Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket

Nuray SAKALLI UĞURLU, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Yağmur RUMELİ, (Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Merve Nur ŞAHİN (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Nesne Dergisi
39 17
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 23 Sayfa Aralığı: 105 - 130 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07 İndeks Tarihi: 28-06-2022

Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket

Öz:
Araştırmacılar genel olarak cinsiyetçiliğe verilen tepkiler konusuna kadın perspektifinden ve deneyimlerinden yaklaşmışlardır. Oysaki geleneksel cinsiyetçi sistem içerisinde erkeklerin cinsiyetçiliği nasıl algıladıklarını ve nasıl tepkiler verdiklerini anlamak cinsiyet eşitliğinin sağlanması açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu derleme makalesinin amacı kadınların maruz kaldığı cinsiyetçiliğe karşı erkeklerin verebileceği tepkileri derlemektir. Bu amaca ulaşmak için Sakallı’nın (2021) derleme makalesindeki şu boyutlardan yararlanılmıştır: (I) cinsiyetçilik farkındalığı olmayıp ya da düşük olup, var olan cinsiyet sistemini olduğu gibi kabullenme ve meşrulaştırma; (II) cinsiyetçilik farkındalığı olup, cinsiyetçiliğe ilişkin olumsuz tutumlara sahip olsa da harekete geçmeyip kendini suskunlaştırma; (III) cinsiyetçilik farkındalığı olup, cinsiyetçi tutum ve davranışlara bireysel olarak doğrudan karşı koyma yani cinsiyetçilikle yüzleşme ve (IV) cinsiyetçilik farkındalığı yüksek olup kolektif hareketlere katılma. Ayrıca, erkeklerin cinsiyetçiliğe tepkileri ile bağlantılı olabileceği düşünülen düşmanca ve korumacı cinsiyetçilik, erkeksilik, erkeklik, erkeklik onuru, feminist erkeklere dair kalıpyargılar, sosyal baskınlık yönelimi, sağ kanat yetkecilik, sistemi meşrulaştırma eğilimi ve adil dünya inancı gibi bazı sosyal psikolojik değişkenler ele alınmıştır. Gelecekte yapılabilecek çalışmalar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Men’s Responses to Sexism: Justification, Self-Silencing, Confrontation, and Collective Action

Öz:
Many researchers, in general, have approached the responses to sexism issues from women's perspectives and experiences. However, it is important to understand how men percieve sexism and their responses to sexism in the traditional gender system in order to achieve gender equality. Accordingly, the aim of the current paper is to review literature on men's reactions to sexism that women experience. In order to reach the aim, the following dimensions of Sakallı’s (2021) review article are used: (I) being unaware or having a low level of awareness of sexism and, accepting and justifying the existing gender system; (II) being aware of sexism and not taking action even if one has negative feelings about sexism; (III) being aware of sexism and responding sexist behavior and incidents individually; (IV) being aware of sexism and engaging in collective action. In addition, some social psychological variables that may be associated with men’s responses to sexism such as hostile and benevolent sexism, masculinity, manhood, masculine honor, stereotypes about feminist men, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, system justification orientation and belief in a just world are examined. Possible future studies are suggested.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, P. J. ve Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper and Brothers.
  • Akarsu, S. A. ve Sakallı, N. (2021). The associations among self-silencing, ambivalent sexism, and perceived devaluation of women in Turkey. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02353-8
  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘‘authoritarian personality.’’ M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology içinde (s. 48 – 92). Academic Press.
  • Anderson, V. N. (2009). What's in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01490.x
  • Ashburn-Nardo, L., Morris, K. A. ve Goodwin, S. A. (2008). The confronting prejudice responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 332– 342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251671.
  • Ayhan, H. (2015). Cinsel tacize ilişkin tutumları yordayan faktörler: Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik, kontrol odağı ve empati [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Haliç Üniversitesi.
