Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması

KAYA, BURCU; keleş, şerafettin

doi:10.18037/ausbd.1252422

Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması

Burcu KAYA, (Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Bölümü, Erzincan, Türkiye)

Şerafettin KELEŞ (Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Erzincan, Türkiye)

Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

25 5

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 813 - 846 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.18037/ausbd.1252422 İndeks Tarihi: 04-10-2023

Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması

Öz:

Sosyal kaynaşma, bir yerleşimde birlikte yaşayan toplulukları ortak değerler çerçevesinde yapılandırmayı, servet ve gelirdeki eşitsizlikleri azaltmayı ve genel olarak insanların ortak bir girişimde bulunma, ortak zorluklarla mücadele etme ve içinde yer aldıkları topluluğun bir parçası oldukları hissine sahip olma davranış ve duygularını ifade eder. Ülkelerin sosyal barış ve refahı için sosyal kaynaşma önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışma, göçmenlerin ve dezavantajlı grupların yoğun olarak bulunduğu Türkiye’de sosyal kaynaşma sorununa bilimsel bir çözüm önerisi geliştirmeyi amaç edinmiştir. Çalışmada, göçmen bireylerin sosyal kaynaşma düzeyleri ve sosyal kaynaşmada sosyal sermaye, pozitif psikolojik sermaye, sosyal umut ve ekonomik beklenti arasındaki ilişki hipotetik bir model oluşturularak analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik analizlerde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli metodu kullanılmıştır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli sonucu: Sosyal Kaynaşma ile Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye, Ekonomik Beklenti, Umut ve Sosyal Sermaye arasında çok yüksek oranda pozitif yönlü ilişki bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada, Ukrayna’dan Türkiye’ye zorunlu göç eden Ahıska Türklerinin bölge halkıyla yüksek düzeyde kaynaşma içerisinde olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma, Üzümlü İlçesi’ne yerleşmiş Ahıska Türküyle yürütülmüştür ve sosyal kaynaşma kapsamında, bölgesel veya ulusal düzeyde araştırmalar için bir perspektif sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelime: Sosyal Kaynaşma Sosyal Sermaye Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye Umut Ekonomik Beklenti Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

Migration and Social Cohesion: A Field Study on Meskhetian Turks Migrating to Turkey with Structural Equality Model

Öz:

Social cohesion refers to structuring communities living together in a settlement around common values, reducing inequalities in wealth and income, and generally the behaviors and feelings of people to take a joint venture, tackle common challenges, and have a sense of being a part of the community in which they belong. Social cohesion is important for the social peace and welfare of countries. This study aims to develop a scientific solution proposal to the problem of social cohesion in Turkey, where immigrants and disadvantaged groups are concentrated. In the study, the relationship between social cohesion levels of immigrant individuals and social capital, positive psychological capital, social hope and economic expectation in social cohesion was analyzed by creating a hypothetical model. Structural Equation Model method was used in empirical analysis. Structural Equation Model result: It has been determined that there is a very high positive correlation between Social Cohesion and Positive Psychological Capital, Economic Expectation, Hope and Social Capital. In the study, it was seen that Meskhetian Turks who migrated from Ukraine to Turkey had a high level of integration with the people of the region. The study was conducted with Meskhetian Turks settled in Üzümlü District and provides a perspective for research at regional or national level within the scope of social cohesion.

Anahtar Kelime: Social Cohesion Social Capital Positive Psychological Capital Hope Economic Prospect Structural Equation Modeling

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Ağaçbacak, P. M. (2019). Pozitif psikoloji bağlamında sınıf öğretmenlerinin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyleri ile özyeterlik inançları ve örgütsel bağlılık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Order No. 28241853). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2460801000). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/pozitif-psikoloji-bağlamında-sınıf/docview/2460801000/se-2
Akpınar, E. (2016). Donetsk’ten Erzincan’a: Ahıska sürgünlerinin son göçü. TÜCAUM Uluslararası Coğrafya Sempozyumu, 13-14. http://tucaum.ankara.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/280/2016/12/Int_semp_BC5.pdf
Albarosa, E., ve Elsner, B. (2022). Forced Migration, Social Cohesion and Conflict. Policy Research Working Paper 9913. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36914
Alex Linley, P., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., ve Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The journal of positive psychology, 1(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372796
Aslan, S. (2016). Türkiye’de Sosyal Sermaye Bileşenlerinden Güven Hakkında Bir Değerlendirme. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 181-204. http://esjournal.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/282722
Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., ve Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human resource management, 48(5), 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20294
Babataş, G. (2007). Beyin Göçü ve Türkiye’nin Sosyo Ekonomik Yapısının Beyin Göçüne Etkisi. Öneri Dergisi, 7(28), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.684406
Beauvais, C., ve Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research (Vol. 62). Ottawa: CPRN. https://oaresource.library.carleton.ca/cprn/12949_en.pdf
Berry, R. A., ve Soligo, R. (1969). Some welfare aspects of international migration. Journal of political economy, 77(5), 778-794. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/259562
Borjas G. (2009) Immigration in high-skill labor markets:The impact of foreign students on the earning of doctorates, in Freeman R. ve Goroff D. (eds.) Science and Engineering Careers in the United States:An Analysis of Markets and Employment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (see also NBER Working Paper 12085). https://www.nber.org/papers/w12085
Borjas, G. J. (1995). The economic benefits from immigration. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(2), 3-22. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.2.3
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory, 7(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Bowen, N. K., ve Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367621.001.0001
Burchi, F., ve Roscioli, F. (2022). Can integrated social protection programmes affect social cohesion? Mixed-methods evidence from Malawi. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(3), 1240-1263. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41287-022-00505-5
Burchi, F., Loewe, M., Malerba, D., ve Leininger, J. (2022). Disentangling the Relationship Between Social Protection and Social Cohesion:Introduction to the Special Issue. The European Journal of Development Research, 1-21. https://d-nb.info/1264757816/34
Camilleri, M. A., ve Camilleri, A. (2016). Education and social cohesion for economic growth. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(5), 617-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.995721
Chan, J., To, H. P., ve Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social indicators research, 75, 273-302. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., ve Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities:An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
Chuang, Y. C., Chuang, K. Y., ve Yang, T. H. (2013). Social cohesion matters in health. International journal for equity in health, 12(1), 1-12. Erişim adresi: https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-9276-12-87
Cole, D. A., ve Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological methods, 19(2), 300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805
Cole, J. (2014). The téléphone malgache: Transnational gossip and social transformation among Malagasy marriage migrants in France. American Ethnologist, 41(2), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12075
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/228943
Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind, New York: Scribner’s. Search in. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=bhj3dl0OnN8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=Cooley,+C.+H.+(1909).
Coppel, J., Dumont, J. C., ve Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 284. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151973
Czaika, M., ve De Haas, H. (2014). The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory?. International Migration Review, 48(2), 283-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12095
Dattalo, P. (2008). Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford university press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=f0JRDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP8&dq=Dattalo,+P.+(2008).
de Europa, C. (2001). Promoting the policy debate on social cohesion from a comparative perspective. Trends in Social Cohesion, (1). https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/Trends/Trends-01_en.pdf
Demir, R., ve Türk F. (2020). Pozitif psikoloji: Tarihçe, temel kavramlar, terapötik süreç, eleştiriler ve katkılar. Humanistic Perspective, 2(2), 108-125. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1154707
Devrisheva, K. (2019). Ahıska Türklerinin Bitmeyen Göçü. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (45), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.21563/sutad.636251
Duman, B., ve Alacahan, O. (2010). Sosyal Kaynaşma. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics ve Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 103-128. Erişim adresi: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=52e406f0-9bbf-4b3f-a709-426ee46f0c6b%40redis
Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 52-67). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315775357-6/elementary-forms-religious-life-emile-durkheim
Freud, S. (1921). Massenpsychologie und Ich-analyse. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag. https://joachimschmid.ch/docs/PAzFreudSigMasseIAn.pdf
Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 30, 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press, Chapter 9. Erişim adresi: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=j0LC6 XZtH84C&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=Fukuyama,+F.+(1995).
Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. Available at SSRN 879582. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=879582
Galabuzi, G. E. ve Teelucksingh, C. (2010). Social cohesion, social exclusion, social capital. Mississauga, ON: Region of Peel, Human Services. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alison-Taylor/publication/264704453_Migrant_Workers_and_the_Problem_of_Social_Cohesion_in_Canada/links/55f2d24408ae51c380c007cd/Migrant-Workers-and-the-Problem-of-Social-Cohesion-in-Canada.pdf
Gradstein, M. ve Justman, M. (2002). Education, social cohesion, and economic growth. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1192-1204. doi: 10.1257/00028280260344722
Green, A., ve Preston, J. (2001). Education and social cohesion: Recentering the debate. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(3-4), 247-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2001.9682001
Gürsu, O., ve Yaşar, A. Y. (2019). Pozitif psikoloji: Mutluluğun ve insanın güçlü yönlerinin bilimi. Turkish Academic Research Review, 4(4), 655-660. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/914051
Haenlein, M. ve Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding statistics, 3(4), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_4
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., ve Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67(1), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162160670011
Hann, C. M. (Ed.). (2002). Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies, and practices in Eurasia. Psychology Press. Erişim adresi:https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=VI0PcRPXtIoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Hann,+C.+M.+(Ed.).+(2002).
Hasanoğlu, İ. (2016). Ahıska Türkleri: Bitmeyen Bir Göç Hikâyesi. Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, 16(1), 1-20. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/407049
Helliwell, J. F., Bonikowska, A., ve Shiplett, H. (2016). Migration as a test of the happiness set point hypothesis: Evidence from Immigration to Canada (No. w22601). National Bureau of Economic Research. Erişim adresi: https://www.nber.org/papers/w22601
Hooghe, M. (2011). Social cohesion in contemporary societies: An update of theoretical approaches. Contemporary Theoretical Perspectives on the Study of Social Cohesion and Social Capital Brussels: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, 7-14. Erişim adresi: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1861508?limo
Hugo, G. (2008). Migration, Development and Environment. Retirved from the International Organization for Migration Geneva. Erişim adresi: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/mrs_35_1.pdf
Hulse, K., ve Stone, W. (2007). Social cohesion, social capital and social exclusion: A cross cultural comparison. Policy Studies, 28(2), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870701309049
Inglehart, R. (2020). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton university press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691011806/modernization-and-postmodernization
IOM, (2022). World Mıgratıon Report 2022. International Organization for Migration. 17 route des Morillons P.O. Box 17 1211 Geneva 19. Switzerland. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2022
Jackman, R. W., ve Miller, R. A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual review of political science, 1(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.47
Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research (pp. 109-28). Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks. http://www.cccg.umontreal.ca/pdf/cprn/cprn_f03.pdf
Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion (No. 1). Commonwealth Secretariat. https://www.socialcohesion.info/fileadmin/user_upload/Jenson_ebook.pdf
Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The counseling psychologist, 34(5), 684-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., ve Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 193-206. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.5.1.193
Kaplan, R. E., ve Kaiser, R. B. (2009). Toward a positive psychology for leaders. Linley, P. A., Harrington, S., ve Page, N. (Eds.). Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Work. New York:Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-21869-000
Katz, E., ve Stark, O. (1986). Labor migration and risk aversion in less developed countries. Journal of labor Economics, 4(1), 134-149. : https://www.jstor.org/stable/2534880
Keleş, Ş. (2021a). Attractiveness of the city, psychological and social capital:Never-ending migration from rural settlements to urban centers in Turkey. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 7(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.846777
Keleş, Ş. (2021b). The impact of economic expectation, social capital and hope on migration request and action. Journal of Life Economics, 8(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.8.1.05
Kelso, W. A. (Ed.). (1994). Poverty and the underclass:Changing perceptions of the poor in America. NYU Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/193/monograph/book/7732
Kerr: P. ve Kerr, W. R. (2011). Economic impacts of immigration:A survey. Working Paper 16736 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16736
Keskin, A., ve Keleş, Ş. (2018). Formation of the social capital by its dimensions in rural areas of Erzurum province in Turkey. Journal of Anımal and Plant Sciences, 28(6). Erişim adresi: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-28-06/38.pdf
Kleist, N. (2016). Introduction:Studying hope and uncertainty in African migration. In Hope and uncertainty in contemporary African migration (pp. 1-20). Routledge. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/48483/1/9781317335481.pdf#page=16
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9f61/4aefcc38de8aa425a190560055dff40fabed.pdf
Koppenberg, S. (2012). Where do forced migrants stand in the migration and development debate. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 2(1), 77-90. Erişim adresi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286269512.pdf
Kutanis, R. Ö. ve Yildiz, E. (2014). Pozitif Psikoloji ile Pozitif Örgütsel Davranış İlişkisi ve Pozitif Örgütsel Davranış Boyutları Üzerine Bir Değerleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 5(11), 135-154. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/213872
Lecture, E. J. H. M. (1996). Social Dimensions of Economic Growth. Eric J. Hanson Memorial Lecture, University of Alberta. Erişim adresi: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf& doi=319afee86064c12c6b3f53aa86b2351f4fac6af9
Leininger, J., Burchi, F., Fiedler, C., Mross, K., Nowack, D., von Schiller, A., ... ve Ziaja, S. (2021). Social cohesion: A new definition and a proposal for its measurement in Africa (No. 31/2021). Discussion Paper. . Erişim adresi: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/247791/1/1780471599.pdf
Letki, N. (2008). Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in British neighbourhoods. Political Studies, 56(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.0069
Loewe, M. (2020). Community effects of cash-for-work programmes in Jordan:supporting social cohesion, more equitable gender roles and local economic development in contexts of flight and migration. DIE Studies, 102. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227755/1/1742820344.pdf
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., ve Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital:Beyond human and social capital. University of Nebraska. Erişim adresi: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151vecontext=managementfacpub.
Mouratidis, K. ve Poortinga, W. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103951
Münz, R., Straubhaar, T., Vadean, F. P. ve Vadean, N. (2006). The costs and benefits of European immigration (No. 3). HWWI Policy Report. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/46220/1/662820886.pdf
Oxoby, R. (2009). Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion, and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(12), 1133-1152. Erişim adresi: https://contacts.ucalgary.ca/info/econ/files/info/unitis/publications/162-34166/UnderstandingSocial Inclusion-Oxoby.pdf
Palloni, A., Massey, D. S., Ceballos, M., Espinosa, K., ve Spittel, M. (2001). Social capital and international migration: A test using information on family networks. American journal of sociology, 106(5), 1262-1298. Erişim adresi: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/320817
Parkinson, M. ve Moores, L. J. (2007). Social cohesion in English cities: Policy, progress and prospects. IzR, 6, 363-370. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Parkinson/publication/352020203_Social_Cohesion_in_English_Cities/links/60b605ff92851cde88477e66/Social-Cohesion-in-English-Cities.pdf
Pine, F. (2014). Migration as hope:space, time, and imagining the future. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), 95-104. Erişim adresi: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/676526
Polgreen, L. A., ve Simpson, N. B. (2011). Happiness and international migration. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 819-840. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-010-9229-3
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital:Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual review of sociology, 24(1), 1-24. Erişim adresi: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Portes, A. ve Landolt, P. (2000). Social capital:promise and pitfalls of its role in development. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(2), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00005836
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. Erişim adresi: http://mktgsensei.com/AMAE/Consumer%20Behavior/bowlingalone.pdf
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone:The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.261
Raykov, T. ve Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_7
Raykov, T. ve Marcoulides, G. A. (2012). A first course in structural equation modeling. Routledge. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=K-pkAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq= Raykov,+T.,+ve+Marcoulides,+G.+A.+(2012)
Sahota, G. S. (1968). An economic analysis of internal migration in Brazil. Journal of political economy, 76(2), 218-245. Erişim adresi: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/259395
Schwartz, J. (1991). The moral environment of the poor. The Public Interest, 103, 21. Erişim adresi: https://www.proquest.com/openview/8983947c80b1bd2748bb805f7bdf4b99/1?cbl=1817076&pq-origsite=gscholar
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness:Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster. Erişim adresi: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=3L0BCCoFMRgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Seligman,+M.+E.+(2002).
Seligman, M. E. ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 5). Erişim adresi: https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2000-13324-001
Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N. ve Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress:empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs Stanford University Press. Stanford. Erişim adresi: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=TYnI9tbHkCEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Simon,+H.+A.+(1983).
Stajkovic, A. D. ve Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and task performance in organizations:conceptual background, meta analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel psychology, 56(1), 155-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00147.x
Stanley, D. (2003). What do we know about social cohesion:The research perspective of the federal government's social cohesion research network. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341872
Strang, A. ve Ager, A. (2010). Refugee integration:Emerging trends and remaining agendas. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq046
Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allynve Bacon. Pearson Education. Erişim adresi: http://bayes.acs.unt.edu:8083/BayesContent/class/Jon/ResourcesWkshp/ 2001_TabachnickFidell_Ch4.pdf
Tanrısevdi, F., Durdu, İ. ve Tanrısevdi, A. (2019). Beyin Göçü mü? Beyin Gücü mü?. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, (14), 133-158. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1409060
Tocqueville, A. D. (1836). Political and Social Condition of France. London and Westminster Review, 3, 137-169. Erişim adresi: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=_TI0p05Q i98C&oi=fnd&pg=PP10&dq=Tocqueville,+A.+D.+(1836).
Tversky, A. ve Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice:A reference-dependent model. The quarterly journal of economics, 106(4), 1039-1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956
Veen, E. J., Bock, B. B., Van den Berg, W., Visser, A. J. ve Wiskerke, J. S. (2016). Community gardening and social cohesion:different designs, different motivations. Local Environment, 21(10), 1271-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1101433
Vigh, H. (2009). Wayward migration:On imagined futures and technological voids. Ethnos, 74(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751220
Wetson, R., ve Gore Jr, P. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation model. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
Wickramasinghe, A. A. I. N. ve Wimalaratana, W. (2016). International migration and migration theories. Social Affairs, 1(5), 13-32. Erişim adresi: http://socialaffairsjournal.com/Achive/Fall_2016/2.International%20Migration%20and%20Migration%20Theories_A.A.I.N.Wickramasinghe_W.%20Wimalaratane_SAJ%201(5).pdf
Wilson, W. J. (1991). Another look at the truly disadvantaged. Political science quarterly, 106(4), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151797
Woolcock, M. (2000). Why should we care about social capital?. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, (98), 17-19. Erişim adresi: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/agispt.20010800
World Bank (1998). The Initiative of Defining, Monitoring and Measuring Social Capital: Overview and program description, Social Capital Initiative. Working Paper No. 1, the World Bank, Washington DC. Erişim adresi: http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/wkrppr/wrkppr.htm
Yavuz, Y. (2021). Bir Denge Arayışı:Sosyal Kaynaşma Ve Avrupa Birliği İncelemesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 419-453. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.753856
Yilmaz, A., ve Mustafa, R. (2014). 1992 sonrası Türkiye’ye göçen Ahıska Türklerinin göç, iskân ve uyum sorunlarına ilişkin bir araştırma, Bursa örneği. Studies of The Ottoman Domain (Osmanlı Hakimiyet Sahası Çalışmaları), 4(6), 1-19. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ohsc/issue/11015/131744
Zetter, R. (2015). Protection in crisis: Forced migration and protection in a global era. Migration Policy Institute. Erişim adresi: https://domide.colmex.mx/Archivos/Doc_6707.pdf
Zhou, M., ve Bankston III, C. L. (1994). Social capital and the adaptation of the second generation:The case of Vietnamese youth in New Orleans. International Migration Review, 28(4), 821-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839402800409

APA	KAYA B, keleş ş (2023). Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. , 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
Chicago	KAYA BURCU,keleş şerafettin Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. (2023): 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
MLA	KAYA BURCU,keleş şerafettin Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. , 2023, ss.813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
AMA	KAYA B,keleş ş Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. . 2023; 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
Vancouver	KAYA B,keleş ş Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. . 2023; 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
IEEE	KAYA B,keleş ş "Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması." , ss.813 - 846, 2023. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
ISNAD	KAYA, BURCU - keleş, şerafettin. "Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması". (2023), 813-846. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1252422

APA	KAYA B, keleş ş (2023). Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
Chicago	KAYA BURCU,keleş şerafettin Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23, no.3 (2023): 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
MLA	KAYA BURCU,keleş şerafettin Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.23, no.3, 2023, ss.813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
AMA	KAYA B,keleş ş Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023; 23(3): 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
Vancouver	KAYA B,keleş ş Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023; 23(3): 813 - 846. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
IEEE	KAYA B,keleş ş "Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması." Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, ss.813 - 846, 2023. 10.18037/ausbd.1252422
ISNAD	KAYA, BURCU - keleş, şerafettin. "Göç ve Sosyal Kaynaşma: Türkiye’ye Göç Eden Ahıska Türkleri Üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Bir Alan Çalışması". Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23/3 (2023), 813-846. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1252422