Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars

Lazoglu, Merve; Karabulutlu, Ozlem; BEYDAĞ, Kerime Derya

Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars

Özlem KARABULUT, (Kafkas Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Ebelik Bölümü, Kars; Türkiye)

Kerime Derya BEYDAĞ, (Okan Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, İstanbul; Türkiye)

Merve LAZOĞLU (Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi

1 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 24 - 31 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 26-05-2021

Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars

Öz:

Aim: This research was carried out to determine prenatal attach-ment grades and its effecting factors of pregnants living in two different cities placed in the west and east sides of Turkey.Material and Method: The research was a descriptive type and was carried out in three different hospitals, which served in Istanbul and Kars. The universe of this research has consisted of preg-nants applied to those hospitals in told above. A sampling of the research has consisted of 5173 pregnants applied to and agreed on the research in the hospitals above between November 2014 and June 2015. Collecting data ‘Personal Information Form’ and ‘Prenatal Attachment Inventory’ were used. Evaluating data, per-centage, average and standard deviation, and t-test and ANOVA test were used.Results: Prenatal attachment grades of the pregnants living in Kars city: 60.57±9.20; Prenatal attachment grades of the preg-nants living in Istanbul: 59.16±10.82. Average prenatal attachment of all pregnants involved in the research 59.89±10.03. Prenatal at-tachment grades of the pregnants who are above 40 years of age, the primary school graduated, are not working, whose income is lesser than their outcomes, live in a crowded house and whose marriage time is more than 11 years, is lower than other partici-pants (p<0.05). Pregnancy numbers of pregnants, situation wheth-er the pregnancy is planned or not, that who decided the pregnan-cy, living children numbers, having disabled children and the case of getting pregnant with treatment has got meaningful differences with the prenatal attachment of pregnants (p<0.05); there are no meaningful statistical differences with pregnancy month and pre-natal attachment grades. (p>0.05). Prenatal attachment grades of the pregnant who go to controls in fewer times, have no education, and do not make sufficient controls during their pregnancies are stated lower (p<0.05).Conclusion: It was found that prenatal attachment increased as perceived social support increased in pregnant women. In order to increase prenatal attachment, it is recommended to continue social support to pregnant wo

Anahtar Kelime:

stanbul’da ve Kars’ta Yaşayan Gebelerin Prenatal Bağlanma Düzeyleri ve Etkileyen Faktörler

Öz:

maç:Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin doğusunda ve batısında iki farklı ilde yaşayan gebelerin prenatal bağlanma düzeylerini ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.Materyal ve Metot:Tanımlayıcı nitelikteki araştırma, İstanbul ve Kars’ta hizmet veren üç farklı hastanede yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini, araştırmanın yapıldığı yılda adı geçen hastanelerin polik-liniklerine başvuran gebeler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örnek-lemini Kasım 2014 - Haziran 2015 tarihleri arasında çalışmanın yapıldığı hastanelere başvuran ve çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 5173 gebe oluşturmuştur. Verilerin toplanmasında, “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” ve “Prenatal Bağlanma Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin de-ğerlendirilmesinde yüzdelik, ortalama, standart sapma, t testi ve ANOVA testi kullanılmıştır.Bulgular:Kars ilinde yaşayana gebelerin prenatal bağlanma dü-zeyi puan ortalaması 60,57±9,20; İstanbul’da yaşayan gebele-rin prenatal bağlanma düzeyi 59,16±10,82 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırmaya dâhil olan tüm gebelerin prenatal bağlanma düzeyi puan ortalaması 59,89±10,03’tür. Kırk yaş ve üzeri yaş grubunda olan, ilköğretim mezunu, bir işte çalışmayan, geliri giderinden az olan, kalabalık ailede yaşayan ve evlilik süresi 11 yıl ve üzeri olan gebelerin prenatal bağlanma düzeyleri daha düşük bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Gebelerin gebelik sayısı, gebeliğin planlı olma durumu, gebelik kararını kimin verdiği, yaşayan çocuk sayısı, engelli çocu-ğu olma durumu ve gebeliğin tedavi ile olma durumu ile prena-tal bağlanma ölçeği puan ortalaması arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmış (p<0,05); gebelik ayı ile prenatal bağ-lanma ölçeği puan ortalaması arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Gebeliği süresinde az kontrole gi-den, eğitim almayan ve gebelik boyunca gerekli testleri yaptırma-yanların prenatal bağlanma ölçeği puan ortalamaları daha düşük bulunmuştur (p<0,05).Sonuç:Gebelerde algılanan sosyal destek arttıkça, prenatal bağ-lanmanın arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Prenatal bağlanmanın artırılması için gebelere verilen sosyal desteğin sürdürülmesi önerilir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Okanlı A, Tortumluoğlu G, Kırpınar İ. The relationship between pregnant women perceived social support from family and problem solving skill. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2003;4(2):98–105.
2. Muller ME. The development and testing of the prenatal attachment inventory. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1993;15(2):199–211.
3. Muller ME. Prenatal and Postnatal Attachment: A Modest Correlation. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 1996;25(2):161–6.
4. Sitrin L. Parental coping after miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and infant death. Doctorate Dissertation. The California School of Professional Pscholog y, Alameda, 1994.
5. Cranley MS. Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nursing Research 1981;30(5):281–4.
6. Peppers LG, Knapp RJ. Maternal reactions to involuntary fetal/infant death. Psychiatry 1980;43(2):155-9.
7. Eswi A, Khalil A. Prenatal Attachment and Fetal Health Locus of Control among Low Risk and High Risk Pregnant Women. World Applied Sciences Journal 2012;18(4):462–71.
8. Abbasoğlu A, Atay G, İpekçi AM, Gökçay B, Candoğan ÇB, Şahin E et al. The relationship between maternal-infant bonding and infantile colic. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2015;58:57–61.
9. Van de Rijt-Plooij HC, Plooij PX. Distinct periods of mother infant conflict in normal development: Sources of progress and germs of patholog y. Journal of Child Psycholog y and Psychiatry 1993;34:229–45.
10. Pearson JL, Cowan PA, Cowan CP. Adult attachment and adult child-order parent relationships. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1993;63(4):606–13.
11. Aluş Tokat M, Okumuş H, Dennis CL. Translation and psychometric assessment of the Breast-feeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form among pregnant and postnatal women in Turkey. Midwifery 2010;26(1):101–8.
12. Dereli Yılmaz S, Kızılkaya Beji N. Turkish Version of Prenatal Attachment Inventory: A Study of Reliability and Validity. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2013;16(2):103–9.
13. Metin A. Examination of the relationship between perceived social support and prenatal self- assessment in pregnant. Atatürk University Programme of Nursing Master Thesis, Erzurum, 2014.
14. Armstrong K, Edwards H. The effects of exercise and social support on mothers reporting depressive symptoms: a pilot randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 2003;12(2):130–8.
15. Lerum CW, LoBiondo-Wood G. The relationship of maternal age, quickening, and physical symptoms of pregnancy to the development of maternal-fetal attachment. Birth 1998;16(1):13–7.
16. Günay P. Examine the variables of Pregnant women associated with prenatal attechement level. Haliç Univesity Instute of Social Sciencess Master Thesis, 2015.
17. Condon JT, Esuvaranathan V. The influence of parity on the experience of pregnancy: a comparison of first- and second-time expectant couples. The British Journal of Medical Psycholog y 1990;63(Pt 4):369–77.
18. Berryman JC, Windridge KC. Pregnancy after 35 and attachment to the fetus. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1996;14(2):133–43.
19. Hjelmstedt A, Widström AM, Collins A. Attachment in women who conceived after in vitro fertilization and women who conceived naturally. Birth 2006;33(4):303–10.
20. Lumley JM. Through a glass darkly: Ultrasound and prenatal bonding. Birth 1990;17(4):214–7.
21. Laxton-Kane M, Slade P. The role of maternal prenatal attachment in a woman’s experience of pregnancy and implications for the process of care, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psycholog y 2002;20(4):253–66.
22. Kleinveld JH, Timmermans DR, Van den Berg M, Van Eijk JT, Ten Kate LP. Does offering and performing prenatal screening inf uence women’s attachment to their unborn child? A longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Prenatal Diagnosis 2007;27(8):757–64.
23. Baıllıe C, Hewıson J, Maso NG. Should ultrasound scanning in pregnancy be routine? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psycholog y 1999;17(2):149–57.

APA	Karabulutlu O, BEYDAĞ K, Lazoglu M (2020). Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. , 24 - 31.
Chicago	Karabulutlu Ozlem,BEYDAĞ Kerime Derya,Lazoglu Merve Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. (2020): 24 - 31.
MLA	Karabulutlu Ozlem,BEYDAĞ Kerime Derya,Lazoglu Merve Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. , 2020, ss.24 - 31.
AMA	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. . 2020; 24 - 31.
Vancouver	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. . 2020; 24 - 31.
IEEE	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M "Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars." , ss.24 - 31, 2020.
ISNAD	Karabulutlu, Ozlem vd. "Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars". (2020), 24-31.

APA	Karabulutlu O, BEYDAĞ K, Lazoglu M (2020). Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 24 - 31.
Chicago	Karabulutlu Ozlem,BEYDAĞ Kerime Derya,Lazoglu Merve Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 10, no.1 (2020): 24 - 31.
MLA	Karabulutlu Ozlem,BEYDAĞ Kerime Derya,Lazoglu Merve Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.10, no.1, 2020, ss.24 - 31.
AMA	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 24 - 31.
Vancouver	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 10(1): 24 - 31.
IEEE	Karabulutlu O,BEYDAĞ K,Lazoglu M "Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars." Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 10, ss.24 - 31, 2020.
ISNAD	Karabulutlu, Ozlem vd. "Prenatal Attachment Levels and Affecting Factors of Pregnant Women Living in İstanbul and Kars". Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 10/1 (2020), 24-31.