Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 245 - 253 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/agri.2022.90018 İndeks Tarihi: 18-05-2023

Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to the development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment and establish its validity and reliability. Methods: This was a methodological study conducted in the 2017–2018 academic year. The sample consisted of 300 nursing students attending at the Department of Nursing of Gazi and Selçuk Universities. First, a 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews with 25 students. Five experts were consulted for content validity. The items were revised, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The 45-item final version was applied to participants. Afterward, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to determine the scale structure. Test-retest reliability was determined on 190 participants selected randomly from the sample. Results: A 51-item draft was developed based on a literature review and interviews. Five experts were consulted for content validity, and six items were removed based on their feedback. The rotated principal component analysis revealed 15 items loaded on two factors. The total scale had internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha; α) of 0.918 and test-retest reliability of 0.738. Conclusion: Factor analyses showed that the scale had satisfactory construct validity and a two-factor structure. All α values were higher than 0.70, indicating that the scale had a satisfactory level of reliability. All in all, it is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure nursing students’ attitudes toward pain assessment
Anahtar Kelime:

Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin ağrı değerlendirmesine yönelik tutum ölçeğinin (HÖADTÖ) geliştirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin ağrı değerlendirmesine yönelik tutumlarını ölçmek için kullanılabilecek bir ölçek geliştirmek, geliştirilen ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2018 eğitim öğretim yılında öğrenim gören 300 öğrenci ile metodolojik olarak yapıldı. Literatür taraması ve öğrenci görüşleri ile 51 maddelik bir ölçek oluşturuldu. Ölçek beş uzmanın görüşüne sunuldu, içerik ve kapsam değerlendirmesi yapıldı ve 45 maddelik son haline getirildi. Ölçek yapısının belirlenmesi için açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri yapıldı. Ölçeğin güvenilirliğine ilişkin olarak, Cronbach Alfa (Crα) iç tutarlık katsayıları ve 190 öğrenci üzerinde ise test tekrar test güvenilirliği hesaplandı. Bulgular: Yapılan döndürülmüş temel bileşenler analizi sonucunda ölçek 15 maddeden oluşan iki faktörlü bir yapıya ulaştı. Birinci faktör 12, ikinci faktör üç maddeden oluşmaktadır. Bu iki faktör tutum değişkenine ait toplam varyansın %65,953’ünü açıklamaktadır. Ölçeğin madde test korelasyonları hesaplandı ve 0,463 ile 0,924 arasında değerler bulundu. Yapılan iç tutarlılık güvenilirlik testi sonucunda ölçeğin Crα değeri 0,918; test tekrar test Crα değeri de 0,738 bulundu. Sonuç: Faktör analizi sonucu ölçeğin, tatmin edici düzeyde yapı geçerliğine ve iki faktörlü yapıya sahip olduğunu belirtmektedir. Madde test korelasyonu bulguları ise ölçek maddelerinin geçerliğini ve aynı yapıyı ölçtüğünü göstermektedir. Ayrıca bütün Crα değerlerinin 0,70’ten yüksek olması ölçeğin tatmin edici düzeyde güvenilirliğe sahip olduğunu açıklamaktadır. Ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğine ait bulgular, üniversitede öğrenim gören hemşirelik öğrencilerinin ilgili özelliğe ilişkin tutumlarını belirlemek üzere kullanılabilir nitelikte olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Dirimeşe E, Özdemir FK, Şahin ZA. Nursing students’ knowledge of related to pain management, cultural awareness and competence. Gümüşhane Univ J Health Sci 2016;5:1–6.
  • 2. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Terminology. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1698. Accessed May 16, 2019.
  • 3. Baker DW. History of the joint commission’s pain standards: Lessons for today’s prescription opioid epidemic. JAMA 2017;317:1117–8.
  • 4. Acar K, Acar H, Demir F, Aslan FE. Determining the satisfaction level of patients after postsurgical pain treatment. J Nurs 2016;19:86–91.
  • 5. Koçoğlu D, Özdemir L. The relation between pain and pain beliefs and sociodemographic-economic characteristics in an adult population. Ağrı 2011;23:64–70.
  • 6. Kuru T, Yeldan İ, Zengin A, Kostanoğlu A, Tekeoğlu A, Akbaba YA, et al. The prevalence of pain and different pain treatments in adults. Ağrı 2011;23:22–7.
  • 7. Ada M, Yılmaz E. Pain behaviors in patients under mechanical ventilatory support during intravascular interventions. J Health Sci Kocaeli Univ 2020;6:138–44.
  • 8. Sayar S, Ergin D. Examination of the effect of music upon the postoperative pain management in pediatric patients who are hospitalized in the orthopedics service. Dokuz Eylul Univ Fac Nurs Elec J 2019;12:67–73.
  • 9. Yurtseven Ş, Deniz Doğan S, Arslan S, Nazik E, Erden Yüksekkaya S. Assessment of postoperative pain intensity using different pain scales. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci 2021;13:1–7.
  • 10. Aydoğdu Ö, Yılmaz DÜ. Patient’s experiences and difficulties at home following day surgery. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci 2020;12:1–9.
  • 11. Aslan F, Dikmen BT. The knowledge of pain management among nursing students. Cyprus J Med Sci 2021;6:222–9.
  • 12. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, et al. Management of postoperative pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council. J Pain 2016;17:131–57.
  • 13. Medrzycka-Dabrowka W, Dąbrowski S, Gutysz-Wojnicka A, Gawroska-Krzemińska A, Ozga D. Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain. Open Med (Wars) 2017;12:239–46.
  • 14. Yılmaz F, Atay S. Clinical pain management of nursing students. J Hacettepe Univ Fac Nurs 2014;1:32–41.
  • 15. Collados-Gómez L, Camacho-Vicente V, González-Villalba M, Sanz-Prades G, Bellón-Vaquerizo B. Neonatal nurses’ perceptions of pain management. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed) [Article in Spanish, English] 2018;29:41–7.
  • 16. Dikmen Y, Usta YY, İnce Y, Gel KT, Kaya MK. Determining of nurses’ knowledge, behavior and clinical decision making regarding pain management. J Complement Med 2012;2:162–72.
  • 17. Mandell BF. The fifth vital sign: A complex story of politics and patient care. Cleve Clin J Med 2016;83:400–1.
  • 18. Nesbitt J, Moxham S, Ramadurai G, Williams L. Improving pain assessment and managment in stroke patients. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2015;4:u203375.w3105.
  • 19. Gordon-Williams R, Trigo A, Bassett P, Williams A, Cone S, Lees M, et al. An interactive pain application (MServ) improves postoperative pain Management. Pain Res Manag 2021;2021:8898170.
  • 20. Lowey SE. Management of severe pain in terminally Ill patients at home: An evidence-based strategy. Home Healthc Now 2020;38:8–15.
  • 21. Carroll KM. Use without consequences? A commentary on Bonn et al. (2020). J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2020;81:561.
  • 22. Silva LMD, Paula ECD, Silveira SQ, Abib ADCV, Nunes WPDM, Sasaki HH. Impact of educational strategies on pain control quality indicators at a tertiary hospital. BrJP 2020;3:342–7.
  • 23. van Dijk JF, Schuurmans MJ, Alblas EE, Kalkman CJ, van Wijck AJ. Postoperative pain: Knowledge and beliefs of patients and nurses. J Clin Nurs 2017;26:3500–10.
  • 24. Mohamadamini Z, Namnabati M, Marofi M, Barekatein B. Four components of pain management in Iranian neonatal Intensive Care Units: The nurses’ and physicians’ viewpoint. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:64.
  • 25. Alkhatib GS, Al Qadire M, Alshraideh JA. Pain management knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in primary medical centers. Pain Manag Nurs 2020;21:265–70.
  • 26. Dharmalingam TK, Muniandy RK. Doctors’ knowledge and attitudes on pain assessment and management in Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Med J Malaysia 2020;75:68–73.
  • 27. Makhlouf SM, Pini S, Ahmed S, Bennett MI. Managing pain in people with cancer-a systematic review of the attitudes and knowledge of professionals, patients, caregivers and public. J Cancer Educ 2020;35:214–40.
  • 28. Jang JH, Park WH, Kim HI, Chang SO. Ways of reasoning used by nurses in postoperative pain assessment. Pain Manag Nurs 2020;21:379–85.
  • 29. Alotaibi K, Higgins I, Chan S. Nurses’ knowledge and attitude toward pediatric pain management: A cross-sectional study. Pain Manag Nurs 2019;20:118–25.
  • 30. El-Aqoul A, Obaid A, Jarrah I, Al-Rawashdeh K, Al Hroub A. Effectiveness of education program on nursing knowledge and attitude toward pain management. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2020;7:382–8.
  • 31. Sloman R, Rosen G, Rom M, Shir Y. Nurses’ assessment of pain in surgical patients. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:125–32.
  • 32. Özveren H, Faydalı S, Gülnar E, Dokuz HF. Attitude and applications of nurses to evaluate pain. J Contemp Med 2018;8:60–6.
  • 33. Basit G, Korkmaz F. The effect of web-based nursing process teaching on senior nursing students’ care planning skills. Int J Nurs Knowl 2021;32:4–19.
  • 34. Bölükbaş N, Irmak B, Bulut G, Özdemir DAÖ, Bayrak HY. Evaluation of nursing diagnoses and interventions determined by students in surgical diseases nursing summer internship files. Ordu Univ J Nurs Stud 2020;3:1–9.
  • 35. Kusi Amponsah A, Kyei-Dompim J, Kyei EF, Oduro E, Afaya RA, Ahoto CK. Final year nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding children’s pain. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:7283473.
  • 36. Yılmaz M, Özüm Ü, Gürler H, Çifçi ES. Sağlık alanında eğitim alan üniversite öğrencilerinin ağrı kavramına ilişkin bilgileri. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Derg 2010;12:17–27.
  • 37. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS basic concepts, applications, and programming. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2016.
  • 38. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik ve lisrel uygulamaları. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık; 2018. p.271.
  • 39. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık; 2020.
  • 40. Kılcan B, Ergür Ş. Finansal Tutum Ölçeğinin (FTÖ) geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Gelecek Vizyonlar Derg 2019;3:59–68.
  • 41. Tavşancıl, E. Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. 5. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2014.
  • 42. Çetin Ş, Çetin F. Öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeği (ÖYTÖ) geliştirme çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Derg 2019;17:140–57.
  • 43. Ghasemi V, Ebadi A, Kariman N, Ozgoli G, Gharenaz MS, Fakari FR, et al. Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Iranian version of Iowa infant feeding attitude scale (IIFAS). Int J Pediatr Mashhad 2018;6:8549–59.
  • 44. Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. 1. Baskı. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi; 2013.
  • 45. Chan HWQ, Sun CFR. Scale development: Chinese irrational beliefs and rational attitude scale. PsyCh J 2019;8:122– 36.
  • 46. Öncü E, Selvi H, Vayisoğlu SK, Ceyhan H. Development of an Attitude Scale for Brain Drain among nursing students: A reliability and validity study. Cukurova Med J 2018;43:207–15.
  • 47. Sun H, Teh PL, Linton JD. Impact of environmental knowledge and product quality on student attitude toward products with recycled/remanufactured content: Implications for environmental education and green manufacturing. Bus Strategy Environ 2018;27:935–45.
APA BULUT H, Guler S, Mercan Annak İ, Berk Özcan Ç (2022). Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. , 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
Chicago BULUT HÜLYA,Guler Sevil,Mercan Annak İnci,Berk Özcan Çiğdem Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. (2022): 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
MLA BULUT HÜLYA,Guler Sevil,Mercan Annak İnci,Berk Özcan Çiğdem Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. , 2022, ss.245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
AMA BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. . 2022; 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
Vancouver BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. . 2022; 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
IEEE BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç "Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment." , ss.245 - 253, 2022. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
ISNAD BULUT, HÜLYA vd. "Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment". (2022), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2022.90018
APA BULUT H, Guler S, Mercan Annak İ, Berk Özcan Ç (2022). Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. Ağrı, 34(4), 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
Chicago BULUT HÜLYA,Guler Sevil,Mercan Annak İnci,Berk Özcan Çiğdem Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. Ağrı 34, no.4 (2022): 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
MLA BULUT HÜLYA,Guler Sevil,Mercan Annak İnci,Berk Özcan Çiğdem Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. Ağrı, vol.34, no.4, 2022, ss.245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
AMA BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. Ağrı. 2022; 34(4): 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
Vancouver BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment. Ağrı. 2022; 34(4): 245 - 253. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
IEEE BULUT H,Guler S,Mercan Annak İ,Berk Özcan Ç "Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment." Ağrı, 34, ss.245 - 253, 2022. 10.14744/agri.2022.90018
ISNAD BULUT, HÜLYA vd. "Development of nursing students’ attitudes scale toward pain assessment". Ağrı 34/4 (2022), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2022.90018