Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students

Zeynep TATLI (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fatih Eğitim Fakültesi, Trabzon, Türkiye)
Contemporary Educational Technology
12 5
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 90 - 110 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 13-09-2018

Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to determine types of games that middle school students play in their daily lives and analyze the effects of various variables such as gender, available technology, grade in school and parents’ education levels on their game preferences. Thesample consisted of a total of 464 grade 5-8 students (212 girls and 252 boys). The study was conducted in Spring 2015 and the data were collected using a two-part survey. The first part of the survey included questions about demographic information and the second part asked students to draw a picture of their favorite games. The results of this studyshowed that girls mostly preferred to play outdoor games whereas boys mostly preferred to play digital games. Participant students preferred to play games with rules outdoors and symbolic games indoors, and in digital environment, girls preferred to play minigames whereas boys preferred to play sports games. CHAID analysis was used in determining the relationships between the variables and game preferences. Gender was a prominent factor in identifying the preferences; that is, girls’ game preferences were mainly influenced by having a computer and those of boys were affected by having an available Internet connection. This study also found that parents’ education level is not related to children’s game preferences. At the end of the study, suggestions were made for gamification and digital game design.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Barnes, P. (2004). Personal, social and emotional development of children. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Aydogdu, M. & Kesercioglu, T. (2005). Ilkogretimde fen ve teknoloji ogretimi. Ankara: Ani.
  • Akpinar, Y. (1999). Bilgisayar destekli ogretim ve uygulamalar. Ankara: Ani.
  • Zhong, Z. (2011). The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers' online and offline social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2352-2363.
  • Yilmaz, B. (2008, May). Analysing the computer addiction aptitudes of 6th and 7th grades students according to different variables. Paper presented at the 6th International Educational Technology Conference. Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
  • Yildiz, D. (2006). CHAID analysis and an application (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
  • Yildirim, H. & Simsek, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin.
  • Yengin, D. (2012). Dijital oyunlarda siddet. Istanbul: Beta.
  • Vanc, K., Miller, K. & Hand, B. (1995). Two examples of using constructivist approaches to teach ecology at the middle school level. The American Biology Teacher, 37(4), 244-249.
  • Von Salisch, M., Oppl, C. & Kristen, A. (2006). What attracts children? İn P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses and consequences (pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Van Rheenen, D. (2012). A century of historical change in the game preferences of American children. Journal of American Folklore, 125(498), 411-443.
  • URL1 (2017). MEB’den egitimde mobil oyun donemi. Retrieved on 15 November 2017 from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/mebden-egitimde-mobil-oyun-donemi-40644390.
  • Ture, M., Kurt, I., Kurum, A. T. & Ozdamar, K. (2005). Comparing classification techniques for predicting essential hypertension. Expert Systems with Applications, 29, 583-588.
  • Tural, H. (2005). The effects of teaching mathematics in elementary school by games and activities on achievement and attitude (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Tufekci, A. (2007). A study of student habits on playing computer games. The Journal of İndustrial Arts Faculty of Gazi University, 21, 38-54.
  • Tugrul, B., Erturk, H. G., Ozen Altinkaynak, S. & Gunes, G. (2014). Change of the play in three generations. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 27, 1-16.
  • Tolay, T. (2013). Critical view on popular culture’s effects on child’s literature and child plays. Science and Culture, 2, 154-16.
  • Sahin, C., Ipek, H. & Ayas, A. (2008). Teaching the subject of ‘reflection and mirrors’ with educational games: a case of reflective race, Asia Pacific Science on Learning, 9(1), 7.
  • Sahin, Y. L., Karadag, N., Bozkurt, A., Dogan, E., Kilinc, H., Ugur, S., Gumus, S., Ozturk, A. & Guler, C. (2017). The use of gamification in distance education: a web-based gamified quiz application. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 8(4), 372-395. doi: 10.17569/tojqi.
  • SPSS (2012). IBM SPSS decision trees 21. Retrieved on 15 June 2015 from http://www.sussex. ac.uk/its/pdfs/SPSS_Decision_Trees_21.pdf
  • Sherry, J., Desouza, R., Greenberg, B. & Lachlan, K. (2003, May). Relationship between developmental stages and video game uses and gratifications, game preference and amount of time spent in play. Paper presented at the International communication Association Annual Convention. San Diego, CA.
  • Sherry, J. L., Holmstrom, A., Binns, R., Greenberg, B. S. & Lachlan, K. (2003, November). Gender differences in video game use and preferences. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Convention. Miami, FL.
  • Serbin, A., Bohlin, G. & Berlin, L. (1999). Sex differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year-olds’ toy-choice in a structured play-session. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 43-48.
  • Romrell, D. (2014). Gender and gaming: A literature review. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the AECT International Convention (pp. 11-22). Hyatt Regency Orange County, Anaheim, CA.
  • Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C. & Lehmann, W. (2006). The relationship between computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 609-619.
  • Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1-4.
  • Prensky, M. (2002). The motivation of gameplay: The real twenty‐first century learning revolution. On the Horizon, 10(1), 5-11. doi: 10.1108/10748120210431349.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning: Fun, play and games. What makes games engaging? New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pilten, P. & Pilten, G. (2013). Evaluating the perceptions of school-aged children about game concept and game preferences. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 15-31.
  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1992). Preference for outdoor play during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 241-254.
  • Parsons, A. (2011). Young children and nature: Outdoor play and development, experiences fostering environmental consciousness, and the implications on playground design. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, Virginia, USA.
  • Pala, F. K. & Erdem, M. (2011). A study on the relationships between digital game preference and game preference reason with gender, class level and learning styles. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 12(2), 53-71.
  • Oxford (2016). Play. Retrieved on 28 January 2016 from: http://www.oxforddictionaries. com/definition/english/play
  • Onay, P., Tufekci, A. & Cagiltay, K. (2005). A Comparative study between METU and Gazi University students: Game playing characteristics and game preferences of university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 6-76.
  • Neesen, K. (2008). The online gaming preferences of pre-teen girls: exploring game preferences within the social context of an all-girls after school computer club (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Faculty of the Curry School of Education University of Virginia, Virginia, USA.
  • Nedim Bal, P. & Metan, H. (2016). The effect of computer addiction management psychotraining program on 9th grade students. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(1), 62-74.
  • Miller, E. & Kuhaneck, H. (2008). Children’s perceptions of play experiences and the development of play preferences: a qualitative study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(4), 407-415.
  • Michael, J. & Gordon, S. (2004). Data mining technique for marketing, sales and customer support (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • McMillian, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Longman.
  • McInnes, K. & Birdsey, N. (2013, July). Understanding play: The perceptions of children, adolescents, parents and teachers. In 2nd Global Conference: Making Sense of Play. Oxford, UK. Retrieved on 12 March 2015 from https://www.interdisciplinary.net/probing-the-boundaries/wpcontent/uploads/2013/05/mcinnesplaypaper.pdf.
  • McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A. & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games. Cambridge: TEEM (Teachers Evaluating Educational Multimedia).
  • Marshall, A. & Foran, J. (2008, December). Australian female gamers video game preferences. Paper presented at the Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (pp.1-3).
  • Marouf, N., Che-Ani, A. İ. & Tawil, N. M. (2015). Examining physical activity and play behavior preferences between first graders and last graders in primary school children in Tehran. Asian Social Science, 12(1), 17.
  • Lucas, K. & Sherry, J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication based explanation. Communication Research, 31(5), 499-523.
  • Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social, media & technology overview. Retrieved on 12 March 2015 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/04/Pİ_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf
  • Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aktas, M. & Aksu, O. (2013). Determining biology student teachers' cognitive structure on the concept of “diffusion” through the free word-association test and the drawing-writing technique. International Education Studies, 6(9), 187-206.
  • Kula, A. & Erdem, M. (2005). The effect of educational computer games on the development of basic arithmetical operation skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 127-136.
  • Kuhaneck, H. M., Spitzer, S. & Miller, E. (2010). Activity analysis, creativity, and playfulness in pediatric occupational therapy: Making play just right. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
  • Korkusuz, M. E. & Karamete, A. (2013). Educational game development models. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 78-109.
  • Klawe, M. (2002). Girls, boys, and computers. ACM SİGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 16-17.
  • Kinzie, M. B. & Joseph, D. R. D. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56, 643-663.
  • Kilmen, S. & Kosterelioglu, I. (2017). Examination of teachers’ perceptions towards alternative assessment approaches with CHAİD analysis. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 256-273.
  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24.
  • Kearney, P. & Pivec, M. (2007). Recursive loops of game-based learning: a conceptual model. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2007-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2546-2553). Retrievedon 23 November 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/25731/.
  • Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistic, 29(2), 119-127. doi: 10.2307/2986296.
  • Karlsson, M. (2007). Teacher educators moving from learning the office package to learning about digital natives' use of İCT. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA 2007-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 100-107). Retrieved on 23 November 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/25364/.
  • Karatas, E. (2014). Gamification in education: Research trends. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 15(2), 315-333.
  • Karamustafaoglu, O. & Kaya, M. (2017). Teaching the subject of ‘reflection and mirrors’ with educational games: a case of reflective race. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 3(2), 41- 49.
  • Karakus, T., Inal Y. & Cagiltay, K. (2008). A descriptive study of Turkish high school students’ gameplaying characteristics and their considerations concerning the effects of games. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2520-2529. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.011.
  • Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Jenvey, V. B. & Jenvey, H. L. (2002). Criteria used to categorize children’s play: Preliminary findings. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(8), 733-740. doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.733.
  • Iwata, T., Yamabe, T., Polojarvi, M. & Nakajima, T. (2010, January). Traditional games meet ICT: A case study on go game augmentation. Proceedings of the Fourth İnternational Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Inal, Y. & Cagiltay, K. (2005). Turkish elementary school students' computer game play characteristics. BİLTEK 2005 International Cognition Congress, Eskisehir, Turkey.
  • Inal, Y. & Cagiltay, K. (2006). Turkish female students' attitudes toward Internet, computers and game play from the view of cultural perspectives. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 3, 16-21.
  • Huizinga, J. (2017). Homo ludens: Oyunun toplumsal islevi uzerine bir deneme (6. basim, Cev. M. A. Kilicbay). İstanbul: Ayrinti.
  • Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S. & Dam, G. (2009). Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 332-344.
  • Horner, S. B., Fireman, G. D. & Wang, E. W. (2010). The relation of student behavior, peer status, race and gender to decisions about school discipline using CHAİD decision trees and regression modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(2), 135-161.
  • Hartmann, T. & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(4), 910-931.
  • Harman, G. (2012). İnvestigation of primary school 8th grade students’ knowledge about mitosis by drawing method. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 295-304.
  • Hamalainen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 98-109.
  • Hacisalihoglu Karadeniz, M. (2017). A general review of acquisitions and problems in the process of adapting and applying traditional children’s games into maths. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(6), 2245-2262.
  • Gunes, F. (2015). Game-based learning approach. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 773-786.
  • Goldstein, J. (2012). Play in children’s development, health and well-being. Toy İndustries of Europe. Retrieved on 12 March 2015 from http://www.ornes.nl/wpcontent/uploads/2010/08/Play-in-children-s-development-health-and-well-being-feb- 2012.pdf.
  • Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. L., Linder, J. R. & Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal ofAdolescence, 27(1), 5-22.
  • Garris, R., Ahlers, R. & Driskel, L. J. E. (2002). Games, motivations and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
  • Funk, J. B. (1993). Reevaluating the impact of video games. Clinical Pediatrics, 32(2), 86-90.
  • Fromme, J. (2003). Computer games as a part of children's culture, game studies. The İnternational Journal of Computer Game Research, 3(1). Retrieved on 21 November 2017 from http://www.gamestudies.org/0301/fromme/.
  • Fis Erumit, S. (2016). Using gamification approaches in education: A design based research (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play in childhood an integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095-1118.
  • Esen, M. A. (2008). The instructional importance of traditional child’s plays and almost forgotten akhiska child’s plays. Uludag University, Journal of Educational Faculty, 21(2),357- 367.
  • Erboy, E. & Vural, R. A. (2010). The factors which effect on computer game addiction of 4th and 5 th grade primary students. Journal of Ege Education, 11(1), 39-58.
  • Ehrlén, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children's conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41-57.
  • Downey, S., Hayes, N. & Brian, O. (2004). Play and technology for children aged 4-12. Techical report. Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin İnstitute of Technology.
  • Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C. & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: a conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster instrinsic motivation. Education Technology Research Development, 55(3), 253-273.
  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Paper presented at the 15th İnternational Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland.
  • Demirel, O., Seferoglu, S. & Yagci, E. (2003). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal gelistirme (4th Ed.). Ankara: PegemA.
  • Catak, G. (2011). Designing as playing: Digital design games. Sigma, 3, 385-391.
  • Cankaya, S. & Karamete, A. (2008). The effects of educational computer games on students’ attitudes towards mathematics course and educational computer games. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2), 115-127.
  • Cankaya, S. (2007). The effects of computer games developed about ratio and proportion topic on students’ thoughts about mathematics course and educational computer games (Unpublished master’s thesis). Balikesir University, Balikesir.
  • Caglar, S. & Arkun Kocadere, S. (2015). Gamification in online learning environments. The Journal of Educational Sciences and Practice, 14(27), 83-102.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary İssues in Early Childhood, 5(1), 68-80.
  • Christoph, K., Dorothée, H. & Peter, V. (2009). The video game experience as “true” identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players' self-perception. Communication Theory, 19(4), 351-373.
  • Christakis, D. A., Ebel, B. E., Rivara, F. P. & Zimmerman, F. J. (2004). Television, video, and computer game usage in children under 11 years of age. J Pediatr, 145(5), 652-659.
  • Cherney, İ. D. & London, K. (2006). Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5- to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles, 54(9-10), 717-726. doi.10.1007/s11199-006-9037-8.
  • Case-Smith, J. & Miller Kuhaneck, H. (2008). Play preferences of typically developing children and children with developmental delays between the ages 3 and 7 years. Occupational Therapy Faculty Publications, 28(1), 19-29. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20080101-01.
  • Caldera, Y. M., Huston, A. C. & O’Brien, M. (1989). Social interactions and play pattern of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child Development, 60(1), 70-76.
  • Buchman, D. D. & Funk, J. B. (1996). Video and computer games in the‚ 90s: Children time commitment & game preferences. Children Today, 24(1), 12.
  • Bonanno, P. & Kommers, P. A. M. (2008). Exploring the influence of gender and gaming competence on attitudes towards using instructional games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 97-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00732.x
  • Bahar, M., Nartgun, Z., Durmus, S. & Bicak, B. (2006). Geleneksel ve alternatif olcme ve degerlendirme ogretmen el kitabi. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J. & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321.
  • Benenson, J. F. (1993). Greater preference among females than males for dyadic interaction in early childhood. Child Development, 64(2), 544-555.
  • Asimoglu, S. (2012). Concept of game in pre-school education with creative drama and orff approach (Unpublished master’s thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
  • Agaoglu, O. & Metin, N. (2015). A survey study on the 4th -8 th graders in the science and arts centers who play violent PC games comparing to their school only peer group. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 3(2), 11-25.
  • Birsen, P. (2017). Effect of gamified game-based learning on l2 vocabulary retention by young learners. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bahcesehir University, Istanbul.
  • Bozkurt, A. & Genc Kumtepe, E. (2014, February). Gamification, game philosophy and education: Gamification. Academic Information’14- XVI. Academic Information Conference Proceeding (147-156). Mersin University.
  • Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R. & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151.
  • Batdi, V. (2017). The effect of edutainment applications upon academic achievement: A metaanalytic study. GUJGEF, 37(1), 47-62.
  • Anderson, C. A. & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772-790.
  • Bottino, R. M, Ferlino, L., Ott, M. & Travella, M. (2006). Developing strategic and reasoning abilities with computer games at primary school level. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1272-1286.
  • Bakar, A., Tuzun, H. & Cagiltay, K. (2008). Students’ opinions of educational computer game utilization: A social studies course case. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 27-37.
  • Amory, A. & Seagram, R. (2003). Educational game models: Conceptualization and evaluation: The practice of higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 17(2), 206.
  • Bayirtepe, E. & Tuzun, H. (2007). The effects of game-based learning environments on students’ achievement and self-efficacy in a computer course. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 41-54.
  • Arabul Yayla, H. (2015). A prototype suggestion including a game based environment to support the language education of children with down syndrome (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bahcesehir University, Istanbul.
APA TATLI Z (2018). Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. , 90 - 110.
Chicago TATLI ZEYNEP Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. (2018): 90 - 110.
MLA TATLI ZEYNEP Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. , 2018, ss.90 - 110.
AMA TATLI Z Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. . 2018; 90 - 110.
Vancouver TATLI Z Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. . 2018; 90 - 110.
IEEE TATLI Z "Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students." , ss.90 - 110, 2018.
ISNAD TATLI, ZEYNEP. "Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students". (2018), 90-110.
APA TATLI Z (2018). Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 90 - 110.
Chicago TATLI ZEYNEP Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology 9, no.1 (2018): 90 - 110.
MLA TATLI ZEYNEP Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, vol.9, no.1, 2018, ss.90 - 110.
AMA TATLI Z Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2018; 9(1): 90 - 110.
Vancouver TATLI Z Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2018; 9(1): 90 - 110.
IEEE TATLI Z "Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students." Contemporary Educational Technology, 9, ss.90 - 110, 2018.
ISNAD TATLI, ZEYNEP. "Traditional and Digital Game Preferences of Children: A CHAID Analysis on Middle School Students". Contemporary Educational Technology 9/1 (2018), 90-110.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 6:42

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları