GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Kübra VAR TÜRK (Ankara Üniversitesi Deniz Hukuku Ulusal Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi
52 0
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 153 - 194 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 28-09-2021

GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz:
İnsansız teknoloji konusundaki gelişmeler tüm sektörleri etkilediği gibidenizcilik sektörünü de etkisi altına almaya başlamıştır. Denizcilik sektörünün engelişmiş teknolojisi insansız gemilerle ilgili özel bir hukuki düzenleme halihazırdamevcut değildir. Bu durum, uluslararası yeknesaklığın en ileri düzeyde olduğu denizhukuku bakımından bir dizi sorunu gündeme getirmektedir. Başta insansız gemilerinhukuken gemi olarak nitelendirilip nitelendirilemeyeceği olmak üzere, mevcut hukukidüzenlemelerin kapsamına insansız gemilerin dahil edilip edilemeyeceği, hukukialtyapının insansız gemiler için yeterli olup olmadığı akla gelen sorular arasındadır.Çalışmada insansız gemilerin hukuki statüsü, tabiiyeti, seyrüsefer hakkı ve gemiadamlarıyla ilgili sorunlar tartışılacaktır
Anahtar Kelime:

-

Öz:
Recent developments in unmanned technology have already affected all sectors including the maritime sector. Currently, these ships, the cutting-edge technology of maritime sector, have not been specifically addressed by any international rule or regulation so far. This raises several problems in terms of the international law of the sea and maritime law, where international uniformity is at the highest level. Among the problems that come to mind are whether unmanned ships can be legally qualified as ships, whether unmanned ships can be within the scope of current legal regulations, whether the legal infrastructure is sufficient for unmanned ships. The study will discuss issues related to the legal status, nationality, and navigation rights of unmanned ships and seafarers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Allen, C. H.: Determining the Legal Status of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles: Formalism vs Functionalism, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 2018, Vol. 49, No. 4, s. 477-514.
  • Allen, C. H.: The Seabots are Coming Here: Should they be Treated as ‘Vessels’?, The Journal of Navigation 2012, Vol. 65, s. 749-752.
  • Baughen, S.: Who is the Master Now? Regulatory and Contractual Challenges of Unmanned Vessels, Soyer, B./Tettenborn, A. (eds): New Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and Shipping Law in the 21st Century, Oxon 2020, s. 129-147.
  • Bi, H./Gao, C./Ma, Y.: Research on the Legal Status of Unmanned Surface Vehicle, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2018 (doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1069/1/012004).
  • Carey, L.: All Hands Off Deck? The Legal Barriers to Autonomous Ships, NUS Centre for Maritime Law Working Paper 17/06, NUS Law Working Paper 2017/011, Singapore 2017.
  • Cartner, J. A. C./Fiske, R. P./Leiter, T. L.: The International Law of the Shipmaster, London 2009.
  • Chwedczuk, M.: Analysis of the Legal Status of Unmanned Commercial Vessels in U.S. Admiralty and Maritime Law, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce 2016, Vol. 47, No. 2, s. 123-169.
  • CMI: Consolidated Analysis of IMO LEG Conventions as Summarized in IMO Document LEG 107/8, https://comitemaritime.org/work/mass/, 30.11.2020.
  • CMI: International Working Group Position Paper on Unmanned Ships and the International Regulatory Framework, http://www.comitemaritime. org/Uploads/Questionnaires/CMI%20Position%20Paper% 20on%20 Unmanned%20Ships.pdf, 28.3.2018 (Anılış: CMI Position Paper).
  • CMI: Questionnaire on Unmanned Ships, https://comitemaritime.org/work/mass/, 30.11.2020.
  • CMI: Summary of Responses to the CMI Questionnaire, https://comitemaritime.org/ work/mass/, 30.11.2020.
  • Danish Maritime Authority: Analysis of Regulatory Barriers to the Use of Autonomous Ships Final Report, December 2017, http://www.dma.dk/ Documents/Publikationer/Analysis%20of%20Regulatory%20Barriers%20 to%20the%20Use%20of%20Autonomous%20Ships.pdf, 28.3.2018.
  • Daugirdas, K./Mortenson, J. D.: Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: United States Confronts China over Seizure of Unmanned Drone in the South China Sea, American Journal of International Law 2017, Vol. 111(2), s. 513-517.
  • Daum, O.: The Implications of International Law on Unmanned Naval Craft, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 2018, Vol. 49, No. 1, s. 71-103.
  • Daum, O./Stellpflug, T.: The Implications of International Law on Unmanned Merchant Vessels, Journal of International Maritime Law 2017, Vol. 23(5), s. 363-374.
  • Dean, P./Clack, H.: Autonomous Shipping and Maritime Law, Soyer, B./Tettenborn, A. (eds): New Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and Shipping Law in the 21st Century, Oxon 2020, s. 67-89.
  • Deketelaere, P.: The Legal Challenges of Unmanned Vessels, Universiteit Gent, Master of Science in Maritime Science, Master Dissertation, Belgium 2017.
  • Delgado, J. P. R.: The Legal Challenges of Unmanned Ships in the Private Maritime Law: What Laws would You Change?, Il Diritto Marittimo – Quaderni 5, Musi, M. (ed.): Port, Maritime and Transport Law between Legacies of the Past and Modernization, Bologna 2018, s. 493-523.
  • Ece, N. J.: Uluslararası Ticaretin Geleceği İnsansız Gemiler: GZFT Analizi ve Hukuki Boyutları, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 2018, C. 10, S. 2, s. 279-302.
  • Henderson, A. H.: Murky Waters: The Legal Status of Unmanned Undersea Vehicles, Naval Law Review 2006, Vol. 53, s. 55-72.
  • Hogg, T./Ghosh, S.: Autonomous Merchant Vessels: Examination of Factors That Impact the Effective Implementation of Unmanned Ships, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, Vol. 8, No. 3, s. 206-222.
  • IMO Document LEG 105/11/1.
  • IMO Document LEG 105/14.
  • IMO Document LEG 107/8.
  • IMO Document MSC 99/WP.9 Annex I.
  • IMO Document MSC 99/WP.9.
  • IMO Resolution A.1047(27) Annex 2.
  • IMO Resolution LEG.3(91).
  • ITLOS: M/V “VIRGINIA G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Judgement, ITLOS Reports, Vol. 14, 2014.
  • Jokioinen, E.: Introduction, AAWA Whitepaper - Remote and Autonomous Ships: The next steps, s. 3-15 (http://www.rollsroyce.com/~/media/Files/R/RollsRoyce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/aawa-whitepaper-210616.pdf, 28.3.2018).
  • Kara, H.: Gemilerde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı ve Buna Dair Hukuki Sorunlar, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2020, C. 10, S. 1, s. 17-51.
  • Karan, H.: Kıbrıs Ekseninde Uluslararası Deniz Hukuku Bakımından Ticaret Gemilerinin Yabancı Limanlara Uğraması, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2010, C. 1, S. 1, s. 53-67.
  • Karlis, T.: Maritime Law Issues Related to the Operation of Unmanned Autonomous Cargo Ships, World Maritime University Journal of Maritime Affairs 2018, Vol. 17, s. 119-128.
  • Komianos, A.: The Autonomous Shipping Era. Operational, Regulatory, and Quality Challenges, The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportations 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2, s. 335-347.
  • Lowe, V.: Report on the Interpretation of the Term ‘Ship’ in the 1992 Civil Liability Convention, IOPC/OCT11/4/4 Annex I.
  • Mavilla, L. K.: The Conflict between Maritime Law & Unmanned Shipping: Manning the Unmanned Ghost Ships?, Supremo Amicus, Vol. 10, s. 142-152.
  • MUNIN: Final Brochure: Research in Maritime Autonomous Systems Project Results and Technology Potentials, http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/ wp-content/uploads/2016/02/MUNIN-final-brochure.pdf, 21.3.2018.
  • MUNIN: Final Report: Shore Control Centre, http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/ wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MUNIN-D8-8-Final-Report-Shore-ControlCentre-CTH-final.pdf, 21.3.2018
  • Nandan, S. N./Rosenne, S. (ed.): United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, Vol. III, The Hague 1995.
  • Pritchett, P. W.: Ghost Ships: Why the Law Should Embrace Unmanned Vessel Technology, Tulane Maritime Law Journal 2015-2016, Vol. 40, s. 197-226.
  • Ringbom, H.: Regulating Autonomous Ships – Concepts, Challenges and Precedents, Ocean Development & International Law 2019, Vol. 50, No. 2–3, s. 141-169.
  • Sözer, B.: Mürettebatsız Gemiler “Unmanned Ships”, Amasya, S.: Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Sigorta Hukukunun İki Güncel Sorunu: İnsansız Araçlar – Sorumluluk ve Özel Sağlık Sigortalarında Birden Çok Sigorta Sempozyumu 18 Ocak 2019, İstanbul 2020, s. 43-59 (Anılış: Unmanned Ships).
  • Sözer, B.: Self-Steering Ships, Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2020, C. 19, S. 2, s. 1345-1380 (Anılış: Self-Steering).
  • Sözer, B.: Teknolojik Gelişmelerin, Taşıyanın Gemiyi Sefere Elverişli Halde Bulundurmak Borcunun Kapsamına ve İçeriğine Etkileri, Süzel, C. (ed.): Deniz Ticareti Hukukunda Yeni Sorunlar Sempozyumu – I, İstanbul 2019, s. 1-12.
  • United Nations: General Assembly Distr.: General 30 September 1999, A/54/429. Vallejo, D. A. G.: Electric Currents: Programming Legal Status into Autonomous Unmanned Maritime Vehicles, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 2015, Vol. 47, s. 405-428.
  • Van Hooydonk, E.: Botport Law – The Regulatory Agenda for the Transition to Smart Ports, Soyer, B./Tettenborn, A. (eds): New Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and Shipping Law in the 21st Century, Oxon 2020, s. 90-104 (Anılış: Botport Law).
  • Van Hooydonk, E.: The Law of Unmanned Merchant Shipping – An Exploration, The Journal of International Maritime Law 2014, Vol. 20, s. 403-423 (Anılış: An Exploration).
  • Var Türk, K.: Deniz Haydutluğu ve Siber Güvenlik Bakımından Uluslararası Deniz Hukuku Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme: İnsansız Gemiler, DEHUKAM Deniz Hukuku Dergisi 2019, C. 2, S. 2, s. 495-517.
  • Veal, R./Ringbom, H.: Unmanned Ships and the International Regulatory Framework, Journal of International Maritime Law 2017, Vol. 23, No. 2, s. 100-118.
  • Veal, R./Tsimplis, M.: The Integration of Unmanned Ships into the lex maritima, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 2017, s. 303-335.
  • Veal, R./Tsimplis, M./Serdy, A.: The Legal Status and Operation of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles, Ocean Development & International Law 2019, Vol. 50, No. 1, s. 23-48.
  • Jalonen, R./Tuominen, R./Wahlström, M.: Safety and Security in Autonomous Shipping – Challenges for Research and Developments, AAWA Whitepaper - Remote and Autonomous Ships: The next steps, s. 58-73, http://www.rollsroyce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship-intel/aawa-whitepaper-210616.pdf, 28.3.2018.
  • Walker, G. K. (ed.): Definitions for the Law of the Sea: Terms Not Defined by the 1982 Convention, Leiden 2012.
  • Yang, T.: Intelligent Ships, Mukherjee, P. K./Mejia, M. Q./Xu, J. (eds): Maritime Law in Motion, Switzerland 2020, s. 703-711.
  • http://ares.global/media-center/news/turkeys-first-armed-unmanned-surface-vehicleulaq-will-be-the-new-guardian-of-the-blue-homeland, 1.11.2020.
  • http://comitemaritime.org/work/mass/, 30.11.2020.
  • http://comitemaritime.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Letter-to-Presidents-ofNMLAs-re-IWG-on-Vessel-Nomenclature-080316.pdf, 14.6.2018.
  • http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/b5/5d/3dc49d9a2758de/US613809. pdf, 6.1.2018.
  • http://www.aselsan.com.tr/tr-tr/basin-odasi/Brosurler/Gudum-ve-Insansiz-Sistemler/ LEVENT_TR.pdf, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.businessinsider.com/sea-hunter-us-navy-actuv-darpa-2018-2, 28.2.2018.
  • http://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/1032823/chinese-seize-usnavy-underwater-drone-in-south-china-sea/, 21.3.2018.
  • http://www.dnvgl.com/technology-innovation/revolt/index.html, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.dnvgl.no/karriere/employee-stories/interview-articles/revolt.html, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1425479.shtml, 21.3.2018.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Autonomous-shipping.aspx, 14.12.2019.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/FAL/Pages/FAL-43rdSession.aspx, 20.4.2019.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Legal/Pages/LEG-106thsession.aspx, 3.4.2019.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/MSC/Pages/MSC-100thsession.aspx, 12.12.2018.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/08-MSC-99-MASSscoping.aspx, 1.6.2018.
  • http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/HumanElement/Pages/PriciplesOnSafeManning. aspx#:~:text=1047(27))%2C%20ado pted%20in,protection%20of%20 the%20marine%20environment, 16.4.2019.
  • http://www.liquid-robotics.com/markets/environmental-assessment/, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.liquid-robotics.com/wave-glider/overview/, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/protector-unmanned-surface-vehicle/, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/japan-to-developautonomous-electric-passenger-vessels-61739, 17.12.2020.
  • https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en, 1.2.2021.
  • http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/about/munins-objectives/, 21.3.2018.
  • http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/about/the-autonomus-ship/, 21.3.2018.
  • http://www.whoi.edu/main/remus, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.whoi.edu/main/slocum-glider, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.whoi.edu/main/spray-glider, 20.3.2018.
  • http://www.yara.com/knowledge-grows/game-changer-for-the-environment/, 20.3.2018.
  • https://www.yara.com/news-and-media/press-kits/yara-birkeland-press-kit/, 30.11.2020.
APA VAR TÜRK K (2021). GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. , 153 - 194.
Chicago VAR TÜRK KÜBRA GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. (2021): 153 - 194.
MLA VAR TÜRK KÜBRA GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. , 2021, ss.153 - 194.
AMA VAR TÜRK K GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. . 2021; 153 - 194.
Vancouver VAR TÜRK K GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. . 2021; 153 - 194.
IEEE VAR TÜRK K "GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ." , ss.153 - 194, 2021.
ISNAD VAR TÜRK, KÜBRA. "GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ". (2021), 153-194.
APA VAR TÜRK K (2021). GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, 37(1), 153 - 194.
Chicago VAR TÜRK KÜBRA GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 37, no.1 (2021): 153 - 194.
MLA VAR TÜRK KÜBRA GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, vol.37, no.1, 2021, ss.153 - 194.
AMA VAR TÜRK K GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi. 2021; 37(1): 153 - 194.
Vancouver VAR TÜRK K GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi. 2021; 37(1): 153 - 194.
IEEE VAR TÜRK K "GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ." Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, 37, ss.153 - 194, 2021.
ISNAD VAR TÜRK, KÜBRA. "GEMİ ADAMI İLE DONATILMAMIŞ (İNSANSIZ) GEMİLERİN DENİZ HUKUKU BOYUTUYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ". Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 37/1 (2021), 153-194.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
13-05-2024 7:4

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları