Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi

Olcay BEKTAŞ, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Bursa, Türkiye)
ELIF YÜCEL (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Bursa, Türkiye)
Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi
16 10
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 96 Sayfa Aralığı: 59 - 84 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.25095/mufad.1177991 İndeks Tarihi: 26-03-2023

Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi

Öz:
Günümüzde mevcut raporlama yöntemlerinin başta yatırımcılar ve pay sahipleri olmak üzere işletmenin tüm paydaşlarının sürekli değişen ihtiyaç ve beklentilerini karşılama konusunda yetersiz kalması nedeniyle, işletmelerin cari dönemde ve uzun vadede nasıl değer yaratabildiğini açıklayabilen kurumsal raporlama sistemlerinin son aşaması olarak entegre raporlama sistemi ortaya çıkmıştır. İşletmelerin uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliğini sağlamayı amaçlayan entegre raporlama, değer yaratma sürecinde tüm sermaye öğelerinin işletme stratejileriyle bütünleştirilerek faaliyetlere entegre edilmesi ile karar verme süreçlerinin çok daha hızlı ve etkin hale gelmesini sağlamakta ve işletmelerin gerek toplumsal gerek çevresel gerekse finansal performansını yükseltmektedir. Dolayısıyla sürdürülebilirlik kavramı her ne kadar daha çok ekonomik ve ekolojik açıdan değerlendirilse de insan temelli sorunlara karşı entegre raporlarda sosyal sürdürülebilirlik de tüm boyutlarla birlikte ele alınmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Türkiye’de son üç yılda düzenli entegre rapor yayınlayan işletme ve kurumların raporlarında, sosyal sürdürülebilirlik kavramına ne ölçüde yer verildiği ve hangi boyutlarına vurgu yaptıldığını tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla çalışmada MAXQDA programı kullanılarak 39 entegre rapor içerik analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiş ve işletmelerin en fazla eğitim ve eşitlik alt boyutlarında sosyal sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sağladıkları tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Entegre raporlama sosyal sürdürülebilirlik içerik analizi

Socıal Sustaınability in Integrated Reporting: A Content Analysis of Integrated Reports Published in Turkey

Öz:
Today, the integrated reporting system has emerged as the last stage of corporate reporting systems that can explain how businesses can create value in the current period and in the long run, since current reporting methods are insufficient to meet the ever-changing needs and expectations of all stakeholders, especially investors and shareholders. Integrated reporting, which aims to ensure the long-term sustainability of businesses, enables decision-making processes to become much faster and more effective by integrating all capital elements into business strategies in the value creation process and increases both social, environmental and financial performance of businesses. Therefore, although the concept of sustainability is evaluated more economically and ecologically, social sustainability should be considered together with all dimensions in integrated reports against human-based problems. The main purpose of this study is to determine to what extent the companies and institutions that have regularly published integrated reports in Turkey in the last three years include the concept of social sustainability in their reports and which sub-dimensions they mostly emphasize. For this purpose, 39 Integrated Reports were analyzed with the content analysis method using the MAXQDA program in the study and it was determined that the enterprises contributed the most to social sustainability in the dimensions of education and equality.
Anahtar Kelime: Integrated reporting social sustainability content analysis

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abeysekera I. (2013), “A Template for Integrated Reporting”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 14, pp. 227–245.
  • Adams, C. A. (2002), “Internal Organisational Factors Influencing Corporate Social And Ethical Reporting: Beyond Current Theorizing”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), pp.223–250.
  • Adger, W. N. (2000), “Ecological And Social Resilience: Are They Related", Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), pp.347–364.
  • Anisul Hug, F. - Stevenson, M. - Zorzini, M. (2014), “Social Sustainability in Developing Country Suppliers: An Exploratory Study in t he Ready Made Garments Industry of Bangladesh”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 34(5), pp.610–638.
  • Anria S. Z. (2013), “Sustainability and Integrated Reporting in The South African Corporate Sector”, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12 (8), pp.903-926.
  • Aras, G. - Sarıoğlu, G. U. (2015), Kurumsal Raporlamada Yeni Dönem: Entegre Raporlama, TÜSİAD, Baskı: İmak Ofset, İstanbul.
  • Argüden Yönetişim (2020), 2020 Yılı Entegre Raporu, https://argudenacademy.org/docs/content/Arguden-Yonetisim-Akademisi-2020-Entegre-Raporu.pdf, Erişim: 10.08.2022
  • Bai, C. - Sarkis, J. (2010), “Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with Grey System and Rough Set Methodologies”, International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), pp.252–264.
  • Barreiro-Gen, M. - Lozano, R. (2020), “How Circular is the Circular Economy? Analysing the Implementation of Circular Economy in Organisations”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (8), pp.3484–3494.
  • Baskaran, V. - Nachiappan, S. - Rahman, S. (2012), “Indian Textile Suppliers Sustainability Evaluation Using the Grey Approach”, International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), pp.647–658.
  • Bassi, F. - Dias, J.G. (2020), “Sustainable Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enter- Prises In The European Union: A Taxonomy of Circular Economy Practices”, Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (6), pp.2528–2541.
  • Blewitt, J. (2014), Understanding Sustainable Development, 2nd Ed., Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
  • Bluffstone1 R. (2008), Child Labor and Improved Common Forest Management in Bolivia. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability, Routledge, pp. 137–154.
  • Can, E. - Kaptanoğlu, S. - Lazgeen, M. H. (2018), “Akademisyenlerde Cam Tavan Sendromunun Güç Mesafesi ile İlişkisi”, Öneri Dergisi. 13(50), pp.52-64.
  • Carter, C. R. - Jennings, M. M. (2000), Purchasing’s Contribution to the Socially Responsible Management of the Supply Chain, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University, USA.
  • Carter, C. R. - Jennings, M. M. (2004), “The Role of Purchasing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Analysis”, Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), pp.145–186.
  • Chiong, P. N.T. (2010), An Examination of Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Level and Its Impact on Financial Performance, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Multimedia University, Malaysia.
  • Cuthill, M. (2010), “Strengthening The ‘Social’ in Sustainable Development: Developing A Conceptual Framework For Social Sustainability in A Rapid Urban Growth Region in Australia”, Sustainable Development, 18(6), pp.362-373
  • Daub, C.H., (2007), “Assessing The Quality of Sustainability Reporting: An Alternative Methodological Approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (1), pp.75–85.
  • De Brito, M. P. - Carbone, V. - Blanquart, C. M. (2008), “Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and Performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, 114 (2), pp.534–553.
  • Dillard, J. - Dujon, V . - Mary C. King. (2008), Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability (J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (eds.),Routledge.
  • Dou, Y. - Sarkis, J. (2010), “A Joint Location and Outsourcing Sustainability Analysis For A Strategic Offshoring Decision”, International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), pp. 567–592.
  • Dyllick, T. - Hockerts, K. (2002),“Beyond the Case for Corporate Sustainability”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), pp.130-141.
  • Eccles, Robert G. - Serafeim, George (2014), Corporate and Integrated Reporting: A Functional Perspective, Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
  • Emmelhainz, M. A. - Adams, R. J. (1999). “The Apparel Industry Response To ‘Sweatshop’ Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(2), pp.51–57.
  • Ercan, C. - Kestane, A. (2017),“Kurumsal Raporlamada Yeni Bir Yaklaşım Olarak Entegre Raporlama ve Bir Vaka Çalışması”, ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 4(8), ss.13- 29
  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V. - Rodríguez-Ariza, L. - Garcia-Sánchez, I. M. (2014), “Explanatory Factors Of Integrated Sustainability and Financial Reporting”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), pp.56–72
  • Gençoğlu Gücenme, Ü. - Aytaç, A. (2016), “ Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Açısından Entegre Raporlamanın Önemi ve BİST Uygulamaları”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (72), ss.51-66
  • Govindan, K. - Khodaverdi, R. - Jafarian, A. (2013), “A Fuzzy Multi Criteria Approach for Measuring Sustainability Performance of A Supplier Based on Triple Bottom Line Approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, pp.345–354.
  • Güçlü, F. (2007), Muhasebe Denetimi İlkeler ve Teknikler, Detay Yayın., 2. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Hahn, T . - Scheermesser, M. (2006), “ Approaches to Corporate Sustainability Among German Companies” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), pp.150-165.
  • Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic Principles of Sustainable Development, Global Development And Environment Institute Working Paper 00-04, Tufts University, USA.
  • Harris, J. – Goodwin, N. (2001), Volume Introduction. In A Survey of Sustainable Development: Social and Economic Dimensions, edited by Jonathan M. Harris, Timothy A. Wise, Kevin P. Gallagher, and Neva R. Goodwin. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Haji, A.A. – Anifowose, M. (2017), “Initial Trends in Corporate Disclosures Following The Introduction of Integrated Reporting Practice in South Africa”, Journal of Intellectual Capital,18(2), pp.373-399
  • Herbert, S. (2018), Trends in Sustainability Disclosures in The Integrated Reports of South African Listed Companies, Master Dissertation, University of Cape Town.
  • Hutchins, M. J. - Sutherland, J. W. (2008), “An exploration of Measures of Social Sustainability and Their Application to Supply Chain Decisions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), pp.1688–1698.
  • https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/glass-ceiling-index?fsrc=core-app-economist, (Erişim: 15.09.2022)
  • IIRC (2013), International Integrated Reporting Framework, https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE- INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf (Erişim: 08.08.2022)
  • Islam, S. M.N.- Munasinghe, M. -Clarke, M.(2003), “Making Long- Term Economic Growth More Sustainable: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits”, Ecological Economics, 47 (2- 3), pp.149-166.
  • James, Marianne L. (2013), “Sustaınabılıty and Integrated Reportıng: Opportunıtıes And Strategıes For Small and Mıdsıze Companıes”, Entrepreneurial Executive, (18), pp.17- 28.
  • King, M . - Roberts, L . (2017). Entegre Düşünce, Çev. Erkin Erimez, Argüden Yönetişim Akademisi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Kolk, A. - Hong, P. - Van Dolen, W. (2012), “Corporate Social Responsibility in China An Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Retailers’ Sustainability Dimensions”, Enterprise Governance EJournal, 19(5), pp.289–303
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, In Sage Publications (2nd ed.)
  • Krzus, M . P. (2012), “Entegre Raporlama: Şimdi Değilse, Ne Zaman?”, Kurumsal Yönetim Dergisi, (16), ss.64-67.
  • Lodhia, S. - Martin, N. (2014), “Corporate sustainability Indicators: An Australian Mining Case Study”, Journal of Cleaner Production. 84, pp.107-115.
  • Low, M. - Samkin, G. - Li, Y. (2015), “Voluntary Reporting of Intellectual Capital: Comparing The Quality of Disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and U nited Kingdom Universities”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), pp.779–808.
  • Magis, K. - Shinn, C. (2008), Emergent Principles of Social Sustainability, In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability Routledge,,pp. 15–44.
  • Mani, V. - Gunasekaran, A. - Delgado, C. (2018), “Supply Chain Social Sustainability: Standard Adoption Practices in Portuguese Manufacturing Firms”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), pp.289–303.
  • Marimon, F. - Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M. - Rodríguez, M. D. P. - Cortez Alejandro, K. A. (2012), “The Worldwide Diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative: What is the Point?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, pp.132–144
  • Maroun, W. - Lodhia, S. (2017), Sustainability and Integrated Reporting By The Public Sector and Not-For-Profit Organizations, In Sustainability Accounting and Integrated Reporting; de Villiers, C., Maroun, W., Eds.; Routledge: London, pp.101–120.
  • Maubane, P. - Prinsloo, A. - Van Rooyen, N. (2014), “Sustainability Reporting Patterns Of Companies Listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange”, Public Relations Review, 40, pp.153–160.
  • Mauro, S. G. - Cinquini, L. - Simonini, E. -Tenucci, A. (2020), “Moving From Social and Sustainability Reporting t o Integrated Reporting: Exploring The Potential Of Italian Public-Funded Universities’ Reports”, Sustainability, 12(8), pp.1-19
  • Mckenzie, S. (2004), Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions, Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series, No 27., South Australia.
  • Meredith, J. (1993), “Theory Building Through Conceptual Methods”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), pp.3–11.
  • Nevado-Peña, D. - López-Ruiz, V. R . - Alfaro-Navarro, J. L. (2015), “The Effects Of Environmental And Social Dimensions Of Sustainability in Response to The Economic Crisis Of European Cities”, Sustainability, 7(7), pp.8255–8269.
  • Neuman, W.L., (2000). Social Research Methods. Allyn and Bacon, London.
  • Öztürk, B. A. - Özçelik, F. (2014), “Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi- Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line”, Business & Economics Research Journal, 5(3), pp.129–147.
  • Pisani, J. A. (2006), “Sustainable Development- Historical Roots of Concept”, Environmental Sciences, 3(2), pp.83-96.
  • Pozzoli, M. - Gesuele, B. (2016), “The Quality of Integrated Reporting in The Public Utilities Sector: First Empirical Impressions”, International Journal of Business Research and Development, 5(1), pp.23-31.
  • Rizos, V. - Tuokko, K. - Behrens, A. (2017), The Circular Economy: A Review of Defini- Tions, Processes and Impacts. CEPS Research Report No 2017/8. Centre for Euro- pean Policy Studies.
  • Roberts, R. W. (1992), “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: an Application of Stakeholder Theory ”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), pp.595– 612.
  • Roca, L.C. - Searcy, C. (2012), “An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports” Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), pp.103-118.
  • Sanchez, I. M.G. - Ariza, L.R. - Aceituno, J. V.F. (2013). “The Cultural System and Integrated Reporting”, International Business Review, 22 (5), pp.828-838.
  • Sangiorgi, D. - Siboni, B. (2017), “The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: What has been done and what should be done”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), pp.354–372.
  • Sassen, R. - Azizi, L. (2018), “Voluntary Disclosure o f Sustainability Reports By Canadian Universities”, Journal of Business Economics, 88(1), pp.97–137.
  • Stubbs, W. – Higgins, C. (2014), “Integrated Reporting and Internal Mechanisms of Change”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1068-1089.
  • Siboni, B. - del Sordo, C. - Pazzi, S. (2013), “Sustainability Reporting in State Universities”, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 4(2), pp.1–15.
  • Solomon, J.- Maroun, W. (2012), “Integrated Reporting: The Influence of King III on Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting”, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), pp.1-56.
  • Stacchezzini, R. - Melloni, G. – Lai, A. (2016). “Sustainability Management and Reporting: The Role Of Integrated Reporting For Communicating Corporate Sustainability Management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (136), pp.102-110
  • The World Bank (1997), Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development, Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series No.17, The World Bank, Washington, D. C.
  • Tıraş, H. (2014), “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Çevre: Teorik Bir İnceleme”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), ss.57-73.
  • Tüm, K . (2014), “ Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve Muhasebeye Yansımaları: Sürdürülebilirlik Muhasebesi”, Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 5 (1), ss.58-81.
  • United Nations (2002), Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Wilson, M. (2003), Corporate Sustainability: What Is It And Where Does It Come From?, Ivey Business Journal, March/April, 1-5.
  • Winter, S. - Lasch, R. (2016), “Environmental and Social Criteria in Supplier Evaluation – Lessons From the Fashion And Apparel Industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, pp.175–190.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future. Oxford, UK
  • Wuttichindanon, S. (2017), “Corporate social Responsibility Disclosure—Choices of R eport and its Determinants: Empirical Evidence From Firms Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand”, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), pp.156–162
  • Yavuz, A. (2010), “Sürdürülebilirlik Kavramı ve İşletmeler Açısından Sürdürülebilir Üretim Stratejileri”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), ss.63-86.
APA BEKTAŞ O, YÜCEL E (2022). Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. , 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
Chicago BEKTAŞ OLCAY,YÜCEL ELIF Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. (2022): 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
MLA BEKTAŞ OLCAY,YÜCEL ELIF Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. , 2022, ss.59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
AMA BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. . 2022; 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
Vancouver BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. . 2022; 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
IEEE BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E "Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi." , ss.59 - 84, 2022. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
ISNAD BEKTAŞ, OLCAY - YÜCEL, ELIF. "Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi". (2022), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1177991
APA BEKTAŞ O, YÜCEL E (2022). Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 0(96), 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
Chicago BEKTAŞ OLCAY,YÜCEL ELIF Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 0, no.96 (2022): 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
MLA BEKTAŞ OLCAY,YÜCEL ELIF Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, vol.0, no.96, 2022, ss.59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
AMA BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2022; 0(96): 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
Vancouver BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2022; 0(96): 59 - 84. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
IEEE BEKTAŞ O,YÜCEL E "Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi." Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 0, ss.59 - 84, 2022. 10.25095/mufad.1177991
ISNAD BEKTAŞ, OLCAY - YÜCEL, ELIF. "Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi". Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 96 (2022), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1177991
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 6:14

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları