ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

KOÇOĞLU, Ramazan; ŞAHİN, Kader TAN

ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Kader Tan ŞAHİN, (Doç. Dr., Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, İİBF, İşletme Bölümü,)

Ramazan KOÇOĞLU (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, SBE,)

Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

9 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 7 - 32 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Öz:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ülkelerin ulusal iş sistemlerinin, önemli bir kurumsal yönetim mekanizması olarak bilinen yönetim kurulu yapılarında nasıl bir farklılık ortaya koyacağını araştırmaktır. Bununla birlikte bu mekanizmalar arasında bir yakınsama veya ıraksama olup olmadığını ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışmada, Whitley (2000)'in çalışmasında yer alan "Ulusal İş Sistemleri" yaklaşımı ile yönetim kurulu yapısı incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Ülkelerin kurumsal yönetim mekanizmalarının kendi ulusal iş sistemlerinden etkilendiği ve farklı iş sistemlerinde farklı kurumsal yönetim mekanizmalarının oluştuğu görülmektedir. Sonuç olarak, ülkelerarası kurumsal yönetim mekanizmalarının yakınsamasının oldukça sınırlı olduğu ileri sürülebilir

Anahtar Kelime:

THE DIFFERENCES OF BOARD STRUCTURE IN NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF USA, GERMANY, JAPAN, TAIWAN AND TURKEY

Öz:

The purpose of this study is to investigate how national business systems show differences in board of directors from corporate governance mechanisms. At the same time the study reveals whether there is a convergence or divergence between these mechanisms. In this study, Whitley’s (2000) “national business systems” approach with board variables and ownership structure variables affecting the board was investigated. For this purpose a content analysis was conducted. Countries corporate governance mechanisms are being affected by their own national business systems and shows that they are subject to different corporate governance mechanisms in different business systems. As a result, convergence of transnational corporate governance mechanisms is argued to be quite limited

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Abe, N. & Jung, T. (2004). Cross-Shareholdings, Outside Directors, and Managerial Turnover: The Case of Japan, Hitotsubashi University Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series, (38).
Abe, N. & Shimizutani, S. (2007). Employment Policy and Corporate Governance-An Empirical Comparison of the Stakeholder and the Profit-Maximization Model, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(2), 346-368.
Adams, R.B. & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank Board Structure and Performance: Evidence for Large Bank Holding Companies, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243-267.
Aguilera, R.V. (2005). Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: An Institutional Comparative Perspective, British Journal of Management, 16(1), 39-53.
Aman, H. & Nguyen, P. (2012). The Size and Composition of Corporate Boards in Japan, Asian Business & Management, 11(4), 425-444.
Ampenberger, M., Schmid, T., Achleitner, A. K., & Kaserer, C. (2013). Capital Structure Decisions in Family Firms: Empirical Evidence from a Bank-Based Economy, Review of Managerial Science, 7(3), 247-275
Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt, Journal of Financial economics, 68(2), 263-285.
Anderson, R.C. & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1327.
Anderson, R.C. & Reeb, D.M. (2004). Board Composition: Balancing Family İnfluence in S&P 500 Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237.
Andres, C.(2008). Large Shareholders and Firm Performance—An Empirical Examination of Founding-Family Ownership, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431-445.
Andres, P.D, Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197-210.
Andres, P.D. & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate Governance in Banking: The Role of the Board of Directors, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570-2580.
Angbazo, L. & Narayanan, R. (1997). Top Management Compensation and the Structure of the Board of Directors in Commercial Banks, European Finance Review, 1(2), 239-259.
Ararat, M., Orbay, H., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2010). The Effects of Board İndependence in Controlled Firms: Evidence from Turkey. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1663403.
Arslan, Ö., Karan, M.B. & Ekşi, C. (2010). Board Structure and Corporate Performance, Managing Global Transitions, 8(1), 3-22.
Aygün, M. & İç, S. (2010). Genel Müdürün Aynı Zamanda Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Olması Firma Performansını Etkiler mi?, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 47, 192-201.
Aygün, M., İç, S. & Sayın, C. (2011). Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğünü Belirleyen Faktörler ve Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Türk Sermaye Piyasası Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 77- 92.
Balsmeier, B., Buchwald, A. & Peters, H. (2011). Outside Board Memberships of CEOs: Expertise or Entrenchment?, DICE discussion paper, No. 26.
Bebenroth, R. & Donghao, L. (2007). Performance İmpact at the Board Level: Corporate Governance in Japan, Asian Business & Management, 6(3), 303-326.
Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201-221.
Bermig, A. & Frick, B. (2010). Board Size, Board Composition, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Germany (June 10, 2010), dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1623103
Bhagat, S. & Black, B. (2000). Board İndependence and Long-Term Firm Performance, Unpublished Paper, University of Colorado.
Block, J. (2010). Family Management, Family Ownership, and Downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 Firms, Family Business Review, 23(2), 109–130.
Boone, A.L., Field, L.C., Karpoff, J.M. & Raheja, C.G. (2007). The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.
Byrd, J.W. & Hickman, K.A. (1992). Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers?: Evidence from Tender Offer Bids, Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195-221.
Carney, R.W. & Child, T. B. (2013). Changes to the Ownership and Control of East Asian Corporations between 1996 and 2008: The Primacy of Politics, Journal of Financial Economics, 107(2), 494-513.
Chen, E. & Nowland, J. (2010). Optimal Board Monitoring in Family-owned Companies: Evidence from Asia, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 3-17.
Chen, H.& Hsu, W-T. (2009). Family Ownership, Board İndependence, and R&D Investment”, Family Business Review, 22(4), 347-362.
Chen, M-Y. (2014). Determinants of Corporate Board Structure in Taiwan, International Review of Economics & Finance, 32, 62-78.
Cheng, S. (2008). Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157-176.
Cheng, S., Evans III, J.H. & Nagarajan, N.J. (2008). Board Size and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31(2), 121-145.
Chiang, H-T. (2005). An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance, Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), 95-101.
Chiang, H-T. & Lin, M-C. (2010). Board Composition and Firm Performance, Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings, 5(2), 185-193
Chou, H-I. & Hamill, P.A. (2010). What Influences Independent Board Member Appointments when Ownership is Concentrated? (30 Nisan 2014). doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599122.
Chu, W. (2011). Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Influence of Family Management, Family Control, and Firm Size, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 833-851.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S. & Lang, L.H.P. (2000). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81-112.
Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D. & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does One Size Fit All?, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-356.
Çatıkkaş, Ö. & Alpaslan, H.İ. (2013). Aracı Kurumlarda Denetim Komitesinin Etkinliği”, Mali Çö- züm Dergisi, sayı 115, 31-58.
Çıtak, L. (2006). Kurumsal Yönetim Sistemlerinde Yakınsama, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 145-172.
Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O. & McConnell, J.J. (2008). Dominant Shareholders, Corporate Boards, and Corporate Value: A Cross-Country Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73-100.
Dashti, G.S. (2013). Corporate Governance Practices in Turkey: Board Structure and Gender Issues, (Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ)).
Davidson, W.N. & Rowe, W. (2004). Intertemporal Endogeneity in Board Composition and Financial Performance, Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(4), 49-60.
Demirag, İ. & Serter M. (2003). Ownership Patterns and Control in Turkish Listed Companies, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(1), 40-51.
Denis, D.J. & Sarin, A. (1999). Ownership and Board Structures in Publicly Traded Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 52(2), 187-223.
Desender, K.A., Aguilera, R.V., Crespi, R. (2011). Foreign Ownership and Corporate Governance Patterns: The Board-Auditor Relationship in Japan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Doğan, M., Elitaş, B.L. & Nacar, R. (2013a). The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Performance of Insurance Firms: Evidence from Turkey, International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS’13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo.
Doğan, M., Elitaş, B.L., Ağca, V. & Ögel, S. (2013b). The Impact of CEO Duality on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2), 149-155.
Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J.G. & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are Outside Directors Effective?, Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195-214.
Elitaş, C., Ağca, V. & Aydemir, O. (2009). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı, İşleyişi ve Performans İlişkisi: Ege Bölgesi Örneği, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 42: 103-116.
Ferreira, D., Kirchmaier, T. & Metzger, D. (2011). Boards of Banks”, Axa Working Paper Series No 6 Discussion Paper No 664, ISSN 0956-8549-664.
Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y-C. & Piesse, J. (2005). Corporate Governance and Performance in Publicly Listed, Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(3), 257-283.
Gökşen, N. S., & Üsdiken, B. 2001. Uniformity and diversity in Turkish business groups: Effects of scale and time of founding. British Journal of Management, 12: 325-340.
Gürünlü, M. (2009). The Evolution of Corporate Governance Mechanisms after Going Public: Evidence from Turkish Panel Data, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), 59-82.
Hanson, R.C. & Song, M.H. (2000). Managerial Ownership, Board Structure, and the Division of Gains in Divestitures, Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(1), 55-70.
Hermalin, B.E. & Weisbach, M.S. (1988). The Determinants of Board Composition, The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589-606.
Jiang, Y. & Peng, M.W. (2011). Are Family Ownership and Control in Large Firms Good, Bad, or İrrelevant?, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 15-39.
Kaymak, T. & Bektas, E. (2008). East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 550-561.
Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375-400.
Koke, J.F., Dherment-Ferere, I. & Renneboog, L. (2001). Corporate Monitoring by Blockholders in Europe: Empirical Evidence of Managerial Disciplining in Belgium, France, Germany and the UK (May 15, 2001). ZEW Discussion Paper No. 01-24. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.358286.
Krivogorsky, V. (2006). Ownership, Board Structure, and Performance in Continental Europe, The International Journal of Accounting, 41(2), 176-197.
Krüger, P. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Board of Directors, Job Market Paper, Toulouse School of Economics, France.
Kula, V. (2005). The İmpact of the Roles, Structure and Process of Boards on Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 265-276.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Sılanes, F. & Shleifer, A. (1999), Corporate Ownership around the World, The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
Li, J. (1994). Ownership Structure and Board Composition: A Multi-Country Test of Agency Theory Predictions, Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 359-368.
Li, L. & Song, F.M. (2009). Bank Regulation and Board Independence: A Cross Country Analysis.
Unpublished working paper, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lin, C-Y., Chen, Y-S., & Yen, J-F. (2014). On the Determinant of Bank Loan Contracts: The Roles of Borrowers’ Ownership and Board Structures”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2014.04.005.
Lin, T-H., Lin, C-C., Cheng, Y. & Lee, W-L. (2009). Asset Impairment and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Finance Industry, Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(2), 411-419.
Linck, J.S., Netter, J.M. & Yang, T. (2008). The Determinants of Board Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308-328.
McCahery, J.A. & Vermeulen, E.P.M. (2014). Understanding the Board of Directors after the Financial Crisis: Some Lessons for Europe, Journal of Law and Society, 41(1), 121-151.
Miller, D., Breton-Miller, L., & Lester, R.H. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly-traded companies, Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 201-223.
Milne, M.J. & Adler, R.W. (1999). Exploring the Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.
Nakano, M. & Nguyen, P. (2012). Board Size and Corporate Risk Taking: Further Evidence from Japan, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 369-387.
Nas, T.İ., Şahin, K.T., & Tarhan, O. (2013). Kurumsal Yönetim ve Çokuluslu İşletmelerin Strateji Tercihleri, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(4).
Nasir, S. (2005). The Development, Change, and Transformation of Management Information Systems (MIS): A Content Analysis of Articles Published in Business and Marketing Journals, International Journal of İnformation Management, 25(5), 442-457.
Okazaki, S. (2004). Do Multinationals Standardise or Localise? The Cross-Cultural Dimensionality of Product-Based Web Sites, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 14(1), 81–94.
Öktem, Ö.Y. & Üsdiken, B. (2010). Contingencies versus External Pressure: Professionalization in Boards of Firms Affiliated to Family Business Groups in Late-Industrializing Countries, British Journal of Management, 21(1), 115-130.
Özen, Ş. (2002). Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin Türkiye’de Yeniden Kurgulanması: Koşul Bağımlı Türdeşleşme Tezinin Bir Testi, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 35(1), 105-142.
Öztürk, M.B., Demirgüneş, K. (2008). Kurumsal Yönetim Bakış açısıyla Entellektüel Sermaye, Sel- çuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 395-411.
Peng, M.W. & Jiang, Y. (2010). Institutions Behind Family Ownership and Control in Large Firms, Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 253-273.
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility, Business & Society, 50(1), 189-223.
Reeb, D. & Upadhyay, A. (2010). Subordinate Board Structures, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 469-486.
Sakawa, H., Watanabel, N., & Ben-Zion, U. (2009). Relation between board composition and firm performance in Japan, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 7(3), 38-41.
Sargut, A.S. & Özen, Ş. (2010). Örgüt Kuramları (2.Baskı), Ankara, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
Selekler-Gökşen, N.N. & Öktem, Ö.Y. (2009). Countervailing İnstitutional Forces: Corporate Governance in Turkish Family Business Groups, Journal of Management & Governance, 13(3), 193-213.
Sheu, D-F. & Lin, H-S. (2007). Impact of Venture Capital on Board Composition and Ownership Structure of Companies: An Empirical Study, International Joumal of Management, 24(3), 573-581.
Shiah-Hou, S-H. & Cheng, C-W. (2012). Outside Director Experience, Compensation, and Performance, Managerial Finance, 38(10), 914-938.
Solomon, J. F., Lin, S. W., Norton, S. D., & Solomon, A. (2003). Corporate governance in Taiwan: Empirical evidence from Taiwanese company directors, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 235-248.
S.S.B.I. (2008). https://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI_ 08.pdf (04 Ağustos 2014).
S.S.B.I. (2011). https://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI_ 2011 _final.pdf (05 Ağustos 2014).
S.S.B.I.(2012). Japon Board Index, https://www.spencerstuart.jp/~/media /PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/Japan-Board-Index-ENGLISH-Spencer-Stuart-7May13.pdf (10 Ağustos 2014).
S.S.B.I. (2013).https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media/PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/SSBI13%20revised%2023DEC2013.pdf (07 Ağustos 2014).
S.S.B.I.(2013). Japon Board Index, https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media /PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/SSBI_Eng2013_14April2014.pdf (11 Eylül 2014).
Şahin, K.T., Nas, T.İ. & Uzun, A. (2011a). İş Sistemlerinde ve Kurumsal Yönetişim Uygulamalarında Yakınsama-Iraksama Tartışması: Makro ve Mikro Bakış Açısı, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1).
Şahin, K., Basfirinci, C. S., & Ozsalih, A. (2011b). The İmpact of Board Composition on Corporate Financial and Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Public-Listed Companies in Turkey, African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2959.
Şener, İ. (2011). Örgütsel Çevre Bağlamında Yönetim Kurulları ve Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerinin Özelliklerinin Örgüt Performansına Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Şener, İ. (2012). Halka açık aile işletmelerinin yönetim kurullarında meydana gelen değişimler, 5. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi, 13-14 Nisan 2012, İstanbul.
Şener, İ. & Elçi, M. (2009). Board Composition of Turkish Listed Companies: Is There any Difference between Industries?, Journal of Global Strategic Management, 3(2): 92-105.
Şener, İ., Varoğlu, A., & Aren, S. (2011). Board composition and organizational performance: environmental characteristics matter, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1481-1493.
Tanaka, T. (2014). Corporate Governance and the Cost of Public Debt Financing: Evidence from Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jjie.2014.03.002.
Topal, Y. & Doğan, M. (2014). Impact of Board Size on Financial Performance: The Case of BIST Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER), 5(4), 74-79.
Tufano, P. & Sevick, M. (1997). Board Structure and Fee-Setting in the US Mutual Fund İndustry, Journal of Financial Economics, 46(3), 321-355.
Tüngler, G. (2000). The Anglo-American Board of Directors and the German Supervisory Board-Marionettes in a Puppet Theatre of Corporate Governance or Efficient Controlling Devices?, Bond Law Review, 12(2), 7.
TÜSİAD (2002). Kurumsal Yönetim En İyi Uygulama Kodu: Yönetim Kurulunun Yapısı ve İşleyişi”, Yayın No. TÜSİAD-T/2002-12/336.
Üsdiken, B. & Öktem, Ö.Y. (2008). Kurumsal Ortamda Değişim ve Büyük Aile Holdingleri Bünyesinde Şirketlerin Yönetim Kurullarında “İcrada Görevli Olmayan” ve “Bağımsız Üyeler”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41(1), 43-71.
Van Essen, M., Van Oosterhout, J.H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate Boards and the Performance of Asian Firms: A Meta-Analysis, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 873-905.
Whitley, R.D. (1990). Eastern Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of Business Organization, Organization Studies, 11(1), 47-74.
Whitley, R.D. (1991). The social construction of business systems in East Asia, Organization Studies, 12(1), 1-28.
Whitley, R.D. (2000). The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies, Organization Studies, 21(5), 855-886.
Yamak, S., Ertuna, B. & Bolak, M. (2006). Sahiplik Dağılımının Birleşik Liderlik Yapısı Üzerine Etkileri, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (1-2): 85-105.
Yang, Y-J., Chen, J., Kweh, Q.L. & Chen, H.C. (2013). Ownership Structure and Efficiency in Taiwanese Electronics Firms, Review of Accounting and Finance, 12(4), 351-368.
Yayla, A.A. & Hu, Q. (2014). The Effect of Board of Directors’ IT Awareness on CIO Compensation and Firm Performance, Decision Sciences, 45(3), 401-436.
Yeh, C.M. (2013). Board Governance and Tourism Firms’ Performance: The Case of Taiwan, Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 14(2), 123-141.
Yeh, Y-H. & Woidtke, T. (2005). Commitment or Entrenchment?: Controlling Shareholders and Board Composition, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1857-1885.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors, Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.
Zahra, S.A. (2003). International Expansion of US Manufacturing Family Businesses: The Effect of Ownership and İnvolvement, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495-512.

APA	ŞAHİN K, KOÇOĞLU R (2016). ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. , 7 - 32.
Chicago	ŞAHİN Kader TAN,KOÇOĞLU Ramazan ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. (2016): 7 - 32.
MLA	ŞAHİN Kader TAN,KOÇOĞLU Ramazan ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. , 2016, ss.7 - 32.
AMA	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. . 2016; 7 - 32.
Vancouver	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. . 2016; 7 - 32.
IEEE	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R "ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI." , ss.7 - 32, 2016.
ISNAD	ŞAHİN, Kader TAN - KOÇOĞLU, Ramazan. "ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI". (2016), 7-32.

APA	ŞAHİN K, KOÇOĞLU R (2016). ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 0(11), 7 - 32.
Chicago	ŞAHİN Kader TAN,KOÇOĞLU Ramazan ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 0, no.11 (2016): 7 - 32.
MLA	ŞAHİN Kader TAN,KOÇOĞLU Ramazan ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.0, no.11, 2016, ss.7 - 32.
AMA	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016; 0(11): 7 - 32.
Vancouver	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016; 0(11): 7 - 32.
IEEE	ŞAHİN K,KOÇOĞLU R "ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI." Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 0, ss.7 - 32, 2016.
ISNAD	ŞAHİN, Kader TAN - KOÇOĞLU, Ramazan. "ULUSAL İŞ SİSTEMLERİNDE YÖNETİM KURUL YAPISI FARKLILIKLARI: ABD, ALMANYA, JAPONYA, TAYVAN VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI". Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11 (2016), 7-32.