title, content, references and tables. The most prominent part of a scientific research report is title and summary. A well-prepared summary provides to have an idea about it without reading all of the article and to focus on the content of the text without loss of time for readers. So, needs to give place for the clear, understandable, net and short phrases in summary. A well summary should specify the scope of the research and main aims, definite the used methodology, summarize the findings, indicate the main results, and provide recommendations based on these results (Büyüköztürk vd., 2011: 297). Also, summary should be written in fluent language, it must contain a clear and uncomplicated expressions. When related literature was scanned, was not observed the study related to summary which is most notable part of a scientific research report. Generally research classified in studies that determine the trends, Turkish publications made in the area of education and training; types and methods of the article, issue areas, data collection instruments used in the article, in terms of data analysis methods and sample (Varışoğlu, Şahin, Göktaş, 2012; Göktaş, Hasançebi, Varışoğlu, Akçay, Bayrak, Akbulut, Sözbilir, 2012; Eyüp, Yurt, Stebler, 2012; Şahin, Kana, Varışoğlu, 2013; Coşkun, Özçakmak, Balcı, 2011; Arslan, 2012; Coşkun, Özçakmak, Balcı, 2012).Examination for the report's summaries of the scientific research is extremely limited. Çelik, Gedik, Karaman, Demirel and Göktaş (2014) in the study titled "the mistakes faced in Education article and their effects to rejected ", in the process of referees and editors as indicate "Short summary (self) not reflect the research" that one of the reasons for rejection of articles. Therefore a well prepared brief summary, eliminates one of the reasons for rejection of articles. Sevim and Özdemir Erem (2012) examine the title and summary of the 128 master thesis in terms of various criteria in the area of Turkish Education. The result of research have demonstrated that they were insufficient except of containing the purposes of summaries. Coşkun and Kan (2013) have evaluated 216 pieces of master thesis summary in terms of the writing techniques that made in the area of Educational Sciences and they have determined that successful in expressing the purpose of summary and the findings with the results, unsuccessful in expressing the methods. This study aims to fill a gap in the area by examining indexed article summaries in terms of various criteria by SSCI and ULAKBİM database in Turkey between 2004 and 2013. Also by this work aims to provide guiding information to not fall into a similar mistakes while preparing their reports to researchers and contribute to the efforts made in this regard. In this study general screening model of the types of descriptive research was used. Education and training of Turkish were examined by scanning related literature and taking expert opinion according to specified criteria that made summaries of 724 research articles between the years 2004-2013. Data were analysed by the content analysis method. In the study categorical content analysis from qualitative data analysis methods were used. In the analysis result is tabulated according to data obtained frequencies and percentages, years and magazines. The study sample in Turkey SSC (n = 5) ULAKBIM Social Sciences (n = 29) in the database 724 Turkish education article that indexed and allowed access to the electronic media in the 34 journal, constitutes between the years 2004-2013. Due to only Turkish education articles was examined in this study purpose of sampling technique was used. As data collection tools in the study is used "Analysis Form Abstract of Article in Turkish Education (TEMÖAF). Located examination categories in the data collection tool is prepared by researchers scanning the relevant literature and the final shape is given taking expert opinion. Subjects consist in analysis form: (1) Was a place given for the purpose of the investigation and / or the problem statement in the abstract? (2) Was a place given for the importance of research in the abstract? (3) Was a place given for samples of research or research / working group and knowledge of sample properties in the abstract? (4) Was a place given for information regarding the methodology of investigation in the abstract? (5) Was a place given for information related with the findings of the research in the abstract? (6) Was a place given for information on the result of the investigation in the abstract? (7) Was a place given for some suggestions in the abstract? (8) What is the distribution of the number of words in the abstract? (8) What is the distribution of the number of key words in the abstract? (10) What is the additional mode and the roof used in the abstract? (11) Is there any quote / reference / citation in the abstract? When distribution of substance "The goal of the research and / or Problem statement" in the summary of the Turkish education article analysed by year, it has been identified that in 658 of 724 article given place for the purpose of the investigation and / or the problem statement. When the distribution of 'The Importance of Research' substance examined, it has been identified that in the most studies (50.69%) not be mentioned about the importance of research. Considering the distribution of the 'Sample or study / research group' substance it draws attention that rate of giving place for sampling, study / research group in the abstract is increasing every year. It has been identified that in the great majority of 724 article (n = 500) included sampling. When viewed in accordance the year to the distribution of 'Research Methodology' substance rate of giving place for research methods is increasing every year. Meanwhile, considering generally it has been identified that in the majority of studies (60.08%) a place not given for knowledge of methods. Further, it is draws attenti