Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 17 Sayfa Aralığı: 379 - 390 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.56133/intermedia.1169655 İndeks Tarihi: 04-01-2023

Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme

Öz:
Sharenting, ebeveynin çocuğa ait içerikleri dijital ortamlarda paylaşmasıdır. Kavram oluşumu itibariyle İngilizcede paylaşma anlamına gelen “sharing” ve ebeveynlik anlamına gelen “parenting” sözcüklerinin birleşimiyle oluşturulmuştur. Kavramın Türkçe karşılığı bulunmamaktadır. “Sharenting” kavramına ilişkin çalışmalar 2012 yılında başlamakla birlikte ilk akademik çalışma 2015 yılında yapılmıştır. Türkiye’de kavrama ilişkin yapılan ilk çalışma 2016 yılında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sharenting; yeni, güncel ve popüler bir kavramdır. Ebeveynler farklı gerekçelerle sharenting davranışında bulunmaktadır. Sharenting, ebeveynlere çeşitli imkânlar sunan bir davranış olmakla birlikte etik ve ahlaki açıdan doğru şekilde yapılandırılmadığında çocuk açısından ciddi riskler ve sorunlar taşımaktadır. Çocuğun dijital ortamlarda korunmasında ulusal ve uluslararası mevzuatlar ve yasal düzenlemeler ebeveynleri sorumlu tutmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ilgili alanyazın çerçevesinde sharenting kavramının tanımlamak ve kavramın gelişim sürecini açıklamak, ebeveynlerin sharenting davranışını gerçekleştirme nedenlerini ifade etmek, sharenting davranışının yarattığı sorunları ele almak ve ulusal ve uluslararası yasal mevzuatlar çerçevesinde sharenting davranışını irdelemektir.
Anahtar Kelime: Sosyal Medya Kavramsal Çözümleme Sharenting Çocuk Ebeveyn

Sharenting: A Conceptual Analysis

Öz:
The use of the Internet and social media has increasingly become widespread. Social media has become an important part of daily life. Thanks to social media, people can receive and offer services in many fields such as education, entertainment, and trade. Social media which is effective in the daily life of many people from different walk of life has also reflected in parents’ routines. The purpose of the current study is to define the concept of sharenting within the framework of the literature and explain the development process of the concept, express the reasons for the parents’ sharenting behaviour, address the problems created by the sharenting behaviour, and examine the sharenting behaviour within the framework of national and international legal regulations. Sharenting refers to sharing content about children by parents in digital media. The concept of sharenting in English emerges from the combination of the terms “sharing” and “parenting”. Along with studies on the concept of sharenting start- ed in 2012, the first academic study was conducted in 2015. The first study on the concept of sharenting in Turkey was carried out in 2016. “Sharenting” is a new, current, and popular concept in both international and national literature. Although the concept can be translated into Turkish as “paylaşan ebeveynlik”, there is no corresponding translation of the concept in Turk- ish as widely accepted. However, having a Turkish equivalent for the concept can be effective in raising and creating awareness of this behaviour in people. Therefore, one of the ways that many parts of the society, especially parents, can internalize the related concept expressively is to create a Turkish expression for the concept. It can be recommended for language experts and academicians working in the field of language education and teaching to find or create a response to the related concept that society can adopt. Besides, the Turkish Language Association (TDK) can also carry out studies on this subject. Today’s parents who have adopted the use of social media use social media for different purposes such as discussing their parenthood, finding solutions to parenting issues and giving advice to other parents, providing social interaction. Shar- enting is effective in fulfilling some of the needs of parents. In fact, parents can fulfil some of their learning needs with sharing. It also provides parents with social interaction and communication opportunities with other parents. Besides, sharenting is also effective in fulfilling some affective needs such as the acceptance of parental identity and appreciation of parenting practices. Thus, sharenting is an activity which offers opportunities to parents. However, when parents share by using their parental identities, they also include their children. Parents think that there is not any situation in which their children are exposed to harmful effects while sharing. However, every share on social media about children exposes them to some digital risks. Even the disclosure of parents’ identity through children may trigger ethical problems. The ignorance of the possible consequences of the sharenting behaviour on children is the reason for the uncon- scious violation of the privacy of children by the parents. The problem with sharenting is that parents configure their children’s digital identities without their children’s consent. Indeed, children’s digital identities should be created by themselves, not by their parents. The reason is that children are individuals who have the capacity to have rights. Therefore, this situation causes a violation of personal rights. The children’s satisfaction with their parent’s share is also unknown. As a result, it is foreseen that parents will have to encounter some legal processes in the future. Hence, the fact that the defendant-complainant re- lationship will be a parent-child relationship should be known. However, when considering the cultural structure of Turkey, it is predicted that the children’s complaints against their parents will be lower than in Western culture. However, regardless of the situation, national and international legislation and legislative regulations are in favor of the children’s interests. Social media platforms can be sensitive to prevent the parent-child conflicts arising from the sharenting behaviour and as a precau- tion they can provide a kind of warning before sharing. In the content shared, the user can be notified before sharing by using the face and word recognition systems. It is possible that shares in a way that does not risk the children’s safety, personality and existence as an individual are reasonable. However, there is no well-accepted criterion describing the ‘reasonable’ level. Although there is no regulation on what information parents can share about their children in many countries, it is considered that it is not possible to find a global solution. However, non-governmental organizations such as the Family Online Safety Institute can develop a common approach to the relevant situation and can ensure that the reasonable sharenting level is determined. The developed ap- proach can also be used as a government policy regarding the sharenting behaviour. Initiatives to determine the reasonable level can be supported by extensive research such as the European Children Online Project (EU Kids Online) including Turkey and other 24 European countries and Global Kids Online supported by UNICEF.
Anahtar Kelime: Social Media Conceptual Analysis Sharenting Children Parents

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Archer, C., & Kao, K. T. (2018). Mother, baby and Facebook makes three: Does social media provide social support for new mothers? Media International Australia, 168(1), 122-139. doi: 10.1177/1329878X18783016
  • Atalay, G. E. (2019). Sosyal medya ve çocuk: “Babishko Family Fun TV” isimli Youtube kanalının eleştirel bir analizi. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, (1), 179-202. doi: 10.17680/erciyesiletisim.484856
  • Barrot, J. S. (2021). Social media as a language learning environment: a systematic review of the literature (2008- 2019). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-29. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673
  • Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017). “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Po- pular Communication, 15(2), 110-125. doi:10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300
  • Brosch, A. (2016). When the child is born into the internet: Sharenting as a growing trend among parents on Fa- cebook. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 225-236. doi:10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.19
  • Brosch, A. (2017). Sharenting – nowy wymiar rodzicielstwa? Świat Małego Dziecka, 17(42). 379-387.
  • Brosch, A. (2018). Sharenting–why do parents violate their children’s privacy? The New Educational Review, 54(4), 75-85. doi:10.15804/tner.2018.54.4.06
  • Chrostowska, B. (2018). Sharenting–skala i wielowymiarowość zjawiska (nierozważnego) ujawniania przez rodziców informacji o dzieciach w mediach społecznościowych. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 4(43), 58-68. doi:10.26881/pwe.2018.43.05
  • Cino, D., Demozzi, S., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2020). “Why post more pictures if no one is looking at them?” Parents’ perception of the Facebook like in sharenting. The Communication Review, 1-23. doi:10.1080/10714421.2 020.1797434
  • COPPA. (1998). https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemakingregulatory-reform-proceedings/child- rens-online-privacyprotection-rule adresinden 08.02.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Çelik, M. (2019). Sosyal medyada anneliğin yeniden üretilmesi: Instagram örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Çimke, S., Gürkan, D. Y., & Polat, S. (2018). Sosyal medyada çocuk hakkı ihlali: Sharenting. Güncel Pediatri, 16(2), 261-267.
  • Çocuk Hakları Sözleşmesi (1989, Kasım 20). Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme. Erişim adresi: https://www.unicef. org/turkiye/%C3%A7ocuk-haklar%C4%B1na-dair-s%C3%B6zle%C5%9Fme
  • Damkjaer, M. S. (2018). Sharenting = Good parenting? Four parental approaches to sharenting on Facebook. In G. Mascheroni, C. Ponte & A. Jorge (Eds.) Digital Parenting. The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age. 209- 218. Göteborg: Nordicom.
  • Dursun, C. (2019). Ebeveynlerin çocuklarını sosyal medyada teşhiri: Çocuk hakları bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Çocuk ve Medeniyet Dergisi, 4(8), 195-208.
