Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 723 - 741 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.24315/tred.520477 İndeks Tarihi: 30-11-2020

ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi

Öz:
ARCS motivasyon modelinin eğitimsel kullanımına ilişkinuygulamalı makalelerin hem yöntemsel hem de içeriksel eğilimlerinibelirlemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmada, döküman analizi yöntemikullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, Web of Science, ERIC, SCOPUS,ULAKBİM ve Google Scholar’da dizinlenen dergilerdeki 128uygulamalı makale incelenmiş ve elektronik ortamda oluşturulanformla sınıflandırılmıştır. Çalışmalar Google Formlar ve MicrosoftExcel programları kullanılarak içerik analizi yöntemiyleçözümlenmiştir. Çalışmada makalelerinin çoğunluğunun Web ofScience’da dizinlenen dergilerden elde edildiği; en sık 2018 yılındayayın yapıldığı; en fazla sayıda makalenin Computers & Educationdergisinde yayınlandığı; bilgisayar destekli/web tabanlı eğitim alanındasıklıkla çalışıldığı; en sık nicel yöntemin tercih edildiği; veri toplamaaracı olarak en yaygın motivasyon anketi/ölçeği veya envanterininkullanıldığı; örneklem grubu olarak sıklıkla üniversite öğrencilerinintercih edildiği; veri analiz tekniğinde ise en yaygın olarak t testininkullanıldığı belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

ARCS Motivation Model: Content Analysis of Applied Articles Between the Years 1997-2018

Öz:
In this study which aims to determine the general tendencies of the applied articles related to educational use of ARCS motivational model, document analysis method was used. In this study, 128 applied articles in journals indexed in Web of Science, ERIC, SCOPUS, ULAKBIM and Google Scholar were examined and classified by electronic form. The studies were analyzed with content analysis method using Google Forms and Microsoft Excel programs.It is determined that the majority of the articles in the study were obtained from the journals indexed in Web of Science; the largest number of publications were published in the year 2018; most articles are published in Computers & Education; the most studied subject area is computer assisted/web based training; the most used method is quantitative method; the most common data collection tool is the motivation questionnaire; the most used sample group is university students; and the most commonly used data analysis technique is the t test.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acar, S. (2009). Web destekli performans tabanlı öğrenmede motivasyon stratejilerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, kalıcılıklarına ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (13).
  • Aslan, A., Şılbır, L., & Karaman, S. (2016). Motivasyonel ifadelerle zenginleştirilmiş metinlerin öğrencilerin anlama ve öz yeterlilik düzeylerine etkisi. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 5(2).
  • Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6).
  • Bacanlı, H. (2009). Eğitim Psikolojisi (14. Baskı). Ankara: Asal Yayıncılık.
  • Balantekin, Y. (2014). ARCS motivasyon modeline göre tasarlanan yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin motivasyonlarına, tutumlarına ve akademik başarılarına etkisi (Doktora Tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir (Tez no: 382054).
  • Balantekin, Y., & Bilgin, A. (2017). ARCS motivasyon modeli’nin öğrencilerin motivasyonlarına, tutumlarına ve akademik başarılarına etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 16(1).
  • Bixler, B. (2006). Motivation and its relationship to the design of educational games. NMC. Cleveland, Ohio. Retrieved, 10(07).
  • Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714-722.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  • Calp, Ş. (2013). Algılanan akademik yeterlik ve algılanan özerklik desteğinin özerk akademik motivasyon ve akademik başarıyla ilişkisi (Doktora Tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No. 356655).
  • Cengiz, E. (2009). ARCS motivasyon modelinin fen ve teknoloji dersinde öğrencilerin başarısına ve öğrenmenin kalıcığına etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezi (Tez no: 238099).
  • Cengiz, E., & Aslan, A. (2012). ARCS motivasyon modelinin vücudumuzdaki sistemler ünitesinde akademik başarı ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 883-896.
  • Çetin, Ü. (2007). ARCS motivasyon modeli uyarınca tasarlanmış eğitim yazılımı ile yapılan öğretimle geleneksel öğretimin öğrencilerin başarısı ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığı açısından karşılaştırılması (Yüksek lisans tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezinden edinilmiştir. (Tez no: 189745).
  • Çiftçi, S. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin akademik risk alma düzeylerine, problem çözme becerilerine, erişilerine, kalıcılığa ve tutumlarına etkisi (Doktora tezi). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nden edinilmiştir (Tez No: 189321).
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Demircioğlu, H., & Geban, Ö. (1996). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde bilgisayar destekli öğretim ve geleneksel problem çözme etkinliklerinin ders başarısı bakımından karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(12).
  • Ergin, A., & Karataş, H. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin başarı odaklı motivasyon düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 868-887.
  • Ersoy, H., Duman, E., & Semiral, Ö. (2016). Artırılmış gerçeklik ile motivasyon ve başarı: deneysel bir çalışma. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 5(1).
  • Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim teknolojileri araştırmalarındaki eğilimler: 2000-2009 dönemi makalelerinin içerik analizi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 177-199.
  • Güven, G., & Sülün, Y. (2012). Bilgisayar destekli öğretimin 8. sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersindeki akademik başarıya ve öğrencilerin derse karşı tutumlarına etkisi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(1), 68-79.
  • Güven,M., Aslan, B.,& Akyol, Y.E. (2017). Türkiye’de psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik alanında yapılan doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi (2000-2016). Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 136-147.
  • Higbee, J.L. (1999). Affective and cognitive factors related to mathematics achievement. Journal of Developmental Education. 23(1), 8-15.
  • Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Wu, T. T. (2014). Embedding diagnostic mechanisms in a digital game for learning mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 187-207.
  • Karakis, H., Karamete, A., & Okçu, A. (2016). The effects of a computer-assisted teaching material, designed according to the assure instructional design and the ARCS model of motivation, on students' achievement levels in a mathematics lesson and their resulting attitudes. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 105- 113.
  • Karasözen, B., Bayram, Ö. G., & Zan, B. U. (2011). WoS ve Scopus veri tabanlarının karşılaştırması. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 25(2), 238-260.
  • Karslı, G. (2015). ARCS motivasyon yönteminin 8. sınıf hücre bölünmesi ve kalıtım ünitesinde öğrencilerin motivasyonu başarısı ve tutumlarına etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezi (Tez no: 415440).
  • Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of instructional development, 2(4), 26.
  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1, 383-434.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance Improvement, 26(8), 1-7.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987b). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987c). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Florida State University.
  • Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New directions for teaching and learning, 1999(78), 37-47.
  • Keller, J. M. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba, 1-13.
  • Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
  • Keller, J. M. (2010). The ARCS model of motivational design. In Motivational design for learning and performance (pp. 43-74). Springer US.
  • Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
  • Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2011). Towards technology integration: The impact of motivational and volitional email messages. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 91-128.
  • Korucu, A. T., Usta, E., & Atun, H. (2017). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi üzerine yapılan 2010-2016 dönemi araştırmalardaki eğilimler. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 104-133.
  • Kula Wassink, F., & Sadi, Ö. (2016). Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitimi yönelimleri: 2005 ile 2014 yılları arası bir içerik analizi. İlköğretim Online Dergisi, 15(2), 594-614.
  • Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 122, 54-62.
  • Malone, T. (8). Lepper (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3.
  • Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 5-17.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Morrison, R. B. (2007). Research methods in education” Routledge.
  • Ono, Y., & Ishihara, M. (2012). Integrating mobile-based individual activities into the Japanese EFL classroom. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 6(2), 116-137.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  • Saracaloğlu, A. S., Gündoğdu, K., Altın, M., Aksu, N., Kozağaç, Z. B.,& Koç, B. (2013). Yaratıcı düşünme becerisi konusunda 2000 yılı ve sonrasında yayımlanmış makalelerin incelenmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 62-74.
  • Sevgi, H. M. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bilimsel araştırma eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (12), 44-53.
  • Song, H. S., Kalet, A. L., & Plass, J. L. (2016). Interplay of prior knowledge, self-regulation and motivation in complex multimedia learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 31-50.
  • Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2013). 3D game-based learning system for improving learning achievement in software engineering curriculum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 1-12.
  • Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2011). Experiential learning: Case-based, problem-based, and realitybased. Teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Thaer, A., &Thaer, G. (2016). The effect of ARCS motivational model on achievement motivation and academic achievement of the tenth grade students. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 68-77.
  • Wlodkowski, R.J. (1985). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A guide to improving ınstruction and increasing learner achievement, SF: Jossey-Bass Publishers, USA.
  • Wlodkowski, R.J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a comprehensive guide for all adults, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., USA.
  • Yıldırım, A.,& Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yay.
  • Yüksel, G. (2011). Öğrenme için motivasyon. M. Ç. Özdemir (Ed.), Sınıf yönetimi içinde (s. 17-43). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Zhang, W. (2017). Design a civil engineering micro-lecture platform based on the ARCS model perspective. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(01), 107-118.
  • Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187-202.
  • Acar, S., & Ünsal Köse, N.Ö. (2015). Acar metoda göre on parmak f klavye öğrenenlerin derse ve öğretim materyaline ilişkin ilgi düzeylerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. PJESS, 2(2), 48-66.
  • Alekhya, N., Prabhu Kishore, N. (2018). Application of ARCS model and motivational design in engineering subjects – a case study. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development. 8(1), 27-34
  • Annamalai, S. (2016). Implementing ARCS model to design a motivating multimedia e-book for polytechnic esl classroom. journal of telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(8), 57-60.
  • Arora, A. S., & Sharma, A. (2018). Integrating the ARCS Model with Instruction for Enhanced Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 32(1), 85-89.
  • Arslan Buyruk, A., Erdoğan, P., Çavuşoğlu Deveci, C., & Yücel Toy, B. (2018). Motivasyon modeli ile zenginleştirilmiş anlamaya dayalı öğretim tasarımının öğrencilerin ingilizce konuşma becerisine ve motivasyonlarına etkisi: tasarım tabanlı bir araştırma. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 8(1).
  • Aslan, A., Şılbır, L., & Karaman, S. (2016). Motivasyonel ifadelerle zenginleştirilmiş metinlerin öğrencilerin anlama ve öz yeterlilik düzeylerine etkisi. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 5(2).
  • Astleitner, H., & Lintner, P. (2004). The Effects of ARCS-Strategies on Self-Regulated Learning with Instructional Texts. E-Journal of instructional science and technology, 7(1), n1.
  • Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6).
  • Atasoy, B., Tosik-Gün, E., & Kocaman-Karoğlu, A. (2017). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarına karşı tutumlarının ve güdülenme durumlarının belirlenmesi. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 18(2).
  • Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., & Ramon Fabregat, K. (2018). Insights into the factors influencing student motivation in augmented reality learning experiences in vocational education and training. Frontiers in psychology, 9.
  • Balantekin, Y., & Bilgin, A. (2017). ARCS motivasyon modeli’nin öğrencilerin motivasyonlarına, tutumlarına ve akademik başarılarına etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 16(1).
  • Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714-722.
  • Cengiz, E., & Aslan, A. (2012). ARCS motivasyon modelinin vücudumuzdaki sistemler ünitesinde akademik başarı ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 883-896.
  • Chang, C. S., Liu, E. Z. F., Sung, H. Y., Lin, C. H., Chen, N. S., & Cheng, S. S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in education and teaching international, 51(4), 366-377.
  • Chang, C., Chang, C. K., & Shih, J. L. (2016). Motivational strategies in a mobile inquiry-based language learning setting. System, 59.
  • Chang, M. M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO journal, 81-98.
  • Chang, N. C., & Chen, H. H. (2015). A motivational analysis of the ARCS model for information literacy courses in a blended learning environment. Libri, 65(2), 129-142.
  • Chang, Y. H., Hwang, J. H., Fang, R. J., Lu, Y. T., & Lin, Y. K. (2017). A kinect-and game-based ınteractive learning system. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4897-4914.
  • ChanLin, L. J. (2009). Applying motivational analysis in a Web-based course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1).
  • Chen, C. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2018). Exploring the effect of learning styles on learning achievement in a uMuseum. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 664-681.
  • Chen, Y. T. (2014). A study to explore the effects of self-regulated learning environment for hearing-impaired students. Journal of computer assisted learning, 30(2), 97-109.
  • Chin, K. Y., Lee, K. F., & Chen, Y. L. (2018). Using an interactive ubiquitous learning system to enhance authentic learning experiences in a cultural heritage course. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 444-459.
  • Chung-Ho, S. U., & Cheng, C. H. (2013). 3D game-based learning system for improving learning achievement in software engineering curriculum. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2).
  • Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Thomas, K. G., & Thompson, W. G. (2009). Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: applying Keller's instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course. Academic Medicine, 84(11).
  • Çağıltay, N. E., Ozcelik, E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35-41.
  • Çetin, Ü., & Mahiroğlu, A. (2015). ARCS motivasyon modeli uyarınca tasarlanmış eğitim yazılımının öğrencilerin akademik başarısına ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 101-112.
  • Çolakoglu, O. M., & Akdemir, O. (2012). Motivational measure of the instruction compared: instruction based on the ARCS motivation theory vs traditional ınstruction in blended courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(2).
  • De Carvalho, C. F. G., Coutinho, R. F., de Araujo Lima, I. D., de Leon, C. G. P., Ribeiro, L. M., Vieira, G. B., ... & dos Santos, S. R. (2018). Evaluation of board game about ımmunopreventable diseases for higher education in health course. Creative Education, 9(05).
  • Dede, Y. (2003). ARCS motivasyon modeli’nin öğrencilerin matematiğe yönelik motivasyonlarına etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(14), 173-182.
  • Derbali, L., & Frasson, C. (2012). Assessment of learners' motivation during interactions with serious games: a study of some motivational strategies in food-force. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012, 5.
  • Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
  • Dinçer, S. (2017). Bilgisayar destekli öğretimde bilgisayar okuryazarlığının, motivasyonun ve öz yeterliliğin öğrenme başarısı üzerindeki etkisi: değişkenlerin araştırma süresi ile incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(14).
  • Dinçer, S., & Doğanay, A. (2016). Öğretim materyali’ne ilişkin motivasyon ölçeği (ömmö) Türkçe uyarlama çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 15(4).
  • Donmuş, A. G. V., & Gürol, M. (2014). The Effect of Educational Computer Games on Student Motivation in Learning English. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(4).
  • Feng, S. L., & Tuan, H. L. (2005). Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders' motivation and achievement in learning about acids and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 463-484.
  • Gedik, N., Hanci-Karademirci, A., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Key instructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1149-1159.
  • Giannakas, F., Kambourakis, G., Papasalouros, A., & Gritzalis, S. (2016). Security education and awareness for k-6 going mobile. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 10(2), 41-48.
  • Güvenç, H. (2015). The Relationship between teachers' motivational support and engagement versus disaffection. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 647-657.
  • Hakkari, F., Yeloğlu, T., Tüysüz, C., & İlhan, N. (2017). Zenginleştirilmiş kitap (z-kitap) kullanımı için dokuzuncu sınıf kimya dersi “kimyasal türler arası etkileşimler” ünitesi ile ilgili materyal geliştirme ve geliştirilen materyalin etkisinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(192).
  • Hamzah, W. M. A. F. W., Ali, N. H., Saman, M. Y. M., Yusoff, M. H., & Yacob, A. (2015). Influence of gamification on students’ motivation in using e-learning applications based on the motivational design model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10(2), 30-34.
  • Hodges, C. B., & Kim, C. (2013). Improving college students’ attitudes toward mathematics. TechTrends, 57(4).
  • Hong, Z. W., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted ınstructional materials for ımproving learning performance and motivation in EFL classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1).
  • Hu, A., Shewokis, P. A., Ting, K., & Fung, K. (2016). Motivation in computer-assisted instruction. The Laryngoscope, 126(S6).
  • Huang, D. W., Diefes-Dux, H., Imbrie, P. K., Daku, B., & Kallimani, J. G. (2004, October). Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using ARCS model of motivational design. In Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual (pp. T1E-30). IEEE.
  • Huang, W. D., & Oh, E. G. (2018). Motivational support from digital game-based learning environments (DGBLEs) for scientific topics designed by novice end users. Educational Media International, 1-14.
  • Huang, W. H., Huang, W. Y., & Tschopp, J. (2010). Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Computers & Education, 55(2).
  • Huang, W., Huang, W., Diefes-Dux, H., & Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction model-based Instructional Material Motivational Survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 243-259.
  • Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Wu, T. T. (2014). Embedding diagnostic mechanisms in a digital game for learning mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 187-207.
  • Huett, J. B., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L., & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-based e-mails. The Amer. Jrnl. of Distance Education, 22(3), 159-176.
  • Huett, J. B., Moller, L., Young, J., Bray, M., & Huett, K. C. (2008). Supporting the distant student: The effect of ARCS-based strategies on confidence and performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 113.
  • Hung, H. C., Shwu-Ching Young, S., & Lin, K. C. (2018). Exploring the effects of integrating the iPad to improve students’ motivation and badminton skills: a WISER model for physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3).
  • Hung, I. C., Chao, K. J., Lee, L., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Designing a robot teaching assistant for enhancing and sustaining learning motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(2), 156-171.
  • Izmirli, S., & Sahin Izmirli, O. (2015). Factors motivating preservice teachers for online learning within the context of ARCS motivation model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 56-68.
  • Jeon, K., Jarrett, O. S., & Ghim, H. D. (2014). Project-based learning in engineering education: ıs it motivational?. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 438-448.
  • Jin, K. A. (2013). Research on the ınfluence of perceived ınterest on digital textbook learning motivation. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 8(6), 237-244.
  • Juan, Y. K., & Chao, T. W. (2015). Game-based learning for green building education. Sustainability, 7(5), 5592- 5608.
  • Jung, I., & Hong, S. (2014). An elaborated model of student support to allow for gender considerations in Asian distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2).
  • Kaneko, K., Saito, Y., Nohara, Y., Kudo, E., & Yamada, M. (2018). Does physical activity enhance learning performance?: learning effectiveness of game-based experiential learning for university library ınstruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
  • Karakis, H., Karamete, A., & Okçu, A. (2016). The effects of a computer-assisted teaching material, designed according to the assure ınstructional design and the ARCS model of motivation, on students' achievement levels in a mathematics lesson and their resulting attitudes. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1).
  • Karataş, K., Ardıç, T., & İsmet, K. A. Y. A. (2016). ARCS motivasyon modeline dayalı öğretim ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(4).
  • Karimi, M. N., & Hosseini Zade, S. S. (2018). Teachers’ use of motivational strategies: effects of a motivationoriented professional development course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-11.
  • Karoulis, A. (2011). On motivation to apply ODL in adult teachers' education. Informatics in Education, 10(1).
  • Kayak, S., & Mahıroglu, A. (2010). ARCS güdüleme modeline göre tasarlanan eğitsel yazılımın öğrenmeye etkisi. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8(1).
  • Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & education, 55(2), 427-443.
  • Kikuchi, H. (2006). Motivational factors affecting online learning by Japanese MBA students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3).
  • Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students’ motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1).
  • Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2011). Towards technology integration: The impact of motivational and volitional email messages. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 91-128.
  • Klampfer, A., & Köhler, T. (2015). Learners' and teachers' motivation toward using e-portfolios. An empirical investigation. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 25(2), 189- 207.
  • Kurt, P. Y., & Kurt, H. (2018). Instructional practices that motivate students to learn english. Journal of Education, (14), 119-130.
  • Kutu, H., & Sozbilir, M. (2011). Öğretim materyalleri motivasyon anketinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 5(1).
  • Li, K., & Moore, D. R. (2018). Motivating Students in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Using the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) Model. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1-12.
  • Li, M., & Ren, Y. (2018). A multimedia teaching model for “sports statistics” based on ARCS motivation theory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(09), 15-28.
  • Liao, H. C., & Wang, Y. H. (2008). Applying the ARCS motivation model in technological and vocational education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 1(2), 53-58.
  • Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
  • Loorbach, N., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2013). Verification steps and personal stories in an instruction manual for seniors: effects on confidence, motivation, and usability. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 56(4).
  • Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the ınstructional materials motivation survey (ımms) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British journal of educational technology, 46(1), 204-218.
  • Lu, S. J., Liu, Y. C., Chen, P. J., & Hsieh, M. R. (2018). Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.
  • Maeng, U., & Lee, S. M. (2015). EFL teachers' behavior of using motivational strategies: The case of teaching in the Korean context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 25-36.
  • Mathew, J. (2018). Effectıveness of attention relevance confidence satisfaction model on mathematics anxiety among students at secondary level. international journal of scientific research, 6(5).
  • Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 5-17.
  • Mohamad, S. N. A., Embi, M. A., & Nordin, N. M. (2016). Designing e-portfolio with ARCS motivational design strategies to enhance self-directed learning. Higher Education Studies, 6(4), 138-145.
  • Munawarah, J., Kasim, U., & Daud, B. (2018). Improving speaking sub-skills by using the attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction (ARCS) model. English Education Journal, 9(3), 356-376.
  • Mustami, M. K., & Safitri, D. (2018). The effects of numbered heads together-assurance relevance ınterest assessment satisfaction on students’ motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 123-134.
  • Nguyen, G. N. T. (2015). A case study of students’ motivation in college algebra courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(8), 693-707.
  • Novak, E. (2014). Toward a mathematical model of motivation, volition, and performance. Computers & Education, 74.
  • Ono, Y., & Ishihara, M. (2012). Integrating mobile-based individual activities into the Japanese EFL classroom. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 6(2), 116-137.
  • Orji, R., Reilly, D., Oyibo, K., & Orji, F. A. (2018). Deconstructing persuasiveness of strategies in behaviour change systems using the ARCS model of motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-17.
  • Ortiz, O. O., Franco, J. Á. P., Garau, P. M. A., & Martín, R. H. (2017). Innovative mobile robot method: improving the learning of programming languages in engineering degrees. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(2), 143- 148.
  • Özdemir, M., Izmirli, S., & Sahin-Izmirli, O. (2016). The effects of captioning videos on academic achievement and motivation: reconsideration of redundancy principle in ınstructional videos. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4).
  • Özdemir, M., Yıldız, A. M & (2015). The effect of educational videos presented in two different content stream on motivation and achievement of students with visual learning styles. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(1).
  • Özer, H. H., & Bicen, H. (2017). The Effect of gamified learning environment on student success. International Journal of Scientific Study, 5(8), 108-113.
  • Pittenger, A., & Doering, A. (2010). Influence of motivational design on completion rates in online self-study pharmacy-content courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 275-293.
  • Proske, A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computerbased writing strategy training: effects on motivation and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 481-505.
  • Putri, A. U., Rusyati, L., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). The ımpact of problem-solving model on students' concept mastery and motivation in learning heat based on gender. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 71-76.
  • Qian, X. (2014). Construction and application of an educational game based on the ARCS model. The World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education Journal, 12(21), 236-241. Wyss, J., Lee, S. E., Domina, T., & MacGillivray, M. (2014).
  • Reisoglu, I., Yilmaz, R., Çoban, M., Topu, F. B., Karkus, T., & Göktas, Y. (2015). Üç boyutlu sanal dünyalardaki tasarım ögelerinin motivasyon boyutlari açısından incelenmesi. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 5(3), 257.
  • Reynolds, K. M., Roberts, L. M., & Hauck, J. (2017). Exploring motivation: integrating the ARCS model with instruction. Reference Services Review, 45(2), 149-165.
  • Roberts, L. (2017). Research in the real world: Improving adult learners web search and evaluation skills through motivational design and problem-based learning. College & Research Libraries, 78(4), 527.
  • Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2017). The role of perceived relevance and attention in teachers’ attitude and ıntention to use educational video games. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(03), 154-168.
  • Sevier, C., Chyung, S. Y., Callahan, J., & Schrader, C. (2012). What value does service learning have on ıntroductory engineering students' motivation and abet program outcomes?. Journal of STEM Education.
  • Small, R. V., Zakaria, N., & El-Figuigui, H. (2004). Motivational aspects of information literacy skills instruction in community college libraries. College & Research Libraries, 65(2), 96-121.
  • Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational technology research and development, 49(2), 5.
  • Sözbilir, M. (2011). Yaşam temelli ARCS öğretim modeliyle 9. sınıf kimya dersi “hayatımızda kimya” ünitesinin öğretimi. ondokuz mayıs üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 30(1).
  • Su, C. H. (2017). The effects of students' learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(5).
  • Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286.
  • Sulısworo, D., Sulıstıyo, E. N., & Akhsan, R. N. (2017). The motivation impact of open educational resources utilization on physics learning using quipper school app. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4).
  • Sultana, N., & Khalil, A. (2017). Application of ARCS model for utilizing blogs to enhance learners' motivation in higher education. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 3(2), 53-70.
  • Suzuki, K., Nishibuchi, A., Yamamoto, M., & Keller, J. M. (2004). Development and evaluation of website to check instructional design based on the ARCS motivation model. Information and Systems in Education, 2(1), 63-69.
  • Şanal, S. Ö., & Türel, Y. K. Fonksiyonlar konusunun ARCS motivasyon modeli temelinde geliştirilen etkileşimli ekitap ile öğretimi: eylem araştırması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(1), 121-140.
  • Taha, A. M., & Thang, S. M. (2014). Exploring motivational design and motivation types facilitated by an online support system for learning literature. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 14(2).
  • Tahiroğlu, M. (2015). ARCS motivasyon modeli'nin İlkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersine yönelik motivasyonlarına ve başarı düzeylerine etkisi. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 7(2), 261-285.
  • Thaer, A., &Thaer, G. (2016). The effect of ARCS motivational model on achievement motivation and academic achievement of the tenth grade students. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 68-77.
  • Thurston, T. N. (2018). Design case: ımplementing gamification with ARCS to engage digital natives. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 2(1), 5.
  • Tlili, A., Essalmi, F., & Jemni, M. (2017). Towards applying Keller’s ARCS model and learning by doing strategy in classroom courses. In Innovations in Smart Learning (pp. 189-198). Springer, Singapore.
  • Tsai, C. H., Kuo, Y. H., Chu, K. C., & Yen, J. C. (2015). Development and evaluation of game-based learning system using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11(7), 498560.
  • Tugun, V. (2018). Impacts and opinions on the technology self-sufficiency of the students who are coding education in the flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS motivation model. Tem Journal-Technology Educatıon Management Informatıcs, 7(2), 366-371.
  • Turan, T., & Şeker, B. S. (2018). The effect of digital stories on fifth-grade students’ motivation. Journal Of Educatıon And Future, (13).
  • Türel, Y. K., & Sanal, S. O. (2018). The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student's achievement, motivation and anxiety. Computers & Education, 127, 130-140.
  • Varol, F., Seda, Ö. Z. E. R., & Türel, Y. K. (2014). ARCS motivasyon modeline yönelik tasarlanan z-kitaplara ilişkin görüşler. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 3(3).
  • Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.
  • Wu, P. L., Tsai, C. H., Yang, T. H., Huang, S. H., & Lin, C. H. (2012). Using ARCS model to promote technical and vocational college students' motivation and achievement. International Journal of Learning, 18(4).
  • Wu, T. T. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of English vocabulary review by integrating ARCS with mobile gamebased learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 315-323.
  • Wyss, J., Lee, S. E., Domina, T., & MacGillivray, M. (2014). Cotton island: students’ learning motivation using a virtual world. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 12(3), 219-232.
  • Yang, Y. F., Lee, C. I., & Chang, C. K. (2016). Learning motivation and retention effects of pair programming in data structures courses. Education for Information, 32(3), 249-267.
  • Yıldız, V., Kılıç, D. (2018). İlkokul öğrencilerinin öğretmenlerine ilişkin motivasyon durumlarının ARCS modeli açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 8 (4).
  • Yüzen, A., & Karamete, A. (2016). Computer assisted educational material preparation for fourth grade primary school students' english language class in teaching numbers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 94-104.
  • Zhang, W. (2017). Design a civil engineering micro-lecture platform based on the ARCS model perspective. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(01), 107-118.
  • Zohoorian, Z., Sadr, N. M., & Shamabadi, F. (2018). A summative evaluation of 'prospect 1': employing the ARCS model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3).
APA Yıldız V, Baydas Onlu O, GÖKTAŞ y (2019). ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. , 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
Chicago Yıldız Vahit Ağa,Baydas Onlu Ozlem,GÖKTAŞ yüksel ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. (2019): 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
MLA Yıldız Vahit Ağa,Baydas Onlu Ozlem,GÖKTAŞ yüksel ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. , 2019, ss.723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
AMA Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. . 2019; 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
Vancouver Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. . 2019; 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
IEEE Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y "ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi." , ss.723 - 741, 2019. 10.24315/tred.520477
ISNAD Yıldız, Vahit Ağa vd. "ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi". (2019), 723-741. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.520477
APA Yıldız V, Baydas Onlu O, GÖKTAŞ y (2019). ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9(4), 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
Chicago Yıldız Vahit Ağa,Baydas Onlu Ozlem,GÖKTAŞ yüksel ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 9, no.4 (2019): 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
MLA Yıldız Vahit Ağa,Baydas Onlu Ozlem,GÖKTAŞ yüksel ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, vol.9, no.4, 2019, ss.723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
AMA Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi. 2019; 9(4): 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
Vancouver Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi. 2019; 9(4): 723 - 741. 10.24315/tred.520477
IEEE Yıldız V,Baydas Onlu O,GÖKTAŞ y "ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi." Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9, ss.723 - 741, 2019. 10.24315/tred.520477
ISNAD Yıldız, Vahit Ağa vd. "ARCS Motivasyon Modeli: 1997-2018 Yılları Arasında Yapılmış Uygulamalı Makalelerin İçerik Analizi". Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 9/4 (2019), 723-741. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.520477