Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 156 Sayfa Aralığı: 175 - 189 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara

Öz:
Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, Ankara’da 4, 5, 6, 7, ve 8. sınıf ilköğretim öğrencileri arasında zorba, kurban ve zorba-kurban öğrenci oranlarını belirlemektir. Araştırmada, farklı tür zorbaca davranışların (sözel, fiziksel, söylenti yayma, dışlama ve eşyalara zarar verme) cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi ve sosyoekonomik düzey bakımından farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı da incelenmiştir. Araştırma biri alt SED, biri üst SED ve ikisi orta SED olmak üzere dört ilköğretim okulunda, toplam 1154 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, veri toplamak amacıyla araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen “Akran Zorbalığı Anketi” kullanılmıştır. Bulgular öğrencilerin %35.1’inin “kurban”, %30.2’sinin “zorba”, %6.2’sinin ise “hem zorba hem de kurban” olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular ayrıca, “zorba” ve “zorba-kurban” grubunda erkeklerin, “kurban” grubunda ise kızların daha fazla olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Veriler, üst sosyoekonomik düzey (SED) okuldaki çocukların, orta ve alt SED okuldaki çocuklara oranla daha fazla zorbalık yaptıklarını göstermektedir. Araştırmada ayrıca, en yaygın zorbalık türünün sözel zorbalık olduğu, bunu fiziksel zorbalığın izlediği görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: zorba tutum fiziksel zorbalık akran zorbalığı zorba sosyoekonomik düzey cinsiyet farklılıkları Ankara ilk öğretim öğrencileri sözel zorbalık eğitim düzeyi cinsiyet kurban

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Ankara’daki İlköğretim öğrencileri arasında akran zorbalığının incelenmesi

Öz:
The main aim of this research is to find the frequency of occurrence of being a victim, bully, and bully-victim among 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th grade children in Ankara. In addition, different types of bullying behaviors (verbal, physical, rumor spreading, isolation, and attacks on property) are also examined in relation to the sex, grade level, and socio-economical level (SEL). A total of 1154 children from four different schools (one of lower SEL, one of higher SEL and two of middle SEL) took part in the research. In order to collect data a “Peer Bullying Questionnaire” was designed and used by the researcher. The results showed that a substantial number of the children were self-identified as “victims” (35.1%) and “bully/victims” (30.2%) and 6.2% as “bullies”. The results also showed a higher percentage for boys as “bullies”, and “bully/ victims” groups and higher percentage for girls as “victims.” It was also found that children from higher SEL were more commonly engaged in bullying behavior than children from middle and low SEL. The data also showed that the most frequent type of bullying behavior children were subjected to was verbal bullying followed by physical bullying.
Anahtar Kelime: verbal bullying educational level sex victim bully attitude indirect bullying peer bullying bullies socio-economic level gender differences Ankara elementary school students

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ando, M., Asakura, T. & Simons-Morton, B. (2005). Psychosocial influences on physical, verbal,and indirect bullying among Japanese early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(3),268-297.
  • Andreou, E. (2000). Bully/victim problems and their association with psychological constructs in 8 to 12 year-old Greek school children. Aggressive Behaviour, 26, 49-56.
  • Andreou, E. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their association with coping behaviour in conflictual peer interactions among school-age children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 59-67.
  • Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.
  • Camodeca, M., Terwogt, M. M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among schoolage children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development,11(3), 332-345.
  • Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123–130.
  • Çınkır, Ş. & Karaman-Kepenekçi, Y. (2003). Öğrenciler Arası Zorbalık. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 34, 236–253.
  • Dölek, N. (2002). “İlk ve Ortaöğretim Okullarındaki Öğrenciler Arasında Zorbaca Davranışların İncelenmesi ve Zorbalığı Önleme Tutumu Geliştirilmesi Programının Etkisinin Araştırılması.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara University, Istanbul).
  • Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I .M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior, Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 20(1), 81-91.
  • Fleming, L.C. and Jacobsen, K. H. (2009). Bullying among Middle-School Students in Low and Middle Income Countries. Health Promotion International Advance Access published online on November 2, 2009
  • Fonzi, A., Genta, M. L., Menesini, E., Bacchini, D., Bonino, S., & Costabile, A. (1999). Italy. In P. K.Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp.140-156). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Genta, M. L., Menesini, E., Fonzi, A., Costabile, A., & Smith, P. K. (1996). Bullies and victims in schools in central and Southern Italy. European Journal of Psychology, 11, 97-110.
  • Gökler, R. (2007). “İlköğretim Öğrencilerinde Akran Zorbalığının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ankara University, Educational Sciences Institution, Ankara).
  • Gültekin, Z. (2003). “Akran Zorbalığını Belirleme Ölçeğinin Geliştirme Çalışması.” Unpublished Master Dissertation, Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institution, Ankara).
  • Kalliotis, P. (2000). Bullying as a special case of aggression–Procedures for cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 21(1), 47-64.
  • Kandemir, M. (2006). “İlköğretimde Algılanan Sınıf İçi Empatik Atmosfer ile Benlik Algısı Arasındaki Etkileşimin Akran Zorbalığıyla İlişkisi.” Unpublished Master Dissertation, Gazi University, Educational Sciences Institution, Ankara).
  • Kapçı, E. G. (2004). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Zorbalığa Maruz Kalma Türünün ve Sıklığının Depresyon, Kaygı ve Benlik Saygısıyla İlişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 1–13.
  • Kristensen, S. M. & Smith, P. K. (2003). The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical)types of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 479–488
  • Lösel, F., & Bliesener, T. (1999). Germany. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R.Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 224-249). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Mellor, A. (1990). Bullying in Scottish secondary schools. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  • Nansel, T. (2001). School kids cite widespread bullying. Science News, 159(18), 280-280.
  • Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., & Ruan, W. J. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment.Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730-736.
  • Nordhagen, R., Nielsen, A., Stigum, H. & Köhler, L. (2005). Parental reported bullying among Nordic children: a population-based study. Child: Care, Health & Development, 31(6), 693–701.
  • O’Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10,426-441.
  • O’Moore, A. M., Kirkham, C., & Smith, M. (1997). Bullying behaviour in Irish schools: A nationwide study. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 141–169.
  • Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The Development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford & Cambridge, MA:Blackwell Publishers.
  • Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 35, 1171–1190.
  • Olweus, D. (1999a). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P.Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross national perspective (pp. 7-27). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Olweus, D. (1999b). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 28-48). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Öğülmüş, S. (1995). Okullara (Liselerde) Şiddet ve Saldırganlık. Yayımlanmamış Araştırma Raporu.Unpublished Research Report, Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences,Ankara).
  • Özdener, O. E., Özdener, N., Tanır, F., Sutoluk, Z., Kıs, U. S., & Akbaba, M. (2007). Bir İlköğretim Okulunda Okul Zorbalığı Yapan ve Maruz Kalan Çocuklarda Depresyon Durumu. Paper presented at the 11th National Public Health Congress 23-26 October, 2007).
  • Pateraki, L. (2001). Bullying among primary school children in Athens, Greece. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 167-176.
  • Pekel, N. (2004). “Akran Zorbalığı Grupları Arasında Sosyometrik Statü, Yalnızlık Ve Akademik Başarı Durumlarının İncelenmesi.” Unpublished Master Dissertation, Hacettepe University,Social Sciences Institution, Ankara).
  • Pelligrini, A. D., & Long, J. A. (2002). A Longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary to secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280.
  • Pereira, B., Mendonca, D., Beto, C., Valente, L., & Smith, P.K. (2004). Bullying in Portuguese schools. School Psychology International, 25, 241-254.
  • Peskin, M.F., Tortolero, S. R., Markham, C. M. (2006). Bullying and victimization among Black and Hispanic adolescents. Adolescence, 41(163), 467-484.
  • Rios-Ellis, B., Bellamy, L., & Shoji, J. (2000). An examination of specific types of Ijime within Japanese schools. School Psychology International, 21, 227-241.
  • Rolider, A. & Ochayon, M. (2005). Bystander Behaviours among Israeli children witnessing bullying behaviour in school settings. Pastoral Care, June, 36-39.
  • Salmivalli, C. (2002). Is there any age decline in victimization by peers at school? Educational Research, 44(3), 269-277.
  • Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school. The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York/London: The Guilford Press.
  • Smith, P. K. (1991). The silent nightmare: Bullying and victimisation in school peer groups. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 4, 243-246.
  • Smith, P. K., Madsen, K. C., & Moody, J. C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267–285.
  • Takış, Ö. (2007). “Ortaöğretim Kurumları İçin Geliştirilen Zorbaca Davranışlarla Baş Edebilme Programının Etkisinin İncelenmesi.” Unpublished Master Dissertation, Ankara University,Educational Sciences Institution, Ankara).
  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3-25.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2001). “The relationships of bullying, family environment and popularity”.Unpublished Master Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Social Sciences Institution, Ankara.
  • Yurtal F. & Cenkseven F. (2006). İlköğretim Okullarında Zorbalığın İncelenmesi. Paper presented at the 1st symposium for violence and schools: Violence against children at school and surroundings and prevention, Ministry of National Education & UNICEF, Istanbul).
  • Yurtal, F. & Cenkseven, F. (2007). İlköğretim Okullarında Zorbalığın Yaygınlığı ve Doğası. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(28), 3–
  • 13.
APA PİŞKİN M (2010). Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. , 175 - 189.
Chicago PİŞKİN Metin Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. (2010): 175 - 189.
MLA PİŞKİN Metin Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. , 2010, ss.175 - 189.
AMA PİŞKİN M Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. . 2010; 175 - 189.
Vancouver PİŞKİN M Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. . 2010; 175 - 189.
IEEE PİŞKİN M "Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara." , ss.175 - 189, 2010.
ISNAD PİŞKİN, Metin. "Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara". (2010), 175-189.
APA PİŞKİN M (2010). Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 175 - 189.
Chicago PİŞKİN Metin Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. Eğitim ve Bilim 35, no.156 (2010): 175 - 189.
MLA PİŞKİN Metin Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.35, no.156, 2010, ss.175 - 189.
AMA PİŞKİN M Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(156): 175 - 189.
Vancouver PİŞKİN M Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(156): 175 - 189.
IEEE PİŞKİN M "Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara." Eğitim ve Bilim, 35, ss.175 - 189, 2010.
ISNAD PİŞKİN, Metin. "Examination of peer bullying among primary and middle school children in Ankara". Eğitim ve Bilim 35/156 (2010), 175-189.