  • Erişir, R. M., & Erişir, D. (2018). Yeni medya ve çocuk Instagram özelinde sharenting (paylaşanababalık) örneği. Yeni Medya, (4-5), 50-64.
  • Fox, A. K., & Hoy, M. G. (2019). Smart devices, smart decisions? Implications of parents’ sharenting for children’s online privacy: An investigation of mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(4), 414-432. doi:10.1177/0743915619858290
  • Hachisuka, R. (2018). Sosyal medyada anneliğin yansıyan hâlleri (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Holiday, S., Norman, M. S., & Densley, R. L. (2020). Sharenting and the extended self: Self-representation in parents’ Instagram presentations of their children. Popular Communication, 18(2), 1-15. doi: 10.1080/15405702.2020.1744610
  • İnternet Ortamında Yapılan Yayınların Düzenlenmesi ve Bu Yayınlar Yoluyla İşlenen Suçlarla Mücadele Edilmesi Hakkında Kanunda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun. (2020, 31 Temmuz). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 31202). Erişim adresi: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2020/07/20200731-1.htm
  • Jacobson, J., Gruzd, A., & Hernández-García, Á. (2020). Social media marketing: Who is watching the watchers?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101774. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.001
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  • Kinghorn, B.E. (2018, 13 Aralık). Why Shaming Your Children on Social Media May Make Things Worse. The Conversation. Erişim adresi: https://theconversation.com/why-shamingyour-children-on-social-media-may-maket- hings-worse-108471
  • Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu. (2016, Nisan 7). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 29677). Erişim adresi: https://www.mev- zuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=6698&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5
  • Kopecky, K. (2019). Jste rodiče? A jste aktivní v prostředí internetu? EBezpečí: Možná i vy provozujete sharenting. https://www.ebezpeci.cz/index.php/rodicum-ucitelum-zakum/1405-jsterodice-a-jste-aktivni-v-prostredi-inter- netu-moznai-vyprovozujete-sharenting adresinden 19.08.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Kopecky, K., Szotkowski, R., Aznar-Díaz, I., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2020). The phenomenon of sharenting and its risks in the online environment. Experiences from Czech Republic and Spain. Children and Youth Services Review,110,104812. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104812
  • Latipah, E., Kistoro, H. C. A., Hasanah, F. F., & Putranta, H. (2020). Elaborating motive and psychological impact of sharenting in millennial parents. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4807-4817. doi:10.13189/ ujer.2020.081052
  • Lazard, L., Capdevila, R., Dann, C., Locke, A., & Roper, S. (2019). Sharenting: Pride, affect and the day-to-day poli- tics of digital mothering. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(4), 1-10. doi:10.1111/spc3.12443
  • Levy, E. (2017). Parenting in the Digital Age: How are We Doing. Report, London: Parent Zone: Making the Internet work for Families.
  • Maraşlı, M., Sühendan, E., Yılmaztürk, N. H., & Çok, F. (2016). Parents’ shares on social networking sites about their children: sharenting. The Anthropologist, 24(2), 399-406. doi:10.1080/09720073.2016.11892031
  • May, Ashley. (2016, 16 Eylül). 18-year-old sues parents for posting baby pictures on Facebook. USA Today. Erişim adresi: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nationnow/2016/09/16/18-year-old-sues-parents-posting-ba-by-picturesfacebook/90479402/
  • McDaniel, B. T., Coyne, S. M., & Holmes, E. K. (2012). New mothers and media use: Associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(7), 1509-1517. doi:10.1007/ s10995-011-0918-2
  • Moser, C., Chen, T., & Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2017, May). Parents’ and children’s preferences about parents sharing about children on social media. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, USA. 5221-5225.
  • Oswald, M., James, H., & Nottingham, E. (2016). The not-so-secret life of five-year-olds: Legal and ethical issues relating to disclosure of information and the depiction of children on broadcast and social media. Journal Of Media Law, 8(2), 198-228. doi: 10.1080/17577632.2016.1239942
  • Otero, P. (2017). Sharenting... should children’s lives be disclosed on social media. Arch Argent Pediatr, 115(5), 412-413.
  • Ouvrein, G., & Verswijvel, K. (2019). Sharenting: Parental adoration or public humiliation? A focus group study on adolescents’ experiences with sharenting against the background of their own impression management. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 319-327. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.011
  • Özaslan, H., Gültekin Akduman, G., & Aydoğan, Y. (2018, Ekim). Ailelerin, sosyal medyada çocuğun haklarına ve mahremiyetine ilişkin görüşleri. Uluslararası IV. Çocuk Gelişimi Kongresi, Ankara/Türkiye.
  • Parsa, A. F., & Akmeşe, Z. (2019). Sosyal medya ve çocuk istismarı: İnstagram anneleri örneği. Kadem Kadın Araş- tırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 163-191.
  • Pınar, Ö. (2018, 8 Ocak). Oğlunun fotoğraflarını izinsiz sosyal medyada paylaşan anne suçlu bulundu. BBC. Erişim adresi: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-42604622
  • Serin, H. (2019). Sosyal medyada çocuk hakları ihlalleri: Ebeveynler ve öğretmenler farkında mı? Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 1005-1031. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.555107
  • Steinberg, S. B. (2017). Sharenting: Children’s privacy in the age of social media. Emory Law Journal 66(4), 839- 884.
  • Turgut, Y. E., Kopuz, T., Aslan, A., & Eryılmaz Toksoy, S. (2021). Factors affecting parents’ share on social me- dia about their children. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 50(1), 276-292. doi: 10.14812/cu- fej.809663
  • Türk Borçlar Kanunu. (2011, Ocak 11). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 27836). Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ MevzuatMetin/1.5.6098.pdf
  • Türk Ceza Kanunu. (2004, Eylül 26). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 25611). Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5237.pdf
  • Türk Medeni Kanunu. (2001, Aralık 8). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 24607). Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ mevzuat?MevzuatNo=4721&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası. (1982, Ekim 18). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 17863). Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat. gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.2709.pdf
  • Ulus, Ç. (2017, Haziran 30). Mahkeme çocuklarını reklam malzemesi yapan blogger annenin iki çocuğunu babaya verdi. NTV. Erişim adresi: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/mahkemecocuklarini-reklam-malzemesi-yapan-blog- ger-annenin-ikicocugunubabaya-verdi,qS8Pj79Zc0SNNhjagnJu8A
  • Wagner, A., & Gasche, L.A. (2018). Sharenting: Making decisions about other’s privacy on social networking sites. http://mkwi2018.leuphana.de/wpcontent/uploads/MKWI_81.pdf adresinden 26.09.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • WAS. (2021). Digital in 2021. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020 adresinden 09.02.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir. WAS. (2022). Digital 2022: Another year of bumper growth. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digi- tal-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/ adresinden 21.05.2022 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Wiśniewska-Nogaj, L. (2019). Udostępnianie online zdjęć dzieci a problem pornografii dziecięcej w opinii matek. Dziecko Krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka, 18(4), 65-83.
  • Wojcicki, S. (2019). An update on kids and data protection on YouTube. https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/ an-update-onkids?visit_id=637484157668249649-901574435&hl=tr&rd=1 adresinden 08.02.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
APA Kopuz T, Turgut Y, Aslan A (2022). Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. , 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
Chicago Kopuz Tuba,Turgut Yiğit Emrah,Aslan Alper Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. (2022): 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
MLA Kopuz Tuba,Turgut Yiğit Emrah,Aslan Alper Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. , 2022, ss.379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
AMA Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. . 2022; 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
Vancouver Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. . 2022; 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
IEEE Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A "Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme." , ss.379 - 390, 2022. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
ISNAD Kopuz, Tuba vd. "Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme". (2022), 379-390. https://doi.org/10.56133/intermedia.1169655
APA Kopuz T, Turgut Y, Aslan A (2022). Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Intermedia International e-Journal, 9(17), 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
Chicago Kopuz Tuba,Turgut Yiğit Emrah,Aslan Alper Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Intermedia International e-Journal 9, no.17 (2022): 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
MLA Kopuz Tuba,Turgut Yiğit Emrah,Aslan Alper Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Intermedia International e-Journal, vol.9, no.17, 2022, ss.379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
AMA Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Intermedia International e-Journal. 2022; 9(17): 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
Vancouver Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Intermedia International e-Journal. 2022; 9(17): 379 - 390. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
IEEE Kopuz T,Turgut Y,Aslan A "Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme." Intermedia International e-Journal, 9, ss.379 - 390, 2022. 10.56133/intermedia.1169655
ISNAD Kopuz, Tuba vd. "Sharenting: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme". Intermedia International e-Journal 9/17 (2022), 379-390. https://doi.org/10.56133/intermedia.1169655