İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği

Şükrü ÖZEN (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Erol Nuran IŞIK, (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Özmen Özgür UYSAL, (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Elif Ayşe ŞENGÜN, (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Beyhan AKSOY, (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Mehmet ÇAKAR, (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Begüm AKIŞ (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
7 5

Proje Grubu: SBB Sayfa Sayısı: 266 Proje No: 105K168 Proje Bitiş Tarihi: 01.05.2007 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş Sosyoloji
Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • ABRAHAMSON, E., Fombrun, C. J., Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences, Academy of Management Review, 19 (4): 728-755, (1994).
  • ADLER, P. S., Kwon, S. W., Social Capital: Prospects for A New Concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40, (2002).
  • ANDERSON A. R. ve Jack, S. L., The Articulation of Social Capital in Entrepreneurial Networks: A Glue Or A Lubricant?, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14: 193-210, (2002).
  • ANDERSON, J. C. , Håkansson, H., Johanson, J., Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context, Journal of Marketing, 58, October: 1-15, (1994).
  • ANDERSSON vd., Moving or doing? Knowledge Flow, Problem Solving, and Change in Industrial Networks, Journal of Business Research, 60: 32–40, (2006).
  • AUDETSCH, D., Feldman M., Knowledge Spillovers and The Geography of Innovation and Production, American Economic Review, 86(3): 630-640, (1996).
  • AULAKH, P. S. , Kotabe, M., Sahay, A., Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5): 1005-1032, (1996).
  • BAILEY, K. D., Methods of Social Research, The Free Press, New York, (1982).
  • BAKER, P., Small Firms, Industrial Districts and Power Asymmetries, International Journal of Entrepreurial Behavior & Research, 1(1), (1995).
  • BAPTISTA, R. , Swann, P. , Do Clusters Innovate More?, Research Policy, 27: 525-540, (1998).
  • BELLANDI, M., The Industrial District in Marshall, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, ed: Goodman, E. A., Routledge, London, (1989). Pp:136-152.
  • BERG, Bruce. L. Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, (1998).
  • BORGATTI, S. P., Foster, P. C. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology, Journal of Management, 29: 991-1013, (2003).
  • BOSCHMA, R. A. ve Lambooy, J. C., Knowledge, Market Structure, and Economic Coordination: Dynamics of Industrial Districts, Growth and Change, 33: 291-311, (2002).
  • BOURDIEU, P. , The forms of Capital, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, ed: Richardson, J. G., Greenwood, New York, (1986). Pp: 241-258.
  • BRUSCO, S. 1996. Global Systems and Local Systems, Local and Regional Response to Global Pressure: The Case of Italy and Its Industrial Districts, Eds: Cossentino, F., Pyke, F., Sengerberger, W., ILO, Geneva. (1996). Pp:145-158.
  • BUĞRA, A., Non-Market Mechanisms of Market formation: The Development of The Consumer Durables Industry in Turkey, New Perspectives on Turkey, 19: 1-28, (1998).
  • BUĞRA, A., Kriz Ve Geleneksel Refah Rejimi, VI. Araştırma Zirvesinde Sunulan Bildiri, 19- 20 Nisan 2001, İstanbul, (2001).
  • BURT, R. S., Structural holes—The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (1992).
  • BURT, R. S. , The Social Structure of Competition., Explanations in Economic Sociology, Ed: Swedberg, R., Russell Sage Foundation, New York, (1993), Pp: 65-103.
  • BURT, R. S., The Contingent Value of Social Capital, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2): 339-365, (1997).
  • BURT, R. S., The Network Structure of Social Capital, Research in Organizational Behavior, Eds: Sutton, R. I., Staw, B. M., CT: JAI Press, Greenwich, (2000), Pp: 345-423.
  • CALOGHIROU, Y. , Kastelli, I. , Tsakanikas, A., Internal Capabilities and External Knowledge Sources: Complements Or Substitutes for Innovative Performance, Technovation, 24: 29-39, (2004).
  • CAMPBELL, K. E. , Peter V. M., Jeanne, S. H., Social Resources and Socioeconomic Status, Social Networks, 8: 97-117, (1986).
  • CARBONARA, N., New Models of Inter-Firm Networks Within Industrial Districts, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14: 229-246, (2002).
  • CHOI, C. J. , Lee, S. H., Kim, J. B. A Note On Counter Trade: Contractual Uncertainty and Transaction Governance In Emerging Economies, Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (1): 189-202, (1999)
  • COFFEY, A., Atkinson, P., Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, (1996).
  • COHEN, M. D. , March, J. G. , Olsen, J. P., A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1-25, (1972).
  • COLEMAN, J. S., Social Capital in The Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, Ek, 95-120, (1988).
  • COLEMAN, J. S., Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Pres, Cambridge, MA., (1990).
  • DACHLER, H. P., Does The Distinction Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Make Sense?, Organization Studies, 18(4): 709-724, (1997).
  • DACIN, M. T., The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions, Journal of Management, May-June, (1999).
  • DAS, T. K., Teng, B. S., Trust, Control and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework, Organization Studies, 22(2): 251-83, (2001).
  • DAYASINDHU, N., Embeddedness, Knowledge Transfer, Industry Clusters and Global Competitiveness: A Case of The Indian Software Industry, Technovation, 22: 551-560, (2002).
  • DEI OTTAI, G., Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in The Industrial District, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18: 529-546, (1994).
  • DEI OTTAI, G., Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in The Industrial District, From Industrial Districts to Local Development, Eds: Becattini, M. , Dei Ottai, G., Sforzi, F., Edward Elgar, UK, (2003). Pp:108-130.
  • DENZIN, N. K. ve Lincoln, Y. S., Entering The Field of Qualitative Research, Handbook of qualitative research, Eds: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln , Y. S., Thousand Oaks: Sage, CA, (1994). Pp: 1-34.
  • DIMAGGIO, P. J., Powell, W. W., Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48: 147- 160, (1983).
  • DONALDSON, L., American Anti-Management Theories of Organization, Cambridge University Press, (1995).
  • DPT., Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013) Ağaç Ürünleri ve Mobilya Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, (2006).
  • DYER, J. H. , Singh, H., The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of InterOrganizational Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660- 679, (1998).
  • EISENHARDT, K. M., Building Theories From Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550, (1989).
  • FLICK, U., An introduction to qualitative research, Sage, London, (2002).
  • FUKUYAMA, F., Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity, Hamish Hamilton, London, (1995).
  • GADDE, L. E. , Huemer, L., Håkansson, H., Strategizing in Industrial Networks, Industrial Marketing Management, 32: 357– 364, (2003).
  • GANESAN, S. Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 58: 1-19, (1994).
  • GÖKALP, N., Ekonomide Güven Faktörü, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10 (2): 163-174, (2003).
  • GOODMAN, E., Bamford, J. (Eds), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, Routledge, London, (1989).
  • GRANOVETTER, M., The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380, (1973).
  • GRANOVETTER, M., The Strength of Weak Ties: A network theory revisited, Sociological Theory, 1: 201-233, (1983).
  • GRANOVETTER, M. , Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510, (1985).
  • GRANOVETTER, M., Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis, Acta Sociologica, 35: 3-11, (1992).
  • GRANOVETTER, M., Problem of Explanation in Economic Sociology, Networks and organization: Structure, form and action, Eds: Nohria, N., Eccles, R., Harvard Business Schools Pres, Boston, (1992a). Pp: 25-56.
  • GREENWOOD, R., Suddaby, R., Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 27-48, (2006).
  • GULATI R. vd., Organizational Networks, Companion to Organizations, Ed.: Baum, J., Blackwell Publication, (2005).
  • GULATI, R. , Alliances and Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 293-317, (1998).
  • GULATI, R., Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance formation, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420, (1999).
  • GULATI, R., Dialdin, D. A., Wang, L., Organizational Networks, The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Ed: Baum, J. A. C., Blackwell, Oxford, (2002). Pp: 281-303.
  • HAGEDOORN, J., Understanding The Cross-Level Embeddedness of Interfirm Partnership formation, Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 670-680, (2006).
  • HÅKANSSON H., Snehota I., Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Routledge, London, (1995).
  • HÅKANSSON, H., ford, D. , How Should Companies Interact in Business Networks?, Journal of Business Research, 55: 133-139, (2002).
  • HALINEN, A., Törnroos, J. A., The Role of Embedded Ness in The Evolution of Business Networks, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14 (3): 187-205, (1998).
  • HALINEN, A., Törnroos, J. A., Using Case Methods in The Study of Contemporary Business Networks, Journal of Business Research, 58: 1285-1297, (2005).
  • HANSEN, M. T., The Search Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organizational Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82- 111, (1999).
  • HELMSING, A. H. J., Externalities, Learning and Governance: New Perspectives On Local Economic Development, Development and Change, 32: 277-308, (2001).
  • HILL, E. W. , Brennan, J. F., A Methodology for Identifying The Drivers of Industrial Clusters: The Foundation of Regional Competitive Advantage, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 65-96, (2000).
  • HUEMER, L. , Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., Organizational Identity and Network Identification: Relations Within and Beyond Imaginary Boundaries, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20: 53-73, (2004).
  • HUMAN, S. E. , Provan, K. G., Legitimacy Building in The Evolution of Small Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise, Administrative Science Quarterly. 45,327–365, (2000).
  • HUMPHREY, J., Schmitz, H., Trust and Inter-Firm Relations in The Developing and Transition Economies, The Journal of Development Studies, 34 (4): 32-61, (1998).
  • HUNG, S. C., The Plurality of Institutional Embedded Ness As A Source of Organizational Attention Differences, Journal of Business Research (baskıda), (2004).
  • HUSTED, B. W., Transaction Costs, Norms, and Social Networks, Business and Society, 33(1): 30-57, (1994).
  • IBRAHIM, S. , Fallah, M. H., Drivers of Innovation and Influence of Technological Clusters, Engineering Management Journal, 17(3): 33-41, (2005).
  • INKPEN, A. C., Tsang, E. C. K., Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer, Academy of Management Review, 30 (1): 146-165, (2005).
  • JACK, S. , anderson, A. R., The Effects of Embedded Ness On The Entrepreneurial Process, Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 467-487, (2002).
  • JACK, S. L., The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), September: 1233-1259, (2005).
  • JANESICK, V. J., The choreography of qualitative research design, Handbook of qualitative research,.Eds: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, (1994). Pp: 379-399.
  • JAP, S. D. , Ganesan, S., Control Mechanisms and The Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment, Journal of Marketing Research, 37: 227-245, (2000).
  • JAROS, Stephen J. vd., Effects of Continuance, Affective, and Moral Commitment on the Withdrawal Process: An Evaluation of Eight Structural Equation Models, Academy of Management Review, 36 (5): 951-995, (1993).
  • JEPPERSON, R. L., Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Eds: Powell, W. W. , DiMaggio, P. J., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1991). Pp: 143-163.
  • JICK, T. D., Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602-611, (1979).
  • JOHANNISON, B., Ramirez, M., The Institutional Embeddedness of Local Inter-firm Networks: A Leverage for Business Creation, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14: 297-315, (2002).
  • KALE, P. , Singh, H. , Perlmutter, H., Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217-237, (2000).
  • KARAGÜL, M., Masca, M., Sosyal Sermaye Üzerine Bir Inceleme, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1, 37-52, (2005).
  • KEEBLE, D. , Wilkinson, F., Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in The Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe, Regional Studies, 33: 295-303, (1998).
  • KHAN, J. H., Ghani, J. A., Clusters and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Innovation in A Developing Economy, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3): 221-238, (2004).
  • KOGUT, B. , Zander U., Knowledge of The Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and The Replication of Technology, Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397, (1992).
  • KRACHARDT, D. , Hanson, J. R., Informal Networks: The Company Behind The Charts, Harvard Business Review, 71: 104-112, (1993).
  • KRUGMAN, P., Geography and Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, (1991).
  • KURTOĞLU, A. , Koç, H. , Aksu, B., Türkiye Mobilya Sanayinin Yapısal Görünümü, 1. Uluslar arası Mobilya Kongresi ve Sergisi, 14-17 Ekim 1999, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, İstanbul, (1999) pp:19-29.
  • LARSON, A., Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of The Governance of Exchange Relationships, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76-104, (1992).
  • LAVIE, D., The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of The Resource-Based View, Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 638-658, (2006).
  • LAWSON, C. , Territorial Clustering and High Technology Innovation: From Industrial Districts to Innovative Milieu, ESRC Working Paper 54, (1997).
  • LAWSON, C., Towards A Competence Theory of The Region, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 151-166, (1999).
  • LAWSON, C., Lorenz, E., Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge, and Regional Innovative Capacity, Regional Studies, 33: 305-317, (1999).
  • LECHNER, C., Dowling, M., The Evolution of Industrial Districts and Regional Networks: The Case of the Biotechnology Regional Munich / Martinsried, Journal of Management and Governance, 3: 309-338, (1999).
  • LECUYER, C. , Making Silicon Valley: Engineering Culture, Innovation, and Industrial Growth: 193-1970, Enterprise & Society, 4: 666-670, (2001).
  • LEE, A. S., Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research, Organization Science, 2(4): 342-365, (1991).
  • LEWIS, J. D., The Connected Corporation, Free Press, New York, (1995).
  • LIN, N., Building a Network Theory of Social Capital, Connections, 22 (1): 28-51, (1999).
  • LUO, Y., Opportunism in Inter-Firm Exchanges in Emerging Markets, Management and Organization Review, 2 (1): 121-147, (2006).
  • MAÈERINSKAS, J. , Pakalnienë, A., The Impact of Embeddedness on the Economic Performance of Firms, Ekonomika, 67: 1-14, (2004).
  • MALMBERG, A. , Industrial Geography: Location and Learning, Progress in Human geography, 21 (4): 573-582, (1997).
  • MARSHALL, A. , Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London, (1891).
  • MARSHALL, A. , Industry and Trade, Macmillan, London, (1920).
  • MARSHALL, A. , Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London, (1952).
  • McALLISTER, D. J., Affect and Cognition Based Trust As Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24-59, (1995).
  • McKINNON, D. vd., Networking, Trust and Embeddedness Amongst Smes in The Aberdeen Oil Complex, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16: 87–106, (2004).
  • MEYER, J. P., Allen, N. J., Testing The Side-Bet Theory of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 372-378, (1984).
  • MEYER, J., Rowan, B., Institutionalized Organizations: formal Structure As Myth and Ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363, (1977).
  • MINGUZZI, A., Passaro, R., The Network of Relationships Between The Economic Environment and The Entrepreneurial Culture in Small Firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 181–207, (2000).
  • MOLINA-MORALES, X. F. , Martinez-Fernández, M. T., How Much Difference Is There Between Industrial District Firms?: A Net Value Creation Approach, Research Policy, 33: 473-486, (2004).
  • MÖLLERING, G., A Typology of Supplier Relations: From Determinism to Pluralism in Interfirm Empirical Research, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9: 31-41, (2003).
  • MORALES-MOLINA, F. X. , López-Navarro, M. Á., Guia-Julve, J., The Role of Local Institutions as Intermediary Agents in the Industrial District, European Urban and Regional Studies. 9 (4): 315-329, (2002).
  • MORAN, P., Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1129-1151, (2005).
  • MOULAERT, F., Sekia, F., Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey, Regional Studies, 37 (3): 289-302, (2003).
  • MUSCIO, A., Patterns of Innovation in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis, Industry and Innovation, 13 (3): 291-312, (2006).
  • NADVI, K., Shifting Ties: Developing Networks in The Surgical Instrument Cluster of Sialkot Pakistan, Development and Change, 30: 141-175, (1999).
  • NAHAPIET, J. , Ghoshal, S. , Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and The Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-266, (1998).
  • NASSIMBENI, G., Network Structures and Co-Ordination Mechanisms, International Journal of Operations, 18 (6): 538-554, (1998).
  • NELSON, R. E., The Strength of Strong Ties: Social Networks and Intergroup Conflict in Organizations, The Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 377-401, (1989).
  • NIELSEN, B. B., The Role of Knowledge Embeddedness in The Creation of Synergies in Strategic Alliances, Journal of Business Research, 58: 1194-1204, (2005).
  • NOOTEBOOM, B., Interfirm Collaboration, Learning, and Networks, Routledge, London, (2004).
  • NUNNALLY, J. L., Psychometric theory, McGraw Hill, New York, (1978).
  • OBA, B., Semercioz, F., Antecedents of Trust in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis of Inter-Firm Relations in a Turkish Industrial District, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17, May: 163-182, (2005).
  • OGBONNA, E., Harris, C. L. Organizational Culture: A Ten-Year, Two-Phase Study of Change in The UK Food-Retailing Sector, Journal of Management Studies, 39(5): 673- 706, (2002).
  • OSLO MANUAL, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition. OECD and Eurostrat Publications, (2005).
  • OZ, O., Clusters and Competitive Advantage: The Turkish Experience, Routledge, London, (2004).
  • ÖZEN, Ş., Bağlam, Aktör, Söylem Ve Kurumsal Değişim: Türkiye’de Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin Yayılım Süreci, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1): 47-90, (2002).
  • ÖZEN, Ş., Aslan, Z., İçsel ve Dışsal Sosyal Sermaye Yaklaşımları Açısından Türk Toplumunun Sosyal Sermaye Potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) Örneği, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 12 (2): 130-161, (2006).
  • PALMER, D. A. ve Biggart, N. W., Organizational Institutions, . The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Ed: Baum, J. A. C., Blackwell, Oxford, (2002). Pp:259-280.
  • PARDO, T. A. , Cresswell, A. M. , Zhang, J. , Thompson, F. 2001. Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Innovations. Academy of Management Proceedings.
  • PAVITT, K., On The Nature of Technological Spillovers, NBER Working paper #4423, (1987).
  • PFEFFER, J., Salancik, S. R., The External Control of Organizations, Harper and Row, (1978).
  • PHILLIPS, M. E., Industry Mindsets: Exploring The Cultures of Two Macro-Organizational Settings, Organization Science, 5(3): 384-402, (1994).
  • PIETROBELLI, C., Barrera, T. O., Enterprise Clusters and Industrial Districts in Colombia’s Fashion Sector, European Planning Studies, 10 (5): 541-562, (2002).
  • PODOLNY, D. M., Page, K. L., Network forms of Organization, Annual Review of Sociology, 24:1-24, (1998).
  • POPP, A., Business Structure, Business Culture and The Industrial District: The Potteries, c185-1914, Ashgate, Burlington, (2001).
  • PORTER, M., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillian, London, (1990).
  • PORTER, M., Clusters and The New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77-90, (1998).
  • PORTES, A., Economic Sociology of Immigrants: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, (1995).
  • PORTES, A., Sensenbrenner, J., Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes On The Social Determinants of Economic Action, American Journal of Sociology, 98:1320-1350, (1993).
  • POWELL, W. W., Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network forms of Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336, (1990).
  • POWELL, W. W., DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1991).
  • PÖYHÖNEN, A., Smedlund., Assessing Intellectual Capital Creation in Regional Clusters, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5 (3): 351-365, (2004).
  • PUTNAM R. D., Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital, American Prospect, 19: 35-42, (1995).
  • PUTNAM, R. D., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, NJ, (1993).
  • RABELLOTTI, R., Schmitz, H. The Internal Heterogeneity of Industrial Districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico, Regional Studies, 32(2): 97-108, (1999).
  • RABELOTTI, R. Is There An Industrial District Model? Footwear Districts in Italy and Mexico compared, World Development, 23(1): 29-41, (1995).
  • RAMA, R., Ferguson, D., Melero, A. Subcontracting Networks in Industrial Districts: The Electronics Industries of Madrid, Regional Studies, 37(1): 71-88, (2003).
  • SABEL, C., Zeitlin, J. Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in The Nineteenth Century Industrialization, Past and Present, 108: 133- 176, (1985).
  • SAKO, M. , Helper, S. Determinants of Trust in Supplier Relations: Evidence From The Automotive Industry in Japan and the United States, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34: 387-417, (1998).
  • SAMMARA, A., Biggierio, L. Identity and Identification in International Districts, Journal of Management and Governance, 5: 61-68, (2001).
  • SARGUT, A. S. Kurumsal Alanlardaki Örgüt Yapılarının Oluşmasında Ve Ekonomik Işlemlerin Yürütülmesinde Güvenin Rolü, Sosyal Bilimlerde Güven, Ed: Erdem, F., Vadi Yayınları, Ankara, (2003). Pp: 89-124.
  • SCHEIN, E., Coming to New Awareness of Organizational Culture, Sloan Management Review, 25 (2): 3-17, (1984).
  • SCHMITZ, H., Collective Efficiency: Growth Path for A Small-Scale Industry, Journal of Development Studies, 31(4): 529-561, (1995).
  • SCHMITZ, H., Collective Efficiency and Increasing Returns, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 465-483, (1999).
  • SCOTT, R. W., Institutions and Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1995).
  • SENGUN, A. E., Wasti, S. N., Trust, Control, and Risk: A Test of Das and Teng's Conceptual Framework, Group and Organization Management, 32 (4) 1-35, (2007).
  • SEO, M. G., Creed, W. E. D., Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 222-247, (2002).
  • SIMSEK, Z. , Lubatkin, M. H., Floyd, S. W., Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective, Journal of Management, 29 (3): 427-442, (2003).
  • SMITKA, M., Competitive Ties: Subcontracting in The Japanese Automobile Industry, Columbia University Press, New York, (1991).
  • SPENCER, J. W., Firms’ Knowledge Sharing Strategies in The Global Innovation System: Empirical Evidence From The Flat Panel Display Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 217-233, (2003).
  • STABER, U., Inter-Firm Co-Operation and Competition in Industrial Districts, Organization Studies, 19(4): 701-724, (1998).
  • STABER, U., The Structure of Network in Industrial Districts, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (3): 537 – 552, (2001).
  • STABER, U., Candace, M., Empirical Foundations of Industrial District Theory, Globalization and Regional Innovation Systems Çalıştayında Sunulan Bildiri, 17-19 Mayıs, Toronto, (1999).
  • STINCHCOMBE, A. L., Social Structure and Organizations, Handbook of organizations, Ed: March, J. G., Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, IL, (1965). Pp: 142-193.
  • STORPER, M., Regional ‘Words’ of Production: Learning and Innovation in The Technology Districts of France, Italy, and the USA, Regional Studies, 27: 433-455, (1993).
  • STORPER, M., The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region As A Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3): 191-221, (1995).
  • STRANG, D. , Sine, W. D., Interorganizational Institutions, The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Ed: Baum, J. A.C., Blackwell, Oxford, (2002). Pp: 497-519.
  • TABACHNICK, B. G., Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics, Allyn Bacon, Boston, (2001).
  • TBMM, TBMM Tutanak Dergisi, Dönem 22, 13, 30 Nisan, (2003).
  • ULRICH, D., Barney, J. B., Perspectives in Organizations: Resource Dependency, Efficiency, and Population, Academy of Management Review, 9(3): 471-481, (1984).
  • UZZI, B., The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for The Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674-698, (1996).
  • UZZI, B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35-67, (1997).
  • UZZI, B., The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for The Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674-698, (1997a).
  • VAN EES, H., Bachmann, R., Transition Economies and Trust Building, Proceedings of the 19th EGOS Colloquium, July 3-5, Copenhagen, (2003).
  • VISSER, E. J., A Comparison of Clustered and Dispersed Firms in The Small-Scale Clothing Industry of Lima, World Development, 27(9): 1553-1570, (1999).
  • WALKER, G., Kogut, B., Shan, W., Social Capital, Structural Holes and the formation of an Industry Network, Organization Science, 8 (2): 109-125, (1997).
  • WASTI, A., Önder, Ç., Kültürlerarası Çalışmalarda Yöntem: Örgütsel Bağlılık Yazınından Dersler, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2): 125-146, (2003).
  • WATTS, Doug H. vd., Owner-Managers, Clusters and Local Embeddedness: Small Firms in The Shefield (UK), Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18 May: 185-205, (2006).
  • WEERAWARDENA, J., The Role of Marketing Capability in Innovation-Based Competitive Strategy, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11: 15-35, (2003).
  • WESTPHAL, J. D. , Gulati, R., Shorthell, S. M., Customization Or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective On The Content and Consequences of TQM adoption, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366-395, (1997).
  • WHITLEY, R., Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999).
  • WILLIAMSON, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies, Free Press, New York, (1975).
  • WILLIAMSON, O. E., The Economics of Organizations: The Transaction Cost Approach, American Journal of Sociology, 87: 548-577, (1981).
  • WOODWARD, J., Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London, (1965).
  • YIN, R., Case Study Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, (1984).
  • YOU, J. I. , Wilkinson, F., Competition and Cooperation: Toward Understanding Industrial Districts, Review of Political Economy, 6: 259-278, (1994).
  • ZAHEER, A., Bell, G. G., Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 809-825, (2005).
  • ZAHEER, A. , McEvily B. , Perrone, V., Does Trust Matter? Exploring The Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust On Performance, Organization Science, 9: 141-159, (1998).
  • ZAMAN GAZETESI, 10 Eylül, (2005).
  • ZUCKER, L. G., Institutional Theories of Organization, Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 443-464, (1987).
  • ZUKIN, S., DiMaggio, P., Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of The Economy, New York: Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge: England, (1990).
APA ÖZEN Ş, IŞIK E, UYSAL Ö, ŞENGÜN E, AKSOY B, ÇAKAR M, AKIŞ B (2007). İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. , 1 - 266.
Chicago ÖZEN Şükrü,IŞIK Erol Nuran,UYSAL Özmen Özgür,ŞENGÜN Elif Ayşe,AKSOY BEYHAN,ÇAKAR Mehmet,AKIŞ Begüm İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. (2007): 1 - 266.
MLA ÖZEN Şükrü,IŞIK Erol Nuran,UYSAL Özmen Özgür,ŞENGÜN Elif Ayşe,AKSOY BEYHAN,ÇAKAR Mehmet,AKIŞ Begüm İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. , 2007, ss.1 - 266.
AMA ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. . 2007; 1 - 266.
Vancouver ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. . 2007; 1 - 266.
IEEE ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B "İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği." , ss.1 - 266, 2007.
ISNAD ÖZEN, Şükrü vd. "İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği". (2007), 1-266.
APA ÖZEN Ş, IŞIK E, UYSAL Ö, ŞENGÜN E, AKSOY B, ÇAKAR M, AKIŞ B (2007). İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. , 1 - 266.
Chicago ÖZEN Şükrü,IŞIK Erol Nuran,UYSAL Özmen Özgür,ŞENGÜN Elif Ayşe,AKSOY BEYHAN,ÇAKAR Mehmet,AKIŞ Begüm İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. (2007): 1 - 266.
MLA ÖZEN Şükrü,IŞIK Erol Nuran,UYSAL Özmen Özgür,ŞENGÜN Elif Ayşe,AKSOY BEYHAN,ÇAKAR Mehmet,AKIŞ Begüm İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. , 2007, ss.1 - 266.
AMA ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. . 2007; 1 - 266.
Vancouver ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği. . 2007; 1 - 266.
IEEE ÖZEN Ş,IŞIK E,UYSAL Ö,ŞENGÜN E,AKSOY B,ÇAKAR M,AKIŞ B "İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği." , ss.1 - 266, 2007.
ISNAD ÖZEN, Şükrü vd. "İş kültürü ve örgütler arası ilişkilerin örgütsel performansa etkilri: Ankara mobilyacılar sitesi örneği". (2007), 1-266.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 0:51

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları