Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 42 - 58 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 İndeks Tarihi: 07-06-2023
Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School
Öz: The purpose of this research was to investigate learning styles, creative thinking skills, and academic achievement of students. The participants were 71 students from lower socioeco- nomic backgrounds and studying in the eighth grade of a secondary school in a central district of Gaziantep. In this study, Grasha–Reichmann Learning Style Scale, Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, and the lecture notes of the students were used as data collection tools. The data col- lected from the participants were transferred to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 22 program and analyzed using descriptive analysis, analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation analysis. It was observed that the students mostly had participant learning style, it was followed by competitive and dependent learning styles. It was also found that the highest of the students’ arithmetic means of creative thinking aspects belonged to fluency, followed by originality, and the lowest belonged to flexibility. It was determined that there was a significant difference among the students’ academic achievements in terms of learning styles. According to this, the students with participant learning style had significantly higher grades than the students with dependent learning style. It was also found that there are significant, positive correlations between creative thinking scores and academic achievement of students.
Anahtar Kelime: Ortaokul Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stilleri, Yaratıcı Düşünme Becerileri ve Akademik Başarılarının İncelenmesi
Öz: Bu araştırmanın amacı; öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerini, yaratıcı düşünme becerilerini ve aka- demik başarılarını incelemektir. Katılımcılar, Gaziantep'in merkez ilçesindeki bir ortaokulun sekizinci sınıfında öğrenim gören, alt sosyoekonomik düzeyden 71 öğrencidir. Bu çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak Grasha-Reichmann Öğrenme Stili Ölçeği, Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünme Testi ve öğrencilerin ders notları kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılardan toplanan veriler; SPSS 22 programına aktarılarak betimsel analiz, Anova ve Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin en çok paylaşımcı öğrenme stiline sahip oldukları, bunu rekabetçi ve bağımlı öğrenme stillerinin izlediği görülmüştür. Öğrencilerin yaratıcı düşünme boyutlarından aritmetik ortalamalarının en yükseğinin akıcılığa ait olduğu, bunu özgünlüğün izlediği ve en düşüğünün ise esnekliğe ait olduğu bulunmuştur. Öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerine göre akademik başarıları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna göre; paylaşımcı öğrenme stiline sahip öğrenciler, bağımlı öğrenme stiline sahip öğrencilere göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek notlara sahiptir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin yaratıcı düşünme puanları ile akademik başarıları arasında anlamlı, pozitif korelasyonlar olduğu bulunmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 329–337. [CrossRef]
- Akarsu, B. (2018). The art of creative thinking. Cinius.
- Akbıyık, C., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2006). Critical thinking dispositions and academic achievement. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 3(32), 90–99.
- Amrai, K., Motlagh, S. E., Zalani, H. A., & Parhon, H. (2011). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 399–402. [CrossRef]
- Anwar, M. N., Shamim-ur-Rasool, S., & Haq, R. (2012). A comparison of creative thinking abilities of high and low achievers secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–6. Arquero, J. L., & Tejero Rioja, C. (2011). How well adapted are accounting students for Bologna? A comparative analysis of learning styles of Spanish social sciences students. EDUCADE – Revista de Educación en Contabilidad, Finanzas y Administración de Empresas, 2(2), 145–156. [CrossRef]
- Arslan, B., & Babadoğan, C. (2005). The relationship of learning styles of 7th and 8th grade students with their academic achievement level, gender and age. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21, 35–48.
- Aslan, E. (2001). Turkish version of Torrance Creative Thinking Test. Mar- mara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(14), 19–40.
- Aydemir, H., Koçoğlu, E., & Karalı, Y. (2016). Evaluation of teacher candi- dates' learning styles according to Grasha-Reichmann scale. Kasta- monu Journal of Education, 24(4), 1881–1896.
- Azarkhordad, F., & Mehdinezhad, V. (2016). Explaining the students’ learn- ing styles based on Grasha-Reichmann’s student learning styles. Journal of Administrative Management. Education and Training, 12(6), 241–247.
- Bakır, S., & Mete, H. (2014). ortaokul öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri: Bur- dur ili örneği. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 15(3), 127–145.
- Baykal, T., & Karakus, M. (2019). Investigation of creative thinking skills and learning styles of seventh grade students. International Journal of Active Learning, 4(2), 75–88.
- Bayrak, B. K. (2014). A research on learning styles and attitudes towards science and technology lesson. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 7(1), 1–15.
- Benzer, A., & Eldem, E. (2013). Knowledge levels of Turkish and literature teachers about measurement and evaluation tools. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 21(2), 649–664.
- Bilgin, İ., & Bahar, M. (2002). The relationship between prospective teachers' learning styles and their attitudes towards science lesson. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 2(2), 53–67.
- Bulut, A., & Aktepe, V. (2015). The effect of creative drama supported mathematics teaching on students' academic success. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 23(3), 1081–1090.
- Büyüköztürk, S. (2016). Thoughts on exams. Kalem Journal of Education and Human Sciences, 6(2), 345–356.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). The handbook of data analysis. Pegem. Çakan, M. (2004). Teachers' assessment and evaluation practices and their proficiency levels: Primary and secondary education. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 99–114.
- Can, A. (2013). Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS. Pegem Academy. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444. [CrossRef]
- Castillo-Vergara, M., Barrios Galleguillos, N., Jofré Cuello, L., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142–152. [CrossRef]
- Cimermanová, I. (2018). The effect of learning styles on academic achieve- ment in different forms of teaching. International Journal of Instruc- tion, 11(3), 219–232. [CrossRef]
- Corbin, A. (2017). Assessing differences in learning styles: Age, gender and academic performance at the tertiary level in the Caribbean. Carib- bean Teaching Scholar, 7(1), 67–91.
- Cornett, C. E. (1983). What you should know about teaching and learning styles. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
- Damayanti, H. T., & Sumardi, S. (2018). Mathematical creative thinking ability of junior high school students in solving open-ended problem. JRAMathEdu, 3(1), 36–45. [CrossRef]
- Demirtaş, V. Y., & Baltaoğlu, M. G. (2010). Students' creativity levels according to learning styles. Education Sciences, 5(4), 2206–2215.
- Dikici, A. (2006). Art education and students' creativity levels. Education and in Science, 31(139), 3–9.
- Dikmen, M., & Tuncer, M. (2020). The effect of learning style-based educa- tion on academic achievement. Aegean Education Journal, 21(1), 71–88. [CrossRef]
- Dilek, A. N. (2013). The effect of socio-cultural characteristics on creative thinking. Master's thesis, (Thesis Nu. 344303) [Master's thesis]. Eskise- hir osmangazi University, Center of the Council of Higher Education. Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (2002). Survey of research on learning styles. California Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 75–98.
- Durnacı, U., & Ültay, N. (2020). Critical and creative thinking dispositions of primary school teacher candidates. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 75–97.
- Eishani, K. A., Saa’d, E. A., & Nami, Y. (2014). The relationship between learn- ing styles and creativity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 52–55. [CrossRef]
- Erdoğdu, M. Y. (2006). Relationships between creativity, teacher behav- iors and academic achievement. Electronic Journal of Social Sci- ences, 5(17), 95–106.
- Erdoğdu, M. Y., & Şirin, T. (2018). The relationship between the creativity of primary school students and moral maturity and academic achievement. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(19), 681–696. [CrossRef]
- Ergün, E., & Kurnaz, F. B. (2019). E-öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenme stilleri ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 12(2), 532–549. [CrossRef]
- Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
- Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (2000). Learning styles and strategies. Retrieved from https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/ drive/1WPAfj3j5o5ouJMiHorJ-lv6foN1C8kCN/styles.pdf
- Fisher, R. (2004). What is creativity. In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum (pp. 6–20). David Fulton Publishers.
- Friedel, C. R., & Rudd, R. D. (2006). Creative thinking and learning styles in undergraduate agriculture students. Journal of Agricultural Edu- cation, 47(4), 102–111. [CrossRef]
- Grasha, A. F., & Reichmann, S. W. (1974). A rational to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning styles scale instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213–236.
- Grasha, A. F., & Yangarber-Hicks, N. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2–10. [CrossRef]
- Grasha, T. (1990). The naturalistic approach to learning styles. College Teaching, 38(3), 106–113. [CrossRef]
- Guilford, J. P. (1973). Characteristics of creativity. Springfield. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED080171.pdf
- Gür, T., Dilci, T., & Arseven, A. (2013). opinions and evaluations of pre-ser- vice teachers in the transition from traditional approach to con- structivist approach: A discourse analysis. Black Sea International Scientific Journal, 18, 123–135.
- Heong, Y. M., othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The level of Marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125. [CrossRef]
- İkikardeş, N. Y., & Şentürk, F. (2011). The effect of learning and teaching styles on 7th grade students' mathematics achievement. Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 250–276.
- İncebacak, B. B., & Ersoy, E. (2019). Creative problem solving skills of mid- dle school students. Necatibey Education Faculty Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–24. [CrossRef]
- Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psycho- logical Reports, 63(2), 659–670. [CrossRef]
- İşleyen, T., & Küçük, B. (2013). Examining prospective teachers' level of creative thinking in terms of different variables. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 10(21), 199–208.
- Jamadar, C., & Sindhu, A. (2015). The impact of socio economic status on emotional intelligence and creativity among tribal adolescent stu- dents. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 112–125.
- Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of ındividual differ- ences, learning, and instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorp, Publishers.
- Kamışlı, H., & Özonur, M. (2019). Students' learning styles in vocational education. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 209–220.
- Kapu, H., & Baştürk, F. (2009). The place and importance of creativity tech- niques in business education. Journal of Social Economic Research, 8(16), 523–540.
- Karakuş, M. (2000). The effect of creative problem solving program on creativity levels of primary school 2nd grade students at sub-socio- economic level (Thesis Nu. 87813) [Master's thesis]. Center of the Council of Higher Education, Çukurova University-Adana.
- Karamustafaoğlu, o., Şeker, S., Şahin, H., & Denizli, Z. (2016). Examining the learning styles of secondary school students with different vari- ables. Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 51–68.
- Karasar, N. (2018). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, tech- niques. Nobel Publishing.
- Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(4), 55–60. [CrossRef]
- Kazazoğlu, S. (2013). The effect of attitude towards Turkish and English lessons on academic achievement. Education and in Science,38(170), 294–307.
- Kazu, I. Y. (2009). The effect of learning styles on education and the teach- ing process. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 85–94. [CrossRef]
- Keçeli-Kaysılı, B. (2008). Family involvement in increasing academic suc- cess. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 9(1), 69–83.
- Khalid, R., Mokhtar, A. A., Fauzee, o., M. S., Kasim, A. L., Don, Y., Abdussy- ukur, N. F., & Soh, K. G. (2013). The learning styles and academic achievements among arts and science streams student. Interna- tional Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 68–85.
- Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14. [CrossRef]
- Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2013). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory–Version 4.0. A Comprehensive Guide to the Theory, Psychometrics, Research on Validity and Educational Applications. Retrieved from https://ww w.researchgate.net.
- Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir, M., & Presley İrfan, A. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based science laboratory practices on academic achievement and scientific process skills. Elementary Education Online (Electronic), 6(3), 377–389.
- Kumar, P., Kumar, A., & Smart, K. (2004). Assessing the impact of instruc- tional methods and information technology on student learning styles. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 533–544. [CrossRef]
- Leikin, R., & Kloss, Y. (2011). Mathematical creativity of 8th and 10th grade students. In Proceedings of the 7th conference of the European Soci- ety for Research in Mathematics Educafion (pp. 1084–1093).
- Liu, H. Y. (2020). Factors affecting nursing students' creativity in Taiwan: Exploring the moderating role of creative personality. Nurse Educa- tion Today, 88, 104367. [CrossRef]
- McCabe, M. P. (1991). Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(2), 116–122. [CrossRef]
- MEB. (2018). High School Entrance System (LGS): Performance of stu- dents placed by central exam. Education Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series, 3. Retrieved from http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_ dosyalar/2018_12/17094056_2018_lgs_rapor.pdf
- MEB. (2019). Turkish lesson curriculum. Retrieved from http://mufredat .meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=663
- MEB. (2019). Central examination for secondary education institutions. Education Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series, 7. Retrieved from http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_06/24094730_2019 _ortaogretim_Kurumlarina_Iliskin_Merkezi_Sinav.pdf
- MEB. (2020). High School Entrance System (LGS): Performance of stu- dents placed by central exam. Education Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series, 13. Retrieved from http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_ dosyalar/2020_08/10084528_No14_LGS_2020_Merkezi_Sinavla_ Yerlesen_ogrencilerin_Performansi.pdf
- Mertoğlu, H., Gürdal, A., & Akgül, E. M. (2019). Constructivist approach in theory and practice. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 27, 138–158. [CrossRef]
- Moussa, N. (2014). The importance of learning styles in education. Insti- tute for Learning Styles Journal, 1(2), 19–27.
- Nami, Y., Marsooli, H., & Ashouri, M. (2014). The relationship between crea- tivity and academic achievement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 36–39. [CrossRef]
- omar, N., Mohamad, M. M., & Paimin, A. N. (2015). Dimension of learning styles and students’ academic achievement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 172–182. [CrossRef]
- Öncü, E. C. (Ed.). (2015). Creativity and its development in early childhood. Pegem Akademi.
- Özçelik, D. A. (1998). Assessment and evaluation. oSYM Publications.
- Özer, M., & Polat, A. Y. (2019). Examination of parental experiences at dif- ferent socioeconomic levels to develop creativity in the preschool period. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(3), 1309–1327.
- Özerbaş, M. A. (2011). The effect of creative thinking learning environment on academic achievement and retention of knowledge. Gazi Univer- sity Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 31(3), 675–705.
- Özmantar, M. F., Bingölbali, E., Demir, S., Sağlam, Y., & Keser, Z. (2009). Changing curricula and classroom norms. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 1–23.
- Parker, J. D. A., Creque, R. E., Barnhart, D. L., Harris, J. I., Majeski, S. A., Wood, L. M., Bond, B. J., & Hogan, M. J. (2004). Academic achievement in high school: Does emotional intelligence matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1321–1330. [CrossRef]
- Reid, G. (2005). Learning styles and inclusion. Sage Publications. Sarıtaş, E., & Süral, S. (2010). Turkish adaptation of Grasha-Reichmann Learning and Teaching Style Scales. Education Sciences, 5(4), 2162–2177.
- Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300–314. [CrossRef]
- Şen, Ö. (2018). Learning styles of secondary school 8th grade students. Journal of Mersin University Faculty of Education, 14(2), 852–862. [CrossRef]
- Shively, C. H. (2011). Grow creativity! Learning and Leading with Technol- ogy, 38(7), 10–15.
- Sığrı, U., & Gürbüz, S. (2011). The relationship between academic achieve- ment and personality: A research on university students. Journal of Defense Sciences, 10(1), 30–48.
- Sitar, A. S., Černe, M., Aleksić, D., & Mihelič, K. K. (2016). Individual learning styles and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 334–341. [CrossRef]
- Sonmaz, S. (2002). Examining the relationship between problem solving skills and creativity and intelligence [Master's Thesis]. Marmara University.
- Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338. [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Retracted article: The nature of creativity. Creativ- ity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Routledge.
- Swan, R. W., & Stavros, H. (1973). Child-rearing practices associated with the development of cognitive skills of children in low socioeconomic areas. Early Child Development and Care, 2(1), 23–38. [CrossRef]
- Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Test of creative thinking, verbal tests forms A And B (figural A& B). Scholastic Service Inc. Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom; what research says to the teacher. National Education Association.
- Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psycho- logical perspectives (pp. 43–75). Cambridge University Press.
- Tsai, K. C., & Shirley, M. (2013). Exploratory examination of relationships between learning styles and creative thinking in math students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(8), 506–519. [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M., & Geçit, Y. (2016). The effect of Collaboratıve Learnıng on Learnıng styles. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(9), 859–878. [CrossRef]
- Tüysüz, C. (2013). A case study to determine the learning styles of gifted students: The case of Kahramanmaraş. Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(7), 19–28.
- Tüysüz, C., & Tatar, E. (2008). The effect of teacher candidates' learning styles on their attitudes and achievements towards chemistry course. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sci- ences, 5(9), 97–107.
- Ulubey, o., & Toraman, C. (2015). The effect of creative drama method on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 12(32), 195–220.
- Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). Non-probability sampling. In C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. E. Smith, T. W. Smith, & Y. C. Fu (Eds.), The Sage handbook of survey methodology (pp. 329–330). Sage. Vidal, R. V. V. (2005). Creativity for operational researchers. Investigacao Operacional, 25(1), 1–24.
- Vural, L. (2013). Construct validity studies of the Grasha-Riechmann Learning Style Scale. Theory and Practice in Education,9(4), 481–496.
- Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to read- ing and writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 38–47. [CrossRef]
- Yenilmez, K., & Calışkan, S. (2011). The relationship between primary school students' multiple intelligence areas and creative thinking levels. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 17, 48–63.
- Yeşilyurt, E. (2020). Creativity and creative thinking: An inclusive compila- tion study with all dimensions and stakeholders. Opus International Journal of Society Studies, 15(25), 3874–3915. [CrossRef]
| APA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö, KARAKUŞ M (2023). Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. , 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| Chicago | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Özge,KARAKUŞ MEMET Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. (2023): 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| MLA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Özge,KARAKUŞ MEMET Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. , 2023, ss.42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| AMA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. . 2023; 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| Vancouver | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. . 2023; 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| IEEE | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M "Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School." , ss.42 - 58, 2023. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| ISNAD | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK, Özge - KARAKUŞ, MEMET. "Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School". (2023), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| APA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö, KARAKUŞ M (2023). Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. Educational academic research (Online), 48(1), 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| Chicago | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Özge,KARAKUŞ MEMET Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. Educational academic research (Online) 48, no.1 (2023): 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| MLA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Özge,KARAKUŞ MEMET Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. Educational academic research (Online), vol.48, no.1, 2023, ss.42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| AMA | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. Educational academic research (Online). 2023; 48(1): 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| Vancouver | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School. Educational academic research (Online). 2023; 48(1): 42 - 58. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| IEEE | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK Ö,KARAKUŞ M "Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School." Educational academic research (Online), 48, ss.42 - 58, 2023. 10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
| ISNAD | YÜKCÜ ÖZTÜRK, Özge - KARAKUŞ, MEMET. "Examining Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Skills, and Academic Success of Eighth-Grade Students in Middle School". Educational academic research (Online) 48/1 (2023), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUJKKEF.2023.1036120 |
