Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri

Demet BAŞAR, (MEF Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Sarıyer / İstanbul)
Nuray SAKALLI UĞURLU (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Çankaya / Ankara)
Türk Psikoloji Yazıları
72 26
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 47 Sayfa Aralığı: 22 - 36 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030 İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2022

Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri

Öz:
Israrlı takip (stalking) psikolojik ve fiziksel şiddet içeren, hedef alınan kişide korku ve endişe uyandıran, istenmeyen ve ısrarcı davranışlar bütünüdür. Bu makalenin amacı son yıllarda kadına yönelik şiddet alanında ayrı bir başlık altında ele alınmaya başlanmış olan ısrarlı takip konusuna ilişkin bir yayın taraması gerçekleştirerek alana katkı sunmaktır. Bu amaçla ilk olarak ısrarlı takip olgusunun tanımı ve farklı disiplinler açısından ele alınış biçimleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Araştırmalarda ısrarlı takip ile birlikte ele alınan takipçi-mağdur ilişkisi (eski veya şimdiki eş/partner ve tanıdık ya da yabancı takipçi), kullanılan takip yöntemleri (fiziksel ortamda veya çevrim içi iletişim araçları ile gerçekleştirilenler), ısrarlı takibin romantikleştirilmesi, toplumsal cinsiyet, cinsiyetçilik, erkeklik ve namus kültürü gibi farklı sosyal psikolojik değişkenler ele alınmıştır. Bu değişkenlerle yapılan çalışmaların bulguları yanı sıra olası gelecek araştırma önerileri verilmiştir. Daha sonra, ısrarlı takibin psikolojik ve fiziksel sağlık üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerine değinilmiştir. Sonuç kısmında ise ısrarlı takip konusuyla ilgili genel bir özetleme ile birlikte kültürümüzde yapılabilecek olası araştırma önerileri sunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Stalking: Definition and Its Relationship with Social Psychological Variables

Öz:
Stalking is an unwanted, persistent and repeated form of behavior that includes both physical and psychological violence and provokes fear or anxiety to the target person. The purpose of this article is to present a review on stalking which is lately considered as a specific topic in violence against women literature. First of all, a broad definition of stalking from the view of diverse disciplines is explained. Then, the associations among stalking and some social psychological variables such as relationships between stalker and victim (former or current romantic partner, acquaintance and stranger stalking), stalking methods (face-to-face stalking and cyberstalking), romanticization of stalking, gender, sexism, manhood and honor culture are elaborated. Both findings of empirical studies and some future directions are covered. Later, psychological and physical health related consequences of stalking are briefly mentioned. As a general conclusion, along with a summary of research on stalking, possible future research suggestions which could be studied in Turkish culture are provided.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B. ve Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111-125. https://psycnet. apa.org/fulltext/2002-08440-011.html
  • Acquadro Maran, D. ve Varetto, A. (2018). Psychological impact of stalking on male and female health care professional victims of stalking and domestic violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 321. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00321
  • Alexy, E. M., Burgess, A. W., Baker, T. ve Smoyak, S. A. (2005). Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5(3), 279-289.
  • Amar, A. F. (2007). Behaviors that college women label as stalking or harassment. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13(4), 210-220.
  • Avrupa Konseyi, (2011). Kadına yönelik şiddet ve aile içi şiddetin önlenmesi ve bunlarla mücadeleye dair Avrupa Konseyi Sözleşmesi. https://rm.coe. int/1680462545
  • Bağ, B. (2012). Bir şiddet türü olarak saplantılı takip etme hâli. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 4(1), 165-182.
  • Bakırcı, K. (2015). İstanbul Sözleşmesi. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, (4), 133-204.
  • Başar, D. (2019). Stalking as a new form of violence: Its relationship with ambivalent sexism, honor endorsement and gender-based violence attitudes (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Becker, A. (2018). Where romance meets stalking: How heteronormative gender beliefs perpetuate stalking culture (Doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Breiding, M., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C. ve Mahendra, R. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Violence Prevention.
  • Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R. ve Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623-634. doi: 10.1177/0146167208331161
  • Boyacıoğlu, İ. (2016). Dünden bugüne Türkiye’de kadına yönelik şiddet ve ulusal kadın çalışmaları: Psikolojik araştırmalara davet. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19, 126-145.
  • Caputo, A. (2013). Cultural models shaping stalking: From a content analysis of Italian newpapers. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 443-460. http:// dx.doiorg/10.5964/ejop.v9i3.604
  • Coleman, F. L. (1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(3), 420-432. https://doi. org/10.1177/088626097012003007
  • Cupach, W. R. ve Spitzberg, B. H. (2000). Obsessive relational intrusion: Incidence, perceived severity, and coping. Violence and Victims, 15(4), 357-372.
  • Cupach, W. R. ve Spitzberg, B. H. (2004). The dark side of relationship pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dardis, C. M., Amoroso, T. ve Iverson, K. M. (2017). Intimate partner stalking: Contributions to PTSD symptomatology among a national sample of women veterans. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(1), 67-73. http//dx.doi. org/10.1037/tra0000171
  • Davis, K. E., Swan, S. C., ve Gambone, L. J. (2012). Why doesn’t he just leave me alone? Persistent pursuit: A critical review of theories and evidence. Sex Roles, 66(5-6), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-010-9882-3
  • Dennison, S. ve Thomson, D. M. (2000). Community perceptions of stalking: What are the fundamental concerns? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7(2), 159- 169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710009524982
  • Doğan, R. (2014). Kadına yönelik şiddetin bir türü olarak, israrlı takip (stalking) kavramı ve suçu. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, (2), 135-154.
  • Douglas, K. S. ve Dutton, D. G. (2001). Assessing the link between stalking and domestic violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(6), 519-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00018-5
  • Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E., Golding, J. M. ve Wasarhaley, N. E. (2012). Mock jurors’ perception of stalking: The impact of gender and expressed fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405-417. doi:10.1007/s11199-011- 9970-z
  • Dunlap, E. E., Lynch, K. R., Jewel, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E. ve Golding, J. M. (2015). Participant gender, stalking myth acceptance, and gender role stereotyping in perceptions of intimate partner stalking: a structural equation modeling approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(3), 234-253. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951648
  • Ellison, L. ve Akdeniz, Y. (1998). Cyber-stalking: the regulation of harassment on the internet. Criminal Law Review, 29, 29-48.
  • Eisler, R. M. ve Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11, 123-136.
  • Ferreira, C. ve Matos, M. (2013). Post-relationship stalking: The experience of victims with and without history of partner abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 28(4), 393-402. doi: 10.1007/s10896-013- 9501-5
  • Fissel, E. R. ve Reyns, B. W. (2020). The aftermath of cyberstalking: School, work, social, and health costs of victimization. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 70-87.
  • Glick, P. ve Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.70.3.491
  • Glick, P. ve Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118. https://doi. org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
  • Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Metin Orta, İ. ve Ceylan, S. (2016). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75(11-12), 543-554. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0550-5
  • Gürgezoğlu, E. (2010). Takip/izlemeye ilişkin algının incelenmesi ve mağdur olan /olmayanların kaygı düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul
  • Hartman, T. (2017). Men, masculinity, and breakups: Resisting the tyranny of “moving on”. Personal Relationships, 24(4), 953-969.
  • Henry, N. ve Powell, A. (2015). Beyond the ‘sext’: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 104-118. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0004865814524218
  • Hills, A. M. ve Taplin, J. L. (1998). Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5(1), 139- 146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719809524927
  • Korkodeilou, J. (2017). “No place to hide”: Stalking victimization and its psycho-social effects. International Review of Victimology, 23(1), 17-32. doi: 10.1177/0269758016661608
  • Kuehner, C., Gass, P. ve Dressing, H. (2012). Mediating effects of stalking victimization on gender differences in mental health. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 199-221. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260511416473
  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Palarea, R. E., Cohen, J., & Rohling, M. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: Unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 73-90.
  • LeBlanc, J. J., Levesque, G. J., Richardson, J. B., ve Berka, L. H. (2001). Survey of stalking at WPI. Journal of Forensic Science, 46(2), 367-369. https:// doi.org/10.1520/JFS14974J
  • Lee, R. K. (1998). Romantic and electronic stalking in a college context. Journal of Women and the Law, 4(2), 373-409.
  • Leung, A. K. Y. ve Cohen, D. (2011). Within-and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507-526.
  • Logan, T. K. ve Walker, R. (2009). Partner stalking: Psychological dominance or “business as usual”? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(3), 247-270. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334461
  • Lyndon, A. E., Sinclair, H. C., MacArthur, J., Fay, B., Ratajack, E. ve Collier, K. E. (2012). An introduction to issues of gender in stalking research. Sex Roles, 66(5-6), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-011-0106-2
  • Magyarics, C. L., Lynch, K. R., Golding, J. M. ve Lippert, A. (2015). The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602- 613. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000151
  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M. ve Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3-25. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
  • McEwan, T. E., MacKenzie, R. D., Mullen, P. E. ve James, D. V. (2012). Approach and escalation in stalking. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(3), 392-409.
  • McEwan, T. E., Mullen, P. E., MacKenzie, R. D. ve Ogloff, J. R. (2009). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1469-1478. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004996
  • McEwan, T., Mullen, P. E. ve Purcell, R. (2007). Identifying risk factors in stalking: A review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijlp.2006.03.005
  • McFarlane, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y. ve Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767999003004003
  • Mechanic, M. B., Weaver, T. L. ve Resick, P. A. (2000). Intimate partner violence and stalking behavior: Exploration of patterns and correlates in a sample of acutely battered women. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886- 6708.15.1.55
  • Meloy, J. R. (1996). Stalking (obsessional following): A review of some preliminary studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 147-162. https://doi. org/10.1016/1359-1789(95)00013-5
  • Meloy, J. R. (1999). Stalking: An old behavior, a new crime. Psychiatric Clinics, 22(1), 85-99. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70061-7
  • Miglietta, A. ve Acquadro Maran, D. (2016). Gender, sexism and the social representation of stalking: What makes the difference? Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/ vio0000070
  • Mohandie, K., Meloy, J. R., McGowan, M. G. ve Williams, J. (2006). The recon typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(1), 147-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1556- 4029.2005.00030.x
  • Mor Çatı Kadın Sığınağı Vakfı. (2020). Flört şiddeti. https://morcati.org.tr/flort-siddeti/ Morewitz, S. J. (2003). Stalking and violence: New patterns of trauma and obsession. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M. ve Purcell, R. (2002). Stalkers and their victims (2. Baskı). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Mullen, P. E., Mackenzie, R., Ogloff, J. R., Pathé, M., McEwan, T. ve Purcell, R. (2006). Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation. Journal of American Academic Psychiatry Law, 34, 439-450.
  • Mullen, P. E., Pathé. M., Purcell, R. ve Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(8), 1244-1249. doi: 10.1176/ ajp.156.8.1244
  • Oxford University Press. (2020). Stalk. https://www. oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/ stalk_2 Pathé, M. ve Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 12-17. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.1.12
  • Patton, C. L., Nobles, M. R. ve Fox, K. A. (2010). Look who’s stalking: Obsessive pursuit and attachment theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.013
  • Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B. ve O’Connor, M. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(1), 73-96. https://doi. org/10.1177/0093854803259251
  • Purcell, R., Pathé, M. ve Mullen, P. E. (2004). Stalking: Defining and prosecuting a new category of offending. International Journal of Law Psychiatry, 27, 157-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.01.006
  • Resmî Gazete. (2004, 12 Ekim). 5237 Türk Ceza Kanunu. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2004/10/20 041012.htm
  • Resmî Gazete. (2012, 20 Mart). Ailenin korunması ve kadına karşı şiddetin önlenmesine dair kanun. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/03/201 20320-16.htm
  • Resmî Gazete (2021, 20 Mart). Cumhurbaşkanı Kararı. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2021/03/20 210320-49.pdf
  • Reyns, B. W. (2019). Online pursuit in the twilight zone: Cyberstalking perpetration by college students. Victims & Offenders, 14(2), 183-198.
  • Roberts, K. A. (2005). Women’s experience of violence during stalking by romantic partners. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 89-114. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271096
  • Russell, B. L. ve Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7-8), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
  • Sakallı, N. ve Curun, F. (2001). Romantik ilişkilerle ilgili kalıpyargılara karşı tutumlar. Tecrübi Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 22, 31-45.
  • Sakallı, N. ve Türkoğlu, B. (2019). “Erkek” olmak ya da olmamak: Sosyal psikolojik açıdan erkeksilik/erkeklik çalışmaları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 52-76.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2003). Cinsiyetçilik: Kadınlara ve erkeklere ilişkin tutumlar ve çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 6(11-12), 1-20.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Akbaş, G. (2013). Namus kültürlerinde “namus” ve “namus adına kadına şiddet”:
  • Sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 16(32), 76-91.
  • Sallan Gül, S. (2013). The role of the state in protecting women against domestic violence and women’s shelters in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 38, 107-116.
  • Sheridan, L. P., Blaauw, E. ve Davies, G. M. (2003). Stalking: Knowns and unknowns. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 148-162. 10.1177/1524838002250766
  • Sheridan, L. ve Davies, G. M. (2001). Violence and the prior victim–stalker relationship. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11, 102-116. https://doi. org/10.1002/cbm.375
  • Sheridan, L., Gillet, R. ve Davies, G. (2002). Perceptions and prevalence of stalking in a male sample. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8(4), 289-310. https://doi. org/10.1080/10683160214668
  • Sheridan, L. ve Lyndon, A. E. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66(5- 6), 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010- 9889-9
  • Sheridan, L., Scott, A. J., Archer, J. ve Roberts, K. (2017). Female undergraduate’s perceptions of intrusive behavior in 12 countries. Aggressive Behavior, 43(6), 531-543. doi: 10.1002/ab.21711
  • Sheridan, L., Scott, A. J. ve Roberts, K. (2016). Young women’s experiences of intrusive behavior in 12 countries. Aggressive Behavior, 42(1), 41-53. doi: 10.1002/ab.21604
  • Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Stalking myth-attributions: Examining the role of individual and contextual variables on attributions in unwanted pursuit scenarios. Sex Roles, 66(5-6), 378-391. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11199-010-9853-8
  • Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(4), 261-288. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524838002237330
  • Sptizberg, B. H. (2017). Acknowledgment of unwanted pursuit, threats, assault, and stalking in college population. Psychology of Violence, 7, 265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040205
  • Spitzberg, B. H. ve Cadiz, M. (2002). The media construction of stalking stereotypes. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9(3), 128-149.
  • Spitzberg, B. H. ve Cupach, W. R. (2003). What mad pursuit?: Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8(4), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1359-1789(02)00068-X
  • Spitzberg, B. H. ve Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001
  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Tjaden, P. ve Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. (No. NCJ 169592).Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs,
  • U.S. Department of Justice, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Türk Ceza Kanunu, (2004, 26 Eylül). Türk Ceza Kanunu kanun numarası: 5237. https://www.mevzuat.gov. tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5237.pdf
  • Vandello, J. A. ve Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997-1010. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
  • Vandello, J. A. ve Cohen, D. (2008). Culture, gender, and men’s intimate partner violence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 652-667. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00080.x
  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M. ve Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0012453
  • Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J. ve Gosse, C. (2018). Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4689-4708. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444818781324
  • Viki, G. T. ve Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47(5-6), 289-293. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1021342912248
  • Weaver, J. R., Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K. ve Burnaford, R. M. (2010). The proof is in the punch: Gender differences in perceptions of action and aggression as components of manhood. Sex Roles, 62(3- 4), 241-251. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9713-6
  • Westrup, D. ve Fremouw, W. J. (1998). Stalking behavior: A literature review and suggested functional analytic assessment technology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(3), 255-274. https://doi. org/10.1016/S1359-1789(97)00023-2
  • Yanowitz, K. L. (2006). Influence of gender and experience on college students’ stalking schemas. Violence and Victims, 21(1), 91-100. Ybarra, M. L., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. ve Mitchell,
  • K. J. (2017). Stalking-like behavior in adolescence: Prevalence, intent, and associated characteristics. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 192-202. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040145
APA Basar D, Sakallı N (2021). Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . , 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
Chicago Basar Demet,Sakallı Nuray Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . (2021): 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
MLA Basar Demet,Sakallı Nuray Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . , 2021, ss.22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
AMA Basar D,Sakallı N Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . . 2021; 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
Vancouver Basar D,Sakallı N Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . . 2021; 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
IEEE Basar D,Sakallı N "Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri ." , ss.22 - 36, 2021. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
ISNAD Basar, Demet - Sakallı, Nuray. "Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri ". (2021), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
APA Basar D, Sakallı N (2021). Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 24(47), 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
Chicago Basar Demet,Sakallı Nuray Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 24, no.47 (2021): 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
MLA Basar Demet,Sakallı Nuray Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.24, no.47, 2021, ss.22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
AMA Basar D,Sakallı N Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2021; 24(47): 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
Vancouver Basar D,Sakallı N Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2021; 24(47): 22 - 36. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
IEEE Basar D,Sakallı N "Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri ." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 24, ss.22 - 36, 2021. 10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
ISNAD Basar, Demet - Sakallı, Nuray. "Israrlı Takip: Tanımı ve Sosyal Psikolojik Değişkenler ile İlişkileri ". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 24/47 (2021), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120201119m000030
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 22:23

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları