Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 565 - 575 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2024
Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage
Öz: This study was carried out to determine the quality of sugar beet pulp (Beta vulgaris L.), lenox (Brassica rapa L.), and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorium cv. caramba) silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Whole corn was harvested at the dough stage, lenox was harvested at the end of flowering, and ryegrass was harvested at the beginning of spike. No additives were added to the corn silage, but 5% molasses was added to the sugar beet pulp, ryegrass, and lenox silages that have low levels of easily degradable sugar. Additionally, 5% sainfoin was added to the sugar beet pulp silage to increase its dry matter level to 20%. All silages used in the study were classified as “very good” according to the Fleig scoring system. Four Holstein dairy cattle at a mean age of 3 years old, at the 3rd month of lactation, and with milk yields close to each other were used in the feeding experiment. In this study, the 4 × 4 Latin square trial design was applied, and each period of the experiment consisted of 21 days, 14 days for exercise and 7 days for sample collection. The amount of feed to be consumed by the animals according to the periods was calculated based on the National Research Council (NRC) standards considering their yield levels. In the experiment, milk yield was found to be similar in the silage groups, but milk fat levels were higher in the group consuming corn silage than the other groups. The rumen fluid and blood serum values of the animals were within the reference ranges. As a result, it was determined that these silages were competitive with corn silage in the feeding of dairy cattle as long as 5% molasses would be added to wet the beet pulp, lenox and ryegrass silages, whereas it was concluded that the digestibility and energy content of the ryegrass silage was lower than those of the other silages.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Alçiçek A. Silo yemi: Önemi ve kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. Technical Bulletin 2. İzmir, Turkiye: Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Agricultural Application and Research Center; 1995 (in Turkish).
- 2. Bilgen H, Alçiçek A, Sungur N, Eichhorn H, Walz OP. Ege bölgesi koşullarında bazı silajlık kaba yem bitkilerinin hasat teknikleri ve yem değeri üzerine araştırmalar. In: Animal Breeding’96 National Congress; İzmir, Turkiye; 1996. pp. 781- 789 (in Turkish).
- 3. Serin Y, Tan M. Yem bitkileri kültürüne giriş. No:206. Erzurum, Turkiye: Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Publications; 2001 (in Turkish).
- 4. Yolcu H, Tan M. Ülkemiz yem bitkileri tarımına genel bir bakış. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008; 14 (3): 303-312 (in Turkish).
- 5. Kutlu HR. Tüm yönleriyle silaj yapımı ve silajla besleme. Adana, Turkiye: Çukurova University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science. 2002 (in Turkish).
- 6. Ergün A, Tuncer ŞD, Çolpan İ, Yalçın S, Yıldız G, Küçükersan MK, Küçükersan S, Şehu A. Yemler, yem hijyeni ve teknolojisi. Ankara, Turkiye: Pozitif Printing House; 2002.
- 7. Karabulut A, Filya İ. Yemler Bilgisi ve Yem Teknolojisi. Bursa, Turkiye: Uludağ University Faculty of Agriculture Lecture Notes; 2007 (in Turkish).
- 8. Muck RE, Filya İ, Contreras-Govea FE. Incullant effects on alpha alpha silage: In vitro gas and volatile fatty acid production. Journal of Dairy Science 2007; 90: 5115-5125. doi: 10.3168/ jds.2006-878
- 9. Kamalak A, Aydın R, Bal MA, Atalay Aİ. Gladiçya meyvesinin katkı maddesi olarak yonca silajında kullanımı. 2009. TÜBİTAK. Proje No:107 0 401 (in Turkish).
- 10. FAO. Utilization of fruit and vegetable wastes as livestock feed and as substrates for generation of other value added products. RAP Publication 2013/04.
- 11. Denek N, Can A. Feeding value of wet pomace ensiled with wheat straw and wheat grain for Avassi sheep. Small Ruminant Research 2006; 65: 260-265. doi: 10.1016/j. smallrumres.2005.06.024
- 12. AOAC. “Official methods of analysis”, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th ed.Arlington. VA.1999.
- 13. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74: 3583- 3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551
- 14. AOCS, Official Method Am 5-04. Rapid determination of oil/ fat utilizing high-temperature solvent extraction. In: Firestone D. (Ed.) Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS, 6th ed., Urbana, IL, USA: AOCS Press; 2013.
- 15. Kılıç A. Silo yemi; öğretim, öğrenim ve uygulama önerileri. Izmir, Turkiye: Bilgehan Printing House; 1986 (in Turkish).
- 16. Polan CE, Stive DE, Garrett JL. Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with heat, formic acid, ammonia, or microbial inoculant. Journal of Dairy Science 1998; 81: 765-776. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(98)75633-4
- 17. Markham P. A steam distillation apparatus suitable for micro- kjeldahl analyses. Biochemical Journal 1942; 36: 790-797. doi: 10.1042/bj0360790
- 18. Leventini MW, Hunt C, Roffler RE, Casebolt DG. Effect of dietary level of barley-based supplements and ruminal buffer on digestion and growth by beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 1990; 68: 4334-4344. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68124334x
- 19. NRC, Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: National Academy Press; 2001.
- 20. SPPS. IBM SPSS statistics version 13.0 for Windows. New York: IBM Corp. 2006.
- 21. Deniz S, Nursoy H, Yılmaz İ, Karslı MA. Vejetasyonun farklı devrelerinde hasat edilmenin bazı mısır varyetelerinde besin madde içeriği ve silaj kalitesi ile sindirilebilir kuru madde miktarına etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Veterinary Faculty 2001; 17 (3): 43-49 (in Turkish).
- 22. Altaçlı S, Deniz S. Değişik şekillerde hazırlanan yaş şeker pancarı posası silajlarının in vivo ve in vitro sindirilebilirlikleri ile enerji içeriklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Veterinary Faculty 2013; 24 (1): 9-13 (in Turkish).
- 23. Can A, Denek N, Yazgan K. Şeker pancarı yaprağına değişik katkı maddeleri ilavesinin silaj kalitesi ile in vitro kuru madde sindirilebilirlik düzeylerine etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Veterinary Faculty 2003; 14 (2): 26-29 (in Turkish).
- 24. Baytok E, Aksu T, Karslı MA, Muruz H. The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Turkish Journal of Veterınary and Animal Sciences 2005; 29: 469-474.
- 25. Balakhial A, Naserian AA, Heravi Moussavi A, Eftekhar Shahrodi F, Vali Zadeh R. Changes in chemical composition and in vitro DM digestibility of urea and molasses treated whole crop canola silage. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advanced 2008; 7 (9): 1042-1044.
- 26. Filya İ. “Silaj yapımı”. Silaj bitkileri yetiştirme ve silaj yapımı. Hasad Publishing; 2011. 54-80.
- 27. Çetin İ. Farklı katkı maddeleri ile silolanan yem şalgamının (Brassica rapa L.) bazı kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Thesis, Uşak University, Uşak, Turkiye, 2017. (in Turkish).
- 28. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. In: 2nd. ed. Comstock Publication; Ithaca, USA; 1994. pp. 476.
- 29. Demirel M, Cengiz F, Çelik S, Erdoğan S. Van ekolojik koşullarında yetiştirilen mısır ve macar fiği karışımlarının silaj kaliteleri ve besin maddelerinin rumende parçalanabilirlikleri üzerine bir araştırma. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Agriculture Sciences 2001; 11 (1): 69-78 (in Turkish).
- 30. Deniz S, Demirel M, Tuncer ŞD, Kaplan O, Aksu T. Değişik şekillerde üretilen şeker pancarı posası silajının süt ineği ve kuzu rasyonlarında kullanılma olanakları. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2001; 25: 1015-1020 (in Turkish).
- 31. Doğan Daş B. Lenox ( Brassica rapa L.) bitkisine farklı düzeylerde buğday samanı ve melas ilavesinin silaj kalitesi, kuzularda canlı ağırlık artışı ve sindirilebilirlik değerlerine etkisi. Thesis, Harran University. Şanlıurfa, Turkiye, 2019. (in Turkish).
- 32. Srigopalram S, Hyung SP, Soundharrajan I, Da HK, Mariadhas VA et al. Isolation, In vitro probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum and its role on Italian ryegrass silage quality enhancement. 3 Biotech 2017; 19: 164-170. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13205-017-0965-5
- 33. Bingöl NT, Karslı MA, Akça İ. Yerelması (Helianthus tuberosus L.) hasılına katılan melas ve formik asit katkısının silaj kalitesi ve sindirilebilirliği üzerine etkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Veterinary Faculty 2010; 21 (1): 11-14 (in Turkish).
- 34. Duru A. Zeytinyağı sanayi yan ürünü yaş zeytin posasının silolanabilme olanaklarının araştırılması. Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, 2012 (in Turkish).
- 35. Arslan Duru A, Aksu Elmalı D. Farklı katkı maddelerinin yonca silajlarında bazı kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisi. In: 1st of International INES Academic Researches Congress (INES 2016); Antalya, Turkiye; 2016.
- 36. Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Sciences 2018; 01: 4020-4033. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909.
- 37. Virtanen AI. The AIV method of preserving fresh fodder. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1933; 1: 143-155.
- 38. Stefanie JWH, Elferink HO, Driehuis F, Gottschal JC, Spoelstra SF. Silage fermentation processes and their manipulation. In: FAO Electronic Conference on Silages; 1999. 1-28.
- 39. Ward RT, De Ondarza MB. Effect of month of sample submittal on corn silage nutrient fractions starch availability, NDF digestibility, and fermentation profiles measured at a commercial forage-testing laboratory. Journal of Dairy Sciences 2008; 91 (1): 30.
- 40. Pereira LGR, Gonçalves LC, Tomich TR, Borges I, Rodriguez NM. Silos experimentais para avaliação da silagem de três genótipos de girassol (Helianthus annuus L.). Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2005; 57: 5. (in Spanish)
- 41. Yıldız S. Saanen x Kıl Keçisi melezi (F1) keçilerin rasyonlarında mısır silajı yerine ayçiçeği silajının kullanılmasının rumen ve kan parametreleri ile süt verimi ve bileşimine etkisi. Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkiye, 2017. (in Turkish).
- 42. Leterme P, Thewis A, Culot M. Supplementation of pressed sugar-beet pulp silage with molasses and urea, laying hen excreta or soybean meal in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 1992; 39: 209-225. https://doi. org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90042-5
- 43. Levendoğlu T. Yaş şeker pancarı posasının buğday kepeği ile birlikte silolanma olanakları ile silaj kalitesi ve sindirilebilirliğinin belirlenmesi. Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkiye, 2006 (in Turkish).
- 44. Küçükersan MK. Silaj Yemleri, yemler yem hijyeni ve teknolojisi. 5th edition. Ankara, Turkiye: Printing House; 2016. 61-97.
- 45. Avcı M, Akdeniz H, Deniz S. Değişik katkılarla hazırlanan yaş şeker pancarı posası silajlarının kalitesinin belirlenmesi. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2005; 21 (3-4): 39-45 (in Turkish).
- 46. Schroeder JW. Dairy cow nutrition affects milk composition. North Dakota State University Extension Service. 2012; 11-18.
- 47. Konyalı A, Südekum Karl H, Yurtman İY. Silaja dayalı besleme koşullarında farklı rumen içi parçalanma hızlarına sahip yoğun yem karmaları kullanımının süt üretimi üzerine etkileri. Mediterr Agriculture Sciences. 2004; 17 (2): 207-215 (in Turkish).
- 48. Leek BF. Ruminantlarda Sindirim. In: Yıldız S. (Editör). Veteriner fizyoloji. Malatya, Turkiye: Medipress Publishing; 2008.
- 49. Islam M, Dahlan I, Rajion MA, Jean ZA. Rumen pH, amnonia nitrogen of cattle fed different levels of oil palm frond based diet and dry matter degradation of fractions of oil palm frond. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Sciences 2000; 941-947.
- 50. Alawa JP, Hemingway RG. The voluntary intake and digestibility of straw diets and the performance of wether sheep as influced by formaldehyde treatment of soyabean meal. Animal Production 1986; 42: 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0003356100017785
- 51. Satter LD, Sylter LL. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 1974; 32: 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1079/ bjn19740073
- 52. Şenyüz HH. Süt inekleri rasyonlarına mısır silajı yerine farklı düzeylerde katılan patates posası silajının süt verimi, bileşenleri ve rumen uçucu yağ asitleri üzerine etkileri. Thesis, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkiye, 2017. (in Turkish).
- 53. Armentano LE. Ruminant hepatic metabolism of volatile fatty acids, lactate and pyruvate. The Journal of Nutrition 1992; 122: 838-842. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/122.suppl_3.838
- 54. Reynolds CK. Glucose balance in cattle. In: Ruminant Nutrition Symposium; Florida, USA; 2005.
- 55. Sarı M, Bolat D, Çerçi İH, Önol AG, Deniz S et al. Hayvan besleme ve beslenme hastalıkları. Malatya, Turkiye: Medipress Printing and Publishing Ltd. Sti.; 2008.
- 56. İmren HY, Şahal M. Veteriner iç hastalıkları. Ankara, Turkiye: Aydoğdu Ofset Printing; 1990.
- 57. Nazifi S, Gheisari HR, Shaker F. Serum lipids and lipoproteins and their correlations with thyroid hormones in clinically healthy goats. Veterınarskı Arhıv 2002; 72 (5): 249-257 (in Croatian)
- 58. Khatun A, Wani GM, Bhat JIA, Choudhury AR, Khan MZ. Biochemical indices in sheep during different stages of pregnancy. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2011; 6: 175-181. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2011.175.181
- 59. Gustafsson AH, Palmquist DL. Diurnal variation of rumen ammonia, serum urea and milk urea in dairy cows at high and low yields. Journal of Dairy Sciences 1993; 76: 475-484. https:// doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77368-3
- 60. Şenel HS. Saman ve mısır silajının süt üretiminde karşılaştırmalı değerleri. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 1974; 21 (1-2): 130-138 (in Turkish).
APA | ÖZKAN F, DENİZ s (2023). Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. , 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
Chicago | ÖZKAN FATMA,DENİZ suphi Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. (2023): 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
MLA | ÖZKAN FATMA,DENİZ suphi Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. , 2023, ss.565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
AMA | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. . 2023; 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
Vancouver | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. . 2023; 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
IEEE | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s "Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage." , ss.565 - 575, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
ISNAD | ÖZKAN, FATMA - DENİZ, suphi. "Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage". (2023), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
APA | ÖZKAN F, DENİZ s (2023). Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 47(6), 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
Chicago | ÖZKAN FATMA,DENİZ suphi Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 47, no.6 (2023): 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
MLA | ÖZKAN FATMA,DENİZ suphi Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.47, no.6, 2023, ss.565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
AMA | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2023; 47(6): 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
Vancouver | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2023; 47(6): 565 - 575. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
IEEE | ÖZKAN F,DENİZ s "Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 47, ss.565 - 575, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |
ISNAD | ÖZKAN, FATMA - DENİZ, suphi. "Determining the quality of sugar beet pulp, lenox, and ryegrass silages used in feeding dairy cattle, in comparison to corn silage". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 47/6 (2023), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4326 |