Development of Social Sensitivity Scale

Faruk BOZDAĞ, (İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Sabiha BOZDAĞ (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Hayef:journal of education (Online)
20 3
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 84 - 101 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2021

Development of Social Sensitivity Scale

Öz:
The way an individual feels about the people and events in the society they live in and their prosocial behavior for the welfare of society is defined as social sensitivity. Conducting effective studies of social sensitivity depends on the development of measurement tools with proven validity and reliability. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a Social Sensitivity Scale (SSS) for university students. The research consisted of two stages. During the first stage, data were collected from a total of 297 university students to conduct an explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis. During the second stage, data were collected from a total of 203 university students to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a reliability analysis, and assess criterion validity. As a result of the EFA, 12 items and four factors were obtained. The total variance explained by these factors was 72.04%. The structure was confirmed by performing CFA. The associations between the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) and the Prosocial Behavioral Intentions Scale (PBIS) were examined to assess criterion validity. The Cronbach’s alpha values were determined as 0.80 and 0.75. All the validity and reliability analyses indicated that the scale was valid and reliable in determining the social sensitivity levels of university students.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Açar, S. (2010). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersinde gözlem gezisi uygulamasının öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerisine ve çevre duyarlılığına etkisi (Tez no. 298037) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
  • Akın, Ü., Akın, A., ve Abacı, R. (2007). Self-compassion scale: the study of validity and reliability. H. U. Journal of Education, 33, 1-10.
  • Anlı, G. (2019). Adaptation of the prosocial behavioral intentions scale for use with Turkish participants: Assessments of validity and reliability. Current Psychology, 38(4), 950-958.
  • Baumsteiger, R., & Siegel, J. (2018). Measuring prosociality: The development of a prosocial behavioral intentions scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 15, 1-10.
  • Bender, L., Walia, G., Kambhampaty, K., Nygard, K. E., & Nygard, T. E. (2012). Social sensitivity and classroom team projects: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 403-408.
  • Bowling, A. (2014). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Boyce, P., & Parker, G. (1989). Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 341-351. Bozkan, R. E. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin toplumsal duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi]. Sakarya Üniversitesi Açık Erişim. https://acikerisim.sakarya.edu. tr/bitstream/handle/20.500.12619/74431/T08154.pdf?sequence=1
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication, 3(1), 3-14.
  • Çetin, T. ve Sönmez, Ö. M. (2009). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersinin amaç ve içeriğine yönelik görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 851-875.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Doğan, T. ve Sapmaz, S. (2012). Psychometric analysis of the interpersonal sensitivity measure (ipsm) among Turkish undergraduate students. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(2), 143-155.
  • Ergin, D. Y. (1995). Validity and reliability of 1st scale. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(7), 125-148.
  • Erkuş, A. (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazılar. TPD Yayınları.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publication.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. The McGraw-Hill.
  • Green, E. G., Deschamps, J., & Páez, D. (2005). Variation of individualism and collectivism within and between 20 countries a typological analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(3), 321-339.
  • Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351-374.
  • Haviland, W. A. (2002). Kültürel antropoloji. (H. İnanç ve S. Çiftçi, Çev.). Kaknüs Yayınevi.
  • Helwig, C. C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21(4), 458-473.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage
  • İnal, H., Yılmaz Koğar, E., Demirdüzen, E. ve Gelbal, S. (2017). Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: A Meta-Analysis Study. H.U. Journal of Education, 32(1), 18-32.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2010). Günümüzde insan ve insanlar. Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kardinasari, R., Iskandar, T. Z., Nugraha, Y., & Jatnika, R. (2019). Social sensitivity effect to public service competence and its Impact on the head of sub-district performance in West Java Province. Psychology, 9(1), 22-31.
  • Kumari, R. (2017). Comparative study of social sensitivity, social skill and social relation of rural area and urban area working women of Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 2(5), 14-17.
  • Kuşcu-Karatepe, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2020). The development of a political awareness scale and psychometric testing on nurses in Turkey: A methodological study. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 9(4), 2418-2429.
  • Küçükoğlu, A., Korkmaz, Z. S., Köse, E. ve Taşgın, A. (2014). An analysis on preservice teachers’ views about community service learning. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 5(17), 1-26.
  • Külekçi, E. ve Özgan, H. (2015). University students’ perceptions on reasons and implications of their taking social responsibility. Anatolian Journal of Educational Leadership and Instruction, 3(2), 1-15.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
  • Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85-101.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • Nurdiansyah, E. (2016, 7-9 September). Improving social sensitivity in society with internalization value of multicultural education [Paper presantation]. Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference, Palembang, Indonesian.
  • Öcal, A., Demirkaya, H. ve Altınok, A. (2013). Development of social sensitivity scale for primary school students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instructıon, 13(1), 67-76.
  • Özdemir, M. ve Tokcan, H. (2010). Evaluation of community service course according to pre-service teachers’ views. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 41-61.
  • Rothenberg, B. B. (1968). Children’s social sensitivity and the relationship to interpersonal competence, intrapersonal comfort, and intellectual level. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1, i-81.
  • Salovey, P. ve Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. 9(3), 185-211.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121-127.
  • Spreng, R., N., Kinnon, C. M., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62-71.
  • Staub, E (1979). Positive social behavior and morality: Socialization and development. Academic Press.
  • Staub, E. (2012). Psychology and morality in genocide and violent conflict: Perpetrators, passive bystanders, and rescuers. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Herzliya series on personality and social psychology. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (p. 381–398). American Psychological Association.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Tekin, H. (1993). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Yargı.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. TPD Yayınları.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M. J. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perpectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 54(2), 323-338.
  • Totan, T., Doğan, T., & Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Egitim Arastirmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 179-198.
  • Üstün, E. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık ve etnikmerkezcilik düzeylerini etkileyen etmenler (Tez no. 279131) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
  • Yavuzer, N. (2011). İlişkiler ve kişilerarası güven. Yavuzer, H. (Ed.), Evlilik okulu içinde (ss. 75-91). Remzi Kitapevi.
  • Wasti, A. ve Erdil, S. E. (2007). Measurement of individualism and collectivism: validation of the self construal scale and indcol in Turkish. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7, 39-66.
  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136.
APA BOZDAĞ F, BOZDAĞ S (2021). Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. , 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
Chicago BOZDAĞ Faruk,BOZDAĞ Sabiha Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. (2021): 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
MLA BOZDAĞ Faruk,BOZDAĞ Sabiha Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. , 2021, ss.84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
AMA BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. . 2021; 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
Vancouver BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. . 2021; 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
IEEE BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S "Development of Social Sensitivity Scale." , ss.84 - 101, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
ISNAD BOZDAĞ, Faruk - BOZDAĞ, Sabiha. "Development of Social Sensitivity Scale". (2021), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
APA BOZDAĞ F, BOZDAĞ S (2021). Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18(1), 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
Chicago BOZDAĞ Faruk,BOZDAĞ Sabiha Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18, no.1 (2021): 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
MLA BOZDAĞ Faruk,BOZDAĞ Sabiha Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. Hayef:journal of education (Online), vol.18, no.1, 2021, ss.84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
AMA BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(1): 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
Vancouver BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S Development of Social Sensitivity Scale. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(1): 84 - 101. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
IEEE BOZDAĞ F,BOZDAĞ S "Development of Social Sensitivity Scale." Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18, ss.84 - 101, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
ISNAD BOZDAĞ, Faruk - BOZDAĞ, Sabiha. "Development of Social Sensitivity Scale". Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18/1 (2021), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.20033
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 20:0

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları