Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes

Yeşim Çapa-Aydın, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü , Ankara , Türkiye)
Yeşim Çapa AYDIN (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara , Türkiye)
Türk Psikoloji Yazıları
16 5
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 48 Sayfa Aralığı: 16 - 28 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037 İndeks Tarihi: 14-05-2022

Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, bireylerin yüz yüze iletişim ve çevrimiçi iletişimde farklı hissetmesi ve davranması ile ilişkili olan çevrimiçi iletişimde disinhibisyon düzeyinin ölçülmesi için bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması gerçekleştirmek amaçlanmıştır. Bu nedenle, Kimlik Belirsizliğinin Sosyal Benlik modelinden (Social Identity Model of Deindividuation; SIDE) yola çıkarak 15 maddelik bir taslak ölçek hazırlanmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) için gerçekleştirilen pilot çalışmaya 130 üniversite öğrencisinden (88 Kadın, 42 Erkek), doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) için ise 517 üniversite öğrencisinden veri toplanmıştır (266 Kadın, 250 Erkek, 1 belirtilmemiş). AFA sonucunda ölçeğin “olumsuz sonuçların sorumluluğunun azalması” ve “iletişim kolaylığı” olarak iki boyuttan oluştuğu görülmüştür. DFA sonuçları ise 14 maddeli ve iki boyutlu yapının kabul edilebilir özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Boyutların Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı sırasıyla .83 ve .80 olarak bulunmuştur. Değerlendirmeler Çevrimiçi Disinhibisyon Ölçeği’nin alanda kullanılabilecek yeterli psikometrik özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ölçeğin kişilik özellikleri, iletişim becerileri ve cinsiyet ile nasıl bir ilişki gösterdiği ile ilgili de bazı bulgular sunulmuştur
Anahtar Kelime:

