Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 157 Sayfa Aralığı: 192 - 199 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Life orientations among university students

Öz:
Bu çalışmada üniversite öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeylerinin, beden imgelerinin, akademik başarılarının ve sınıf, fakülte, cinsiyet, yaş değişkenlerinin yaşam yönelimi düzeylerini yordayıp yordamadığı incelenmiştir. Araştırma, Mersin Üniversitesi’nin dört fakültesinden seçilen 214 kız ve 213 erkek, toplam 427 öğrenci ile yapılmıştır. (134 kişi Eğitim Fakültesi, 150 kişi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, 52 kişi Mühendislik Fakültesi ve 91 kişi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi öğrencisi; 120 birinci sınıf, 144 ikinci sınıf, 128 üçüncü sınıf ve 35 dördüncü sınıf). Araştırma grubunun yaş ortalaması 21.26 ve standart sapması 2.17’dir (17 ile 33 arasında değişmektedir). Yaşam yönelimi ile ilgili veriler Scheier ve Carver (1987) tarafından geliştirilen ve Aydın ve Tezer (1991) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan Yaşam Yönelimi Testi ile, Yalnızlıkla ilgili veriler, Russel, Peplau ve Ferguson (1978) tarafından geliştirilen ve Demir (1989) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan UCLA yalnızlık Ölçeği ile, beden imgesi ile ilgili veriler ise Offer, Ostrov, Howard ve Atkinson (1989) tarafından geliştirilen ve Şahin (1993) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Offer Benlik İmgesi Ölçeği, beden imgesi alt ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin yalnızlık düzeyleri, beden imgesi, sınıf, fakülte, cinsiyet, yaş ve akademik başarılarının yaşam yönelimi düzeylerini yordayıp yordamadığını incelemek amacıyla aşamalı çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bu analizin sonucunda üç ayrı anlamlı model elde edilmiştir [beden imgesi (F=70.595; sd=399;1, p=0.000), cinsiyet (F=38.272: sd=399;2, p=0.000) ve sınıf (F=27.271, sd=399;3, p=0.000)]. Beden imgesi yaşam yönelimindeki değişimin %15.1’ini yordarken, bunu sırasıyla % 1.1 ile cinsiyet, % 0.9 ile sınıf izlemektedir. Beden imgesi olumlu yönde arttıkça yaşam yönelimi puanları artmaktadır (t=8.402; p=.000). Ayrıca, kızların yaşam yönelimi puanları erkeklerden daha yüksektir (t=-2.156; p=.02) ve sınıf seviyesi arttıkça yaşam yönelimi puanları azalmaktadır. Fakülte, yaş, akademik başarı ve yalnızlığın, yaşam yönelimini yordamadığı gözlenmiştir. Bulgular, cinsiyetler arası farklılaşma ve eğitim sürecinin davranışlara etkisi yönünden tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: iyimserlik yalnızlık yaşam yönelimi beden imgesi

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam yönelimi

Öz:
In the present research, whether or not loneliness, body image, academic achievement level and grade, faculty, gender and age variables predicted life orientation of university students. The research is conducted with 427 students (214 females and 213males) selected from Faculty of Education (134 students), Faculty of Science and Literature (150 students), Faculty of Engineering (52 students) and Faculty of Economical and Administrative Sciences (91 students) of Mersin University. One-hundredtwenty of them were freshmen, 144 sophomores, 128 juniors and 35 were senior students whose ages ranged between 17-33 with a mean of 21.26 and standard deviation of 2.17. The data related with life orientation was gathered by means of Life Orientation Scale developed by Scheier and Carver (1987) adapted to Turkish by Aydın and Tezer (1991). UCLA Loneliness Scale developed by Russel, Peplau and Ferguson (1978) and adapted to Turkish culture by Demir (1989) was used to gather data related with loneliness, the data related with the body image was developed by Offer Self Image Scale Body Image Subscale developed by Offer, Ostrov, Howard and Atkinson (1989) and adapted to Turkish culture by Şahin (1993). Stepwise multiple regression analysis was administered to the data to examine whether the students’ loneliness levels, body image, academic achievement level and grade, faculty, gender and age predicted life orientation. According to the analysis, three statistically significant models have observed (body image (F=70.595; df=399;1, p=0.000), gender (F=38.272: df=399;2, p=0.000) and grade (F=27.271, df=399;3, p=0.000)). Body image has predicted 15.1% of the variance of life orientation and follows 1.1% gender and 0.9% grade respectively. The greater the body image scores of the students the greater the life orientation scores (t=8.402; p=.000). Additionally, females scored greater on life orientation than males (t=-2.281; p=.023) and while the grade level increase, life orientation scores of the students decrease (t=2.140; p=.033). Faculty, age and academic achievement did not predict the life orientation. Results were discussed with a special concern on gender difference and the effect of educational process to the behavior.
Anahtar Kelime: life orientation body image optimism loneliness

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akbaş, A. (2005). Duygusal Gelişim, Ersanlı, K. & Uzman, E. (Ed.) Gelişim ve Öğrenme (ss. 139-168), İstanbul: Lisans Yayıncılık.
  • Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456-1464.
  • Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V.A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 500-505.
  • Aydın, G. & Tezer, E. (1991). İyimserlik, Sağlık Sorunları ve Akademik Başarı İlişkisi. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 2-9.
  • Baker, B. L., Blacher, J. & Olsson, M. B. (2005). Preschool children with and without developmental delay: behaviour problems, parents’ optimism and well-being. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(8), 575.
  • Bakırcıoğlu, R. (2002). Çocuk Ruh Sağlığı ve Uyum Bozuklukları, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Barlow, P. J., Tobin, D. J. &Schmidt, M. M. (2009). Social interest and positive psychology: positively aligned. The Journal of individual psychology, 65(3), 191-202.
  • Bedi, G. & Brown, S. L. (2005). Optimism, coping style and emotional well-being in cardiac patients. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 57-70.
  • Bektaş, D. Y. (2004). Ergenlerde Beden İmgesi Üzerine Bir Çalışma, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 22, 67-75.
  • Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in children. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765-785.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA., Stanford University Press.
  • Cassidy, J., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Loneliness and peer relationships in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365.
  • Collin-Ve´zina, D., He´bert, M., Manseau, H., Blais, M. & Fernet, M. (2006). Self-concept and dating violence in 220 adolescent girls in the child protective system. Child Youth Care Forum, 35, 319–326.
  • Çivitci, N., Çivitci, A. & Fiyakalı, N. C. (2009). Loneliness and Life Satisfaction in Adolescents with Divorced and Non-Divorced Parents. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri/Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 9(2) 513-525.
  • Davidsdottir, S. (2004). Do we think ourselves sick? Psychological processes and health behaviors associated with adolescents’ somatic complaints. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 1 (1), 42-59.
  • De Minzi, M. C. R. & Sacchi, C. (2004). Adolescent loneliness assessment. Adolescence, 39(156).
  • Demir, A. (1989). U.C.L.A. Yalnızlık Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(23), 14-18.
  • Demirer, Y. (2005). Beden Algısı ve Ruh Sağlığı, [Online]: retrieved on 22 February 2010, at URL: http:// www.bilgice.com/yazi/2439-beden-algisi-ve-ruh-sagligi.html
  • Deniz, M. E., Hamarta, E. & Arı, R. (2005). An Investigation of Social Skills and Loneliness Levels of University Students with respect to Their Attachment Styles in a Sample of Turkish Students. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(1), 19-32.
  • Fitts, S. D. Sebby, R. A. & Zlokovich. M. S. (2009). Humor styles as mediators of the shyness-loneliness relationship. North American Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 257-272.
  • Giddens, A. (1996). Introduction to sociology. New York, Norton & Company.
  • Girgin, G.˙ (2009). Evaluation of the factors affecting loneliness and hopelessness among university students in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(6), 811-818.
  • Hudek-Knežević, J. & Kardum, I. (2009) Five-factor Personality Dimensions and 3 Health related Personality Constructs as Predictors of Health. Croatian Medical Journal, 50, 394-402.
  • Jackson, L. M., Pratt, M. W., Hunsberger, B. & Pancer, S. M. (2005). Optimism as a mediator of the relation between perceived parental authoritativeness and adjustment among adolescents: finding the sunny side of the street. Social Development, 14(2), 273-304.
  • Ji, L. J., Zhang, Z., Usborne, E. & Guan, Y. (2004). Optimism Across Cultures: In response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 25-34.
  • Kim, J., LaRose, R. & Peng, W. (2009) Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic internet use: The relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451-55.
  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early adjustment. Child Development, 67, 1103-1118.
  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Distinct relational systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment? Child Development, 68, 1181-1197.
  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of Gender. New Heaven, CT., Yale University Press.
  • Matthews, E. E. & Cook, P. F. (2009). Relationships among optimism, well-being, self-transcendence, coping, and social support in women during treatment for breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 18, 716–726
  • Modrzejewska, R. & Badura-Madej, W. (2009). Change in self-image in the population of adolescents in 15 years – a comparative study. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2, 41–47.
  • Özaltın, G. (2003). Beden İmgesi Değişimine Yaklaşımlar. Hemşirelik Dergisi, 51.
  • Pilecki, M. & Józefik, B. (2008) Self-image of girls with different subtypes of eating disorders. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 3, 17–22.
  • Raphael, B. & Cubis, J. (1990). The impact of parental loss on adolescents’ psychosocial characteristics. Adolescence, 25(99), 689-700.
  • Renshaw, P. D., & Brown, P. J. (1993). Loneliness in middle childhood: Concurrent and longitudinal predictors. Child Development, 64, 1271-1284.
  • Rokach, A. (2004). Loneliness Then and Now: Reflections on Social and Emotional Alienation in Everyday Life. Current Psychology: Developmental Learning Personality Social, 23(1), 24–40.
  • Rokach, A. & Brock, H. (1997). Loneliness: A multidimensional experience. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 34, 1-9.
  • Rotenberg, Ken J., MacDonald, Keltie J. & King, Emily V. (2004). The Relationship between loneliness and interpersonal trust during middle childhood. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165(3), Issue 3.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, A., & Cutrano, C. E. (1980). Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence for the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 475.
  • Savaşır, I. & Şahin, N. H. 1997. Bilişsel-Davranışçı Terapilerde Değerlendirme: Sık Kullanılan Ölçekler. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Schäfer, M., Korn, S., Smith, P. K., Hunter, S. C. Mora-Merchán, J. A., Singer, M. M. & Meulen K. (2004). Lonely in the crowd: Recollections of bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 379–394.
  • Scheier, M. F. & Carver, C. S. (1987). Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: The influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. Journal of Personality, 55(2), 169-210.
  • Seepersad, S. (2004). Coping with loneliness: Adolescent Online and offline behavior. Cyber psychology & Behavior, 7(1), 35-39.
  • Tennen, H. & Affleck, G. (1987). The costs and benefits of optimistic explanations and dispositional optimism. Journal of Personality, 55(2), 377-393.
  • TUIK (2010). Statistical indicators, [Online]: retrieved on 29 May 2010, at URL: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ yillik/Ist_gostergeler.pdf.
APA gündoğdu m (2010). Life orientations among university students. , 192 - 199.
Chicago gündoğdu mehmet Life orientations among university students. (2010): 192 - 199.
MLA gündoğdu mehmet Life orientations among university students. , 2010, ss.192 - 199.
AMA gündoğdu m Life orientations among university students. . 2010; 192 - 199.
Vancouver gündoğdu m Life orientations among university students. . 2010; 192 - 199.
IEEE gündoğdu m "Life orientations among university students." , ss.192 - 199, 2010.
ISNAD gündoğdu, mehmet. "Life orientations among university students". (2010), 192-199.
APA gündoğdu m (2010). Life orientations among university students. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(157), 192 - 199.
Chicago gündoğdu mehmet Life orientations among university students. Eğitim ve Bilim 35, no.157 (2010): 192 - 199.
MLA gündoğdu mehmet Life orientations among university students. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.35, no.157, 2010, ss.192 - 199.
AMA gündoğdu m Life orientations among university students. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(157): 192 - 199.
Vancouver gündoğdu m Life orientations among university students. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(157): 192 - 199.
IEEE gündoğdu m "Life orientations among university students." Eğitim ve Bilim, 35, ss.192 - 199, 2010.
ISNAD gündoğdu, mehmet. "Life orientations among university students". Eğitim ve Bilim 35/157 (2010), 192-199.