Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 213 - 220 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 İndeks Tarihi: 02-10-2021
Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey
Öz: AIM: This study aimed to establish the validity and reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale in Turkey.METHOD: This methodological study was conducted between December, 2014, and July, 2017, in the neonatal intensive care unit of 4 hospitals (2 public, 1 university, and 1 private hospital) in the center of a city in eastern Turkey. The study population consisted of all the nurses of the hospitals. No sampling was performed, and the sample consisted of 145 nurses who agreed to participate in the study. The 26-item Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale developed by Kain et al. (2009) was translated into Turkish and then back-translated into English for to determine the validity for Turkey. Experts were consulted to determine the validity of the content. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, test-retest reliability, and item-total correlation were used for reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used for validity.RESULTS: Content validity index ranged from .8 to 1.0. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .934, for which the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was χ2 = 415.127, p = .000. According to the principal component analysis, the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale in Turkey. had 3 subscales as did the original Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale. The items had factor loadings greater than .40, and the factors accounted for 55.51% of the total variance. The subscales “organization,” “resources,” and “clinician” had a Cronbach’s alpha of .692, .710, and .680, respectively.CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale in Turkey. has a structure similar to that of the original Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale and has high validity and reliability. It is, therefore, a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to identify nurses’ attitudes toward neonatal palliative care.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Ahmedzai, S.H, Costa, A., Blengini, C., Bosch, A., Sanz-Ortiz, J., Ventafridda, V., Verhagen, S. C., International working group convened by the European School of Oncology. (2004). A new international framework for palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 40(15), 2192-2200. [Crossref]
- Akgül, A. (Ed.). (2005). Tıbbi Araştırmalarda istatistiksel anal-iz teknikleri SPSS uygulamaları. [Statistical anlaysis techniques in medical research, SPSS applications] 3. Baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Emek Ofset.
- Ay, M.A., & Öz, F. (2019). Nurses attitudes towards death, dy-ing patients and euthanasia: A descriptive study. Nursing Ethics, 26(5), 1442-1457. [Crossref]
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (Ed.). (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı. [Data anal-ysis handbook] (pp.167-182). 8. Baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Ak Yayıncılık.
- Cam, M., & Baysan Arabacı, L. (2010). Tutum ölçeği hazırla-mada nitel ve nicel adımlar. [Qualitative and quantitative steps on attitude scale construction] Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 12(2), 59-71.
- Chen, C. H., Huang, L. C., Liu, H. L., Lee, H. Y., Wu, S. Y., Chang, Y. C., & Peng, N. H. (2013). To explore the neonatal nurses’ beliefs and attitudes towards caring for dying neonates in Taiwan. Mat-enal and Child Health Journal, 17(10), 1793-1801. [Crossref]
- Cherlin, E., Schulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., Johnson-Hur-zeler, R., & Bradley, E. (2004). Family perceptions of clinicians’ outstanding practices in end-of-life care. Journal of Palliative Care, 20(2), 113-116. [Crossref]
- Cimete, G. (Ed.). (2002). Yaşam sonu bakım: Ölümcül hasta-larda bütüncü yaklaşım. [Care in the terminal period of life: Holistic approach in deadly patients]. Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi.
- Çapık, C., & Gözüm, S. (2018). Intercultural scale adaptation stages, language and culture adaptation: Updated guideline. Flor-ence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 26(3), 199-210. [Crossref].
- Çavuşoğlu, H. (Ed.). (2013). Çocuk sağlığı hemşireliği [Pediat-ric nursing]. (pp.133-146). Cilt I. 11. Baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Sistem Ofset Basımevi.
- Çırak G. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ahlaki Yargı Yetenekleri ve Ahlaki Yargı Yetenekleri ile Kendini Gerçekleştirme Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). [Moral judgement abilities of the university students and the comparison of their moral judge-ment abilities and their levels of self-realization (Master’s Thesis)]. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi; 2006.
- Durak, A. (1994). Beck Umutsuzluk Ölçeği geçerlik ve güve-nirlik çalışması. [Validity and reliabiliy of the Beck Hopelessness Scale]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 1-11. [Crossref]
- Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenilirlik ve geçerli-lik. [Reliability and validity in the scales] Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 211-216.
- Esin, M.N. (2014). Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları & Veri to-plama araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliği [Data collection methods and tools & Reliability and validity of data collection tools]. In Er-doğan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N. (Eds), Hemşirelikte araştırma süreç, uygulama ve kritik [Research process, application and criti-cal in nursing]. (pp. 215-231). Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Matbaacılık.
- Forouzi, M. A., Banazadeh, M., Ahmadi, J. S., & Razban, F. (2017). Barriers of palliative care in neonatal intensive care units: Attitude of neonatal nurses in southeast Iran. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 205-211. [Crossref]
- Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2003). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyar-laması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. [A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale II: Psychometric characteristics and cross-cultural comparison]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 5(1), 3-14.
- Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Focus on quantitative meth-ods, selection and use of content experts for instrument develop-ment. Research in Nursing & Health,20(3), 269-274. [Crossref]
- Harrington, D. (Ed). (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Newyork: Oxford University Press. [Crossref]Hopkinson, J.B., Hallet, C.E., & Luker, K.A. (2003). Caring for dying people in hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(5), 525-533. [Crossref]
- Işık, R., & Sakallı Uğurlu, N. (2009). Namusa ve namus adı-na kadına uygulanan şiddete ilişkin tutumlar ölçeklerinin öğrenci örneklemiyle geliştirilmesi. [The development of attitudes toward honor scale and attitudes toward violence against women for pro-tecting honor scale with a student sample]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 12(24), 16-24.
- Kain, V., Gardner, G., & Yates, P. (2009). Neonatal palliative care attitude scale: Development of an instrument to measure the barriers to and facilitators of palliative care in neonatal nurs-ing. Pediatrics, 123(2), e207-e213. [Crossref]
- Kalischuk, R. G. (1992). Nurses’ perception of death educa-tion (Master’s dissertation). Lehtridge, Alberta, University of Le-thbridge.
- Karagöz, Y., & Kösterelioğlu, İ. (2008). İletişim becerileri değerlendirme ölçeğinin faktör analizi metodu ile geliştirilmesi. [Developing evaluation scale of communication skills with factor analysis]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, 81-98.
- Karakoç, F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışma-larında temel ilkeler. [Basic principles of scale development]. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 40(13), 39-49. [Crossref]
- Meghani, S. H. (2004). A concept a nalysis of palliative care in the United States. Journal of Advanced Nursing,46(2), 152-161. [Crossref]
- Mok, E., Lee, W. M., & Wong, F. K. (2002). The issue of death and dying: Employing problem-based learning in nursing educa-tion. Nurse Education Today, 22(2), 319-329. [Crossref]
- National Cancer Institute, (2010). Palliative care In cancer. (2020, 12 February). Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/Can-certopics/ Factsheet/Support/Palliative-Care Rebagliato, M., Cuttini, M., Broggin, L., Berbik, I., de Vonder-weid, U., Hansen, G., Kaminski, M., Kollée, L. A., Kucinskas, A., Le-noir, S., Levin, A., Persson, J., Reid, M., Saracci, R., EURONIC Study Group (European Project on Parents’ Information and Ethical De-cision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Units). (2000). Neonatal end-of-life decision making physicians’ attitudes and relation-ship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA, 284(19), 2451-2459. [Crossref]
- Sahan, F. U. & Terzioglu, F. (2017). Nurses’ knowledge and practice toward gynecologic oncology palliative care. Journal of Palliative Care and Medicine, 7(4), 1-6. [Crossref]
- Simkiss, D. (2003). Palliative care for children. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 49(6), 324-326. [Crossref]
- Turgay, G., & Kav, S. (2012). Turkish healthcare professionals’ views on palliative care. Journal of Palliative Care, 28(4), 267-273. [Crossref]
- World Health Organization, (2012). WHO definition of palli-ative care. (2020, 11 February). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
- Wright, V., & Hilgenberg, C. (2011). Why is end-of-life care delivery sporadic? A quantitative look at the barriers to and facili-tators of providing end-of-life care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Advances in Neonatal Care, 11(1),29-36. [Crossref].
| APA | AKAY G, Aytekin Özdemir A (2021). Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. , 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| Chicago | AKAY Gamze,Aytekin Özdemir Aynur Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. (2021): 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| MLA | AKAY Gamze,Aytekin Özdemir Aynur Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. , 2021, ss.213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| AMA | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. . 2021; 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| Vancouver | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. . 2021; 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| IEEE | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A "Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey." , ss.213 - 220, 2021. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| ISNAD | AKAY, Gamze - Aytekin Özdemir, Aynur. "Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey". (2021), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| APA | AKAY G, Aytekin Özdemir A (2021). Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 29(2), 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| Chicago | AKAY Gamze,Aytekin Özdemir Aynur Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 29, no.2 (2021): 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| MLA | AKAY Gamze,Aytekin Özdemir Aynur Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), vol.29, no.2, 2021, ss.213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| AMA | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2021; 29(2): 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| Vancouver | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2021; 29(2): 213 - 220. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| IEEE | AKAY G,Aytekin Özdemir A "Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey." Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 29, ss.213 - 220, 2021. 10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
| ISNAD | AKAY, Gamze - Aytekin Özdemir, Aynur. "Validity and Reliability of the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale In Turkey". Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 29/2 (2021), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2021.20041 |
