The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 40 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 İndeks Tarihi: 04-10-2020
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire
Öz: Objectives: The aim of this study was to adapt the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire (NCQ) into Turkish and to ensure its validity and reliability.Methods: This study was conducted with 538 nurses working at five state hospitals and one university hospital inGaziantep Province from March 3 to 29 August 29, 2014. The data were collected using a personal information formand the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire after ensuring the equivalency of the questionnaire’s items in the Turkishlanguage. The statistical analysis of the data was done using SPSS 22 for Windows. The analysis of factor groups usedconfirmatory factor analysis. The analysis of data conformity used Barlett’s test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test in thedetermination of internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient and test-retest correlation tests were usedto determine internal consistency.Results: The linguistic validity of the NCQ was determined to be sufficient after translation and back-translation, andconsulting expert opinion. For the NCQ, sample size was calculated using the KMO (0.81) and Barlett’s test (1,965.419).The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of the questionnaire was 0.051, the comparative fit index (CFI)was 0.88, the normed fit index (NFI) was 0.84, and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) was 0.046. TheCronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for the 15 items in factor 1 was 0.74. For the 9 items in factor 2 it was 0.50, and itwas 0.77 for all 24 items on the questionnaire. The test-retest correlation value was r=0.79, and there was a significantcorrelation between the results of the both tests (p<0.000).Conclusion: The Nurse Codependency Questionnaire has high levels of validity and reliability and can be used to determine levels of nurse codependency in Turkey
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Ançel G. Karşılıklı Bağımlılık Kavramı: Hemşirelikle ilişkisi ve Karşılıklı Bağımlılığı Belirleme Araçları. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2012;12:70–8.
- 2. Loucks HAL. Levels of codependency in associate degree nursing students upon entry to and completion of nursing school M.S. Unpublished graduate thesis, University of Wyoming. 2005.
- 3. Parker F, Faulk D, Lo Bello S. Assessing Codependency and Family Pathology in Nursing Students. Journal of Addictions Nursing 2003;14:85–90.
- 4. Ançel G, Kabakçı E. Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of Codependency Assessment Tool. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2009;23:441–53.
- 5. Hughes-Hammer C, Martsolf DS, Zeller RA. Development and testing of the codependency assessment tool. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 1998;12:264–72.
- 6. Harkness D. To have and to hold: codependency as a mediator or moderator of the relationship between substance abuse in the family of origin and adult-offspring medical problems. J Psychoactive Drugs 2003;35:261–70.
- 7. Allison S. Nurse codependency: instrument development and validation. J Nurs Meas 2004;12:63–75.
- 8. Self JS. Codependency among nurses: A comparison by substance use disorder and other selected variables. Unpublished posgraduate thesis, University of Alabama. 2010.
- 9. Allison S. Biographic and psychobehavioral influences on body mass index in a nursing sample. West J Nurs Res 2005;27:7–20.
- 10. Martsolf DS, Hughes-Hammer C, Estok P, Zeller RA. Codependency in male and female helping professionals. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 1999;13:97–103.
- 11. Holder LM, Farnsworth BJ, Wells D. A preliminary survey of codependency traits and family of origin status of nursing students. Addictions Nursing 1994;6:76–9.
- 12. Martsolf DS. Codependency, Boundaries, and Professional Nurse Caring: Understanding Similarities and Differences in Nursing Practice. Orthopaedic Nursing 2002;21:61–7.
- 13. Şencan H. Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçünlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2005. p. 105–363.
- 14. Yurdugül H. Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Kapsam Geçerliği için Kapsam Geçerlilik İndekslerinin Kullanılması. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Denizli. 2005.
- 15. Akgül A. İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri SPSS'te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları. Ankara: Emek Ofset Ltd.Şti; 2003.
- 16. Karagöz Y, Kösterelioğlu İ. İletişim Becerileri Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Faktör Analizi Metodu ile geliştirilmesi. Dumlupınar Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2008;21:82–97.
- 17. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlamasa için rehber II: Psikometriközellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;1:3–14.
- 18. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cuttoff criteria for fit indices in covarience structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999;6:1–55.
- 19. Linn RL, Gronlund NE. Measurement and Assesment in Teaching. New York: Prentice HallInc; 1995.
- 20. Tavşancıl E. Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım; 2002. p. 110–6.
- 21. Tezbaşaran A. Likert Tipi Ölçek Geliştirme Kılavuzu. 2. baskı. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları; 1997. s. 5–51.
- 22. Öner N. Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik testler, bir başvuru kaynağı, 2. baskı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Matbaası; 2009. s. 520–5.
- 23. Aksayan S, Gözüm S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber I. ölçek uyarlama aşamaları ve dil aşamaları. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2002;4:9-20.
- 24. Ulusoy Y. Kişilerarası bağımlılık ölçeği’nin (InterpersonalDependency Inventory) uyarlama çalışması. [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi] Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2010.
- 25. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211–6.
- 26. Özdamar K. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi-1. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi, 2004.
- 27. Akdağ M. SPSS’de İstatistiksel Analizler. Retrieved from https:// www.scribd.com/doc/46325304/SPSS-testleri.2008.
- 28. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin NM. Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları, veri toplam araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliliği. Hemşirelik Araştırma Süreç Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2014. s. 193–233.
- 29. Buelow JM, Hinkle JL. Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses? J Neurosci Nurs 2008;40:369–70.
| APA | OZDEMIR N, BUZLU S (2020). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. , 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| Chicago | OZDEMIR NURGÜL,BUZLU Sevim The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. (2020): 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| MLA | OZDEMIR NURGÜL,BUZLU Sevim The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. , 2020, ss.35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| AMA | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. . 2020; 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| Vancouver | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. . 2020; 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| IEEE | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S "The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire." , ss.35 - 40, 2020. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| ISNAD | OZDEMIR, NURGÜL - BUZLU, Sevim. "The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire". (2020), 35-40. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| APA | OZDEMIR N, BUZLU S (2020). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 11(1), 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| Chicago | OZDEMIR NURGÜL,BUZLU Sevim The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi 11, no.1 (2020): 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| MLA | OZDEMIR NURGÜL,BUZLU Sevim The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2020, ss.35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| AMA | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| Vancouver | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 35 - 40. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| IEEE | OZDEMIR N,BUZLU S "The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire." Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 11, ss.35 - 40, 2020. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
| ISNAD | OZDEMIR, NURGÜL - BUZLU, Sevim. "The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Nurse Codependency Questionnaire". Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi 11/1 (2020), 35-40. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.72792 |
