An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States

EMİNE BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK, (Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur, Türkiye)
Peter R. LITCHKA (Loyola Univercity in Maryland, USA)
Eğitim ve Bilim
15 6
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 158 Sayfa Aralığı: 58 - 74 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States

Öz:
Bu nicel araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye'deki ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'ndeki okul müdürlerinin liderlik algısının hem müdürlerin cinsiyetine hem de öğretmenlerin cinsiyetine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışma 2009 yüında yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemİni Türkiye'de çalışan 144 müdür ve 1076 öğretmen ile Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde çalışan 198 müdür ve 706 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada Türkiye'deki öğretmen ve müdürlerin algılarının cinsiyete göre anlamlı fark göstermediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Fakat Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde iki boyutta anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Yürekten Cesaretlendirmek boyutunda erkek öğretmenlerin müdürlerinin liderliğine ilişkin algı ortalamalan kadın öğretmenlerin kendi müdürlerine ilişkin algı ortalamalarından yüksek iken, Ortak Vizyon Oluşturmak boyutunda kadın müdürlerin kendi liderlik algılarına ilişkin puanları erkek müdürlerin kendi liderlik algılarından yüksek çıkmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: liderlik toplumsal cinsiyet okul müdürleri

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Türkiye ve America Birleşik Devletleri'ndeki okul müdürlerinin liderlik yeterliklerinin cinsiyet değişkenine göre incelenmesi

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to examine if perceptions of the leadership skills of principals in both Turkey and the United States were influenced by the gender of the principal and the gender of teachers for whom they lead. The study, conducted in 2009 included a sample of 144 principals and 1076 teachers from Turkey, and 198 principals and 706 teachers from the United States. No statistically signficantly differences, according to gender, in the mean were found among the groups of principals and teachers in Turkey. However, in the United States, statistically signficant differences in the means were found in two domains-Encouraging the Heart, in which male teachers had significantly higher scores than female teachers in the rating of their principals, and in Inspiring Shared Vision, where female principals had significantly higher self-ratings than male principals.
Anahtar Kelime: leadership gender school principals

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adler, S., Laney, J., & Parker, M. (1993). Managing women: Feminism and power in educational management. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Altınışık, S. (1988). Kadın Öğretmenlerin Okul Müdürü Olmasının Engelleri [The barriers of female teachers' to be a school principal]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Anafarta, N., Sarvan, F., & Yapıcı, N. (2008). Konaklama işletmelerinde Kadın Yöneticilerin Cam Tavan Algısı: Antalya İli'nde Bir Araştırma [Perception of glass ceiling of female managers in the hospitality enterprises: a survey in Üre city of Antalya]. Akdeniz I.I.B.F. Dergisi 25(8), 111-137.
  • Andrews, R., & Soder, R. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 44, 9-11.
  • Barbuto, J.E., Fritz, S.M., Matkin, G.S., & Marx, D.B. (2007). Effects of gender, education, and age upon leaders' use of influence tactics and full range leadership behaviors. Sex Roles, 56(1-2), 71-83.
  • Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Bayrak, S., & Mohan, Y. (2001). Erkek Yöneticilerin Çalışma Yaşamı ve Liderlik Davranışları Açısından Kadın Yöneticileri Algılama Tarzları [Male managers' perception style to female managers in terms of working life and leadership behavior]. Amme idaresi Dergisi, 34(2), 89-114.
  • Beırnis, W., & Goldsmith, J. (2003). Learning to lead. New York: Basic Books.
  • Blake, R. & Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
  • Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1978). The Nezv Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
  • Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1985). The manager ini grid III: The key to leadership excellence. Houston, TX: Gulf.
  • Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2001). Leading with soul. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Boydak Özan, M., & Akpınar, B. (2002). Okul Yönetiminde Kadın Yöneticilerin Başarısı [The success of women administrators in school administration]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal B ilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 219-234.
  • Can, N. (2008). Okul Yöneticilerinin Yönetimde Cinsiyet Faktörüne İlişkin Görüşleri [The opinions of school principals on gender factor in administration]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 35-41.
  • Carli, L., & Eagly, A. (1999). Gender effects oninfluence and emergent leadership. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 202-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Çelikten, M. (2004). Okul Müdürü Koltuğundaki Kadınlar: Kayseri İli Örneği [Women in administrators' chairs: The case of Kayseri province]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 91-118.
  • Çelikten, M., & Yerıi, Y. (2004). Okul Müdürlerinin Liderlik ve Yöneticilik Özelliklerinin Cinsiyet Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of leadership and management characteristics of school administrators with respect to sexuality]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 12(2), 305-314.
  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996, 2008). Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: Standards for school leaders. Washington, DC.
  • Covey, S. (1992). Principle-centered leadership. New York: Fireside.
  • Eagly, A., Wood, W., & Diekman, A, (2000). Social role theory of sex difference and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. Truatner (Eds), The developmental social psychology of gender, (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Erçetin, Ş.Ş., & Çalışkan Maya, İ. (2005). Bayan Okul Müdürlerinin Mesleki ve Aile Profilleri ve İdari Rollerini Yerine Getirirken Karşılaştıkları Engeller [Professional and famüy profiles of female school principals and obstacles faced when fulfilling the administrative role], XTV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresinde sunulan bildiri, Denizli, Türkiye.
  • Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. (1995). A solid investment: Making full use of the nation's human capital Washington, DC: Author.
  • Fenwiclc, L., & Pierce, M. (2001). The principal shortage: Crisis or opportunity. The Principal Retrieved from www.naesp.org/comm/p0301a.htm
  • Friedman, T. (2005). The ivorld is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership, Sex Roles, 55(1-2), 51-61.
  • Green, L. (2010). The four dimensions of principal leadership. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Green, W. (1999). Self-perceived characteristics of leadership behaviors of male and female principals in Detroit Public Schools. Unpublished master's thesis, Eastern Michigan University/ Ypsilanti, MI
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
  • Herndon, J. (2002). Gender differences in high school principals'leadership styles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pacific, California.
  • Hoff,D., &: Mitchell,S. (2008). Insearch of leaders: Gender factors inschoo administration. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 28(2). Retrieved from http://advancingwomen.com/awl/ awl_wordpress/in-searcli-of-leaders-gender~factors-in-school-administration/
  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • House, R., & Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. In House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., Gupta V., and Associates (Eds.). Cidture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 9-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hudson, J., & Rea, D. (1998). Teachers' perceptions of women in the principalship. Advancing Women in Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.advancingwomen.com/awl/summer98/HUD.html.
  • Institute for Educational Leadership (2000). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. Washington, D.C.
  • Jago, A. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management Science, 28(3), 315-336.
  • Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü. (May 2009). Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu [The situation of women in Turkey]. Ankara: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ksgm.gov.tr/Pdf/ t%C3%BCrIdyede%20kadinin%20durumu%20SON%2005.05.2009.doc
  • Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2001). Leadership practices inventory: Participant's workbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lashway, L. (2003). Transforming principal preparation. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • Lee, V., Dedrick, R., & Smith, J. (1991). The effect of die social organization of the school on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190-208.
  • Lugg, C. (2003). Gender, sexual orientation, and a new politics of education? Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 95-134.
  • Lucas, S., & Valentine, J. (2002). Transformational leadership: Principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 468 519).
  • Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • McGee-Banks, C. (2007). Gender and race as factors in educational leadership and administration.
  • In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (2nd ed.). (pp. 299-338). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (2007). Contexts of elementary and secondanj education. Retrieved January 23, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2007/section4/ indicator34.asp
  • Norürouse, P. (2009). Leadership theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Pigford, A., & Tonnsen, S. (1993). Women in school leadership. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publications.
  • Rudman L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743-762.
  • Shein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675-688.
  • Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Shakeshaft, C., Nowell, I., & Perry, A. (1991). Gender and supervision. In Educational leadership (2nd ed., pp. 339-348). San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Thompson, M. D. (2000). Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness: Testing Üre theoretical models of Bolman and Deal and Quinn. Sex Roles, 42(11-12), 969-992.
  • Turan, S., & Ebiçlioğlu, N. (2002). Okul Müdürlerinin Liderlik Özelliklerinin Cinsiyet Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [A Study of gender differences and leadership characteristic of elementary school principals]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 31, 444-458.
  • Turkey's Statistical Yearbook, (2008). Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/yillik/yillik.pdf
  • Tyree, C. (1995). Women in education: Are we perpetuating societal attitudes by moving toward an androgynous leadership style. Women executives: Voices and visions Ausün, TX: The Texas Council of Women School Executives.
  • Vroom, V., & Yetton, P. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
APA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E, LITCHKA P (2010). An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. , 58 - 74.
Chicago BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK EMİNE,LITCHKA Peter R. An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. (2010): 58 - 74.
MLA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK EMİNE,LITCHKA Peter R. An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. , 2010, ss.58 - 74.
AMA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. . 2010; 58 - 74.
Vancouver BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. . 2010; 58 - 74.
IEEE BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P "An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States." , ss.58 - 74, 2010.
ISNAD BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK, EMİNE - LITCHKA, Peter R.. "An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States". (2010), 58-74.
APA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E, LITCHKA P (2010). An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(158), 58 - 74.
Chicago BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK EMİNE,LITCHKA Peter R. An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. Eğitim ve Bilim 35, no.158 (2010): 58 - 74.
MLA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK EMİNE,LITCHKA Peter R. An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.35, no.158, 2010, ss.58 - 74.
AMA BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(158): 58 - 74.
Vancouver BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(158): 58 - 74.
IEEE BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK E,LITCHKA P "An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States." Eğitim ve Bilim, 35, ss.58 - 74, 2010.
ISNAD BABAOĞLAN ÇELİK, EMİNE - LITCHKA, Peter R.. "An examination of leadership competencies of school principals in Turkey and the United States". Eğitim ve Bilim 35/158 (2010), 58-74.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 16:29

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları