Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis

Tunahan HACIİMAMOĞLU, (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Ekonomi Bölümü, Rize, Türkiye)
Abdulmuttalip PİLATİN (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Finans ve Bankacılık Bölümü, Rize, Türkiye)
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi
4 2
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 58 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 208 - 230 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2023

Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis

Öz:
Supply-leading and demand-following hypotheses are crucial to explain the relationship between economic growth and loans. Based on these two theoretical approaches, the aim of the study explores the causality relationships between economic growth and loans on a provincial basis in Turkey in the period of 2007-2019. Differing from the majority of previous studies, in this study, loans are represented by the change in total loans, the change in commercial and industrial loans, the change in consumer loans, the change in construction loans, and the change in agricultural loans. The relationships between the variables are examined using the panel Granger causality test proposed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012). As a result of the analysis, it is determined that there is a unilateral causal relationship from the change in total loans and the change in commercial and industrial loans to economic growth, and from economic growth to the change in consumer loans and the change in agricultural loans. On the other hand, any causal relationship between the change in construction loans and economic growth has not been found.
Anahtar Kelime: Economic Growth Loans Bank Supply leading Hypotheses Demand following Hypotheses

Türkiye'de İllere Göre Ekonomik Büyüme ve Krediler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Panel Nedensellik Analizinden Ampirik Kanıtlar

Öz:
Ekonomik büyüme ve krediler arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklayabilmek için arz yönlü ve talep takipli hipotezler oldukça önemlidir. Bu iki teorik yaklaşımdan hareketle bu çalışmanın amacı 2007-2019 döneminde Türkiye’de il bazında ekonomik büyüme ile krediler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkilerini araştırmaktır. Önceki çalışmaların çoğundan farklı olarak bu çalışmada krediler toplam kredilerdeki değişme, ticari ve endüstri kredilerindeki değişme, tüketici kredilerindeki değişme, inşaat kredilerindeki değişme ve tarımsal kredilerdeki değişme ile temsil edilmektedir. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) tarafından önerilen panel Granger nedensellik testi kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Analiz sonucunda, toplam kredilerdeki değişme ile ticari ve endüstri kredilerindeki değişmeden ekonomik büyümeye, ekonomik büyümeden ise tüketici kredilerindeki değişme ve tarımsal kredilerdeki değişmeye tek taraflı nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Diğer yandan inşaat kredilerindeki değişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasında herhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisi bulunamamıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Ekonomik Büyüme Kredi Banka Arz Yönlü Hipotez Talep Takipli Hipotez

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (1999). Diversity of opinion and financing of new technologies. J. Financ. Intermed. 8, 68–89.
  • Altunç, Ö. F. (2008). Türkiye’de Finansal Gelişme ve İktisadi Büyüme Arasındaki Nedenselliğin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 3(2), 113-127.
  • Aslan, Ö., ve Küçükaksoy, I. (2006). Finansal Gelişme ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Ekonomisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Uygulama. Ekonometri ve İstatistik, 4, 12-28.
  • Aydın, Y. (2019). Finansal Gelişme ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin Kırılgan Beşli Ülkeleri İçin Analizi. Ekonomi, Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 37-49.
  • Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., &Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164-177.
  • Bayrak, İ. C., ve Telatar, O. M. (2021). İnşaat sektörü ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye ekonomisi üzerine ampirik bir analiz. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 1283-1297.
  • Beck, T., &Levine, R. (2004). Stock markets, banks, and growth: panel evidence. J. Bank. Finance, 28, 423–442.
  • Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R., & Lundblad, C. (2005). Does financial liberalization spur growth? J. Financ. Econ. 77, 3–55.
  • Bijlsma, M., Kool, C., & Non, M. (2018). The effect of financial development on economic growth: a meta-analysis. Applied Economics, 50(57), 6128-6148.
  • Boot, A.W.A., & Thakor, A. (1997). Financial system architecture. Rev. Financ. Stud. 10(3): 693–733.
  • Boyd, J.H., & Smith, B.D. (1998). The evolution of debt and equity markets in economic development. Econ. Theory, 12, 519–560.
  • Bozoklu, Ş., ve Yılancı, V. (2013). Finansal Gelişme ve İktisadi Büyüme Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomiler İçin Analiz. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 161-187.
  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of Economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  • Ceylan, S., ve Durkaya, M. (2010). Türkiye’de kredi kullanimi-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 21-35.
  • Contuk, F. Y., ve Güngör, B. (2016). Asimetrik Nedensellik Testi ile Finansal Gelişme Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 71, 89-108.
  • Coval, J.D. & Thakor, A.V. (2005). Financial intermediation as a beliefs-bridge between optimists and pessimists. J. Financ. Econ. 75, 535–569.
  • Çakar, R., Güngör, S., ve Karakaş, G. (2018). Türkiye’de geleneksel ve katilim bankalarinin toplam kredi hacimleriyle ekonomik büyüme arasindaki ilişkisi. İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Dergisi (İEFD), 4(1), 69-95.
  • Danışoğlu, Ç. A. (2004). Finansal Gelişme ve İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Yönetim, 15(49), 19-29.
  • De Gregorio, J. & Guidotti, P.E. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World development, 23(3), 433-448.
  • Deidda, L., & Fattouh, B., (2008). Banks, financial markets and growth. J. Financ. Intermed. 17, 6–36.
  • Demetriades O. P. & Hussein A. K. (1996). Does Financial Development Cause Economic Growth? Time Series evidence from 16 countries, Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 387-411.
  • Demir Bingöl, N., Bingöl, M. and Emsen, Ö. S. (2022). Türkiye'de Mevduatların Krediye Dönüşümünün Büyümeye Etkileri: Tüketim Çekişli mi? Yatırım İtişli mi? BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 16(1), 27-61
  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., Feyen, E., & Levine, R. (2013). The evolving importance of banks and securities markets. World Bank Econ. Rev., 27(3), 476–490.
  • Dumitrescu, E. I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Noncausality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  • Goldsmith, R. W. (1969). Financial Structure and Development, Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct.
  • Gurley, J. & Shaw, E. (1967). Financial Structure and Economic Development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 15(3), 257-268.
  • Guru, B. K., & Yadav, I. S. (2019). Financial development and economic growth: panel evidence from BRICS. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(47), 113-126.
  • Güven, S. (2002). Türkiye’de Banka Kredileri ve Büyüme. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 197, 88-100.
  • Hassan, M., Sanchez, B. & Yu, J. (2011). Financial development and economic growth: New evidence from panel data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 88–104.
  • Hicks, J. (1969). A Theory of Economic History, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Ho, S. H., & Saadaoui, J. (2022). Bank credit and economic growth: a dynamic threshold panel model for ASEAN countries. International Economics, 170, 115-128.
  • Holmstrom, B. & Tirole, J. (1993). Market liquidity and performance monitoring. J. Polit. Econ. 101(4), 678–709.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
  • Kahouli, B. (2017). The short and long run causality relationship among economic growth, energy consumption and financial development: Evidence from South Mediterranean Countries (SMCs). Energy Economics, 68, 19-30.
  • Kar, M., &Pentecost, J. E. (2000). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Turkey: Further Evidence on the Causality Issue. Loughborough University Department of Economics, Economic Research Paper No 00/27.
  • Kar, M., Nazlioglu, S., & Agir, H. (2011). Financial development and economic growth nexus in the MENA countries: Bootstrap panel granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 28, 685–693.
  • Kılıç, M., Gürbüz, A., ve Ayrıçay, Y. (2019). Finansal gelişmenin ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: türkiye örneği. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 53-68.
  • King, R.G. & Levine, R., (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Q. J. Econ. 108(3), 717–738.
  • Levine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of monetary Economics, 46(1), 31-77.
  • Lucas, R. E., (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monet. Econ. 22, 3–42.
  • Miller, M. H. (1998). Financial Markets and Economic Growth. Journal of Applied Corporate.
  • Nyasha, S., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2014). Bank-based financial development and economic growth: A review of international literature. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 6(2), 112-132.
  • Ofori-Abebrese, G., Pickson, R. B., & Diabah, B. T. (2017). Financial development and economic growth: Additional evidence from Ghana. Modern Economy, 8(2), 282-297.
  • Öztürkler, H. & Çermikli, A. H. (2007). Türkiye’de Bir Parasal Aktarım Kanalı Olarak Banka Kredileri. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(51), 57-68.
  • Patrick, H. (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14, 174-189.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, No. 1240, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA): Bonn
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H. & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
  • Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B. & Bahmani, S. (2018). Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 132, 130-142.
  • Robinson, J., (1952). The generalization of the general theory. The Rate of Interest and Other Essays. (pp. 67–142). London: Macmillan.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Singh, A., & Weisse, B.A. (1998). Emerging stock markets, portfolio capital flows and long-term economic growth: micro and macroeconomic perspectives. World Dev. 26(4), 607–622.
  • Valickova, P., Havranek, T., & Horvath, R. (2015). Financial development and economic growth: A meta analysis. Journal of economic surveys, 29(3), 506-526.
  • Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu, BDDK, (2020). İllere Göre Bankacılık Verileri, Retrieved from https://www.bddk.org.tr/BultenFinTurk
  • Türkiye Bankalar Birliği, TBB, (2021). Banka Kredilerinin Sektörel Dağılımı Mart 2021, Retrieved from https://www.tbb.org.tr/Content/Upload/Dokuman/7769/Sektorel_Kredi_Dagilimi_Mart_2021.pdf
APA HACIİMAMOĞLU T, Pilatin A (2023). Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. , 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
Chicago HACIİMAMOĞLU TUNAHAN,Pilatin Abdulmuttalip Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. (2023): 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
MLA HACIİMAMOĞLU TUNAHAN,Pilatin Abdulmuttalip Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. , 2023, ss.208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
AMA HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. . 2023; 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
Vancouver HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. . 2023; 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
IEEE HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A "Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis." , ss.208 - 230, 2023. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
ISNAD HACIİMAMOĞLU, TUNAHAN - Pilatin, Abdulmuttalip. "Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis". (2023), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
APA HACIİMAMOĞLU T, Pilatin A (2023). Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 58(1), 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
Chicago HACIİMAMOĞLU TUNAHAN,Pilatin Abdulmuttalip Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 58, no.1 (2023): 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
MLA HACIİMAMOĞLU TUNAHAN,Pilatin Abdulmuttalip Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, vol.58, no.1, 2023, ss.208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
AMA HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2023; 58(1): 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
Vancouver HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2023; 58(1): 208 - 230. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
IEEE HACIİMAMOĞLU T,Pilatin A "Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis." Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 58, ss.208 - 230, 2023. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
ISNAD HACIİMAMOĞLU, TUNAHAN - Pilatin, Abdulmuttalip. "Investigating the Relationship between Economic Growth and Loans by the Provinces of Turkey: Empirical Evidence from Panel Causality Analysis". Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 58/1 (2023), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.02.1974
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 22:57

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları