Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 73 - 84 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14686/buefad.993603 İndeks Tarihi: 31-10-2023
Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy
Öz: This study aimed to determine the effect of technology use of university students studying in the field of health on their digital reading self-efficacy according to different variables, in this study. The survey model was determined to be suitable for the research and the data were obtained by convenience sampling method. The sample group consists of 461 (372 female-89 male) students studying at Sivas Cumhuriyet University. The research data were obtained by applying the "Reliability of the Technology Usage Scale" and the "Digital Reading Self-Efficacy Scale". Descriptive statistics, independent groups t-test, ANOVA, Tukey, CFA, and SEM techniques were used in the analysis of the data obtained. It was determined that students' technology use levels differed significantly in terms of internet usage time, digital reading self-efficacy in terms of grade level, and branch according to the research findings. In addition, it was determined that students' technology use levels had a positive effect on their digital reading self-efficacy levels and predicted all their factors.
Anahtar Kelime: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Teknoloji Kullanım Düzeylerinin Dijital Okuma Öz-Yeterlikleri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Belirlenmesi
Öz: Bu araştırmada sağlık alanında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin teknolojiyi kullanma düzeylerinin dijital okuma öz-yeterlikleri üzerindeki etki düzeyinin belirlenmesi, farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın modeli olarak tarama modeli benimsenmiş olup veriler kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Örneklem grubu Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinde sağlık alanında öğrenim gören 461 (372 kadın-89 erkek) öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma verileri Zincirkıran ve Tiftik (2014) tarafından geliştirilen “Teknoloji Kullanım Ölçeği” ve Akkaya ve Çıvğın (2020) tarafından geliştirilen “Dijital Okuma Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeği” uygulanarak elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız gruplar t testi, ANOVA, Tukey, DFA ve YEM teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre; öğrencilerin teknoloji kullanım düzeylerinin internet kullanım süresi, dijital okuma öz-yeterliklerinin sınıf düzeyi, branş ve internet kullanım süresi değişkenleri açısından anlamlı farklılık gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin teknoloji kullanım düzeylerinin dijital okuma öz-yeterlik düzeyleri üzerinde pozitif yönde etkisi olduğu ve tüm faktörlerini yordadığı saptanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akkaya, N., & Çıvğın, H. (2020). Dijital okuma öz yeterlilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Digital reading self-efficacy scale: Validity and reliability study]. Güneş, F. and Işık, AD (Ed.), In Entrepreneurship and Innovation (pp. 20-29). Sınırsız Eğitim ve Araştırma Derneği Yayınları.
- Aksoy, C. (2018). Measuring the validity and reliability of the technology usage scale: A research on university students. OPUS-International Journal of Society Researches, 8(15), 1111-1131. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.419032
- Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Fornell, C. (1982). Theoretical concepts, measurement, and meaning. Vol. 2, C. Fornell (Ed.) In a second generation of multivariate analysis, (pp. 5-23). Chicago.
- Bloom, B. S. (1979). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme [Human qualities and learning at school. (Çev. Durmuş Ali Özçelik). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayını.
- Bozpolat, E., & Arslan, A. (2018). Preservice teachers’ views about the course teaching technologies and material design. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 60-84. https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.4639
- Clever, A. G., & Scarisbrick, D. H. (2001). Practical statistics and experimental design for plant and crop science. Jon Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Dargut, T., & Çelik, G. (2014). Pre-service Turkish language teachers’ attitudes and thoughts toward use of technology in education. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergis/Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 2(2), 28-41.
- Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT journal, 51(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
- Güneş, F. (2016). Kâğıttan ekrana okuma alanındaki gelişmeler [From paper to screen developments in the field of reading]. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v5i1.5000155474
- Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi [Structural equation modeling with AMOS]. (First Edition). Seçkin.
- İmren, M., & Tekman, H. G. (2020). The relationship between information and the level of communication technology use, motivations and cognitive abilities. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 35(86). https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320190717m000021
- İşeri, K. (1998). Educational function of reading. Language Journal, 70, 5-18.
- Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques]. (6. Edition). Asil.
- Karasakaloğlu, N., Saracaloğlu, A. S., & Uça, S. (2011). Türkçe öğretmenlerinin teknoloji tutumları ile bilgi teknolojilerini kullanma düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of Turkish teachers' technology attitudes and their level of using information technologies]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 7(2), 26-36.
- Katrancı, M., & Uygun, M. (2013). Classroom teacher’s perspectives about using technology in Turkish lessons. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Special Issue of Education of Turkish Language, 6(11), 773-797. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.460
- Kayri, M. (2009). The multiple comparison (post-hoc) techniques to determine the difference between groups in researches. Journal of Social Science, 19(1), 51-64.
- Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Redearch, 32(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
- Odabaş, H. (2017). Kitap okumadan dijital okumaya: okuma kültüründe ve davranışında gözlemlenen değişimler [From book reading to digital reading: observed changes in reading culture and behavior]. In the effects of Information Technologies on information centers and services. (pp. 272-292). Hiperyayın.
- Odabaş, H., Odabaş, Z. Y., & Sevmez, H. (2018). Dıgıtal / e-book readıng culture ın unıversıty students: Selçuk Unıversıty sample. Ankara University the Journal of Languages, History-Geography, 58(1), 139-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.1.8
- Öksüz, C., & Karakoç, Ş. A. (2010). A validity and reliability study of the level of technology use scale in mathematics lessons at elementary school level. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(32), 372-383.
- Özen, Y., & Gül, A. (2007). Population-sampling issue on social and educational research studies. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 15, 394-422.
- Seyitoğulları O., & Yalçınsoy A. (2016). Günümüz gençliğinin inovasyon ve teknoloji algılarına yönelik ampirik bir araştırma [An empirical research on the perceptıons of innovation and technology of today's youth]. International Journal of Social Academia, 1(1), 13-23.
- Şahenk-Erkan, S. S., & Dağal, A. B. (2018). Evaluating the teacher candidates’ views on their own digital reading, writing and presentation skills. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.21733/ibad.373767
- Ulu, H., & Zelzele, E. B. (2018). Investigation of screen reading perceptions self efficacy pre-service teachers. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture and Education (TEKE), 7(4), 2608-2628.
- Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Literacy 2.0, 66(6), 32–37. https://www.mbaea.org/media/documents/Educational_Leadership_Article_The__D87FE2BC4E7AD.pdf
- Yalın, H. İ. (2003). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Nobel.
- Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Detay.
- Yıldız, N., & Keskin, H. (2016). The evaluation of adolescent students attitudes’ towards to digital and printed reading according to various variables. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 344- 361. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.82485
- Yılmaz, M., Üredi, L., & Akbaşlı, S. (2015). The identification of preservice teachers’ level of computer competency and their perception of technology use in teaching. International Journal of Humanities and Education (IJHE), 1(1), 105-121.
- Zincirkıran, M., & Tiftik, H. (2014). Innovation or technological mad-ness? a research on the students of business administration for their preferences of innovation and technology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(2), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i2/65
| APA | ARSLAN A (2023). Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. , 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| Chicago | ARSLAN AYSEL Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. (2023): 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| MLA | ARSLAN AYSEL Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. , 2023, ss.73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| AMA | ARSLAN A Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. . 2023; 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| Vancouver | ARSLAN A Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. . 2023; 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| IEEE | ARSLAN A "Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy." , ss.73 - 84, 2023. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| ISNAD | ARSLAN, AYSEL. "Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy". (2023), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| APA | ARSLAN A (2023). Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| Chicago | ARSLAN AYSEL Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12, no.1 (2023): 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| MLA | ARSLAN AYSEL Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.12, no.1, 2023, ss.73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| AMA | ARSLAN A Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 12(1): 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| Vancouver | ARSLAN A Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 12(1): 73 - 84. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| IEEE | ARSLAN A "Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy." Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, ss.73 - 84, 2023. 10.14686/buefad.993603 |
| ISNAD | ARSLAN, AYSEL. "Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self- Efficacy". Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12/1 (2023), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.993603 |