  • Bareket, O., Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N. ve Glick, P. (2018). The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy: Men who perceive women's nurturance and sexuality as mutually exclusive endorse patriarchy and show lower relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 79(9), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7
  • Barreto, M. ve Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
  • Becker, J. C. ve Swim, J. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43(3), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000091
  • Becker, J. C. ve Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615
  • Begany, J. J. ve Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119
  • Berryman-Fink, C. ve Verderber, K. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00860.x
  • Bilge, Ç., Karakaş, S. ve Oskay, Ü. (2020). İstanbul’da bir üniversitede hemşirelik öğrencilerinin evlilikte kadına karşı şiddet konusundaki düşünce ve tutumları. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.466919
  • Bosson, J. K. ve Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669
  • Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R. ve Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161
  • Boyacıoğlu, İ. (2016). Dünden bugüne Türkiye’de kadına yönelik şiddet ve ulusal kadın çalışmaları: Psikolojik araştırmalara davet. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19, 126-145.
  • Burgess, D. ve Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665-692.
  • Burkley, M., Wong, Y. J. ve Bell, A. C. (2016). The masculinity contingency scale (MCS): Scale development and psychometric properties. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 17(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039211
  • Burn, S. M., Aboud, R. ve Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42(11-12), 1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007044802798
  • Cengiz, A. A. ve Özdemir, A. (2020). Kadın yöneticilere yönelik tutumların oluşumunda çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ve narsisizmin etkisi. Çalışma ve Toplum, 4(67), 2123 - 2143. https://www.calismatoplum.org/makale/kadin-yoneticilere-yonelik-tutumlarin-olusumunda-celisikduygulu- cinsiyetcilik-ve-narsizmetkisi
  • Christopher, A. N. ve Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x Christopher, A. N. ve Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 65- 73.
  • Cole, B. P., Brennan, M., Tyler, E. ve Willard, R. (2020). Predicting men’s acceptance of sexual violence myths through conformity to masculine norms, sexism, and “locker room talk”. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000248
  • Conlin, S. E. ve Heesacker, M. (2017). Feminist men?: Examining men’s feminist self-identification, activism and the impact of language. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(8), 928-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1371007
  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Polity Press.
  • Connell, R. W. ve Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829-859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
  • Connelly, K. ve Heesacker, M. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing? Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 432-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369
  • Cottrell, C. A. ve Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to" prejudice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
  • Cramer, K. M., Gallant, M. D. ve Langlois, M. W. (2005). Self-silencing and depression in women and men: Comparative structural equation models. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.012
  • Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J. ve Mark, A. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 784–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784.
  • Daly, M. (1990). Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Beacon Press.
  • Demirel, G., Kaya, N., Ertekin Pınar, Ş., Değerli, B. ve Gökmen, E. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kadına ilişkin namusa, şiddete ve cinsiyetçiliğe yönelik tutumları. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 6(3), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.5152/hsp.2019.478060
  • Dickter, C. L., Kittel, J. A. ve Gyurovski, I. I. (2012). Perceptions of non‐target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.855
  • Doğulu, C. (2012). System justification and terror management: Mortality salience as a moderator of system-justifying tendencies in gender context [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Drury, B. J. (2013). Confronting for the greater good: Are confrontations that address the broad benefits of prejudice reduction taken seriously? [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. University of Washington.
  • Drury, B. J. ve Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083
  • Duarte, L. ve Thompson, J. (1999). Sex differences in self-silencing. Psychological Reports, 85, 145–161.
  • Eagly, A. H. ve Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154008
  • Eisler, R. M. ve Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress. Behavior Modification, 11(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455870112001
  • Eliezer, D. ve Major, B. (2012). It’s not your fault: The social costs of claiming discrimination on behalf of someone else. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211432894
  • Ercan, N. (2009). The predictors of attitudes toward physical wife abuse: Ambivalent sexism, system justification and religious orientation [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Erkurt, A. (2015). Kadına yönelik şiddet: Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik, yetkecilik ve sosyal baskınlık yönelimi açısından bir inceleme [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Estevan-Reina, L., de Lemus, S. ve Megias, J. L. (2020). Feminist or paternalistic: Understanding men’s motivations to confront sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02988
  • Gervais, S. J. ve Hillard, A. L. (2014). Confronting sexism as persuasion: Effects of a confrontation's recipient, source, message, and context. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12084
  • Gervais, S. J., Hillard, A. L. ve Vescio, T. K. (2010). Confronting sexism: The role of relationship orientation and gender. Sex Roles, 63(7-8), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9838-7
  • Glick, P. ve Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00407.x
  • Glick, P. ve Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American psychologist, 56(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
  • Glick, P. ve Whitehead, J. (2010). Hostility toward men and the perceived stability of male dominance. Social Psychology, 41, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000025.
  • Good, J. J., Sanchez, D. T. ve Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2016). A paternalistic duty to protect? Predicting men’s decisions to confront sexism. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000077
  • Gratch, L. V., Bassett, M. E. ve Attra, S. L. (1995). The relationship of gender and ethnicity to self‐silencing and depression among college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00089.x
  • Gul, P. ve Uskul, A. K. (2019). Men’s perceptions and emotional responses to becoming a caregiver father: The role of individual differences in masculine honor ideals and reputation concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01442
  • Gundersen, A. B. ve Kunst, J. R. (2019). Feminist≠ feminine? Feminist women are visually masculinized whereas feminist men are feminized. Sex Roles, 80(5), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7
  • Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1086/268911 Hammond, M. D. ve Sibley, C. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier? Sex Roles, 65, 332–343. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2
  • Harnois, C. E. (2017). Intersectional masculinities and gendered political consciousness: How do race, ethnicity and sexuality shape men’s awareness of gender inequality and support for gender activism? Sex Roles, 77(3), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0702-2
  • Harper, M. S. ve Welsh, D. P. (2007). Keeping quiet: Self-silencing and its association with relational and individual functioning among adolescent romantic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507072601
  • Harrington, A. G., Overall, N. C. ve Cross, E. J. (2021). Masculine gender role stress, low relationship power, and aggression toward intimate partners. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 22(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000262
  • Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, M. S. ve Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Sex Roles, 61(11), 794-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9689-2
  • Hurst, R. J. ve Beesley, D. (2013). Percieved sexism, self-silencing, and psychological distress in college women. Sex Roles, 68, 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0253-0
  • Hyers, L. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to Anti-Black racism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9142-8
  • Işık, R. ve Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2009). “Namus” ve “namus adına kadına uygulanan şiddete” ilişkin tutumlar ölçeklerinin geliştirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 12(24), 1-9.
  • Iyer, A. ve Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 791-814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x
  • Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self: Women and depression. Harvard University Press.
  • Jack, D. C. ve Dill, D. (1992). The silencing the self scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97-106.
  • Jakupcak, M., Lisak, D. ve Roemer, L. (2002). The role of masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress in men's perpetration of relationship violence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3(2), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.97
  • Jost, J. T. ve Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
  • Jost, J. T. ve Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
  • Kaiser, C. R. ve Miller, C. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063001
  • Kaiser, C. R. ve Miller, C. T. (2004). A stress and coping perspective on confronting sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-402.2004.00133.x
  • Kaynak-Malatyalı, M., Kaynak, B. D. ve Hasta, D. (2017). A social dominance theory perspective on attitudes toward girl child marriages in Turkey: The legitimizing role of ambivalent sexism. Sex Roles, 77(9), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0750-2.
  • Kimmel, M. S. ve Mosmiller, T. E. (1992). Introduction. M. S. Kimmel ve T. E. Mosmiller (Ed.), Against the tide: Pro-feminist men in the United States içinde (s. 1- 46). Beacon Press.
  • Kıral Uçar, G. ve Özdemir, G. (2021). Social dominance, hostile sexism and justifications: Examining attitudes towards wife abuse among Turkish men. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110785
  • Klandermans, B. (1989). Union commitment: Replications and tests in the Dutch context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 869-75. Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Adamska, K., Jaśkiewicz, M., Jurek, P. ve Vandello, J. A. (2016). If my masculinity is threatened I won’t support gender equality? The role of agentic self-stereotyping in restoration of manhood and perception of gender relations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 17(3), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000016
  • Koutrelakos, J., Baranchik, A. J. ve Damato, N. (1999). Cultural and sex differences in rating the self and an hypothetical well-adjusted person on Jack's divided self and care as self-sacrifice subscales. Psychological Reports, 84(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.84.1.67
  • Kreindler, S. A. (2005). A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1
  • Kuzlak, A. (2019). Are women and men’s atypical educational choices punished? Gender system justification, ambivalent sexism and precarious manhood [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Latane, B. ve Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Prentice Hall.
  • Lemaster, P., Strough, J., Stoiko, R. ve DiDonato, L. (2015). To have and to do: Masculine facets of gender predict men’s and women’s attitudes about gender equality among college students. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036429
  • Leone, R. M., Schipani-McLaughlin, A. M., Haikalis, M. ve Parrott, D. J. (2020). The “white knight” effect: Benevolent sexism accounts for bystander intervention in party situations among high status men. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 21(4), 704-709. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000314
  • Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G. ve Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853-870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853 Malik, D. (2017). Evli bireylerin değer yönelimleri ile cinsiyetçilik düzeylerinin evlilik uyumlarıyla olan ilişkisi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi.
  • Moore, T. M. ve Stuart, G. L. (2004). Effects of masculine gender role stress on men's cognitive, affective, physiological, and aggressive responses to intimate conflict situations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.2.132
  • Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. S. Moscovici, G. Mugny ve E. Van Avermaet (Ed.), Perspectives on minority influence içinde (s. 9-51). Cambridge University Press. Nisbett, R. E. ve Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Westview Press.
  • Page, J. R., Stevens, H. B. ve Galvin, S. L. (1996). Relationships between depression, self-esteem, and self-silencing behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(4), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.4.381
  • Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Priester, J. R. ve Feinstein, A. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19(4), 418-442. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.4.418.20758
  • Pratto, E, Sidanius, J. ve Stallworth, L. M. (1993). Sexual selection and the sexual and ethnic basis of social hierarchy. L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality: A comparative biosocial analysis içinde (s. 111-137). Praeger.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J. ve Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. ve Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Precopio, R., F. ve Ramsey, L. R. (2017). Dude looks like a feminist!: Moral concerns and feminism among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000042
  • Radke, H. R., Hornsey, M. J. ve Barlow, F. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71(9), 863-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040345
  • Radke, H. R., Hornsey, M. J. ve Barlow, F. K. (2018). Changing versus protecting the status quo: Why men and women engage in different types of action on behalf of women. Sex Roles, 79(9), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0884-2
  • Radke, H. R., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S. C. ve Becker, J. C. (2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320918698
  • Rasinski, H. M. ve Czopp, A. M. (2010). The effect of target status on witnesses' reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539754
  • Robin, M. J., Price, J. M., Bryson, J. B. ve Sanchez, F. J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(6), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90052-N Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Manstead, A. S. R. ve Fischer, A. H. (2000). The role of honor-related values in the elicitation, experience, and communication of pride, shame, and anger: Spain and the Netherlands compared. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200269008
  • Roy, R., Weibust, K. S. ve Miller, C. T. (2007). Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 146-156.
  • Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K. ve Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2012). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 572-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461160
  • Saguy, T. ve Szekeres, H. (2018). Changing minds via collective action: Exposure to the 2017 Women’s March predicts decrease in (some) men’s gender system justification over time. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217750475
  • Sakallı, N. (1996). Ingroup minority’s support and self-interest in the effectiveness of outgroup minority influence [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. The University of Kansas, Lawrence.
  • Sakallı, N. (2001). Kadın hakları: Farklı terimler, farklı tutumlar. Tecrübi Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 22, 1-13.
  • Sakallı, N. (2021). Kadınların cinsiyetçiliğe tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, kendini suskunlaştırma, yüzleşme ve kolektif hareket. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 24 (47), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120210220m000035
  • Sakallı, N. ve Curun, F. (2001). Romantik ilişkilerle ilgili kalıpyargılara ilişkin tutumlar. İstanbul Üniversitesi Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 22(0), 31-45.
  • Sakallı, N. ve Türkoğlu, B. (2019). "Erkek” olmak ya da olmamak: Sosyal psikolojik açıdan erkeksilik /erkeklik çalışmaları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 52-76. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120190516m000014
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2003). Kadınlara ve erkeklere ilişkin tutumlar ve çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 6(11-12), 1-20.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Akbaş, G. (2013). Namus kültürlerinde "namus" ve "namus adına kadına şiddet": Sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 16(32), 76-91.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Beydoğan, B. (2002). Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: The effect of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 136(6), 647-656.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Salman, S. ve Turgut, S. (2010). Predictors of Turkish women’s and men’s attitudes toward sexual harassment: Ambivalent sexism, and ambivalence toward men. Sex Roles, 63, 871- 881.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A. ve Gupta, A. (2021). Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Current Psychology, 40, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Turkoglu, B. ve Kuzlak, A. (2018). How are women and men perceived? Structure of gender stereotypes in contemporary Turkey. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(13), 309-336. https://doi.org/ 10.7816/nesne-06-13-04
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, Z. S. ve Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11), 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Ulu, S. (2003). Evlilikte kadına yönelik şiddete ilişkin tutumlar: Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik, yaş, eğitim ve gelir düzeyinin etkileri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 6(11-12), 53-65.
  • Sanchez-Ruiz, M., El Ahmad, P., Karam, M. ve Saliba, M. A. (2021). Rape myth acceptance in Lebanon: The role of sexual assault experience/familiarity, sexism, honor beliefs, and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110403
  • Saucier, D. A. ve McManus, J. L. (2014). Men of honor: Examining individual differences in masculine honor beliefs. J. Gelfer (Ed.), Masculinities in a global era içinde (s. 85-99). Springer.
  • Saucier, D. A., Stanford, A. J., Miller, S. S., Martens, A. L., Miller, A. K., Jones, T. L., McManus, J. L. ve Burns, M. D. (2016). Masculine honor beliefs: Measurement and correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.049
  • Saucier, D. A., Strain, M. L., Hockett, J. M. ve McManus, J. L. (2015). Stereotypic beliefs about masculine honor are associated with perceptions of rape and women who have been raped. Social Psychology, 46(4), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000240
  • Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N. ve Sintemaartensdijk, N. (2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075-1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.609
  • Shelton, J. N. ve Stewart, R. S. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x
  • Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. ve Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745
  • Sidanius, J., Devereux, E. ve Pratto, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory as explanations for racial policy attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(3), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924713
  • Sidanius, J. ve Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. ve Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998
  • Smolak, L. (2010). Gender as culture: The meanings of self-silencing in women and men. D. C. Jack ve A. Ali (Ed.), Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world içinde (s. 129–147). Oxford University Press.
  • Ståhl, T., Eek, D. ve Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 239-258. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11211-010-0117-0
  • Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B. ve Jost, J. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 27, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201274009.
  • Stewart, A. L. (2017). Men’s collective action willingness: Testing different theoretical models of protesting gender inequality for women and men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 18(4), 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000068
  • Stratmoen, E., Greer, M. M., Martens, A. L. ve Saucier, D. A. (2018). What, I′m not good enough for you? Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs and the endorsement of aggressive responses to romantic rejection. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.018 Strömwall, L. A., Alfredsson, H. ve Landström, S. (2013). Blame attributions and rape: Effects of belief in a just world and relationship level. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02044.x
  • Subašić, E., Hardacre, S., Elton, B., Branscombe, N. R., Ryan, M. K. ve Reynolds, K. J. (2018). “We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 707-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1371007
  • Swim, J. K. ve Thomas, M. A. (2006). Responding to everyday discrimination: A synthesis of research on goal-directed, self-regulatory coping behaviors. S. Levin ve C. Van Laar (Ed.), Stigma and group inequality içinde (s. 105–128). Erlbaum.
  • Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L. ve Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200 Thompson, J. M. (1995). Silencing the self: Depressive symptomatology and close relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00079.x
  • Thompson, J. M., Whiffen, V. E. ve Aube, J. A. (2001). Does self-silencing link perceptions of care from parents and partners with depressive symptoms? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(4), 503-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501184004 Toker, Y. (2016). İşyerlerinde cinsel taciz: Kapsamı, öncülleri, sonuçları, kurumsal baş etme yöntemleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19(38), 1-19.
  • Toller, P. W., Suter, E. A. ve Trautman, T. C. (2004). Gender role identity and attitudes toward feminism. Sex Roles, 51(1-2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000032316.71165.45
  • Türkoğlu, B. (2019). Precarious manhood in Turkey: Earned, lost and threatened status of manhood [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Twenge, J. M. ve Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed- and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x
  • Uçar, G. K. ve Özdemir, G. (2021). Social dominance, hostile sexism and justifications: Examining attitudes towards wife abuse among Turkish men. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110785
  • Uluğ, Ö. M., Odağ, Ö. ve Solak, N. (2020). Women’s rights and gender equality in Turkey: Voices against misogyny in Turkey: The case of a successful online collective action against a sexist commercial. International Journal of Communication, 14(2020), 5575–5596.
  • Üzümçeker, E. ve Akfırat, S. (2018). Kadın cinayetlerine yönelik atıfların cinsiyet grubuyla özdeşleşme, çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ve siyasi ideolojilerle ilişkisi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 38(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.26650/sp372013
  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M. ve Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453
  • Wade, J. C. ve Brittan-Powell, C. (2001). Men's attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender-related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.2.1.42 Wagstaff, G. F. ve Quirk, M. A. (1983). Attitudes to sex-roles, political conservatism and belief in a just world. Psychological reports, 52(3), 813-814.
  • Wegner, R., Abbey, A., Pierce, J., Pegram, S. E. ve Woerner, J. (2015). Sexual assault perpetrators’ justifications for their actions: Relationships to rape supportive attitudes, incident characteristics, and future perpetration. Violence Against Women, 21(8), 1018-1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215589380
  • Whiffen, V. E., Foot, M. L. ve Thompson, J. M. (2007). Self-silencing mediates the link between marital conflict and depression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(6), 993-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507084813
  • Wiley, S. ve Dunne, C. (2019). Comrades in the struggle? Feminist women prefer male allies who offer autonomy-not dependency-oriented help. Sex Roles, 80(11), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0970-0
  • Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B. ve Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/668417
  • Williams, R. ve Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11-12), 885-904. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02936345
APA Sakallı N, RUMELİ Y, ŞAHİN M (2022). Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. , 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
Chicago Sakallı Nuray,RUMELİ YAĞMUR,ŞAHİN Merve Nur Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. (2022): 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
MLA Sakallı Nuray,RUMELİ YAĞMUR,ŞAHİN Merve Nur Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. , 2022, ss.105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
AMA Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. . 2022; 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
Vancouver Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. . 2022; 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
IEEE Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M "Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket." , ss.105 - 130, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
ISNAD Sakallı, Nuray vd. "Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket". (2022), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
APA Sakallı N, RUMELİ Y, ŞAHİN M (2022). Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. Nesne Dergisi, 10(23), 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
Chicago Sakallı Nuray,RUMELİ YAĞMUR,ŞAHİN Merve Nur Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. Nesne Dergisi 10, no.23 (2022): 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
MLA Sakallı Nuray,RUMELİ YAĞMUR,ŞAHİN Merve Nur Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. Nesne Dergisi, vol.10, no.23, 2022, ss.105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
AMA Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(23): 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
Vancouver Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(23): 105 - 130. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
IEEE Sakallı N,RUMELİ Y,ŞAHİN M "Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket." Nesne Dergisi, 10, ss.105 - 130, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
ISNAD Sakallı, Nuray vd. "Erkeklerin Cinsiyetçiliğe Tepkileri: Meşrulaştırma, Kendini Suskunlaştırma, Yüzleşme ve Kolektif Hareket". Nesne Dergisi 10/23 (2022), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-23-07
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 23:36

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları