Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 301 - 309 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2021

Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours

Öz:
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated withpancreatic fistula (PF) development after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) at our clinic.Methods: Patients who underwent PD for periampullarytumours between 2010 and 2019 were included in the study andcategorised into Group I (with PF) and Group II (without PF). Thedemographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters,tumour characteristics and post-operative results were comparedbetween the groups. Risk factors for PF were analysed by univariateanalysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: In total, 155 patients participated in the study (GroupI: n=31; Group II: n=124). The rate of PF was 20%. The twogroups were comparable with regard to sex (p=0.348) and age(64.8 vs 66.9 years, p=0.916). Compared with Group II, GroupI had a higher number of metastatic lymph nodes (1.61 vs 0.87,p=0.041), a higher number of post-operative complications (58.1%vs 21.8%, p=0.000) and a longer duration of post-operative hospitalstay (25.25 vs 16.43 days, p=0.000). Haemoglobin (p=0.493) andalbumin (p=0.698) levels were similar between the groups. Totalsurvival duration was shorter in Group I (23.9 vs 38.18 months,p=0.024). In multivariate analyses, being ≥65 years (p=0.040),tumour localisation (p=0.021), lymph node stage (p=0.008) andtumour diameter ≥2 (p=0.021) were the independent risk factorsfor developing pancreatic fistula.Conclusion: In our study, tumour diameter, patient age and lymphnode status were associated with PF development. The developmentof PF reduced expected survival. We believe that identifying the preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative factors related to PFformation may help decrease its development.
Anahtar Kelime:

Periampullar Tümör Nedeniyle Pankreatikoduodenektomi Uygulanan Hastalarda Pankreatik Fistülle İlişkili Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde pankreatikoduodenektomi (PD) sonrası gelişen pankreatik fistül (PF) ile ilişkili faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: 2010-2019 yılları arasında periampullar bölge tümörü nedeniyle PD, uygulanan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edili. Grup 1 (PF var) ve Grup 2 (PF yok) olmak üzere iki grup oluşturuldu. Gruplarda hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, labrotuvar parametreleri, tümöre ait özellikler, postoperatif sonuçlar ortalama sağkalımları karşılaştırıldı. Pankreas fistülü (PF) için risk faktörleri tek değişkenli analiz ve çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza 155 hasta katıldı. PF oranımız %20 olarak bulduk. Buna göre Grup 1: 31 Grup 2: 124 hastadan oluşuyordu. Gruplarda cinsiyet benzer özellikteydi (p=0,348). Gruplarda yaşlar benzer (64,8; 66,9, p=0,916). Metastastik lenf nodu sayısı Grup 1’de 2’ye oranla daha yüksek (1,61; 0,87, p=0,041) Postoperatif komplikayon Grup 1’de yüksek (%58,1; %21,8 p=0,000). Postoperatif yatış süresi Grup 1’de daha uzundu (25,25 vs 16,43 gün p=0,000). Gruplarda hemoglobin p=0,492, albumin p=0,698 benzer. Toplam sağkalım süresi Grup 1’de daha kısa (23,9 ay; 38,18 ay p=0,024). Çok değişkenli analizlerde >65 yaş p=0,040, Tümör lokalizasyon p=0,021 lenf nodu evresi p=0,008. Tümör çapının >2 p=0,021 pankreatik fistül için bağımsız risk faktörüydü. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda tümör çapı hasta yaşı ve lenf nodu durumu PF gelişmesi ile ilişkiliydi. PF gelişimi beklenen sağ kalımı azaltmıştı. Preoperatif, intraoperatif ve postoperatif dönemdeki etkenlerin ortaya konulması ile PF oluşumunun azalabileceğini düşünmekteyiz
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Yılmaz N, Özkurt H, Değirmenci H, Kahraman AD, Başak M. Pankreas kanserlerinin preoperatif rezektabilite değerlendirilmesinde spiral BT. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2004;38:39-43.
  • 2. Conzo G, Gambardella C, Tartaglia E, Sciascia V, Mauriello C, Napolitano S, et al. Pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the management of pancreatic stump. Literature review. Int J Surg 2015;21:4-9.
  • 3. Chen JS, Liu G, Li TR, Chen JY, Xu QM, Guo YZ, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and preventive strategies. J Cancer Res Ther 2019;15:857-63.
  • 4. Ke ZX, Xiong JX, Hu J, Chen HY, Li Q, Li YQ. Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center Experience. Curr Med Sci 2019;39:1009-18.
  • 5. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161:584-91.
  • 6. Ağcaoğlu O, Aksakal N, Azamat İF, Doğan S, Mercan S, Barbaros U. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution Experience. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2019;53:114- 9.
  • 7. Wu MP, Zhang X, Liu XJ. Pancreatic ductdiameter and pancreatic glandthickness measure dusing preoperative CT imaging in predicting pancreatic fistula following pancreatic oduodenectomy. Chin J Bases Clin General Surg 2014;21:1019-23.
  • 8. Liu QY, Zhang WZ, Xia HT, Leng JJ, Wan T, Liang B, et al. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:17491-7.
  • 9. Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ, Dong JH. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:7797- 805.
  • 10. Machado NO. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management-review. Int J Surg Oncol 2012;2012:602478.
  • 11. Søreide K, Healey AJ, Mole DJ, Parks RW. Pre-, peri- and postoperative factors for the development of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2019;21:1621-31.
  • 12. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.
  • 13. Yu QS, Huang HC, Ding F, Wang XB. Analysis of related risk factors forpan creatic fistula after pancreatic oduodenectomy. J Hainan Med Univ 2016;22:67-70.
  • 14. van Roest MH, Gouw AS, Peeters PM, Porte RJ, Slooff MJ, Fidler V, et al. Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma: perineural growth more important prognostic factor than tumor localization. Ann Surg 2008;248:97- 103.
  • 15. Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, et al. Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009;2009:404520.
  • 16. Akgul O, Merath K, Mehta R, Hyer JM, Chakedis J, Wiemann B, et al. Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following PancreaticoduodenectomyStratification of Patient Risk. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:1817-24.
  • 17. McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Sprys MH, Ecker BL, Drebin JA, et al. Pancreatic fistula risk for pancreaticoduodenectomy: an international survey of surgeon perception. HPB 2017;19:515-24.
  • 18. Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Shakir M, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, et al. An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1523- 9.
  • 19. Sert OZ, Berkesoglu M, Canbaz H, Olmez A, Tasdelen B, Dirlik MM. The factors of pancreatic fistula development in patients who underwent classical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Ital Chir 2021;92:35-40.
  • 20. Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 1991;11:1831-48.
  • 21. Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393:459-71.
  • 22. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1280-90.
  • 23. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:425-33.
  • 24. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman JA, et al. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:766-72.
  • 25. Ansorge C, Nordin JZ, Lundell L, Strömmer L, Rangelova E, Blomberg J, et al. Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014;101:100-8.
  • 26. Sutcliffe RP, Battula N, Haque A, Ali A, Srinivasan P, Atkinson SW, et al. Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2012;36:879-83.
  • 27. Hackert T, Werner J, Büchler MW. Postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surgeon 2011;9:211-7.
  • 28. Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2014;259:773-80.
APA topal u, Sözüer E, ARIKAN T, gök m, bozkurt g (2021). Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. , 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
Chicago topal uğur,Sözüer Erdoğan Mütevelli,ARIKAN TURKMEN BAHADIR,gök mustafa,bozkurt gamze kübra Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. (2021): 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
MLA topal uğur,Sözüer Erdoğan Mütevelli,ARIKAN TURKMEN BAHADIR,gök mustafa,bozkurt gamze kübra Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. , 2021, ss.301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
AMA topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. . 2021; 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
Vancouver topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. . 2021; 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
IEEE topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g "Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours." , ss.301 - 309, 2021. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
ISNAD topal, uğur vd. "Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours". (2021), 301-309. https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
APA topal u, Sözüer E, ARIKAN T, gök m, bozkurt g (2021). Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. Bezmiâlem Science, 9(3), 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
Chicago topal uğur,Sözüer Erdoğan Mütevelli,ARIKAN TURKMEN BAHADIR,gök mustafa,bozkurt gamze kübra Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. Bezmiâlem Science 9, no.3 (2021): 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
MLA topal uğur,Sözüer Erdoğan Mütevelli,ARIKAN TURKMEN BAHADIR,gök mustafa,bozkurt gamze kübra Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. Bezmiâlem Science, vol.9, no.3, 2021, ss.301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
AMA topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. Bezmiâlem Science. 2021; 9(3): 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
Vancouver topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours. Bezmiâlem Science. 2021; 9(3): 301 - 309. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
IEEE topal u,Sözüer E,ARIKAN T,gök m,bozkurt g "Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours." Bezmiâlem Science, 9, ss.301 - 309, 2021. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185
ISNAD topal, uğur vd. "Evaluation of Factors Related to Pancreatic Fistula Development in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours". Bezmiâlem Science 9/3 (2021), 301-309. https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.4185