The Development of Online Disinhibition Scale: Reliability and Validity Study

Öz:
The present study aims to develop an instrument to measure the online disinhibition which is associated with individuals feeling and behaving differently in online and face-to-face contexts. Based on the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation (SIDE) Model, a draft scale with 15 items was prepared. A pilot study was conducted with 130 university students (88 female, 42 male) and the main study included 517 university students (266 female, 250 male, 1 non-specified). According to the results of exploratory factor analysis with pilot data, the two-factor model appeared, which are named “reduced responsibility of negative behavior” and “facilitated communication.” Results of confirmatory factor analysis with 517 participants showed that the two-factor model had shown a good model fit. Internal consistency measures of the factors are .83 and .80, deemed acceptable. Further validity findings such as the relationship with personality characteristics, communication skills, and gender are provided and discussed as well. Overall, findings support that the Online Disinhibition Scale shows sufficient psychometric evidence
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aktaş, H. & Yılmaz, N. (2017). Smartphone addiction in terms of the elements of loneliness and shyness of university youth. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(1), 85-100.
  • Altundağ, Y. (2016). The relationship betweeb problematic internet use and cyberbullying among high school students. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying, 3(1), 27-43.
  • Alvídrez, S., Piñeiro-Naval, V., Marcos-Ramos, M. & Rojas-Solís, J. L. (2015). Intergroup contact in computer-mediated communication: The interplay of a stereotype-disconfirming behavior and a lasting group identity on reducing prejudiced perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 533-540.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2007). Personality, individual differences and Internet use.A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.D. Reips (Ed.),Oxford handbook of internet psychology (s.187 -204 )içinde. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Hayat, Z. (2013). Internet and personality. Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Understanding our online behavior (2.bs), (s.1-10 ) içinde. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G. & Fox, S. (2002). “On the internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 5(2), 125-128.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos 23.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: IBM SPSS. Atak, H. (2013). The Turkish adaptation of the ten-Item personality inventory. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 50(4), 312.
  • Ayvaşık, H. B., Er, N. M., Kışlak, Ş. T., & Erkuş, A. (2000). Psikoloji terimleri sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Baker, L. R.& Oswald, D. L. (2010). Shyness and online social networking services. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 873-889.
  • Bruss, O. E. & Hill, J. M. (2010). Tell me more: Online versus face-to-face communication and self-disclosure. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 15(1), 3-7.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2. bs.) New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Casale, S., Lecchi, S.& Fioravanti, G. (2015). The association between psychological well-being and problematic use of Internet communicative services among young people. The Journal of Psychology, 149(5), 480-497.
  • Caspi, A.&Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54-59.
  • Cheung, C. M., Wong, R. Y. M.& Chan, T. K. (2016, Aralık). Online Disinhibition: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to aggressive behaviors. 37. Uluslararası Bilişim Sistemleri Konferansında sunulan bildiri, Dublin, İrlanda. Erişim adresi: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016
  • Christie, C.& Dill, E. (2016). Evaluating peers in cyberspace: The impact of anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 292-299.
  • Derin, S.& Bilge, F. (2016). Internet addiction and the level of subjective wellbeing in adolescents. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 6(46), 35 – 51.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide (2. bs.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Durak-Batıgün, A.& Kılıç, N. (2011). The relationship between internet addiction, social support, psychological symptoms and some socio-demographical variables. Turkish Psychology Journal, 26(67), 1 – 10.
  • Gallo, L. L., Rausch, M., Smith, C. K. & Wood, S. (2016). School counselors’ experiences working with digital natives: A qualitative study. Professional School Counseling, 20(1), 1096-2409.
  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J.& Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528.
  • Görzig, A.& Ólafsson, K. (2013). What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 9-27.
  • Guegan, J., Moliner, P.& Milland, L. (2016). Social asymmetries and anonymity in dyadic computer-mediated communication. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 17, 15 – 23.
  • Güngör, D. (2016). Guide to scale development and adaptation in psychology. Turkish Psychological Articles, 19(38), 104-112.
  • Hollenbaugh, E. E.& Everett, M. K. (2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283-302.
  • Hu, L. T.& Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, (21. sürüm). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • John, O. P.&Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102-138.
  • Joinson, A. N. (2007). Disinhibition and the Internet. J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (2nd ed.) (s. 75-92) içinde. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Joinson, A. N. (1998). Cues and implications of disinhibited behavior on the internet.J. Gackenback (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications. (s.43-60) içinde. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Kaşıkçı, D., Çağıltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E.& Ogan, C. (2014). Internet habits and safe internet use of children in Turkey and Europe. Education and Science, 39(171), 230 -243.
  • Kaya, H., Turan, N., Hasoğlu, Ö., Güre, Ö., Arslanova, E.& Elmas, G. (2015). Examination of the relationship between the purpose of nursing students for using social network sites and their communication skills. Communication, Theory and Research Journal, 1(40), 16 – 31.
  • Kerstens, J.& Stol, W. P. (2012). Youth & Cybersafety: Online victimization and perpetration among Dutch youth. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
  • Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., Cummings, J., Boneva, B., Helgeson, V.& Crawford, A. (2002). Internet evolution and social impact. It & Society, 1(1), 120-134.
  • Korkmaz, M., ve Kiran-Esen, B. (2012). The effects of peer-training about secure internet use on adolescents. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(38), 180 -187.
  • Korkut-Owen, F., ve Bugay, A. (2014). Developing a communication skills scale: Validity and reliability studies. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), 51-64.
  • Koydemir, S. (2006, Haziran). Association of relational, individual, and collective self-aspects with social anxiety among Turkish university students. 4. Uluslararası Diyalojik Benlik Konferansında sunulan bildiri, Braga, Portekiz.
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T.& Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017.
  • Lapidot-Lefler, N.&Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in human behavior, 28(2), 434-443.
  • Lapidot-Lefler, N.& Barak, A. (2015). The benign online disinhibition effect: Couldsituational factors induce self-disclosure and prosocial behaviors? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(2) doi: 10.5817/CP2015-2-3
  • Le Bon, G., (1977). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. New York: Penguin Books
  • Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C.& Siponen, M. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962-986.
  • McNamara-Barry, C., Nelson, L. &Christofferson, J. L. (2013). Asocial and afraid: An examination of shyness and anxiety in emerging adulthood. Journal of Family Studies, 19(1), 2-18.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory (2. bs.), New York, US: McGraw-Hill.
  • Odacı, H.& Çıkrıkçı, Ö. (2017). Differences in problematic internet use based on depresion, anxiety and stress levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 4(1), 41-61.
  • Oriji, A.& Efebo, P. I. (2013). New technology, new methodology: the” digital natives” and” digital immigrants” debate. Journal of Educational Review, 6(2).
  • Öztürk, E., & Çalıcı, C. (2018). Modern Toplumda Kimlik, “Siber Dissosiyasyon” ve “Siber Alter”: Teorik ve Klinik Bir Yaklaşım. Öztürk E, (Ed.). Ruhsal Travma ve Dissosiyasyon. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. W.
  • Strobe & M. Hewstone (Ed.), European review of social psychology (s. 161-198) içinde. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Santana, A. D. (2014) Virtuous or Vitriolic, Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18-33.
  • Saunders, P. L. & Chester, A. (2008). Shyness and the internet: Social problem or panacea? Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2649-2658.
  • Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M.& Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 10(2), 292-315.
  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3. bs). New York, US: Taylor & Francis.
  • Siyez, D. M. (2014b). Gender and sensation seeking as predictor variables of problematic Internet use by high school students. The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 1, 78-97.
  • Siyez, D. M. (2014a). Lise öğrencilerinde problemli internet kullanımının yordayıcıları olarak heyecan arama ve cinsiyet. The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 1(1), 63-97.
  • Spada, M. M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 3-6.
  • Spears, R.& Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
  • Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York, US: Taylor & Francis.
  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7 (3), 321-326.
  • Suler, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184-188.
  • Sümer, N. & Sümer, H. C. (2005). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri Ölçeği. Yayınlanmamış çalışma.
  • Şahin, M. & Gülnar, B. (2016). The relationship between communication apprehension and internet usage: A survey among Turkish university students. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 9(2), 5 – 26.
  • Tabachnick, B. G.& Fidell, L. S. (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, US: Pearson.
  • Tanrıkulu, İ. (2015). The relationships between cyber bullying perpetration motives and personality traits: testing uses and gratifications theory (Doktora tezi). Erişim adresi: http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr
  • Taş, İ., & Ayas, T. (2015). Relationship the level of internet addiction with personality traits of high school students Lise öğrencilerinin internet bağımlılık düzeyinin kişilik özellikleriyle ilişkisi. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 150-162.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195-205.
  • Uçar, M. E. (2016). A study to develop a scale of expressing emotions on Facebook. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 1(1)1-16.
  • Udris, R. (2014). Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: Development and validation of the online disinhibition scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253-261.
  • Wang, C. W., Ho, R. T., Chan, C. L. & Tse, S. (2015). Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 32-35.
  • Whitty, M. T.& McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1435-1446.
  • Wu, S., Lin, T. C. & Shih, J. F. (2017). Examining the antecedents of online disinhibition. Information Technology & People, 30(1), 189-209.
APA Ayas S, Capa Aydin Y (2021). Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. , 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
Chicago Ayas Selin,Capa Aydin Yesim Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. (2021): 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
MLA Ayas Selin,Capa Aydin Yesim Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. , 2021, ss.16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
AMA Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. . 2021; 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
Vancouver Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. . 2021; 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
IEEE Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y "Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes." , ss.16 - 28, 2021. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
ISNAD Ayas, Selin - Capa Aydin, Yesim. "Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes". (2021), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
APA Ayas S, Capa Aydin Y (2021). Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 24(48), 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
Chicago Ayas Selin,Capa Aydin Yesim Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 24, no.48 (2021): 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
MLA Ayas Selin,Capa Aydin Yesim Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.24, no.48, 2021, ss.16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
AMA Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2021; 24(48): 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
Vancouver Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2021; 24(48): 16 - 28. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
IEEE Ayas S,Capa Aydin Y "Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 24, ss.16 - 28, 2021. 10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
ISNAD Ayas, Selin - Capa Aydin, Yesim. "Implicit Processes in Close Relationships: Implicit Partner Attitudes and Relationship Outcomes". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 24/48 (2021), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120210209m000037
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 22:8

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları