The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 103 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 İndeks Tarihi: 02-05-2021
The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method
Öz: Meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are becoming increasingly important as a cause of hospital and communityacquired infections. The aim of this study is to compare PCR, gradient tests and automated system which are the methods for determining methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains. The study included 50 MRSA strains isolated from various samples (wound, blood, sputum, respiration, abscess, osteomyelitis, etc.) from the microbiology laboratory of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Medical Faculty between 2010-2016. A single isolate was obtained from each patient. In our study, the pres ence of mecA gene in MRSA strains was investigated by conventional, automated and PCR methods. The presence of methicillin resistance was found in 49 of 50 MRSA strains which were examined by Oxacillin E-test method (MIC˃2). All of the strains which were tested by cefoxitin E-test were found resistant to methicillin (MIC˃4). Vitek 2 automated system detected that all of the strains are resistant to methicillin. All samples examined by PCR method were positive, the presence of mecA gene was determined. Sensitivity rate of strains examined by oxacillin E-test method was 98%, while the susceptibility rate of strains examined by cefoxitin E-test, Vitek 2 automated system and PCR methods was 100%.In order to obtain the necessary precautions in hospitals with hi gh MRSA ratio, mecA investigation is of great importance in achieving the correct results. Since the results of the three methods are almost close to each other, three methods can beused to determine the correct results.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Sancak B. MRSA direnç mekanizmaları: Dünyada ve Türkiye’de epidemiyolojisi. ANKEM Derg 2012; 26: 38-47.
- 2. Çelik C, Bakıcı MZ, diğ. Kan akımı infeksiyonlarından izole edilen Staphylococcus aureus suşlarında antimikrobiyal direnç paterni, Genel Tıp Dergisi 2013; 23: 109-113.
- 3. Kloos WE. Bonnerman TL. Staphylococcus and micrococcus. In: Murray PR, Borron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds). Manuel of Clinical Microbiology, American Society of Microbiology. Washington DC 1999; 264-282.
- 4. Banu Sancak Staphylococcus aureus ve Antibiyotik Direnci Mikrobiyol Bul 2011; 45: 565-576.
- 5. Martins A. Cunha M de L. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase- negative staphylococci: Epidemiological and molecular aspects. Microbiol Immunol Rev 2007; 51: 787-795.
- 6. Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE. The molecular evolution of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13: 222-235.
- 7. Özen NS, Dağlar D, Özhak Baysan B, Yildirim Ç, Yazisiz H, Öğünç D, Öngüt G, Çolak D, Gültekin M. Metisilin Dirençli Staphylococcus Aureus Suşlarının Saptanmasında MRSA Id Kromojenik Besiyerinin Değerlendirilmesi. ANKEM Derg 2011; 25: 31-34.
- 8. Siripornmongcolchai T, Chomvarin C, Chaicumpar K, Limpaiboon T, Wongkhum C. Evulation of different primers for detection mecA gene by PCR in comparison with phenotypic methods for discrimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health 2002; 33: 758-763.
- 9. Başustaoğlu A. Dirençli mikroorganizma enfeksiyonları ve kontrol programları: Gram pozitif bakteriler. Aktüel tıp dergisi 2002; 7: 82-85.
- 10. Aköğretmen,T. Balıkesir ve yöresinde mental retarde hastalarda nazal metisilin dirençli Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) taşıyıcılığı oranının moleküler yöntemlerle araştırılması. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Balıkesir: Balıkesir Üniversitesi; 2016.
- 11. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Tenover FC, McDonald LC, Horan T, Gaynes R. Changes in the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units in US hospitals, 1992-2003. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: 389-391.
- 12. Kallen AJ, Brunkard J, Moore Z, Budge P, Arnold KE, Fosheim G ve ark. S. aureus community-aquired pneumonia during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53: 358-365.
- 13. Bozca B, Coşkuner SA, Biçer KÇ, Genç VE, Özgenç O. Stafilokoklarda metisilin direnç oranlarının saptanması. ANKEM Dergisi 2007; 21: 26.
- 14. Güner S, Gürler N. 2001-2006 yıllarında cerehat ve yara örneklerinden izole edilen stafilokok suşlarında metisilin direnci. ANKEM Derg 2007; 21: 27.
- 15. Orak F. Mardin Devlet Hastanesi’nde 2011- 2013 yılları arasında metisiline dirençli stafilokoklarda direnç profilleri. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2015; 72: 191-198.
- 16. John MA, Burden J, Stuart JI, Reyes RC, Lannigan R, Milburn S, Diagre D, Wilson B, Hussain Z. Comparison of three phenotypic techniques for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus spp. reveals a species-dependent performance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63: 493-496.
- 17. Acosta-Pérez G, Rodríguez-Ábrego G, Longoria-Revilla E, Castro-Mussot ME. [Evaluation of four methods for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens at a regional hospital in Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex 2012; 54: 1-6.
- 18. Tiwari HK, Sapkota D, Das AK, Sen MR. Assessment of different tests to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009; 40: 801-826.
- 19. Junkins AD, Lockhart SR, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Von Stein DL, Winokur PL, Doern GV, Richter SS. BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with cefoxitin. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 2879-2882.
- 20. Uzun B, Karataş Şener AG, Güngör S, Afşar I, Yüksel Ergin O, Demirci M. Staphylococcus aureus Suşlarındaki Metisilin Direncinin Belirlenmesinde Sefoksitin Disk Difüzyon Testi, Otomatize Sistem ve Kromojenik Besiyerinin Karşılaştırılması Mikrobiyol Bul 2013; 47: 11-18.
- 21. Kaya, E, Aral, M, Orhan, Z, Yalçınkaya, K, Uğurlu, H. Comparison of Conventional PCR Method With Cefoxitin Disc Diffusion, Automated System and Isolation on Chromogenic MRSA Medium Methods for The Detection of Meticillin Resistance In Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated From Various Clinical Specimens. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 1019; 22: 451-455.
- 22. Cirit OS, Yıldırım T, Çoban AY. Staphylococcus aureus klinik izolatlarında panton-valentin lökosidin varlığının araştırılması. Balkan Med J 2009; 28: 119-124
APA | DENİZ N, BAYRAM Y, Parlak M, IRDEN Ş, Guducuoglu H (2021). The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. , 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
Chicago | DENİZ Naziye Yildiz,BAYRAM YASEMIN,Parlak Mehmet,IRDEN Şevin,Guducuoglu Huseyin The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. (2021): 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
MLA | DENİZ Naziye Yildiz,BAYRAM YASEMIN,Parlak Mehmet,IRDEN Şevin,Guducuoglu Huseyin The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. , 2021, ss.99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
AMA | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. . 2021; 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
Vancouver | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. . 2021; 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
IEEE | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H "The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method." , ss.99 - 103, 2021. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
ISNAD | DENİZ, Naziye Yildiz vd. "The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method". (2021), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
APA | DENİZ N, BAYRAM Y, Parlak M, IRDEN Ş, Guducuoglu H (2021). The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. Eastern Journal of Medicine, 26(1), 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
Chicago | DENİZ Naziye Yildiz,BAYRAM YASEMIN,Parlak Mehmet,IRDEN Şevin,Guducuoglu Huseyin The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. Eastern Journal of Medicine 26, no.1 (2021): 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
MLA | DENİZ Naziye Yildiz,BAYRAM YASEMIN,Parlak Mehmet,IRDEN Şevin,Guducuoglu Huseyin The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. Eastern Journal of Medicine, vol.26, no.1, 2021, ss.99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
AMA | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. Eastern Journal of Medicine. 2021; 26(1): 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
Vancouver | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method. Eastern Journal of Medicine. 2021; 26(1): 99 - 103. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
IEEE | DENİZ N,BAYRAM Y,Parlak M,IRDEN Ş,Guducuoglu H "The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method." Eastern Journal of Medicine, 26, ss.99 - 103, 2021. 10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |
ISNAD | DENİZ, Naziye Yildiz vd. "The Determination of mecA Gene Presence In MRSA Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Unit ByConventional, Automated and PCR Method". Eastern Journal of Medicine 26/1 (2021), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2021.89801 |