Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey

Zerrin KILIÇARSLAN, (Erciyes University)
Yasemin DUMRUL (Erciyes University)
İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi
14 3
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 647 - 660 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey

Öz:
In this study, it is aimed to analyze the environmental impact of foreign direct investment. The theoretical and applied literature on the relationship between foreign direct investment and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is presented. The study examines the relationship between foreign direct investment and pollution by using Johansen Cointegration test and vector error correction model in Turkey, for 1974-2013 period. The main conclusion of the study is that foreign direct investment positively affects carbon dioxide emissions in the long run. The results indicate the validity of Pollution Haven hypothesis in Turkey
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abbasi, F., & Riaz, K. (2016). CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An Augmented VAR Approach. Energy Policy, 90, 102-114.
  • Acharyya, J. (2009). FDI, growth and the environment: Evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. Journal of Economic Development, 34(1), 43-58.
  • Aliyu, M.A. (2005). Foreign direct investment and the environment: Pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany, 9-11 June 2015, 1-35.
  • Al-mulali, U., & Tang, C.F. (2013). Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. Energy Policy, 60, 813-819.
  • Artan, S., Hayaloğlu, P., & Seyhan, B. (2015). Türkiye’de çevre kirliliği, dışa açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 308-325.
  • Asghari, M. (2013). Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1(6), 92-100.
  • Atay Polat, M. (2015). Türkiye’de yabancı sermaye yatırımları ile CO2 emisyonu arasındaki ilişkinin yapısal kırılmalı testler ile analizi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(41), 1127-1135.
  • Bekhet, H.A., & Othman, N.S. (2017). Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: Evidence from the dynamic relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.174.
  • Blanco, L., Gonzalez, F., & Ruiz, I. (2011). The impact of FDI on CO₂ emissions in Latin America. Pepperdine University, School of Public Policy Working Papers. Paper 28. http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/sppworkingpapers/28
  • Copeland, B.R. (2008). The pollution haven hypothesis. from Kevin P. Gallagher (ed.) Handbook on Trade and the Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 116-125.
  • Dean, J.M., Lovely, M.E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 1–13.
  • Deng, B., & De-yong, S. (2008). Study of the relationship between China’s foreign, FDI and environmental pollution: 1995-2005. International Trade Issues, 4, 101-108.
  • Dickey, D.A., & Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
  • Doytch, N., & Uctum, M. (2016). Globalization and the environmental impact of FDI. CUNY Academic Works, Economics Working Papers,1-22, http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=gc_econ_wp.
  • Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Eskeland, G.S., & Harrison, A.E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70,1- 23.
  • Gökalp, M.F., & Yıldırım, A. (2004). Dış ticaret ve çevre: Kirlilik sığınakları hipotezi Türkiye uygulaması. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 11(2), 99-113.
  • Görg, H., & Strobl, E.(2004). Foreign direct investment and local economic development: Beyond productivity spillovers. In: GEP The Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, University of Nottingham, 137-157, https://piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/3810/06iie3810.pdf.
  • Hadi, D.M. (2016). Industrial production, CO2 emissions and financial development: A case from Thailand. 2nd International Conference on Applied Economics and Finance (ICOAEF 2016) 5 - 6 December, 2016 Girne American University North Cyprus, 67-75.
  • Hoffmann, R., Lee, C., Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2005). FDI and pollution: A granger causality test using panel data. Journal of International Development, 17, 311-317.
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 231- 254.
  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to money demand. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 52, 169-210.
  • Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
  • Karaca, C. (2012). Ülkeler tarafından uygulanan çevre politikalarının uluslararası doğrudan yatırımlar üzerindeki etkileri: Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezinin test edilmesi. İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 47, 181-200.
  • Keho, Y. (2016). Trade openness and the impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions: Econometric evidence from ECOWAS countries. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(18), 151-157.
  • Kellenberg, D.K. (2009). An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 78, 242–255.
  • Kim, M.H., & Adilov, N. (2012). The lesser of two evils: An empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff. Applied Economics, 44, 2597-2606.
  • Kitamura, Y. (1998). Likelihood-based inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models by Soren Johansen. Econometric Theory, 14(4), 517-524.
  • Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74(1), 595–606.
  • Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1997), In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy 1960-1995. World Bank Discussion Papers, 1-22. http://www.oecd.org/industry/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/2076285.pdf
  • Mutafoglu, T.H. (2012). Foreign direct investment, pollution, and economic growth evidence from Turkey. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(3), 281-297.
  • Ouyang, X., & Boqiang, L. (2015). An analysis of the driving forces of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China’s industrial sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 838-849.
  • Omri, A., Nguyen, D.K., & Rault, C. (2014). Causal interactions between CO2 Emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Economic Modelling, 42, 382–389.
  • Öztürk, Z., & Öz, D. (2016). The Relationship between energy consumption, income, foreign direct investment, and CO2 emissions: The case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 269-288.
  • Pao, H.T., & Tsai, C.M. (2011). Multivariate Granger Causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685-693.
  • Phillips, P.C.B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), pp.335-346.
  • Saatçi, M., & Yasemin, D. (2011). Çevre kirliliği ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Çevresel kuznets eğrisinin Türk ekonomisi için yapisal kirilmali eş-bütünleşme yöntemiyle tahmini. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, Ocak-Haziran, 65-86.
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., & Talat, A. (2011). Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: Evidence from panel data analysis. Bulletin of Energy Economics, 2(2), 14-27.
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., & Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics, 51, 275–287.
  • Solarin, S.A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: An empirical investigation. Energy, 124(1), 706-719.
  • Şahinöz, A., & Fotourehchi, Z. (2014). Kirlilik emisyonu ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları: Türkiye için "kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi testi”. Sosyoekonomi, 21(1), 187-210
  • Tang, C.F., & Tan, B.W. (2015). The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447–454.
  • Taşpınar, N. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Roles of financial development and FDI for the case of Turkey. Eastern Mediterranean University, February 2016, Gazimağusa, North Cyprus.
  • Yang, W., Yang, Y., & Xu, J. (2008). The impact of foreign trade and fdi on environmental pollution. China-USA Business Review, 7(12), 1-11.
  • Yaylalı, M., Doğan, E.M., Yılmaz, V.M., & Karaca, Z. (2015). Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile karbondioksit emisyonu arasındaki ilişkinin ARDL yaklaşımı ile araştırılması. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2),107-112.
  • Yılmazer, M., & Açıkgöz Ersoy, B. (2009). Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kamu politikaları. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9(4), 1441-1462.
  • Zarsky, L. (1999). Havens, halos and spaghetti: Untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: The Hague, Netherlands, 28-29 January 1999. 1-25.
  • Zeren, F. (2015). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların CO2 emisyonuna etkisi: Kirlilik hale hipotezi mi kirlilik cenneti hipotezi mi? Journal of Yasar University, 10(37),6381-6477.
APA KILIÇARSLAN Z, DUMRUL Y (2017). Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. , 647 - 660.
Chicago KILIÇARSLAN ZERRİN,DUMRUL YASEMİN Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. (2017): 647 - 660.
MLA KILIÇARSLAN ZERRİN,DUMRUL YASEMİN Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. , 2017, ss.647 - 660.
AMA KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. . 2017; 647 - 660.
Vancouver KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. . 2017; 647 - 660.
IEEE KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y "Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey." , ss.647 - 660, 2017.
ISNAD KILIÇARSLAN, ZERRİN - DUMRUL, YASEMİN. "Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey". (2017), 647-660.
APA KILIÇARSLAN Z, DUMRUL Y (2017). Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 647 - 660.
Chicago KILIÇARSLAN ZERRİN,DUMRUL YASEMİN Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 8, no.4 (2017): 647 - 660.
MLA KILIÇARSLAN ZERRİN,DUMRUL YASEMİN Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.8, no.4, 2017, ss.647 - 660.
AMA KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 8(4): 647 - 660.
Vancouver KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 8(4): 647 - 660.
IEEE KILIÇARSLAN Z,DUMRUL Y "Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey." İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, ss.647 - 660, 2017.
ISNAD KILIÇARSLAN, ZERRİN - DUMRUL, YASEMİN. "Foreign Direct Investments and CO2 Emissions Relationship: The Case of Turkey". İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 8/4 (2017), 647-660.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 3:15

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları