Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population

Adem Sümen, (Kumluca Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, Türkiye)
Selma Öncel (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
4 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 245 - 255 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 11-11-2020

Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population

Öz:
Objective: This study was aimed at adapting the “Parental Sun Protection Scales(PSPS)” in Turkish society and at determining its validity and reliability.Methods: It was conducted methodologically in the kindergartens affiliated withAntalya-Manavgat District Directorate of National Education between May-June2016. 974 individuals of 635 parents with children agreed to participate in the studywhich two forms as descriptive socio-demographic characteristics of the parents andPSPS were used. The scale were statistically tested by computing the languagevalidity, content validity, internal criterion validity, construct validity, internal consistencyanalysis, test-retest analysis and item analysis.Results: As a result of the screen test, the number of subscales was observed tobe divided into four factors as in both original scales. The general Cronbach’s alphavalue of “Scale of the Use of Sunscreen Products” and “Sun Avoidance Scale” werefound as 0,84. Among the subscales that Norms/Attitudes for the Use of SunscreenProducts (0,90), Self-Efficacy of Sun Avoidance (0,90), Norms/Attitudes for SunAvoidance (0,87), Self-Efficacy of the Use of Sunscreen Products (0,86), and TanningExpectancies (0,81) were highly reliable and Expectancies for the Use of SunscreenProducts (0,79), Expectancies for Sun Avoidance (0,79), and Impediments to the Useof Sunscreen Products (0,76) were likewise reliable. All of these scales can be usedtogether or individually.Conclusion: The PSPS, the results of the analyses showed that the scales are validand reliable tools for Turkish Society. PSPS can be used to assess the parents’ statusof using sunscreen products for their children and their status of sun avoidance.
Anahtar Kelime:

Ebeveyn Güneşten Koruma Ölçekleri’nin Türk Toplumunda Geçerlik ve Güvenirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, “Ebeveyn Güneşten Koruma Ölçekleri (EGKÖ)”ni Türk toplumuna uyarlamak, geçerlik ve güvenirliğini saptamaktır. Materyal Metot: Metodolojik tipteki bu araştırma, Mayıs-Haziran 2016 tarihleri arasında, Antalya-Manavgat İlçe Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü’ne bağlı anaokullarına devam eden çocukların ebeveynleri ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya toplam 974 ebeveynden 635’i katılmayı kabul etmiş olup veriler Sosyo-demografik özellikler formu ve EGKÖ ile toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin istatiksel işlemleri için dil geçerliği, kapsam geçerliği, iç ölçüt geçerliği, yapı geçerliği, iç tutarlık analizi, test-tekrar test analizi ve madde analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Açıklayıcı faktör analizine göre alt ölçek sayısının her iki orijinal ölçekte olduğu gibi dörder faktöre ayrıldığı görülmüştür. “Güneş Koruyucu Ürün Kullanımı Ölçeği” ve “Güneşten Kaçınma Ölçeği”nin genel Cronbach’s alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı 0.84 bulunmuştur. Alt boyutlarda Güneş Koruyucu Ürünlerin Kullanımıyla İlgili Normlar/ Tutumlar (0.90), Güneşten Kaçınma Öz-Yeterliliği (0.90), Güneşten Kaçınmayla İlgili Normlar/Tutumlar (0.87), Güneş Koruyucu Ürünlerin Kullanımı Öz-Yeterliliği (0.86), Bronzlaşma Beklentileri (0.81) yüksek derecede güvenilir; Güneş Koruyucu Ürün Kullanımıyla İlgili Beklentiler (0.79), Güneşten Kaçınma Beklentileri (0.79) ve Güneş Koruyucu Ürünlerin Kullanımıyla İlgili Engeller (0.76) ölçeklerinin de oldukça güvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu ölçeklerin tamamı birlikte veya her biri ayrı ayrı da kullanılabilir. Sonuç: Bulgular EGKÖ’nin Türk toplumunda geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermiştir. EGKÖ ebeveynlerin güneş koruyucu ürün kullanımı ve güneşten kaçınma durumlarını değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59(4): 225-249.
  • [2] Hunter S, Love-Jackson K, Abdulla R, Zhu W, Lee JH, Wells KJ, et al. Sun protection at elementary schools: a cluster randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102(7): 484-492.
  • [3] Li J, Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O. A comparison of patterns of sun protection during beach holidays and everyday outdoor activities in a population sample of young German children. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166(4): 803-810.
  • [4] Dobbinson S, Wakefield M, Hill D, Girgis A, Aitken JF, Beckmann K, et al. Prevalence and determinants of Australian adolescents’ and adults’ weekend sun protection and sunburn, summer 2003-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59(4): 602-614.
  • [5] Lazovich D, Vogel RI, Berwick M, Weinstock MA, Anderson KE, Warshaw EM. Indoor tanning and risk of melanoma: a case-control study in a highly exposed population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19(6): 1557-1568.
  • [6] Veierød MB, Adami HO, Lund E, Armstrong BK, Weiderpass E. Sun and solarium exposure and melanoma risk: effects of age, pigmentary characteristics, and nevi. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19(1): 111-120.
  • [7] Maguire-Eisen M, Rothman K, Demierre MF. The ABCs of sun protection for children. Dermatol Nurs 2005; 17(6): 419-22.
  • [8] Bodekær LM, Petersen B, Philipsen PA, Young A, Thieden E, Wulf HC. Sun exposure and protection behavior of Danish farm children: parental influence on their children. J Photochem Photobiol 2014; 90(5): 1193-1198.
  • [9] Glanz K, Mayer JA. Reducing ultraviole tradiation exposureto prevent skin cancer. Am J Prev Med 2005; 29(2): 131-142.
  • [10] Sümen A, Öncel S. Studies conducted with students about skin cancer and sun protection: A literature review. DEUHYO ED 2014; 7(2): 78-91.
  • [11] Sümen A, Öncel S. Effect of skin cancer training provided to maritime high school students on their knowledge and behaviour. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16(17): 7769-7779.
  • [12] Saraiya M, Glanz K, Briss PA, Nichols P, White C, Das D, et al. Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27(5): 422-466.
  • [13] Haktanır TN, Yazıcı S. Effect of social, economic, and cultural level of parents on protection of their children from the harmful effects of sunlight. Çocuk Derg 2008; 8(3): 160-165.
  • [14] Glanz K, Steffen AD, Schoenfeld E, Tappe KA. Randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention for children: the Project SCAPE family study. J Health Commun 2013; 18(11): 1368-1383.
  • [15] Stöver LA, Hinrichs B, Petzold U, Kuhlmei H, Baumgart J, Parpart C, et al. Getting in early: primary skin cancer prevention at 55 German kindergartens. Br J Dermatol 2012; 167(s2): 63-69.
  • [16] Thomson CE, White KM, Hamilton K. Investigating mothers’ decisions about their child’s sun-protective behaviour using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. J Health Psychol 2012; 17(7): 1001-1010.
  • [17] Guy GP, Machlin SR, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the US, 2002-2006 and 2007-2011. Am J Prev Med 2015; 48(2): 183-187.
  • [18] Çayırlı M, Tunca M, Açıkgöz G. Sun protection and sunscreens. TAF Prev Med Bull 2013; 12(2): 193-198.
  • [19] Gilaberte Y, Carrascosa JM. Sun protection in children: realities and challenges. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2014; 105(3): 253-262.
  • [20] Tripp MK, Carvajal SC, McCormick LK, Mueller NH, Hu SH, Parcel GS, et al. Validity and reliability of the parental sun protection scales. Health Educ Res 2003; 18(1): 58-73.
  • [21] World Health Organization. [Internet]. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. [cited 2017 February 19]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
  • [22] Aksayan S, Gözüm S. A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale. HEMARGE Derg 2002; 4(1): 9-14.
  • [23] Kline RB. Principles and practise of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
  • [24] Dixon JK. Exploratory factor analysis. Plichta SB, Kelvin E, editors. Munro’s statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; p.371-398.
  • [25] Büyüköztürk Ş. Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy; 2011.
  • [26] Tavşancıl E. Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel; 2014.
  • [27] Polit FD, Beck CT. Nursing Research Principles and Method. 9th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2012.
  • [28] Şencan H. Reliability and validity in social and behavioural measurements. Ankara: Seçkin; 2005.
  • [29] Esin MN. Data collection methods and tools and the reliability and validity of data collection tools. Erdoğan S, Nahçivan N, Esin MN, editors. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel; 2014.
  • [30] Çakmur H. Measurement reliability validity in research. TAF Prev Med Bull 2012; 11(3): 339-344.
APA Sümen A, öncel s (2018). Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. , 245 - 255.
Chicago Sümen Adem,öncel selma Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. (2018): 245 - 255.
MLA Sümen Adem,öncel selma Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. , 2018, ss.245 - 255.
AMA Sümen A,öncel s Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. . 2018; 245 - 255.
Vancouver Sümen A,öncel s Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. . 2018; 245 - 255.
IEEE Sümen A,öncel s "Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population." , ss.245 - 255, 2018.
ISNAD Sümen, Adem - öncel, selma. "Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population". (2018), 245-255.
APA Sümen A, öncel s (2018). Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8(4), 245 - 255.
Chicago Sümen Adem,öncel selma Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8, no.4 (2018): 245 - 255.
MLA Sümen Adem,öncel selma Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol.8, no.4, 2018, ss.245 - 255.
AMA Sümen A,öncel s Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018; 8(4): 245 - 255.
Vancouver Sümen A,öncel s Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018; 8(4): 245 - 255.
IEEE Sümen A,öncel s "Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population." Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8, ss.245 - 255, 2018.
ISNAD Sümen, Adem - öncel, selma. "Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Parental Sun Protection Scales in Turkish Population". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8/4 (2018), 245-255.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
30-04-2024 8:8

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları