, 1, 21–45 (2005).
[53] S.A. Zahra, J. Covin, Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-company performance relationship in established firms: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing. 10, 1, 43–58 (1995).
[54] R.D. Ireland, M.A. Hitt, D.G. Sirmon, A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management. 29, 6, 963–989 (2003).
[55] S. Shane, S. Venkataraman, The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review. 25, 1, 217–226 (2000).
[56] S.A. Zahra, D. Garvis, International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing. 15, 5–6, 469–492 (2000).
[57] F.W. Swierczek, T.H. Thai, Motivation, entrepreneurship and the performance of SMEs in Vietnam. Journal of Enterprising Culture. 11, 1, 47–68 (2003).
[58] N.J. Adler, International Dimensions Of Organizational Behavior, 2nd
[59] S. Mueller, A. Thomas, Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing. Edition, Boston: Kent Publishing, 1991. 16, 1,
[60] K. Tajeddini, Effect of customer orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on innovativeness: Evidence from the hotel industry in Switzerland. Tourism Management. (Article in Press), 1–11 (2009). 51–75 (2001).
[61] M. Sonfield, R. Lussier, The entrepreneurial strategy matrix: Strategies for new and ongoing ventures. Business Horizons. 40, 3, 73–77 (1997).
[62] J.M. Stopford, C.W.F. Baden-Fuller, Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal. 15, 7, 521–536 (1994).
[63] B.R. Barringer, A.C. Bluedorn, The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 20, 5, 421–444 (1999).
[64] S.A. Zahra, Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing. 8, 4, 319–340 (1993).
[65] R.A. Burgelman, A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review. 8, 1, 61–70 (1983a).
[66] R.A. Burgelman, Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science. 29, 12, 1349–1363 (1983b).
[67] R.A. Burgelman, A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28, 2, 223–244 (1983c).
[68] J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, New venture strategic posture, structure and performance: An industry life cycle analysis. Journal of
[69] J.L. Naman, D.P. Slevin, Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal. 14, 2, 137–153 (1993). Business Venturing. 5, 2, 123–135 (1990).
[70] S.I. Krauss, et al., Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among Southern African small business owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 14, 3, 315–344 (2005).
[71] K. Atuahene-Gima, A. Ko, An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science. 12, 1, 54–74 (2001).
[72] J. Birkinshaw, Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal. 18, 3, 207–229 (1997).
[73] J.G. Covin, K.M. Green, D.P. Slevin, Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 30, 1, 57–81 (2006).
[74] G.G. Dess, G.T. Lumpkin, J.G. Covin, Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal. 18, 9, 677–695 (1997).
[75] D. Lyon, G.G. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management. 26, 5, 1055–1085 (2000).
[76] H. Mintzberg, Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review. 16, 2, 44–53 (1973).
[77] N. Karagözoğlu, W.B. Brown, Adaptive responses by conservative and entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 5, 4, 269–281 (1988).
[78] J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, R. Schulz, Implementing strategic missions: Effective strategic, structural and tactical choices. Journal of Management Studies. 31, 4, 481–505 (1994).
[79] G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, J.G. Covin, Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal. 18, 9, 677–695 (1997).
[80] J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, The development and testing of an organization-level entrepreneurship scale (R. Ronstadt, J.A. Hornaday, K.H. Vesper, Eds.), Frontiers Of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 1986.
[81] G.T. Lumpkin, C.C. Cogliser, D.R. Schneider, Understanding and measuring autonomy: An entrepreneurial orientation perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 33, 1, 47–69 (2009).
[82] M.H. Morris, D.L. Sexton, The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications of company performance. Journal of Business Research. 36, 1,
[83] J.G. Covin, M.P. Miles, Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 23, 3, 47-63 (1999). 5–13 (1996).
[84] R. Nelson, S. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory Of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[85] J. Wiklund, Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Jonkoping International Business School, Sweden, 1998.
[86] R. Luecke, Managing Creativity and Innovation. Boston. MA: Harvard Business Essentials, 2003.
[87] H.H. Stevenson, D.E. Gumpert, The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review. March-April, 85–94 (1985).
[88] G.G. Dess, G.T. Lumpkin, The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Executive. 19, 1, 147–156 (2005).
[89] A. Neely, J. Hii, Innovation And Business Performance: A Literature Review. Cambridge, MA: The Judge Institute of Management Studies, 1988.
[90] F. Damanpour, Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal. 34, 3, 555–590 (1991).
[91] T. Koçel, İşletme Yöneticiliği. 10. Baskı, İstanbul: Arıkan Basım Yayım Dağıtım Ltd. Şti., 2005, s.314.
[92] D. Dougherty, B.F. Hardy, Sustained innovation production in large mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal. 39, 5, 826–851 (1996).
[93] B.H. Kemelgor, A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 14, 1, 67–87 (2002).
[94] D. Miller, C. Dröge, J.M. Toulouse, Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal. 31, 3, 544–569 (1988).
[95] R.L. Daft, A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Review. 21, 2, 193–210 (1978).
[96] F. Damanpour, Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science. 42, 5, 693–716 (1996).
[97] M.A. Hitt, R.D. Ireland, H. Lee, Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth, and performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 17, 3–4, 231–246 (2000).
[98] F. Damanpour, W. Evans, Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly. 29, 3, 392–402 (1984).
[99] R. Zammuto, E. O’Connor, Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies benefits: The role of organizational design and culture. Academy of Management Review. 17, 4, 701–728 (1992).
[100]T.D. Kuczmarski, Creating an innovative mind-set. Management Review. 85, 11, 47–51 (1996).
[101]S. Kitchell, Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23, 3, 195–205 (1995).
[102]R.D. Russell, C.J. Russell, An examination of effects of organizational norms, organizational structure, and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy. Journal of Management. 18, 4, 639–656 (1992).
[103]A.M. Khan, V. Manopichetwattana, Models for innovative and non innovative small firms. Journal of Business Venturing. 4, 3,187–196 (1989).
[104]R.A. Burgelman, Designs for corporate entrepreneurship. California Management Review. 26, 154–166 (1984).
[105]R. Cantillon, Essay on the Nature of General Commerce. http:// cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/cantillon.htm (Erişim: 20.2.2009).
[106]D.R. Hisrich, P.M. Peters, Entrepreneurship. London: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2002, p.48.
[107]I.S. Baird, H. Thomas, Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review. 10, 2, 230–243 (1985).
[108]J.R. Cornwall, B. Perlman, Organizational Entrepreneurship. Homewood, IL: Boston-Irvin, 1990.
[109]J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin, Adherence to plans, risk taking, and environment as predictors of firm growth. Journal of High Technology Management Research. 9, 2, 207–237 (1998).
[110]D.F. Kuratko, J.S. Hornsby, M. G. Goldsby, Sustaining corporate entrepreneurship: Modelling perceived implementation and outcome comparisons at organizational and individual levels. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 5, 2, 77–90 (2004).
[111]R.H. Brockhaus, Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal. 23, 3, 509–520 (1980).
[112]R.H. Brockhaus, The psychology of the entrepreneur (C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, K.H. Vesper, Eds.), Encyclopedia Of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
[113]I.M. Kirzner, Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature. 35, 1, 60–85 (1997).
[114]S.B. Sitkin, A.L. Pablo, Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy on Management Review.17,1,9-38 (1992).
[115]H.T. Keh, M.D. Foo, B. C. Lim, Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 27, 2, 125–148 (2002). 1, 9–38 (1992).
[116]P. Hughes, R.E. Morgan, A resource-advantage perspective of product-market strategy performance and strategic capital in high technology firms. Industrial Marketing and Management. 36,4,503-517 (2007)
[117]P.R. Dickson, J.J. Giglierano, Missing the boat and sinking the boat: A conceptual model of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Marketing. 50, July, 58–70 (1986).
[118]L. Busenitz, J. Barney, Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing. 12, 1, 9–30 (1997).
[119]G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, Proactiveness versus competitive aggressiveness: Teasing apart key dimensions of an entrepreneurial orientation (P. Reynolds, et al., Eds.), Frontiers Of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 1997.
[120]P. Dimitratos, E. Plakoyiannaki, Theoretical foundations of an international entrepreneurial culture. Journal of International Entrepreneurship. 2, 1, 187–215 (2003).
[121]A. Rauch, M. Frese, Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success: A general model and an overview of findings (C.L. Cooper, I.T. Robertson, Eds.), International Review Of Industrial And Organizational Psychology, 13, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2000.
[122]T. Begley, D. Boyd, Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing. 2, 1, 79–93 (1987).
[123]J.A. Timmons, L.E. Smollen, A.L.M. Dingee, New Venture Creation. Homewood, Illinois: lrwin, 1985.
[124]S.F. Slater, J.C. Narver, Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing. 59, July, 63–74 (1995).
[125]R. Mayer, J. Davis, F. Shoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review. 20, 3, 709–734 (1995).
[126]E.W. Morrison, S.L. Robinson, When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review. 22, 1, 226–256 (1997).
[127]R.E. Miles, G. Miles, C.C. Snow, Collaborative entrepreneurship: A business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics. 35,1, 1–11 (2006).
[128]N. Venkatraman, The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review. 3, 423–444 (1989). 14,
[129]T.S. Bateman, J.M. Crant, The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 14, 2, 103–118 (1993).
[130]C. Lee, K. Lee, J.M. Pennings, Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study of technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 22, 6/7, 615–640 (2001).
[131]D. Miller, Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implication for performance. Academy of Management Journal. 30, 1, 7–32 (1987).
[132]V. Wood, K. Robertson, Strategic orientation and export success: An empirical study. International Marketing Review. 14, 6, 424–444 (1997).
[133]J. Johannessen, A.B. Olsen, G.T. Lumpkin, Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management. 4, 1, 20–30 (2001).
[134]A. Shapero, L. Sokol, The social dimensions of entrepreneurship (C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, K.H. Vesper, Eds.), Encyclopedia Of Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, 1982.
[135]J.G. Covin, T. Covin, Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 14, 4, 35–50 (1990).
[136]I.C. MacMillan, P.E. Jones, Designing organizations to compete. Journal of Business Strategy. 4, 4, 11–26 (1984).
[137]T. Blumentritt, Does small and mature have to mean dull? Defying the ho-hum at SMEs. Journal of Business Strategy. 25, 1, 27–33 (2004).
[138]M.J. Chen, D.C. Hambrick, Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 38, 2, 453–482 (1995).
[139]J. Birkinshaw, N. Hood, S. Young, Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review. 14, 2, 227–248 (2005).
[140]R.A. D’aveni, Hypercompetition: Managing The Dynamics Of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: The Free Press, 1994.
[141]A. Miller, B. Camp, Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures.Journal of Business Venturing. 1, 1, 77–105 (1985).
[142]I.C. MacMillan, D.L. Day, Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry. Journal of Business Venturing. 2, 1, 29–39 (1987).
[143]W.J. Ferrier, Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 44, 4, 858–877 (2001).
[144]R.E. Morgan, C.A. Strong, Market orientation and dimensions of strategic orientation. European Journal of Marketing. 32, 11/12, 1051–1073, (1998).
[145]I.C. MacMillan, P.E. Jones, Designing organizations to compete. Journal of Business Strategy. 4, 4, 11–26 (1984).
[146]A. Utsch, et al., Who becomes a small scale entrepreneur in a post-socialist environment: On the differences between entrepreneurs and managers in East Germany. Journal of Small Business Management. 37, 3, 31–42, (1999).
[147]M.J. Chen, Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry: Towards a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review. 21, 1, 100–134 (1996).
[148]H.J. Sheu, S.F. Lo, A new conceptual framework integrating environment into corporate performance evaluation. Sustainable Development. 13, 2, 79–90 (2005).
[149]G.A. Boyne, Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 13, 3, 367–394 (2003).
[150]H.G. Rainey, Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 2nd Edition, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
[151]R.L. Daft, Organization Theory And Design. 7 th Edition, Mason: South-Western College Publishing, 2000.
[152]G.B. Murphy, J.W. Trailer, R.C. Hill, Measuring performance in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research. 36, 1, 15–23 (1996).
[153]G.G. Dess, R.B. Robinson, Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Management Journal. 5, 3, 265–273 (1984).
[154]J.D. Ford, D.A. Schellenberg, Conceptual issues of linkage in the assessment of organisational performance. Academy of Management Review. 7, 1, 49–58 (1982).
[155]B.M. Beamon, Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 19, 3, 276–277 (1999).
[156]S.E. Seashore, E. Yuchtman, Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. 12, 377–395 (1967).
[157]J.P. Campbell, On the nature of organizational effectiveness (P. Goodman, J.M. Pennings, Eds.), New Perspectives On Organizational Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.
[158]B.H. Clark, Marketing performance measures: History and interrelationships. Journal of Marketing Management. 15, 8, 711 – 732 (1999).
[159]S. Haber ve A. Reichel, Identifying performance measures of small ventures — The case of the tourism industry, Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 3, 257–286 (2005).
[160]N. Venkatraman, V. Ramanujam, Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review. 11, 4, 801–814 (1986).
[161]N. Venkatraman, J. Prescott, Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 1, 1–23 (1990).
[162]T.C. Powell, Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal. 13, 2, 119–134 (1992).
[163]S. Hart, C. Banbury, How strategy making process can make difference? Strategic Management Journal. 15, 4, 251–269 (1994).
[164]R. Eusebio, J.L. Andreu, M.P.L. Belbeze, Measures of marketing performance: A comparative study from Spain. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 18, 2, 145–155 (2006).
[165]N. Aggarwal, M. Gupta, Marketing performance measures: Current status in Indian companies. Decision. 33,1, 47–74 (2006).
[166]R.M. Kanter, When Giants Learn To Dance. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989.
[167]J.M. Geringer, L. Hebert, Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies. 22, 2, 249–263 (1991).
[168]C. Bendheim, S. Graves, Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment: An industry level study. Business and Society. 37, 3, 306–339 (1998).
[169]T. Peters, R.H. Waterman, In Search Of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
[170]G.T. Lumpkin, B.B. Lichtenstein, The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 29, 4, 451–472 (2005).
[171]J.T. Hage, Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology. 25, 597–622 (1999).
[172]H. Atkinson, J.B. Brown, Rethinking performance measures: Assessing progress in UK hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 13, 3, 128–135 (2001).
[173]P.J. Harris, M. Mongiello, Key performance indicators in European hotel properties: General Managers’ choices and company profiles. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 13, 3, 120–128 (2001).
[174]M. Gosselin, An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 54, 5/6, 419–437 (2005).
[175]W. Van Der Stede, C.W. Chow, W.L. Thomas, Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 18, 1, 185–205 (2006).
[176]T.D. Wall, et al., On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology. 57, 1, 95–118 (2004).
[177]M.B.E. Clarkson, A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporation. The Academy of Management Review. 21, 1, 92–117 (1995).
[178]M. Maurer, S. Sachs, Implementing the stakeholder view, learning process for a changed stakeholder orientation. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 17, 93–107 (2005).
[179]S. Berman, et al.,Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy Of Management Journal. 42, 5, 488–505 (1999).
[180]J.E. Mattingly, Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business and Society. 43, 1, 97–114 (2005).
[181]J. Galbreath, Does primary stakeholder management positively affect the bottom line? Management Decision. 44, 8, 1106–1121 (2006).
[182]C.G. Brush, P.A. Vanderwerf, A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 7, 2, 157–170 (1992).
[183]Ö. Turunç, A. Erkuş, M. Polat, İşletmelerde örgütsel performansın değerlendirilmesinde nicel-nitel kriterler: Savunma sanayiinde bir araştırma, 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 761–768 (2005).
[184]G.E. Greenley, G.R. Foxal, External moderation of associations among stakeholder orientation and company performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 15, 1, 51–69 (1998).
[185]N. Bontis, W.C. Keow, R. Stanley, Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 1, 1, 85–100 (2000).
[186]N. Bontis, Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision. 36, 2, 63–76 (1998).
[187]S.W.J. Kozlowski, K.J. Klein, A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes (K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, And Methods In Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
[188]R. Harms, S. Kraus, E. Schwarz, The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 21, 1, 25–49 (2009).
[189]D. George, P. Mallery, SPSS For Windows Step By Step: A Simple Guide And Reference. 11.0 Update, 4th Edition, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2003.
[190] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[191]Y.H. Li, J.W. Huang, M.T. Tsai, Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management. 38, 440–449 (2009).

APA	ALTUNDAŞ G, DÖNMEZ POLAT D (2010). Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. , 50 - 74.
Chicago	ALTUNDAŞ Gültekin,DÖNMEZ POLAT Dilek Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. (2010): 50 - 74.
MLA	ALTUNDAŞ Gültekin,DÖNMEZ POLAT Dilek Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. , 2010, ss.50 - 74.
AMA	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. . 2010; 50 - 74.
Vancouver	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. . 2010; 50 - 74.
IEEE	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D "Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma." , ss.50 - 74, 2010.
ISNAD	ALTUNDAŞ, Gültekin - DÖNMEZ POLAT, Dilek. "Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma". (2010), 50-74.

APA	ALTUNDAŞ G, DÖNMEZ POLAT D (2010). Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 50 - 74.
Chicago	ALTUNDAŞ Gültekin,DÖNMEZ POLAT Dilek Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 39, no.1 (2010): 50 - 74.
MLA	ALTUNDAŞ Gültekin,DÖNMEZ POLAT Dilek Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.39, no.1, 2010, ss.50 - 74.
AMA	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 39(1): 50 - 74.
Vancouver	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 39(1): 50 - 74.
IEEE	ALTUNDAŞ G,DÖNMEZ POLAT D "Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma." İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, ss.50 - 74, 2010.
ISNAD	ALTUNDAŞ, Gültekin - DÖNMEZ POLAT, Dilek. "Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma". İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 39/1 (2010), 50-74.