Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 51 - 61 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels

Öz:
Problematic Internet use has been assessed as a significant factor that negatively affects people’s lives, and it is increasing to worrying levels. This study aims to investigate the differences in problematic Internet use based on depression, anxiety, and stress levels among late adolescent university students. The research group for the study is comprised of 543 university students, 378 females (69.6%) and 154 males (28.4%); 11 people’s gender was undetermined (2%). The ages of students in the research group ranged from 17 to 28 with a mean age of 18.49 (SD = 1.06). The Problematic Internet Use Scale; Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, and a personal information form were used to collect data. The results show that problematic Internet use behaviors vary depending on depression, anxiety, and stress levels. As depression, anxiety, and stress levels increase, problematic Internet use increases. The results are discussed in light of the literature, and recommendations have been made for researchers and professionals working in the field of mental health
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akın, A., & Çetin, B. (2007). The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS): The study of validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7, 241–268.
  • Akın, A., & Iskender, M. (2011). Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 138–148.
  • Bakken, I. J., Wenzel, H. G., Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., & Øren, A. (2009). Internet addiction among Norwegian adults: A stratified probability sample study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 121–127.
  • Berber-Çelik, Ç., Odacı, H., & Bayraktar, N. (2015). Is problematic Internet use an indicator of eating disorders among Turkish university students? Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 20(2), 167–172.
  • Cao, F., & Su, L. (2007). Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 275–281.
  • Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553–575.
  • Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721–736.
  • Caplan, S. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 234–242.
  • Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A. A., & Gürcan, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Problematic Internet Usage Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7, 387–416.
  • Chou, C., Condron, L., & Belland, J. C. (2005). A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 363–388.
  • Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7(3), 269–297.
  • Çam, H. H. & Nur, N. (2015). Adölesanlarda Internet bağımlılığı prevalansı ile psikopatolojik semptomlar ve obezite arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 14(3), 181–188.
  • Dalbudak, E., Evren, C., Aldemir, S., Coskun, K. S., Ugurlu, H., & Yildirim, F. G. (2013).
  • Relationship of Internet addiction severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character in university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 272–278.
  • Davis, R. (2001). A cognitive–behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17(2), 187–195.
  • Durak Batıgün, A. & Kılıç, N. (2011). İnternet bağımlılığı ile kişilik özellikleri, sosyal destek, psikolojik belirtiler ve bazı sosyo-demografik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67), 1–10.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Eşel, E. (2003). Genelleşmiş anksiyete bozukluğunun nörobiyolojisi. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 13(2), 78–87.
  • Everly, G. S., & Lating, J. M. (2013). A clinical guide to the treatment of the human stress response (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  • Glozah, F. N., & Pevalin, D. J. (2014). Social support, stress, health, and academic success in Ghanaian adolescents: A path analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 37(4), 451–460.
  • Hipkins, J., Whitworth, M., Tarrier, N., & Jayson, G. (2004). Social support, anxiety and depression after chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: A prospective study. British journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 569–581.
  • Internet World Stats. (2016). The Internet big picture: World Internet users and 2015 population stats. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.html
  • Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2004). Internet addiction: Characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12–18 years). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 223–229.
  • Kaltiala-Heino, R., Lintonen, T., & Rimpelä, A. (2004). Internet addiction? Potentially problematic use of the Internet in a population of 12–18 year-old adolescents. Addiction Research & Theory, 12(1), 89–96.
  • Kim, K., Ryu, E., Chon, M. Y., Yeun, E. J., Choi, S. Y., Seo, J. S., & Nam, B. W. (2006). Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(2), 185–192.
  • Köroğlu, E. (2006). Depresyon nedir, nasıl baş edilir? (2. basım). Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği.
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998).
  • Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological wellbeing? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017.
  • Lee, M. S., Oh, E. Y., Cho, S. M., Hong, M. J., & Moon, J. S. (2001). An assessment of adolescent Internet addiction problems related to depression, social anxiety and peer relationship. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 40(4), 616–628.
  • Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. Sydney, Australia: The Psychological Foundation of Australia.
  • Mayda, A. S., Yılmaz, M., Bolu, F., Çetin-Dağlı, S., Teker, N., Tiryaki, S., … Önder, A. D. (2015). Bir öğrenci yurdunda kalan üniversite öğrencilerindeki İnternet bağımlılığı ile Beck Depresyon Ölçeği arasındaki ilişki. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi, 7(1), 6–14.
  • Odacı, H. (2013). Risk-taking behavior and academic self-efficacy as variables accounting for problematic Internet use in adolescent university students. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(1), 183–187.
  • Odacı, H., & Berber-Çelik, Ç. (2013). Who are problematic Internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic Internet use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and self-perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2382–2387.
  • Odacı, H., & Çikrıkci, Ö. (2014). Problematic Internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 61–66.
  • Odacı, H., & Kalkan, M. (2010). Problematic Internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1091–1097.
  • Öztürk, Ö., Odabaşıoğlu, G., Eraslan, D., Genç, Y. & Kalyoncu, Ö. A. (2007). İnternet bağımlılığı: Kliniği ve tedavisi. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 8(1), 36–41.
  • Peirce, R. S., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., Cooper, M. L., & Mudar, P. (2000). A longitudinal model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use. Health Psychology, 19(1), 28–38.
  • Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57(1), 267–272.
  • Steinberg, L., Lowe Vandell, D., & Bornstein, M. H. (2011). Development: Infancy through adolescence. Wadsworth, UK: Cengage Learning.
  • Şenol-Durak, E., & Durak, M. (2011). The mediator roles of life satisfaction and self-esteem between the affective components of psychological well-being and the cognitive symptoms of problematic Internet use. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 23–32.
  • Tovar, E., Rayens, M. K., Gokun, Y., & Clark, M. (2015). Mediators of adherence among adults with comorbid diabetes and depression: The role of self-efficacy and social support. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(11), 1405–1415.
  • Tsai, C. C., & Lin, S. S. (2003). Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: An interview study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 649–652.
  • Üneri, Ö. Ş. & Tanıdır, C. (2011). Bir grup lise öğrencisinde Internet bağımlılığı değerlendirmesi: Kesitsel bir çalışma. Düşünen Adam Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 24, 265–272.
  • Yeh, Y. C., Ko, H. C., Wu, J. Y. W., & Cheng, C. P. (2008). Gender differences in relationships of actual and virtual social support to Internet addiction mediated through depressive symptoms among college students in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 485–487.
  • Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Young, K. S., & Rogers, R. C. (1998). The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(1), 25–28.
APA ODACI H, ÇİKRIKCİ Ö (2017). Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. , 51 - 61.
Chicago ODACI Hatice,ÇİKRIKCİ Özkan Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. (2017): 51 - 61.
MLA ODACI Hatice,ÇİKRIKCİ Özkan Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. , 2017, ss.51 - 61.
AMA ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. . 2017; 51 - 61.
Vancouver ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. . 2017; 51 - 61.
IEEE ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö "Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels." , ss.51 - 61, 2017.
ISNAD ODACI, Hatice - ÇİKRIKCİ, Özkan. "Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels". (2017), 51-61.
APA ODACI H, ÇİKRIKCİ Ö (2017). Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 4(1), 51 - 61.
Chicago ODACI Hatice,ÇİKRIKCİ Özkan Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions 4, no.1 (2017): 51 - 61.
MLA ODACI Hatice,ÇİKRIKCİ Özkan Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, vol.4, no.1, 2017, ss.51 - 61.
AMA ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2017; 4(1): 51 - 61.
Vancouver ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2017; 4(1): 51 - 61.
IEEE ODACI H,ÇİKRIKCİ Ö "Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels." Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 4, ss.51 - 61, 2017.
ISNAD ODACI, Hatice - ÇİKRIKCİ, Özkan. "Differences in Problematic Internet Use based on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels". Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions 4/1 (2017), 51-61.