The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids
questionnaire

Akansel, Neriman; Yilmaz, İrem

doi:10.14744/agri.2021.01033

The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire

İrem YILMAZ, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Hastanesi, Hemşirelik Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye)

Neriman AKANSEL (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Cerrahi Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Bursa, Türkiye)

Ağrı

9 3

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 130 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/agri.2021.01033 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2022

The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire

Öz:

Objectives: This study was performed to conduct The Psychometric Properties of Nurses’ Mental Models About Opioids Questionnaire in the Turkish Language. Methods: This was a validation study in which the sample consisted of 86 nurses working in surgical clinics and agreed to participate in the study. Data were collected using the data collection form, examining nurses’ demographic characteristics (10 items) and the questionnaire (14 items). Results: In this study, the interclass correlation coefficient was calculated as 0.80. Items’ suitability was assessed using the experts’ opinions, and the internal consistency was examined considering the Cronbach’s alpha value. Cronbach’s alpha value ranged from 0.78 to 0.81 for the items in the scale. This value was 0.81 for all 14 items on the scale, and the reliability was found to be high. The questionnaire was entitled “Nurses’ Perception of Administering Opioids”in Turkish, believing that this Turkish title would be suitable. Conclusion: Nurses’ Perception of Administering Opioids was a valid and reliable tool, and the items represented nurses’ perceptions of administering opioids in Turkish nurses.

Anahtar Kelime:

Opiyoid ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkçe karşılığı “Hemşirelerin Opiyoidlere Yönelik Zihinsel Modellerinin Psikometrik Özellikleri” olan İngilizce ölçeğin psikometrik çalışmasını Türkçede yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu araştırma, cerrahi kliniklerde çalışan ve çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 86 hemşirenin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen bir geçerlilik çalışmasıdır. Veriler, hemşirelerin demografik özellikleri (10 madde) ile ölçek sorularından oluşan (14 madde) bir form kullanılarak toplandı. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada, sınıflar arası korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) 0,80 olarak hesaplandı. Maddelerin uygunluğu uzman görüşleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi ve iç tutarlılığı Cronbach alfa değeri dikkate alınarak incelendi. Ölçekte yer alan maddeler için Cronbach alfa değeri 0,78 ile 0,81 arasında değişmekteydi. Ölçekte yer alan 14 maddenin tamamı için bu değer 0,81 ve güvenilirliği yüksek olarak değerlendirildi. Ölçeğin Türkçe formu, “Hemşirelerin Opiyoid İlaçları Uygulamaya Yönelik Algısı” olarak adlandırıldı. Sonuç: Hemşirelerin Opiyoid İlaçları Uygulamaya Yönelik Algısı ölçeği, Türk hemşirelerin bu konudaki algılarını belirlemede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçektir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Çevik Eren Ş, Yeşil O, Öztürk Cimilli T, Güneysel Ö. Opioid use in the treatment of acute pain in emergency room. Sakarya Med J 2011;1(2):39–45. [CrossRef ]
2. Faydalı Y. Quality use of analgesics in surgical patients. Hacettepe Univ Fac Health Sci Nurs J 2010;17(2):83–91. 3. Şenyüz KY, Koçaşlı S. Multimodal analgesy and nursing approach in postoperative pain. Health Care Acad J 2017;4(2):90–5. [CrossRef ]
4. Yılbaşı AA, Çelebi N. Pain management and difficulties in palliative care. J Anesthesia 2014;22(3):124–34.
5. Eyigör C. Opioidlerin kullanım ilkeleri, yan etki yönetimi ve yeni opioidler. J Turk Soci Algology 2015;1–6.
6. Baldemir R, Akçaboy EY, Çelik Ş, Noyan Ö, Akçaboy ZN, Baydar M. An assessment of physicians’ attitudes toward opioid usage and opiophobia: Results of a survey from a training and research hospital. J Turk Soci Algology 2005;31(1):23–31.
7. Şenel G, Oğuz G, Koçak N, Karaca Ş, Kaya M, Kadıoğulları N. Opioid use and the management of cancer patient pain in palliative care clinic. J Turk Soci Algology 2016;28(4):171–6.
8. Dunwoody DR, Jungquist CR. Opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression: Are sedation scales enough to prevent adverse drug events postoperatively? Pain Manag Nurs 2020;21:110–19. [CrossRef ]
9. Aslan EF, Badır A. Reality about pain control: The knowledge and beliefs of nurses on the nature, assessment and management of pain. J Turk Soci Algology 2005;17(2):44– 51.
10. Çelik S, Baş BK, Korkmaz ZN. Determination of knowledge and behaviour of nurses about pain management. Bakırköy Med J 2018;14:17–23. [CrossRef ]
11. Guest C, Sobotka F, Karavasopoulou A, Ward S, Bantel C. Nurses, and opioids: Results of a bi-national survey on mental models regarding opioid administration in hospitals. J Pain Res 2017;10:481–93. [CrossRef ]
12. Ogbeide SS. Acute postoperative pain: An assessment of postoperative nurses’ knowledge and attitudes using evidence- based education. Doctoral dissertation. Irvine, CA: Brandman University; 2017.
13. Ferreira M, Verloo H, Vieira MMS, Marques PV. Attitudes towards morphine use among nurses and physicians working in French-speaking Switzerland. Nurs Res Rev 2013;3:141–53. [CrossRef ]
14. Karakaya A. Sağlık personelinin opioid kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Eskişehir: Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Anabilim Dalı; 2007.
15. Demir DY, Yıldırım UY, İnce Y, Gel KT, Akı MK. Determining of nurses’ knowledge, behavior and clinical decision making regarding pain management. J Contemp Med 2012;2(3):162–72.
16. Oregon Pain Treatment Guidelines. Available at: http:// www.oregonpainguidance.org/,2016. Accessed Jan 20, 2020.
17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2019, May). Pain management best practices inter-agency task force report: Updates, gaps, inconsistencies, and recommendations. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ ash/advisory-committees/pain/reports/index.html. Accessed Jan 20, 2020.
18. Francis L, Fitzpatrick JJ. Postoperative pain: Nurses’ knowledge and patients’ experiences. Pain Manag Nurs 2013;14(4):351–7. [CrossRef ]
19. Kobelt P, Burke K, Renker P. Evaluation of a standardized sedation assessment for opioid administration in the post anesthesia care unit. Pain Manag Nurs 2014;15(3):672–81.
20. Hartel MJ, Staub LP, Röder C, Eggli S. High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11(1):199. [CrossRef ]
21. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug Saf 2013;36(11):1045-67. [CrossRef ]
22. Rupp T, Delaney KA. Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43(4):494–503. [CrossRef ]
23. Zarea K, Mohammadi A, Beiranvand S, Hassani F, Baraz S. Iranian nurses’ medication errors: A survey of the types, the causes, and the related factors. Int J Africa Nurs Sci 2018;8:112–6. [CrossRef ]
24. Bekar ÖE. Nurses with addictive substance abuse and nursing management approach: A literature review. J Health Nurs Manag 2014;1(1):43–7. [CrossRef ]
25. Costello M, Thompson S. Preventing opioid misuse and potential abuse: The nurse’s role in patient education. Pain Manag Nurs 2015;16(4):515–9. [CrossRef ]
26. Er F, Altuntaş S. Employee empowerment in nursing. J Health Nurs Manag 2014;3(1):155–60. [CrossRef ]
27. Çapık C, Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Intercultural scale adaptation stages, language and culture adaptation: Updated guideline. Florence Nightingale J Nurs 2018;26(3):199–210.
28. Esin MN. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları, veri toplama araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliliği. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi; 2014. p.223–31.
29. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Reliability and validity in the scales. J Uludağ Univ Med Fac 2004;30(3):211–6.
30. Yeşilyurt S, Çapraz C. A road map for the content validity used in scale development studies. Erzincan Univ J Educ Fac 2018;20(1):251–64.
31. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15(2):155–63. [CrossRef ]
32. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Basic principles of scale development. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2014;40:39–49. [CrossRef ]
33. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:53–5. [CrossRef ]
34. Webster F, Rice K, Katz J, Bhattacharyya O, Dale C, Upshur R. An ethnography of chronic pain management in primary care: The social organization of physicians’ work in the midst of the opioid crisis. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0215148.
35. Apker J, Propp KM, Zabava Ford WS, Hofmeister N. Collaboration, credibility, compassion, and coordination: Professional nurse communication skill sets in health care team interactions. J Prof Nurs 2006;22(3):180–9. [CrossRef ]
36. Gallagher R. New category of opioid-related death. Can Fam Physician 2018;64(2):95–6.
37. Gomes T, Juurlink DN, Antoniou T, Mamdani MM, Paterson JM, van den Brink W. Gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: A population-based nested casecontrol study. PLoS Med 2017;14(10):e1002396. [CrossRef ]
38. Kiyatkin EA. Respiratory depression and brain hypoxia induced by opioid drugs: Morphine, oxycodone, heroin, and fentanyl. Neuropharmacology 2019;151:219–26. [CrossRef ]
39. Kuğuoğlu S, Çövener Ç, Tanır Kürtüncü M, Aktaş E. Professional and legal responsibilities of nurses in drug administration. Maltepe Univ Nurs Sci Art J 2009;2(2):86–93.
40. Bilen A. Palliative care. Commun Physician 2016;31(1):25– 30. [CrossRef ]
41. Bell DM, McDonough JP, Ellison JS, Fitzhugh EC. Controlled drug misuse by certified registered nurse anesthetists. AANA J 1999;67(2):133–40.
42. Criste A. Do nurse anesthetists demonstrate gender bias in treating pain? A national survey using a standardized pain model. AANA J 2003;71(3):206–9.
43. Bodur S, Filiz E, Durduran Y. A comparison of medical staff’s and community’s opinions about medical errors. Int J Gen Mef 2011;21(4):123–30.
44. Tunç T, Kutani RÖ. Underlying causes of anxiety among physicians and nurses: A sample of a university hospital. Suleyman Demirel Univ J Vision 2015;6(13):62–71.
45. Robinson FP, Gorman G, Slimmer LW, Yudkowsky R. Perceptions of effective and ineffective nurse-physician communication in hospitals. Nurs Forum 2010;45(3):206–16.
46. Caymaz M. A study on medical practice errors of healthcare personnel. Int J Manag Soci Stud 2016;2(4):1–14.
47. Caruso CC, Baldwin CM, Berger A, Chasens ER, Landis C, Redeker NS, et al. Position statement: Reducing fatigue associated with sleep deficiency and work hours in nurses. Nurs Outlook 2017;65(6):766–8. [CrossRef ]
48. Cebeci F, Gürsel E, Tekingündüz S. Determining the level of tendency in malpractice among nurses. Anatol J Nurs Health Sci 2012;15(3):188–96.
49. Feleke SA, Mulatu MA, Yesmaw YS. Medication administration error: Magnitude and associated factors among nurses in Ethiopia. BMC Nurs 2015;14:53. [CrossRef ]
50. Clendon J, Gibbons V. 12 h shifts and rates of error among nurses: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2015;52(7):1231–42. [CrossRef ]

APA	Yilmaz İ, Akansel N (2022). The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. , 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
Chicago	Yilmaz İrem,Akansel Neriman The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. (2022): 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
MLA	Yilmaz İrem,Akansel Neriman The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. , 2022, ss.117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
AMA	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. . 2022; 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
Vancouver	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. . 2022; 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
IEEE	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N "The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire." , ss.117 - 130, 2022. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
ISNAD	Yilmaz, İrem - Akansel, Neriman. "The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire". (2022), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.01033

APA	Yilmaz İ, Akansel N (2022). The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. Ağrı, 34(2), 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
Chicago	Yilmaz İrem,Akansel Neriman The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. Ağrı 34, no.2 (2022): 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
MLA	Yilmaz İrem,Akansel Neriman The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. Ağrı, vol.34, no.2, 2022, ss.117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
AMA	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. Ağrı. 2022; 34(2): 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
Vancouver	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire. Ağrı. 2022; 34(2): 117 - 130. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
IEEE	Yilmaz İ,Akansel N "The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire." Ağrı, 34, ss.117 - 130, 2022. 10.14744/agri.2021.01033
ISNAD	Yilmaz, İrem - Akansel, Neriman. "The Turkish form of psychometric properties of opioids questionnaire". Ağrı 34/2 (2022), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.01033