Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?

Ercan, Başak; GÜVEN, ENGİN; kaya aybek, Zeynep; Salar, Riza

Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?

Zeynep KAYA AYBEK, (TED Ankara Koleji, Ankara, Türkiye)

Başak ERCAN, (İngilizce Bölümü, Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, Türkiye)

Engin GÜVEN, (Öğretmen Akademisi Vakfı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Rıza SALAR (Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Başkent University Journal of Education

10 4

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 193 - 206 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2023

Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?

Öz:

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki akademik başarı durumuna göre ortaöğretim kademesinde farklı okul türlerine yerleştirilen öğrencilerin bulunduğu okulların iklimlerini karşılaştırmak amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada 2018 yılında uygulanan PISA Türkiye veri seti kullanılmıştır. Okul iklimini yordayan on bir adet değişkenden sekiz değişken öğrenci anketinden, üç değişken ise yönetici anketinden analize tabi tutulmuştur. Okul katmanlaştırmanın okul iklimini belirleyen değişkenler ile ilişkisini tespit etmek amacıyla çok değişkenli varyans analizi (MANOVA) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre merkezi sınav ile öğrenci alan okullarda akran zorbalığının daha az yaşandığı, Türkçe dersindeki sınıf disiplin ortamının daha olumlu olduğu, okuldaki rekabet ortamının yüksek olduğu ve aile katılımının daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca iki okul kategorisinde öğrencinin okula aidiyet duygusu anlamlı olarak birbirinden farklı olmamakla birlikte öğrencilerin ortalama indeks puanlarının OECD puanlarının altında olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulardan yola çıkılarak eğitim politika önerileri getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime:

How Does School Climate Differ in Different School Types?

Öz:

This study aims at comparing the climate of different schools where students are classified according to their academic achievement. PISA 2018 Turkey data set was used in the study. Of the eleven variables that predict the school climate, eight variables from the student questionnaire and three variables from the administrator's questionnaire were used in the analysis. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was utilised to determine the relationship between school stratification and the variables that determine the school climate. According to the findings, in schools where students are accepted via central examination, it was seen that peer bullying is less experienced, a more positive climate concerning disciplinary problems in Turkish lessons is observed, the competitive environment throughout the school is high, and family participation is higher. In addition, although the sense of belonging of the students to the school in the two school categories was not significantly different from each other, it was revealed that the average index scores of the students were below the OECD scores. Based on these findings, educational policy recommendations were put forward.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Acosta, J., Chinman, M., Ebener, P., Malone, P. S., Phillips, A., & Wilks, A. (2019). Evaluation of a whole-school change intervention: Findings from a two-year cluster-randomized trial of the restorative practices intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(5), 876–890. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01013-2
Aygün Esen, H. & Taşkın Şahin, Ç. (2018). Investigating of perceptions on classroom climate for third and fourth graders. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 8(2), 2018, 327-352.
Allen, K. P. (2010). Classroom management, bullying, and teacher practices. Professional Educator, 34(1), 1-16.
Allen, K., Kern, M.L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., Waters, L., (2018). What school need to know about fostering school belonging: a meta-analysis, Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1-34.
Anthony, C.J., Ogg, J., (2019). Parent involvement, approaches to learning, and student achievement: Examining longitudinal mediation, American Psychological Association, 34 (4), 376-385.
Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor. R. A. & Benbenishty, R., (2016). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425-469. DOI: 10.3102/0034654316669821
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publication
Boterman, W., Musterd, S., Pacchi, C. & Ranci, C. (2019). School segregation in contemporary cities: Socio-spatial Dynamics, institutional context and urban outcomes. Urban Studies, 56(15), 3055-3073.
Burnukara, P. & Uçanok, Z. (2012). Okul ortamı ve sanal ortamda meydana gelen akran zorbalığı ne ölçüde örtüşüyor? Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27(69), 81-96.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oak: CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Çarkıt, E. & Bacanlı, F. (2020). Okullarda akran zorbalığı: Öğretmen görüşlerine göre nitel bir çalışma. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(24), 2547- 2583. DOI: 10.26466/opus.644848
Dağli, A., & Baysal, N. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sınıfta karşılaştıkları disiplin sorunlarının nedenlerine ilişkin görüşleri. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 18, 259–271.
Den Brok,P., Levy, J., Brekelmans,M. & Wubbels, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students’ subject-specific motivation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(2), 20-33.
Dietrich, J., Dicke, A. L., Kracke, B. & Noack, P. (2015). Teacher support and its influence on students’ intrinsinc value and effort: Dimensional comparison effects acrooss subjects. Learning and Instruction, 39, 45-54.
Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R. & Goetz, T., (2015). Teaching This Class Drives Me Nuts! -Examining the Person and Context Specificity of Teacher Emotions. PLOS ONE, 10(6), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1263860
Frenzel, A. C., Taxer, J. L., Schwab, C. & Kuhbandner, C., (201). Independent and joint effects of teacher enthusiasm and motivation on student motivation and experiences: A field experiment. Motivation and Emotion, 43, 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9738-7
Fullan, M., Hill, P. & Crevola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Goodenow, C., Grady, K.E., (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends’ valus to academic motivation among urban adolescent students, The Journal of Experimental Education, 62 (1), 60-71.
Guess, P. & S. McCane-Bowling (2016). Teacher support and life satisfaction: An investigation with urban, middle school students, Education and Urban Society, 48/1, pp. 30-47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124513514604.
Hamlin, D. (2020). Can a Positive School Climate Promote Student Attendance? Evidence From New York City. American Educational Research Journal, 58(2), 315–342. DOI: 10.3102/0002831220924037
Hanushek, E.A., Wösmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences- indifferences evidence across countries, The Economic Journal, 116, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 0297.2006.01076.x
Hoy, W. & Miskel, C. (2012). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. McGraw-Hill education.
Huang, F. & Anyon, Y., (2020). The relationship between school disciplinary resolutions with school climate and attitudes toward school, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(3), 212-222. DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2020.1722940
Hung, H., Young, S.S. & Lin, C., (2015). No student left behind: a collaborative and competitive game-based learning environment to reduce the achievement gap of EFL students in Taiwan, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 35-49. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.822412
Katz, I., Kaplan, A. & Gueta, G. (2009). Students’ needs, teachers’ support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 246-267.
Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Morger, V., Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students’interest, Learning and Instruction, 33, pp. 29-38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001.
Keller, M. M., Hoy, A. W., Goetz, T. & Frenzel, A. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct, Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), pp. 743-769, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 015-9354-y.
Keller, M. M., Becker, E. S., Frenzel, A. C. & Taxer, J. L., (2018). When teacher enthusiasm is authentic or inauthentic: Lesson profiles of teacher enthusiasm and relations to students’ emotions. AERA Open, 4(4), 1- 16. DOI: 10.1177/2332858418782967
Kılıç, Y., (2014). Türkiye’de eğitimsel eşitsizlik ve toplumsal tabakalaşma ilişkisine dair ampirik bir çalışma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 4(2), 243-263.
Klem, A.M., & Connel, J.P., (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement, Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.
Knisely, K. (2011). Literature Review: How much does parental involvement really affect the student’s success? Retrieved from http://kniselymtt.pbworks.com/f/EDCI6300_kknisely_LiteratureReview.pdf.
Korpershoek, H., Canrinus E.T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Boer, H., (2020). The relations betwen school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes in secondary education: a meta-analytic review, Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641-680.
Koutselini, M. & Agathangelou, S. (2009). Human rights and equity in teaching. Peter Cunningham (Ed.), Human Rights and Citizenship Education içinde. (s.237-243). London: Ciice.
Köksal Akyol, A., & Bilbay, A. (2018). Ergenlerin akran zorbalığı yapmaları, zorbalığa maruz kalmaları ve empatik eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 667-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1379
Kunter, M. (2013). Motivation as an aspect of professional competence: Research findings on teacher enthusiasm, in Kunter, M. et al. (eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, Springer US, Boston, MA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_13.
Laftman, S. B., Östberg, V. & Modin, B. (2017). School climate and exposure to bullying: A multilevel study, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1),153-164, DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2016.1253591
Larocque, M., Kleiman, I., Darling, S.M. (2011). Parental involvement: The missing link in school achievement, Preventing School Failure, 55(3), 115-122.
Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H. & Dicke, A. L. (2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation: Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support. Learning and Instruction, 60, 126-137.
Lynch, K. & Baker, J. (2005). Eqıity in education. An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131-164.
Ma, L., Luo, H. & Xiao, L. (2021). Perceived teacher support self-concept, enjoyment and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA2018. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 1-9.
Martinez-Garrido, C., Siddiqui, N. & Gorard, S. (2020). Longitudinal study of socioeconomic segregation between schools in the UK. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 18(4), 123-141.
MEB. (2019). Eğitim analiz ve değerlendirme raporları serisi, PISA 2018 Türkiye Ön Raporu.
Mischel, J. & Kitsantas, A. (2020). Middle school students’ perceptions of school climate, bullying prevalence, and social support and coping. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 51 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019- 09522-5
Mustafaa, F. N., Lozada, F. T., Channey, J., Skoog-Hoffman, A. & Jagers, R. J. (2017). Perceptions of teaching practices, teacher support, and school engagement among middle school students an examination of the developmental designs approach. Middle Grades Research Journal, 11(2), 83-98.
Ning, B., Damme, J. V, Noortgate, W. V. D., Yang, X. & Gielen, S. (2015). The influence of classroom disciplinary climate of schools on reading achievement: a cross-country comparative study, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 586-611. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1025796
OECD (2016). Ten Questions for Mathematics Teachers... and How PISA Can Help Answer Them, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265387-en.
OECD (2018a). Equity in education breaking down barriers to social mobility, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
OECD (2018b). PISA 2018 Database. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2018database/.
OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en.
Özdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system: A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students, European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 193-217.
Özkan, Y. & Çifci, E. G. (2010). Düşük sosyo-ekonomik düzeydeki ilköğretim okullarında akran zorbalığı. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 576-586.
Parick, H., Ryan, A., Kaplan, A. (2011). Possitive classroom motivational environments: Converge between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate, Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 367-382. DOI: 10.1037/a0023311
Pitzer, J. & Skinner, E. (2017). Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1),15-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025416642051.
Reeve, J. & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
Ricard, N. & Pelletier, L. (2016), “Dropping out of high school: The role of parent and teacher self-determination support, reciprocal friendships and academic motivation”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, pp. 32-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2015.12.003.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S. & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Reinke, W.M, Smith, T.E., Herman, K.C. (2019). Family – school engagement across child and adolescent development, American Psychological Association, 34 (4), 346-349.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L. & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analysis approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
Roseth, C.J., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures, Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.
Salle T. P. L., Wang C., Parris, L. & Brown, J. A. (2017). Associations between school climate, suicidal thoughts, and behaviors and ethnicity among middle school students. Wiley Periodicals, 54,1294–1301. DOI: 10.1002/pits.22078
Sarı, M. (2012). Sense of school belonging among elementary school students, Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 41(1), 1-11.
Sheldon, S.B. & Epstein, J. L. (2002). Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement, Education and Urban Society, 35 (1), 4-26.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T.A, & Furrer, C.J. (2008). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., & Özer, M. (2020). Türkiye’de Öğrencilerin Okuryazarlık Becerilerinin Yıllara ve Okul Türlerine Göre Değişimi: Öğrencilerin PISA Uygulamalarındaki Performansı. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(1), 76-97.
Ttofi, M., & Farrington, D. (2009). What works in preventing bullying: Effective elements of anti bullying programmes. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2010). Lesson plans well served. Educational Leadership, 74(2), 89-99.
Tunç, E. (2019). Okulu Terk Etmiş Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Benlik Algıları ve Rehberlik Gereksinimlerinin Karşılanma Düzeyleri. Turkish Studies, 14(1), 723-749. DOI: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.14797
Türnüklü, A., Zoraloğlu, Y., & Gemici, Y. (2001). İlköğretim okullarında okul yönetimine yansıyan disiplin sorunları. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 27, 417-441.
Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17-26.
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L. & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary educational Psychology, 35(3), 193-202.
Yu, R. & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1204260
Yurtal, F., & Yaşar, M. (2018). Öğretmenlerin sınıf yönetimi profillerine göre sınıflarında görülen akran zorbalığı. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 64-75.

APA	kaya aybek Z, Ercan B, GÜVEN E, Salar R (2022). Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. , 193 - 206.
Chicago	kaya aybek Zeynep,Ercan Başak,GÜVEN ENGİN,Salar Riza Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. (2022): 193 - 206.
MLA	kaya aybek Zeynep,Ercan Başak,GÜVEN ENGİN,Salar Riza Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. , 2022, ss.193 - 206.
AMA	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. . 2022; 193 - 206.
Vancouver	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. . 2022; 193 - 206.
IEEE	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R "Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?." , ss.193 - 206, 2022.
ISNAD	kaya aybek, Zeynep vd. "Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?". (2022), 193-206.

APA	kaya aybek Z, Ercan B, GÜVEN E, Salar R (2022). Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. Başkent University Journal of Education, 9(2), 193 - 206.
Chicago	kaya aybek Zeynep,Ercan Başak,GÜVEN ENGİN,Salar Riza Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. Başkent University Journal of Education 9, no.2 (2022): 193 - 206.
MLA	kaya aybek Zeynep,Ercan Başak,GÜVEN ENGİN,Salar Riza Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. Başkent University Journal of Education, vol.9, no.2, 2022, ss.193 - 206.
AMA	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. Başkent University Journal of Education. 2022; 9(2): 193 - 206.
Vancouver	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?. Başkent University Journal of Education. 2022; 9(2): 193 - 206.
IEEE	kaya aybek Z,Ercan B,GÜVEN E,Salar R "Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?." Başkent University Journal of Education, 9, ss.193 - 206, 2022.
ISNAD	kaya aybek, Zeynep vd. "Farklı Okul Türlerinde Okul İklimi Nasıl Değişmektedir?". Başkent University Journal of Education 9/2 (2022), 193-206.